How they stole the 2012 elections
(Hat Tip to bobmann101, who compiled most of the following links.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hbf3iaEbAuY
WND Poll: What role, if any, did vote fraud play in the 2012 election? [1295 Votes]
- We may never have a free and fair election again in America if we don't start exposing abuses and prosecuting them (53%, 681 Votes)
- The election was stolen – pure and simple (25%, 322 Votes)
- It played a decisive role in the presidential election, robbing the real winner of victory (8%, 98 Votes)
- It is abundantly clear now that presidential elections in the U.S. are rigged in favor of Democrats (7%, 89 Votes)
- There's enough doubt about the fairness of the election that is causing Americans to lose confidence in the vote (3%, 42 Votes)
- Democrats are fine with cheating and law-breaking, as James O'Keefe demonstrated in his videos (3%, 34 Votes)
- Other (2¼%, 29 Votes)
Read more at Did Obama steal the 2012 election? | WorldNetDaily
Colorado Counties Have More Voters Than People | RedState
Forensic profiler: Obama is subconsciously confessing election fraud | WorldNetDaily
THE BIG LIST of vote fraud reports | WorldNetDaily
Cuccinelli seems to agree voter fraud helped Obama - Virginia Politics | The Washington Post
22 Signs That Voter Fraud Is Wildly Out Of Control And The Election Was A Sham | The American Dream
Discrepancies Found in Election Results from Several Swing States | Breitbart
Governor Romney would have won in the electoral college, 270-268, if he had received 333,912 more votes in four swing states: 103,482 in Ohio, 73,859 in Florida, 115,911 in Virginia, and 40,660 in New Hampshire. | Breitbart
Election Fraud? Barack Obama Won More Than 99 Percent Of The Vote In More Than 100 Ohio Precincts | Market Daily News
Claims increase of machines switching votes in Ohio and other battleground states | Fox News
The Hamilton Co., Ohio, Director of Elections removed two precinct election judges for allowing several dozen unrregistered voters to cast regular ballots (not provisional ballots).
Woodbridge, Virgiania, poll watcher Dara Fox reports massive voter fraud at her polling place. | WMAL-AM 630.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmJtaOO2etc
Why the Republicans don't/won't/can't challenge the Democrats about voter fraud or election fraud. | Fellowship of the Minds
... during the weekly True the Vote webcast, Catherine Engelbrecht (see her photo below) related a meeting she had with Reince Priebus, the chairman of the Republican National Committee (RNC), asking what the GOP would do about voter integrity. The answer?
Nothing. They aren’t legally able to.
This all goes back to a lawsuit 31 years ago, in 1981. The following is compiled from an account on The Judicial View, a legal website specializing in court decision research and alerts, and from “Democratic National Committee v Republican National Committee,” Case No. 09-4615.
In 1981, during the gubernatorial election in New Jersey (NJ), a lawsuit was brought against the RNC, the NJ Republican State Committee (RSC), and three individuals (John A. Kelly, Ronald Kaufman, and Alex Hurtado), accusing them of violating the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1971, 1973, and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.
The lawsuit was brought by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the NJ Democratic State Committee (DSC), and two individuals (Virginia L. Peggins and Lynette Monroe).
The lawsuit alleged that:
- The RNC and RSC targeted minority voters in New Jersey in an effort to intimidate them.
- The RNC created a voter challenge list by mailing sample ballots to individuals in precincts with a high percentage of racial or ethnic minority registered voters. Then the RNC put the names of individuals whose postcards were returned as undeliverable on a list of voters to challenge at the polls.
- The RNC enlisted the help of off-duty sheriffs and police officers with “National Ballot Security Task Force” armbands, to intimidate voters by standing at polling places in minority precincts during voting. Some of the officers allegedly wore firearms in a visible manner.
To settle the lawsuit, in 1982 — while Ronald Reagan was President (1981-1989) — the RNC and RSC entered into an agreement or Consent Decree, which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance. The following is what the RNC and RSC, in the Consent Decree, agreed they would do:
[I]n the future, in all states and territories of the United States:
(a) comply with all applicable state and federal laws protecting the rights of duly qualified citizens to vote for the candidate(s) of their choice;
(b) in the event that they produce or place any signs which are part of ballot security activities, cause said signs to disclose that they are authorized or sponsored by the party committees and any other committees participating with the party committees;
(c) refrain from giving any directions to or permitting their agents or employees to remove or deface any lawfully printed and placed campaign materials or signs;
(d) refrain from giving any directions to or permitting their employees to campaign within restricted polling areas or to interrogate prospective voters as to their qualifications to vote prior to their entry to a polling place;
(e) refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities in polling places or election districts where the racial or ethnic composition of such districts is a factor in the decision to conduct, or the actual conduct of, such activities there and where a purpose or significant effect of such activities is to deter qualified voters from voting; and the conduct of such activities disproportionately in or directed toward districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations shall be considered relevant evidence of the existence of such a factor and purpose;
(f) refrain from having private personnel deputized as law enforcement personnel in connection with ballot security activities.
The RNC also agreed that the RNC, its agents, servants, and employees would be bound by the Decree, “whether acting directly or indirectly through other party committees.”
As modified in 1987, the Consent Decree defined “ballot security activities” to mean “ballot integrity, ballot security or other efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud.”
Since 1982, that Consent Decree has been renewed every year by the original judge, Carter appointee District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise, now 88 years old. Long retired, Debevoise comes back yearly for the sole purpose of renewing his 1982 order for another year.
http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordp.../debevoise.jpg
In 2010, the RNC unsuccessfully appealed “to vacate or modify” the Consent Decree in “Democratic National Committee v Republican National Committee,” Case No. 09-4615 (C.A. 3, Mar. 8, 2012). [Case No. 09-4615 was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court but apparently was not accepted for oral arguments.]
This is a summary of the appeals judge’s ruling, filed on March 8, 2012:
In 1982, the Republican National Committee (“RNC”) and the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) entered into a consent decree (the “Decree” or “Consent Decree”), which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance. The RNC appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denying, in part, the RNC’s Motion to Vacate or Modify the Consent Decree. Although the District Court declined to vacate the Decree, it did make modifications to the Decree. The RNC argues that the District Court abused its discretion by modifying the Decree as it did and by declining to vacate the Decree. For the following reasons, we will affirm the District Court’s judgment.
Surprise! The judge who denied the RNC’s appeal to “vacate” the 1982 Consent Decree is an Obama appointee, Judge Joseph Greenaway, Jr., of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
[Atty. Orly Taitz writes that Obama appointee Judge Joseph Greenaway, Jr., is the same judge who cast the deciding vote against her 2011 case, Liberi v. Taitz, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Philadelphia, Penn..]
http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordp.../greenaway.jpg
Judge Joseph Greenaway, Jr.,
U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit
(Continued. . .)
Fellowship of the Minds has several more links - those in green - to accounts of voter fraud in 2012 by Democrats.