There is no mention of whether the petition for recusal of Assoc. Justices Sotomayor and Kagan was accepted.Quote:
Originally Posted by The U.S. Supreme Court
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Unruh for WorldNetDaily
Printable View
There is no mention of whether the petition for recusal of Assoc. Justices Sotomayor and Kagan was accepted.Quote:
Originally Posted by The U.S. Supreme Court
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Unruh for WorldNetDaily
The "natural born citizen" clause has been effectively annulled, without amendment, by AG Eric Holder, the DOJ, the U.S. Attorneys, and their threats of retaliatory litigation. I think the Constitution and the American people would be better served by focusing on Amendment XIV, § 3, which would get the job done. That strategy abandons a slam dunk prosecution using Art. ii, § 1, ¶ 5. However, any argument mentioning nbC is locked out of the courts, and ¶ 5 is de facto null and void.
On the other hand, the usurper has established an indisputable record of fealty to an anti-American ideology, mainly the Marxist/Leninist/Maoist/Ché-Fanon communism into which his mother and her parents indoctrinated him from birth until he left for Occidental College. As a lifelong practicing communist, he is an atheist at heart, but as an infidel dhimmi, he is subjected to Is1am by the sword. His appeal to Christianity is a matter of expediency, a declaration his wife required for political purposes.
Mr. Obama's loyalty to globalist communism and his rendering of submission to Is1amist political ideology, as evidenced by an uninterrupted train of anti-American acts, make him unfit for office according to Amendment XIV, § 3. A two-thirds majority of the Senate will never buy it, but a simple majority of the House very well might. We don't need a conviction, just discovery. Convene a Congressional investigation with subpoena power, and he's done.
May I recommend former Inspector General Gerald Walpin to be the chief investigator. He has demonstrated the courage to go up against City Hall and prevail.
Bull crap!Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayday
'Birther' bill is fringe of the fringe
So? Write a comment! What an opportunity to impact Obots!
http://media.fukung.net/images/4352/...st%20Party.gif
Barack Obama II's party buds
Minuteman, it is time consuming to argue with idiots. I am just thankful the left represents, in reality, a minority of American thought. Admittedly they are a loud minority, but they are a minority.Quote:
Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC
Kind of like trying to make a silk purse out of a pig's ear.
.
Well, there is some deep research going on in Hawaii, and I am not certain what it all means. From the attached link, you can see that someone has gotten into the birth indexes for the years 1960-1964, and it (the index page) has apparently been tampered with (probably no surprise to anyone on Alipac).
Because of the expandable images, I would suggest that we-all read the article at the blog site, rather than transfer the data here.
http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.c ... ts-a-date/
.
I remember some time ago we were hoping that Patrick Fitzgerald would investigate the Obama eligibility problem and several of us sent letters to Fitzgerald asking for his assistance.
Well, as this RTR video with Julio Rausseo and Wayne Madsen will show, Fitzgerald is more like Al Capone than he is like Elliot Ness - he's extremely dirty.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inn_-YAcVCQ
Note also the fairly extensive commentary on Rahm Emanuel and his criminal activity.
This treatise from 1919 may dispel skepticism that The Law of Nations by Emerich de Vattel was a primary source, if not the primary source, for the U.S. Constitution [where it relates to nationality and loyalty, birthright, inheritance, and citizenship].
Quote:
Originally Posted by In Transactions of The Colonial Society of Massachusetts, Volume XX, 1917-1919, Thomas Willing Balch
Mar 10, 7:16 PM EST
Nebraska presidential birth certificate bill dies
By GRANT SCHULTE
Associated Press
LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) -- A Nebraska bill introduced in response to a flap over President Barack Obama's citizenship and requiring presidential candidates to prove their citizenship with a birth certificate won't get out of committee, the panel's chairman said Thursday.
The bill's sponsor, state Sen. Mark Christensen of Imperial, didn't appear in person before the Legislature's Government, Military and Veterans Affairs Committee but said in written testimony that he didn't want his proposal to be perceived as a political attack on the president. An aide said the bill was strictly intended to guarantee that presidential candidates are confirmed as eligible for office.
"He doesn't want this to be a sideshow," said Dan Wiles, the aide who read the senator's testimony to the panel. "He wants to know if we can craft some kind of process to give people the security that we've done our job" of verifying candidates.
People known as "birthers" have contended since 2008 that Obama is ineligible to serve as president. They say he actually was born in Kenya, his father's homeland, and they have questioned the digital "Certificate of Live Birth" Obama has released.
Hawaii officials have repeatedly confirmed Obama's citizenship and attempts to challenge his eligibility to serve as president in court have failed. But the issue has persisted among birthers, and Nebraska is one of 10 states that have considered measures to require more proof that presidential candidates are U.S. citizens.
State Sen. Bill Avery, who chairs the committee, said the Nebraska bill, LB654, would die there.
It would have required presidential candidates to provide state officials with a sworn statement and a certified copy of their U.S. birth certificate to appear on the state's election ballot. The Nebraska Secretary of State would confirm each candidate's eligibility.
One supporter, Nellie Ristvedt, of Crete, said the legislation would likely trigger a federal lawsuit that she hoped would rise to the U.S. Supreme Court.
"This isn't about any one person," Ristvedt said. "It's about the constitution being followed. It's about the rule of law, and that is my only concern."
Several lawmakers on the panel questioned the bill's purpose, and noted that federal appellate courts might simply refuse to hear the case after lower courts ruled.
The proposal would "be obligating us to a court challenge, where we'd have to spend thousands of dollars," said state Sen. Scott Price of Bellevue. "You want the state to have to defend this, with the hope that the Supreme Court might make a ruling."
The other states that have considered legislation are Arizona, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, Connecticut, Indiana, Tennessee and Maine. A measure proposed in Maine failed.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/N/ ... TE=DEFAULT
Let's see if this story is written up by someone else besides AP whose pro-Obama spin makes it untrustworthy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayday