Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

Obama Trying to Keep Secret New Constitutional Move Against ‘No-Fly Lists’

January 17, 2014 By 21wire

21st Century Wire says…

It’s now official: This is White House which knows no shame when it comes to justifying its un-American police state.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-3Dl1hBagx5...liam-Alsup.jpgA U.S. District Judge, William Alsup (photo, left), has sided with the American people by speaking in favour of the US Constitution, saying that a Malaysian PhD student studying at Stanford University, Rahinah Ibrahim, should not have been put on a ‘No-Fly List’, and has ordered that the federal government clear up the mess it has created.

Alsup says that the US federal government has in fact violated the student’s legal rights by placing her on a secretive “no-fly” list with zero due process.
To avoid embarrassment, the Obama administration has ‘vigorously contested the case’, and demanded the trial be sealed for ‘national security reasons’. The federal government seems keen to avoid letting other victims gain any legal ground on this issue for fear of a tidal wave of lawsuits against the unconstitutional practice. Ibrahim’s case partly reveals how the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) conjures up its notorious ‘No-Fly’ lists – based on zero evidence that said targeted individuals pose any real threat to US national security.

http://cdn.charismanews.com/images/s...older-ACLJ.jpg
“Don’t worry Barry, I’ll make sure none of these idiots get any of their old rights back.”

HERE ARE THE COURT DOCUMENTS FOR THIS LATEST CASE:
nofly.pdf

document at link belowNo-fly list challenged: Stanford student wrongly labeled a terrorist, judge says

.
Howard Minz
San Jose Mercury News

The federal government violated a former Stanford University doctoral student’s legal rights nine years ago when it put her on its secretive “no-fly” lists targeting suspected terrorists, a San Francisco federal judge ruled Tuesday.
http://cdn.rt.com/files/news/21/da/8...ibrahim.si.jpgIn a decision for the most part sealed, U.S. District Judge William Alsup disclosed that Rahinah Ibrahim was mistakenly placed on the controversial list and said that the government must now clear up the mistake. The decision comes in a case that has for the first time revealed how the U.S. Department of Homeland Security assembles the no-fly lists, used to tighten security in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
The Obama administration has vigorously contested the case, the first of its kind to reach trial, warning that it might reveal top-secret information about the anti-terrorism program. As a result, Alsup sealed his ruling until April to give the government an opportunity to persuade a federal appeals court to keep the order from being released publicly.
But Alsup issued a separate three-page ruling outlining the results for Ibrahim, who has waged a high-profile legal battle since she learned she had been placed on the no-fly list as she tried to board a 2005 flight to Hawaii from San Francisco International Airport.
Ibrahim, Alsup wrote, is “entitled by due process to a … remedy that requires the government to cleanse and/or correct its lists and records of the mistaken information.”
Elizabeth Pipkin, Ibrahim’s lawyer, said she hopes the ruling will permit the Malaysian national to again be able to travel to the United States.
“She’s entitled to have her name cleared from the system,” Pipkin said. “She shouldn’t be ensnared in their system anymore.”
The 48-year-old Ibrahim has been fighting the U.S. government from abroad, denied the right since 2005 to return to this country. Her case went to trial in December before Alsup, who heard the allegations of government wrongdoing without a jury, in part because of the government’s assertion of national security privilege.
Ibrahim, an architecture scholar, wearing a traditional Muslim hijab, was arrested at SFO in January 2005 as she headed to a conference in Hawaii with her teen daughter. She had been branded a terrorist suspect in government databases, she learned. Ibrahim denies any connection to terrorist organizations and settled a separate legal case against San Francisco police and others linked to her airport arrest for $225,000.
Before the incident, Ibrahim had been a regular traveler to the United States since the early 1980s, calling it her “second home.” She met her husband here, marrying in Seattle in 1986, and her first child is a U.S. citizen.
After returning to Malaysia, she founded the architecture department at a major Malaysian university but returned to the states in 2000 to secure her doctorate from Stanford. As a result of later being put on the no-fly list, Ibrahim had to complete her Stanford doctorate remotely.
But she pressed her legal case for years, even as the government tried to sidetrack the legal claims. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals twice allowed her case to proceed over the government’s objections, leading to the recent trial.
Justice Department officials could not be reached for comment on Alsup’s order.
The government places thousands of people on the lists each year, and similar lawsuits against the program and its methods have been unfolding in other courts around the country, including a major challenge in Oregon brought by the American Civil Liberties Union.
Howard Mintz covers legal affairs. Contact him at 408-286-0236 or follow him at Twitter.com/hmintz


http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/01/17/obama-trying-to-keep-secret-latest-constitutional-ruling-against-no-fly-lists/


Now do you think he would go to bat for an American citizen?? No way, he commits treason against America and it citizens. His unconstitutional laws and abuses against us is disgusting...Impeachment is too good for this administration!!

WAS OBAMA HIGH ON COCAINE DURING BENGHAZI ATTACK?

January 18, 2014 / Clark Kent

http://static.squarespace.com/static...g?format=1000w
HUFFPO (By Dean Chambers, The Examiner)









While our consulate in Benghazi was attacked during the night of September 11 of last year, our fearless leader was allegedly hiding away somewhere getting “high as a kite” on cocaine. This is the speculation of Kevin DuJan, a self-described “gay conservative political analyst” writing for a publication called HillBuzz. DuJan states that his claim, which he appears to make based on knowledge and experience of drug addicts, explains the president being missing for most of the evening during the attack on Benghazi.

DuJan also suggests the president sought out gay entertainment when he left the next day for Las Vegas, writing that Obama was, “jetting off to fabulous Las Vegas for a fun-and-games fundraiser event he had scheduled there (where, it also should be noted, not only Chippendales but also Thunder From Down Under male revues are regularly held…which certainly establishes the appeal of heading to Las Vegas instead of managing a national crisis back in Washington for this particular president).
DuJan cited an article by Rich Lowry in Politico about the time-line of events the night of the attack and the next day. Obama was seen, “sober on 9/11/12 at 5pm EST when he met with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey, DuJan writes, “I have never been able to shake the feeling that Barack Obama was woefully disappointed when he learned that Gen. Dempsey has nothing to do with either marijuana or penises in his capacity as the Chairman of the “Joint” Chiefs of “Staff”. But, I presume he would not have done cocaine before meeting with these two military men. Obama appears to have been still functional and ambulatory at 5pm that day.”
DuJan says Obama found out US Ambassador Chris Stevens died and disappeared to somewhere to go get high on cocaine. Obama was allegedly not seen again until 10 P.M. that night when he spoke with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on the phone. Obama spoke at 10:35 A.M. The next day when he made the statement about the attack on Benghazi being caused by the YouTube video.
Suggesting again the gay theme as well as cocaine use, DuJan wrote, “After reading Lowry’s article, my good friend Justine in California emailed me to ask whether I thought Obama was having sex with Reggie Love during the “missing hours” and if that’s where he was. Justine was an actress and model in Los Angeles back in the late-1970s and ran in the same circles as friends of closeted gay men like Rock Hudson…so her first instinct with Obama and Benghazi is that he and Reggie Love were getting at it and Obama didn’t want to be disturbed.”
Despite speculating about Obama having gay tendencies, DuJan stated he believes the idea of getting high on cocaine that night is a much stronger explanation for Obama’s absense during those hours. DuJan explained, “once you take drugs you are pretty much on another astral plane for however long it takes for the drugs to leave your system. I’ve sadly watched a lot of incredible people in the nightlife scene ruin their lives with cocaine over the years, and once these people got high they stayed high until the drugs metabolized enough for them to function. In fact, a few years ago I dated a day trader here in Chicago who (unbeknownst to me at first) would use cocaine in the evening when he came home from work…and he’d process the drugs in his system enough to be back at his office early the next morning.”
DuJan offered to retract his story in exchange for an explanation from the president on why he was missing during those hours, writing, “I would gladly retract this story if the White House would sufficiently explain Barack Obama’s whereabouts during those missing hours and prove he was not out of his mind on cocaine at the time (or gluttonously engaged in gay sex, as my friend Justine believes).”
DuJan closed his article with this question: “Do you think it’s better for the White House to say the president’s location is “irrelevant” or for them to admit “the president was high on cocaine and/or having gay sex in his private quarters”?”


- See more at redflagnews
CLARK KENT @ americasfreedomfighters

LIKE US ON FACEBOOK TOO!


http://www.americasfreedomfighters.c...nghazi-attack/

https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...22300690_q.jpgOverpasses For America shared Impeach Obama 2013's photo.


https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.n...62379409_n.jpg

Contact Subway Customer Service

Sorry Subway. But, if this is the case about your partnership with the White House occupier's wife, I will not be doing any more business with you. Aka Obama has now been exposed for his criminal ID fraud. Hence, I won't be promoting a business that [partners with a fraud in the act of his felony or] promotes the "First [Fake] Lady."

Obama’s birth certificate documentation [is] now publicly declared a forgery by Sheriff Arpaio's legal investigation.

moralmatters.org/2013/04/07/obamas-birth-certificate-documentation-now-publicly-declared-a-forgery-by-legal-sheriff-arpaio-investigation/

[ED.: Why does nearly everyone refuse to cooperate with Atty. Orly Taitz, even to the point of refusing to forward recorded testimony to her? Is there no sense of unity, that we are all on the same side in our support and defense of the Constitution of the United States, and our opposition to the Obama usurpation and coup d'état of the legitimate Constitutional government, limited by checks and balances, which is not a monarchy or a dictatorship? Why such division?

While America' enemies circle to seize and devour the spoils, we are under siege by:

• communism, socialism, and totalitarianism;
• the lamestream media and their constant pumping of brainwashing propaganda, mindless drivel, and moral sewage;
• Is1amist terrorism and global conquest for the caliphate;
• bankster greed and Eurocentric one-world government designs on these runaway original colonies in the New World;
• invasion by the flood of illegal aliens, filling the vacuum left by the genocide of abortion and the dereliction of procreation because of poverty, pornography, or simple failure to connect and commit;
• homosexual activists' filthy, nasty, vile attacks, attempting to desecrate all that is holy and virtuous about love, marriage, and family.

In the face of the onslaught of moral degeneracy, media-driven "democracy", and foreign diplomacy that amounts to betrayal under fire of Israel, our only ally in the Middle East, to her (and our) avowed enemies within the Nation of Is1am:

• the Shi'ites of Iran and Iraq, who declared war on the United States in 1979 and never ceased, who made known their pursuit of nuclear weapons in the 1980s and never desisted;
• the Baathists of Syria and Iraq, who preserved Saddam's biochemical arsenal by burying some 70 semi trailers of the stuff in the Bekaa Valley of Lebanon, the headwaters of the Sea of Galilee and the River Jordan;
• the Syrian rebels a.k.a. al Qaeda, who seek another nation to occupy even as our best and bravest seek to evict them from their caves in the Hindu Kush; and
• the Mus1im Brotherhood, which exalts itself wherever U.S. armed forces and operatives create a power vacuum in the M.E.;

the naked perverts' parade and the illegal aliens' entitlement brigade march in ranks, shoulder to shoulder and hip to hip, with disciples of Marx and Alinsky and the moolahs of Iran, united only against their common enemy (that would be US),
while our field generals in the support and defense of the Constitution and freedom consistent with law and order, are . . . stealing star players and sniping at each other?!?!?

Why such division, indeed.]

FOIA to sheriff Arpaio seeking affidavit of expert Reed Hayes

Posted on | January 27, 2014 |

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
ph 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
orly.taitz@hushmail.com

01.27.2014
Sheriff Joseph Arpaio
Maricopa County, AZ
via e-mail
mediarequest@mcso.maricopa.gov
cc.Montgomw@mcao.maricopa.gov
virgilj@mcao.maricopa.gov
info@joepac.org
1tick@joepac.org
jburges@azleg.gov

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION UNDER ARIZONA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW §39.101 ET SEQ.

Dear Sheriff Arapio,

As you are well aware, between 2009 [and] 2012, I have forwarded to you and Mike Zullo, director of [the MCSO] Cold Case Posse, evidence of forgery in IDs of Barack Obama, which included sworn affidavits and reports received by me from former Chief Investigator of the Special Investigations Unit of the U.S. Coast Guard, Jeffrey Stephan Coffman, [from] experts Paul Irey and Doug Vogt, and many others. The evidence that I submitted to court was later confirmed by you and was used in a number of press conferences.

The only new information that was uncovered by your Sheriff’s Department and Cold Case Posse, that [the] public is aware of, is an affidavit or opinion from a forensic document expert, Reed Hayes, who according to interviews given by Mr. Zullo, confirmed that Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery. There were inferences [references?] to this affidavit by Mr. Zullo and, I believe by you as well; however, this affidavit was never made public.

You have already stated that you will not submit a criminal complaint to the District Attorney and [the] Attorney General, as you believe that you do not have jurisdiction. You also stated that you believe that Congress has jurisdiction; however, you never submitted an official complaint to the Judiciary Committee(s) of Congress either.

Some of your supporters have submitted to 200 conservative members of Congress “sheriff’s kits,” which contained your and Zullo’s press conferences; however, members of Congress never took any action.

I have submitted a Request for Information under Arizona Public Records Law §39.101 et seq. to the District Attorney of Maricopa County, [Ariz.,] William Montgomery, seeking information[ as to] whether you submitted to him the affidavit or declaration or any other document from Reed Hayes. He responded, via Custodian of Records Debbie McKenzie, stating that you never submitted to him any documents from Reed Hayes (see below).

I currently have several active legal actions which challenge [the] legitimacy of Barack Obama, among them:

1.Taitz v Donahoe and Williams 13-cv-1020, [the U.S. District Court] for Washington, DC, legal action dealing with Obama’s use of a fabricated Selective Service Certificate with a fabricated Cancellation Postal Stamp attached to it;

2. Taitz v Colvin 13-cv-1878, dealing with Obama’s use of a stolen CT Social Security number 042-nn-nnnn (redacted here) of Harrison (Harry) J Bounel;

3. Taitz et al v Democratic party et al 12-cv-280, which relates to RICO complaint of a de facto criminal enterprise whereby a number of high ranking officials acted in concert in order to perpetrate and cover up forgery in Obama’s IDs and [his] usurpation of the U.S. Presidency.

Additionally, there are 2 cases in the [U.S.] Courts of Appeals:

Judd v Obama and Grinols at al v Electoral College.

[This a]ffidavit of Reed Hayes, if it really exists, would be of great importance in these cases.

[Therefore,] I am requesting release of the aforementioned affidavit.

Since you have already stated that you will not be submitting your own complaint due to alleged lack of jurisdiction, further refusal of release of the aforementioned affidavit can be seen as an Obstruction of Justice and Misprision of Forgery and Fraud. This is particularly true, since you previously refused to appear in court and testify to evidence in your possession, in challenges to Barack Obama, when you were subpoenaed to appear in Georgia, California, Indiana, and Mississippi. In the state of Indiana you went even further and paid for one of my witnesses, retired Deportation officer John Sampson, to fly to AZ, you deputized him as a part of your Cold Case Posse and told him that he can no longer testify for Attorney Taitz, as he is [now] a member of the Cold Case Posse. Mr. Sampson appeared on [the] Peter Boyles show in Colorado and admitted that you, Mike Zullo, and he made a deal, an agreement not to comply with the court ordered subpoenas, not to appear in court, and not to testify in regards to your knowledge of forgery in Obama’s IDs.

[Therefore,] it is of paramount importance that you do not obstruct justice and [that you] release the aforementioned affidavit of Reed Hayes, so that Mr. Obama can finally be held accountable for massive elections fraud, use of forged IDs, and usurpation of the U.S. Presidency.

Respectfully,
/s/ Dr. Orlty Taitz ESQ

cc William Montgomery, District Attorney of Maricopa county
cc Joseph Virgil, Legal counsel for MC sheriff’s Department

Quote:

---

response from office of William Montgomery, Maricopa County DA

Re: Public Records Request # 2013-0909-6

Dear Dr. Orly Taitz,

In response to your August 29, 2013, Public Records Request for “ … sworn affidavit of Forensic Document Expert Reed Hayes … ,” we didn’t identify anything that pertains.

This Public Records Request is closed.

Thank you.
Debbie MacKenzie

Custodian of Records
602/506-7283 or mcaocor@mcao.maricopa.gov

---

www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=446047

Who is Barack Hussein Obama………… Soebarkah?

Posted on January 29, 2014 by Steven Ahle

http://freepatriot.org/wp-content/up...rm-300x135.jpg
In this article, you will read true statements about certain writings on official documents. You will then read possible meanings and explanations that may or may not have happened. What you will read will lead you to have new questions but possibly no new answers. Or will it?
When Thomas Alva Edison was looking for the right filament for his light bulb, one of his employees remarked that it was such a shame that Edison should try 9,000 types of filaments without learning a thing. Edison countered that statement by saying, “On the contrary, I have learned what 9,000 elements won’t work.” Piecing together Obama’s early life is like that. We have problems uncovering what is true but end up only eliminating that which is not true.
Nick Chase, a writer for the American Thinker posted an article, making the case that Obama’s birth certificate is fake. Now this is a subject people spend way too much time on. What would happen if tomorrow, Obama would call a press conference and announce that his birth certificate is a total photo shop fake? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. As a matter of law, Obama does not have to prove where he was born. His accusers have the burden of proof. They must prove he was born elsewhere.
However, Chase did find something interesting about a passport renewal made by Obama’s mother:

Finally, we have Stanley Ann Soetoro’s 1968 application to extend her 1965 passport (now destroyed) for an additional two years, as shown in Figure PPA.
On the second page of the application, Ann moved to exclude her son Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah) from her passport, but the item has been crossed out — perhaps on the advice of the consulate in Jakarta, as this would have left seven-year-old Barry passportless — so it didn’t happen.
The appendage “(Soebarkah)” has never been satisfactorily explained by anyone, and I certainly don’t know what “Soebarkah” means, but it does seem to indicate a name change or change in citizenship status for the boy.

While Chase is right , the name change could reflect either a name change or a change in passport status, it could also have to do with the Subud cult. Obama’s mother was a member of the cult, which originated in Indonesia by a Muslim named Muhammed Subuh. There are several coincidences that might point to this as the real reason for the name. Subud is found in only three main places in the world. Indonesia, Hawaii, and….drum roll, please, Chicago.
Another interesting coincident with a Subud connection is the death of Loretta Fuddy.
http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/da.../25/faith1.jpgRegional helper and member of the Subud faith Deliana Fuddy, right, meditates at one of the group’s meetings at Richards Street YWCA. Meditation is followed by spiritual exercises.

Notice that the article calls her Deliana Fuddy instead of Loretta. That’s because in Subud, it is common to change your name to a Subud name. Soebarkah could have been Obama’s Subud name.
SubudVoice in 2011 did an article on one of their former members, Ann Soetoro, Obama’s mother. Some of the material came from a biography on Obama’s mother by NYT reporter, Janny Scott:

Obama’s mother and Subud
By Staff Reporter…
A Singular Woman: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mother,a biography of the mother of US President Obama, Ann DunhamSutoro, contains several references to Subud. As is generally known Obama lived with his mother in Jakarta for some years…
Arianne (no second name) wrote to me to say, “Talked to Irin Poellot who is reading the book about Obama’s mother and has already run into several literal mentions of Subud!!! I remember the late Mansur Madeiros mentioning he knew her in Indonesia and he is mentioned in the book! I can’t help wondering if we will get inquiries about Subud since it is mentioned often in a book which probably will be widely read. It also is a delicious fact that our Subud sister, Ms Fuddy, just was appointed to her post in the Health Dept in Hawaii in time to be involved in the documentation of fact that Obama was born there.”
I wrote back asking for more specific information and Arianne replied, “Irin kindly supplied some quotes:In chapter 4 “Initiation in Java” the Subud members are quoted. And then (on page 116): “…she (Ann) was hired to start an English-language, business-communications department in one of the few private non profit management-training schools in the country.”
Ann “found a group of young Americans and Britons enrolled in an intensive course in Bahasa Indonesia, the national language, at the University of Indonesia recalled Irwan Holmes, (a member of the original group). She was looking for teachers. A half dozen of them accepted her invitation, many of them members of an international spiritual organization, Subud, with a residential compound in a suburb of Jakarta..”
And ……Mohammad Mansur Madeiros, a reclusive and scholarly Subud member from Fall River, Massachusetts, and Harvard, whom Ann hired as a teacher, had immersed himself so deeply in Javanese culture, language and religion that friends nicknamed him Mansur Java. When he died in 2007, friends recalled his preference for the company of ordinary Indonesians –street vendors and becak drivers — over that of other Subud members and expatriates.”
http://www.americanthinker.com/artic.../FigurePPA.jpg

Now, this leaves us with one last question. Was it really a coincidence that Fuddy, a leader of an obscure cult, with ties to Obama’s mother was appointed to office just in time to release the controversial birth certificate?
So, did we really learn anything here? Yes, we have. And let that great detective Sherlock Holmes explain: “When you have eliminated the impossible whatever remains, HOWEVER IMPROBABLE, must be the truth.”
Steven Ahle is the Editor of Red Statements.

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/01...ama-soebarkah/

https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hpho...94011945_n.jpg

Sooner Or Later They Will Expose Him! Obama’s FRAUDULENT SS NUMBER: MARYLAND JUDGE TAKES NOTICE & OPENS A (LEGAL) DOOR


By Adina Kutnicki
EVERY now and again a little piece of good news waft’s in the direction of those who consider themselves patriots, regardless of whether they are ex pats or not. This is one of those times. Nevertheless, hold off on the party hats and the bubbly. It is premature. But just in case the news turns out to be a positive result – and for those who are not interested in booze – well, there are always other ways to enjoy the party! Best to think good thoughts.

And we also know – at least on this end – that patience and perseverance are key virtues, even when butting up against all the naysayers and tsk, tskers becomes tiresome. Besides, who cares what they babble. Sticks and stones. In any case, one develops a thick skin when verbal arrows are slung, at times even being called “Zionist scum”!
Such is the case with Attorney Orly Taitz (who happens to also be a dentist, and certainly not a stupid sort) who is reviled all over the “leftistsphere” (just coined a new phrase) for supposedly maligning the integrity of “The One”. Barf.
Now, it is not as if the attorney/doc is making things up and that there is no there there. Wishing doesn’t make it so. Thus, a few trails to back her up:
Trail One:
The continued quest for answers: EXACTLY, who is the man-child leading the free world? Earth shaking questions few DARE ask.
Trail Two:
“Birthers” are reaching critical mass: Congress will hopefully receive an earful & eyeful.
Trail Three
The “birther” kerfuffle FINALLY in reach of Congress (backhandedly)via the Supreme Court. Will they do a damn thing? Their sworn duty.
Trail Four
UPDATE: will “birther” probe (soon?) come to a climactic head?
ONTO the main event…
Judge Makes Order To Investigate Obama’s Social Security Number
http://itmakessenseblog.com/files/20...op-550x309.jpg
It took years for Watergate to unravel fully. The controversy over Barack Hussein Obama and his past, along with fraudulent documents continues to make headlines. Yet, the items needed to actually verify who Obama is continue to be kept from the public eye. Well, that all may be about to change. Attorney Orly Taitz may have just found a chink in the federal government’s armor in protecting Barack Obama from scrutiny, following a judge’s ruling over her Freedom of Information Act request from the Social Security Administration.
Taitz has claimed that Obama uses the Social Security number of Harry Bounel and has submitted several Freedom of Information Act requests for the information from the Social Security Administration. Each time, she has been met with stonewalling by the Social Security Administration.
However, Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander has ruled to give Taitz “an opportunity to file a second amended complaint and add allegations of SSA not doing a proper search and withholding records.”
From Taitz’s Press Release:
Judge Hollander in Maryland gives Attorney Orly Taitz 21 days to file a second amended complaint and add allegations in regards to an improper withholding by the Social Security Administration of records of Harry Bounel, whose Social security number is being illegally used by Barack Obama. When Taitz filed the complaint, SSA did not respond at all. After the law suit was filed, SSA responded by fraudulently claiming that the records were not found. Taitz responded that this is a fraudulent assertion, since the records were found before and denied to another petitioner due to privacy concerns, however Social Security has no right to claim privacy as according to their own 120 year rule they have a duty to release the records. The judge stated that the plaintiff Taitz might be correct, however at this time she cannot rule in her favor as her original complaint was filed before SSA responded, so the judge gave Taitz an opportunity to refile a second amended complaint and add new allegations, stating the SSA responded but improperly hidden the records . This is a great development. This all but assures that the judge will order the SSA to release the SS-5, Social Security application of resident of CT, Harrison (Harry) Bounel, whose CT SSN 042-68-4425 was stolen by Obama and used in Obama’s 2009 tax returns, which initially were posted on WhiteHouse.gov without proper redaction, without flattening of the file. Taitz will be very careful not to be Breitbarted or Fuddied in the next 21 days.
Additionally, there is an increased tampering with the web site of Orly Taitz and with her ability to send mass -emails. It seems her private server is somehow affected and Taitz is unable to send mass e-mails on two different programs.
It’s interesting that Taitz points out that she will be “careful not to be Breitbarted or Fuddied,” indicating that she believes that both Andrew Breitbart and Andrew Breitbart and Loretta Fuddy were targeted by Obama for assassination.” Breitbart died on the very day that he said he would begin vetting Obama for the 2012 elections, which raised suspicions. Fuddy, best remembered as being instrumental in issuing the Hawaii long-form birth certificate, was the only person to die aboard a small plane that crashed off the coast of Hawaii last week. Already, there are questions surrounding the narrative of her death.
Taitz alleged that Mr. Bounel was born in 1890, and therefore, under the “’120 Year Rule’ implemented by the SSA in 2010,” pertaining to “‘extremely aged individuals,’” Bounel’s “Social Security applications have to be released under FOIA without proof of [his] death . . . .”
The reason for the judge’s amendment seems to be a procedural one. Taitz filed suit with the court prior to receiving word back from her Freedom of Information Act request, which she did receive on July 29, 2013 from Dawn S. Wiggins, a Fredom of Information Officer. Wiggins replied to Taitz:
I have enclosed a copy of the SS-5s for Mr. Tsarnaev and Ms. Dunham. . . .
We were unable to find any information for Mr. Bounel based on the information you provided to us. Mr. Bounel may not have applied for a Social Security number (SSN) or may have given different information on the application for a number.
It appears that once the amendment is submitted, this may force the Social Security Administration to explain exactly what is going on with Barack Obama’s Social Security number.
We should know something about the case by the second week in January 2014.
It is within the above backdrop/prism that the mysterious death of Loretta Fuddy (Hawaii’s ex DOH Director) occurred, VERY SOON after Arpaio’s team announced criminally explosive findings re-eligibility. COINCIDENCE – OR NOT?
One also has to wonder: why precisely wasn’t the above preliminary decision (whatever the court finally decides, to hear the fraud case or not…truth be told, the judge will have her arms twisted…only the form it takes is anyone’s guess) SPLASHED all over the media’s airwaves? Don’t waste time thinking over this conundrum…what a head scratcher!
With these trails firmly in mind, the CRIME/HEIST OF THE CENTURY becomes Obama’s FORGED documents via his red/green accomplices, leading to an IMPERIAL Presidency!


Source: http://itmakessenseblog.com/2014/01/28/sooner-or-later-they-will-expose-him-obamas-fraudulent-ss-number-maryland-judge-takes-notice-opens-a-legal-door/



Yea right still waiting on this end!!!!

{ED.: meanwhile, back at the ranch, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California...}

Defendant Obama defaulted in Grinols et al v Obama et al

Grinols Notice of Default of Defendant Obama
Notice of Electronic Filing

The following transaction was entered by Taitz, Orly,
on 1/30/2013 at 8:14 PM PST and filed on 1/30/2013

Case Name:	Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al
Case Number:	2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD
Filer:	James Grinols
	Keith Judd
	Thomas Gregory MacLeran
	Edward Noonan
	Robert Odden
Document Number:	64

Docket Text: NOTICE Notice of DEFAULT of DEFENDANT Obama, request for an expedited DEFAULT Judgment and post judgment discovery by All Plaintiffs. (Taitz, Orly)

2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Notice has been electronically mailed to: [7 recipients]

Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
[telephone, FAX, and email address]

IN THE US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Grinols et al . . . . . . .) Case # 12-cv-2997

V . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ) Honorable Morrison C. England

Electoral College et al ) Chief Judge Presiding

NOTICE OF DEFAULT OF DEFENDANT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, AKA BARACK (BARRY) SOETORO, AKA BARACK (BARRY) OBAMA SOEBARKAH

REQUEST FOR AN EXPEDITED DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND A PROPOSED DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Case at hand was file[d] on 12.12.2012. Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, AKA BARACK (BARRY) SOETORO, AKA BARACK (BARRY) OBAMA SOEBARKAH was sued in his capacity as a candidate for the U.S. President. Defendant was served by Same Day professional service processor on 01.04.2013. Defendant was under an obligation to file an answer or a responsive pleading within 21 days on 01.25.2013. Defendant failed to file an answer or a responsive pleading and is currently in DEFAULT.

Plaintiffs are hereby respectfully requesting a default judgment against the defendant, post-judgment discovery, costs and attorney fees. Additionally, Plaintiffs are seeking an EXPEDITED DEFAULT JUDGMENT for the following reason:

Commissioner of Social Security, Bush appointee, is Michael Astrue. He announced that he is leaving office in February, within days. According to evidence provided to this court, Obama made his tax returns public, which show him using a CT [issued to a Connecticut resident] SSN xxx-xx-4425, which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Affidavits of investigators Sankey and Daniels already submitted to this court with the complaint, show aforementioned SSN to be linked in a number of databases to a date of birth 1890.

Recently investigator Albert Hendershot found in the database of www.acxiom.com/identity-solutions/acxiom-identity-batch-solutions/
the name of the individual whose Social Security [number] Obama is using. Acxciom-batch-solutions showed (Exhibit 1) that Harry J Bounel with the same Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 [resides] at 5046 S Greenwood Ave in Chicago, home address of Barack Obama. Database shows Bounel with the same address and Social Security number as Barack Obama himself. According to the databases, last changes to the information on Harrison (Harry) J Bounel were made in and around November 2009 by Michelle Obama, who is listed as Bounel’s relative. Database changes can involve entering the information or deletion of information. It appears that changes made by relative Michelle Obama included deletion of information, which was done at a time when Taitz brought to Federal court in the Central District of California before Judge David O. Carter a case of election challenge by her client[s], former U.S. ambassador Dr. Alan Keyes and 40 state Representatives and high ranked members of the U.S. military.

Recently obtained results of the 1940 census (Exhibit 2) provided the last missing link between Harry J. Bounel and the date of birth of 1890. Exhibit 2 shows the printout of the U.S. census, showing Harry J Bounel, immigrant from Russia, residing at 915 Daly Ave, Bronx, NY, age 50 during the 1940 census, meaning he was born in 1890, as shown in the affidavit of Investigators Daniels and Sankey.

There is a pattern of Obstruction of Justice and tampering with the official records and falsification/forgery of the official records related to Obama. This happens in particular when Bush employees leave their positions and are replaced by Obama appointees.

In March of 2009 one of the clients of Taitz, Major General Carol Childers, arranged for her to meet with the Director of the Selective Service William Chatfield. After Taitz provided Chatfield with evidence of forgery of Obama’s alleged Selective Service certificate, Childers resigned and was replaced by Obama appointee Lawrence Romo. Later, when Sheriff of Maricopa [C]ounty, AZ, Joseph Arpaio demanded from Romo the original paper registration by Obama, Romo responded that it was destroyed.

Similarly, when the former intelligence officer Pamela Barnett sought passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama’s mother, she was given only some of the records and was told that the 1965 passport for Dunham was destroyed.

When investigator Sandler provided Taitz and reporter Corsi with a batch number for the immigration/travel records for Obama for August 1-7 , 1961, those records disappeared from the National Archives, even though the records for the other 51 weeks for 1961 could be found with no problem. After an article was written about missing records, there was a falsification of records and another investigator, Montgomery Blair Sidley, found a record, where [the] original date of August 7, 1961, was visibly erased, and August 1, 1961, was written over it (Exhibit 3).

Based on the pattern of the original vital records, which are essential in removing Obama from office and criminally prosecuting him, rapidly disappearing, there is a high probability that the SSA application SS-5 for the Social Security number for Harry J. Bounel will be either destroyed or falsified the moment Bush appointee Commissioner of Social Security Astrue leaves in February and is replaced by the Obama appointee. Due to high probability of essential evidence being destroyed or altered, Plaintiffs are asking this court to issue an expedited Default Judgment against the Defendant Obama, aka Soetoro, aka Soebarkah, and order expedited post-judgment discovery, which should include the production of the original SS-5 for the Connecticut SSN xxx-xx-4425.

Respectfully submitted



/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

Attorney for Plaintiffs

CC:

UN Nations committee for civil rights defenders
OHCHR in New York
UN Headquarters
New York, NY 10017
USA

Inter-American Commission for Human rights
1889 F St., NW
Washington, DC 20006
USA

Darrel Issa,
Chairman of the House [O]versight [C]ommittee
2157 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING,
WASHINGTON, DC 20515

Congressman Bob Goodlatte,
Chairman of the Judiciary Committee
[of the U.S.] House of Representatives
[2309] RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING,
WASHINGTON, DC 20515

PROPOSED ORDER

Case at hand was file[d] on 12.12.2012. Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, AKA BARACK (BARRY) SOETORO, AKA BARACK (BARRY) OBAMA SOEBARKAH was sued in his capacity as a candidate for the U.S. President. Defendant was served by SameDay professional service processer on 01.04.2013. Defendant was under an obligation to file an answer or a responsive pleading within 21 days on 01.25.2013. Defendant failed to file an answer or a responsive pleading and is currently in DEFAULT.

Complaint and 100 exhibits provided by the Plaintiffs provided the following evidence, which was not refuted by the Defendant:

1. Defendant Obama never lawfully registered with the Selective Service, and the [S]elective [S]ervice registration represents a computer generated forgery. [Therefore, D]efendant is not eligible to work in any position in the executive branch of the U.S. Government, which of course includes the Chief Executive - The U.S. President and the Commander in Chief of the U.S. military. (Sworn Affidavit of Jeffrey Stephan Coffman, the Chief Investigator of the Special Investigations Unit of the U.S. Coast Guard (ret) and former special agent of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security). As such [an ineligible candidate], Obama fraudulently submitted his candidacy for the U.S. President, while knowing all along that he is not eligible for any position in the Executive Branch.
2. Defendant fraudulently ran for the position of the U.S. President while using the last name Obama, while in his mother’s passport records he is listed under the legal name Soebarkah. As such [name Soebarkah], Barack Obama was unlawfully elected, confirmed by the U.S. Senate, and sworn in by the Chief Justice John Roberts, as [the] legal entity “Barack Obama” does not exist. Defendant failed to provide any proof of legal change of name from Soebarkah to Obama.
3. Plaintiffs provided this court with the copy of the [s]chool registration of the Defendant from the Assissi School in Jakarta, Indonesia, where his citizenship is listed as Indonesian. Defendant failed to provide any evidence of Change of Citizenship from Indonesian to [U.S.] American. Even if he were to [have] legally relinquish[ed] his Indonesian citizenship to [U.S.] American upon his arrival from Indonesia in 1971, he would be a Naturalized Citizen and not Natural born as required by Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.
4. OCON, official certification of Candidate, signed by the Chairman of the Democratic Party of Hawaii, Brian Schatz (recently appointed to the U.S. Senat[e] from HI), and the [S]ecretary of the Democratic Party of Hawaii, Lynn Matusow, was a flagrantly falsified document, as [the] required wording, “eligible according to provisions of the U.S. Constitution,” was removed from the Certification, whereby there was never a valid certification of the candidate, which showed an intent to defraud and fraud on the part of the Defendant and aforementioned executives of the Democratic Party of Hawaii.
5. Defendant himself posted his tax returns on the public web site WhiteHouse.gov, one of the most travelled web sites in the world, and did not flatten the PDF file. [T]herefore [his] full, unredacted Connecticut Social Security xxx-xx-4425, which he used in conjunction [with] his 2009 Tax Returns, became available to millions of the U.S. citizens and citizens around the world. This Social Secuirty [number] failed both E-Verify and SSNVS (Social Security Number Verification Systems), two systems of verification of the Social Security number, showing that the number that the Defendant is using in his tax returns was never issued to him. This represents Social Security Fraud, Identity fraud, and Elections Fraud as Defendant ran for the highest office in the U.S. government without possessing a valid Social Security number, one of the two basic Identification papers used in the United States of America.
6. Plaintiffs provided sworn affidavits of Sheriff Joseph Arpaio, Investigator Mike Zullo, Typesetting expert Paul Irey, Adobe-Illustrator/Computer Graphics expert Felicito Papa, scanning machines expert Douglas Vogt, and others which show that the alleged copy of Barack Obama’s alleged long form birth certificate represents a computer generated forgery, while [the] Department of Health of Hawaii refused to comply with any and all federal and state subpoenas and never provided to any judge or jury or expert an original birth certificate that they claim to possess. At this point there is no reason to believe that the original 1961 typewritten birth certificate ever existed, as there would not have been a reason to create a flagrant forgery, if an original birth certificate ever existed.
7. Based on all of the above, Default Judgment is GRANTED. This court is forwarding its findings to the Chairman of the Judiciary Commission of the U.S. Congress for determination whether the Articles of Impeachment against Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, AKA BARACK (BARRY) SOETORO, AKA BARACK (BARRY) OBAMA SOEBARKAH are justified.
8. Based on the unrefuted evidence by the Plaintiffs, this court makes a finding and Declaratory ruling that Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, AKA BARACK (BARRY) SOETORO, AKA BARACK (BARRY) OBAMA SOEBARKAH was not eligible to the position of the U.S. President and Commander in Chief as he is a citizen of Indonesia, who ran for the U.S. Presidency based on fraud and misrepresentation and using either forged or fraudulently obtained identification papers.
   
9. Plaintiff[s] are entitled to their costs, attorneys fees and post-judgment discovery.
   

So ORDERED and ADJUDGED on this _____________ of _______




Chief Judge, U.S District Court [for the Eastern District of California]

www.orlytaitzesq.com/?page_id=385062

[ED.: Not to worry, not to hurry. The Court will almost certainly grant the attorneys for the Defendant the courtesy of an additional 60 days to respond, giving Commissioner of Social Security Michael Astrue ample time to retire, and his Obama-appointed replacement enough time to be firmly seated and to replace strategic department directors where necessary. Wait for it...]
_______________________________

FOUR DAYS LATE...

The attorneys for the Defendants filed their response, 69 pages of the usual mind-numbing legalese about:
lack of standing,
claims were moot,
claims were barred by the political question doctrine,
claims against Congress were barred by the speech or debate clause,
plaintiffs' arguments lack merit (?!?), and
the question of whether the U.S. District Court has authority to issue declaratory relief.

www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Grinols-opposition-by-Federal-defendants-9th-circuit.pdf

All of which comparatively trivial motions serve merely to deny a court hearing on the burning issue of Mr. Obama's Constitutional ineligibility to the Office of President, not being a natural born Citizen, one born in the country of parents who were citizens, as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett (1875), which was quoted as the controlling opinion about nbC in Wong Kim Ark (1898 ).

Is there nothing in the U.S. judicial system, U.S. Code, or Constitution of the U.S. as amended and interpreted by the courts, that allows a judge or a jury to set aside less important obstacles and legal roadblocks in case of extreme and urgent necessity to reach a just and timely outcome on issues of critical importace, such as the survival of the United States as a sovereign nation?

Obama Eligibility Challenge

Reaches United States Supreme Court

REPEATING A LIE “DOESN’T MAKE IT TRUTHFUL”

By Sharon Rondeau | The Post & Email

(Jan. 28, 2014) — A petition for certiorari regarding Barack Hussein Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief arrived at the U.S. Supreme Court and was docketed as of January 23, 2014 after a long and circuitous routing through the New York State courts.
...

Neither the courts nor Congress have been willing to examine the issue of whether or not Obama is usurping the office of the presidency.

Laity’s current case, Laity v. New York, began in December 2011 with a ballot challenge filed by Robert Christopher Laity with the New York State Board of Elections which Laity said became a “hot potato” that the courts “didn’t want to handle.”
...

THE POST & EMAIL: What is the process for your case now?

MR. LAITY: The case has been given a docket number, 13-875. The book was stamped, and I got it back in the mail with the docket number stamped on it. Now they will take the case to conference. If there are [four] Supreme Court justices who accept the case, then I’m in.

www.birtherreport.com/2014/01/report-obama-eligibility-challenge.html