Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

[ED.: before, based upon a cursory reading, you write off the following as a far-fetched, wacko, conspiracy delusion, please give Butterdezillion's analysis a serious audience. She is a serious researcher, who is serious about her field work and her homework, and just as she says, the subject is "serious as a heart attack."]

Butterdezillion's Blog
Friday, May 16, 2014 11:12 PM

Some Background Information
[about the purported death of Hawaii Dept. of Health Director Loretta Fuddy, in the ocean off Molokai, Hawaii, about an hour after an emergency landing in the water.]

Some have expressed concern because I’ve not posted for a while. Thank you for caring. I’ve had a lot of real-life stuff that has required my attention, in addition to the research.

To those who have given me information or input, thank you! I have read what you said and have been processing it in my mind and collating it with other information I’ve received. A lot of the processing and information I’ve got right now can’t be revealed yet because I have a bunch of pending FOIA requests, and I want to make sure that state and federal agencies don’t know what discrepancies they need to try to mitigate, so they don’t know how to alter the records they give me. The records I’ve got so far show serious discrepancies on every major detail regarding this crash and the response to it, and also show some agencies manipulating the data to try to hide things. So I know that manipulation of the records is a very real possibility. I’ve been biting my tongue, trying not to say more than I should in places like Free Republic.

Every [Hawaii UIPA] request I’ve made has been like pulling teeth, with emails disappearing, UIPA (HI’s FOIA) responses getting “lost” in the US mail, delays, appeals, non-responses, etc.. I’ve had to babysit every request, forcing people to do what is required by law, force-feeding them the legal reasons why they have to respond and why the records [can be disclosed], appealing their non-responses or denials, reminding them they haven’t responded, double-checking to make sure they got my communications and I got theirs, looking up contact information for people who aren’t responding or to whom my request was forwarded, sorting out how my requests were divided and whose responses are about what part of the request (a way that the FAA was able to cancel a request, since I didn’t know that the longer deadline I was given only applied to a portion of the request that was separated from my original request without the agency telling me what part was separated), etc..

So it’s been a zoo. The extra people in the water just minutes after the crash strongly suggest that the crash was planned in advance. I will say that the combined records so far allude to 11 people who were pulled from the water by rescuers and at least another 2 who swam ashore. That’s 13 people, when the “official narrative” claims only 9 were there. So the extra people shown in the video are also corroborated by the records, with summaries provided to the public contradicting what’s in the internal records.

Why was the crash planned? The answer to that depends on whether [Hawaii DOH Director Loretta] Fuddy is actually dead. Some of my records requests are trying to get to the bottom of that, using records that are required public disclosures. MAJOR obstructions on all those records.

Part of the obstructions could be legally-justified, IF this crash was planned in order to put Fuddy into witness protection – if not on a federal level then on a state level. Either level would make it mandatory for the agencies to hide information which would reveal Fuddy’s hidden protected status, if the AG so ordered it. HI statute allows the AG to do ANYTHING that he/she deems necessary to “protect” somebody who somewhere down the line might testify for the government in some investigation or legal proceeding – as long as the AG believes that investigation/case will have a lot of people interested in it and the potential witness could be in danger.

Rather than take the time to rewrite everything, I’m going to adapt what I posted elsewhere, about that, and about the whole idea of faked deaths and whether it is an unthinkably crazy theory. Given the evidence that the crash was planned, the alternate theory is murder.

The rest of this post is how I responded when asked the question, “Who/what was in the casket?”:

I have no way of knowing, because the image that I know is genuinely from the funeral and shows some of the interior of the casket doesn’t seem to match the photoshopped images. What’s in the middle of the casket in the genuine photo looks dark and round, not like the pasty-white hands from the other images. There’s not much empty space on either side of the person, in the casket showing the hands. But it seems like you can see the whole side cushion inside the coffin in the genuine photo – with no arms, torso or anything showing. The style of the casket seems different – rounded top versus flat top, different profile when the lid was open, etc.. The images just don’t seem to match.

And I can’t help but wonder why they photoshopped the other images.

So I don’t know. I have no way of knowing. What I do know is that something seems screwy, with the photoshopping and the images not seeming to match.

And I suppose Fred is right. I suppose you’re setting me up to laugh at me, because of course funerals are NEVER faked. Reading a bit, I find that drownings are the easiest way to fake a death, because there doesn’t have to be a body. That makes it all the more interesting that the acting coroner’s information officer, Lt. William Juan, was quoted in the LA Times the day after the crash, saying that Fuddy’s body was retrieved from the wreckage. The confusion over how many people were in the plane, how many swam ashore, who picked them out of the water, etc., means that to this day the public claims of what really happened don’t match the number of people reported in the records as having been retrieved. There are differing numbers reported as having been transported. The lat[itude]-longitude coordinates for where the [helicopters] went when they transported people make no sense.

Confusion like that allowed several different claims to be an option – from Fuddy drowning and her body not being found, to her drowned body being retrieved from the wreckage, to her dying in the water, to her being in critical condition when found but dying while she was being worked on… And almost all those stories have been simultaneously claimed by different people in the reports or in the media statements. There may have been Plan A, Plan B, Plan C, and Plan D, and people got confused over which one was actually going to be used. Maybe it depended on how things went. For whatever reason, the timing of the crash being discovered, the media report of one dead, the timing of when the helicopters were where and what was in the Fire Dept versus the [U.S. Coast Guard] CAD transcripts, when the aircraft arrived, etc were all off as well as the stories of where and in what condition Fuddy was found, by whom, by whom she was lifted, where she was taken once lifted, etc, which are all off. They have internal and external inconsistencies. Which is what clued in a lot of people (including myself) to the suspicious nature of this crash, even before the video surfaced showing extra people and equipment in the water.

At thekojonnamdishow.org/audio-player?nid=11442, there is a 2002 interview with the guy who founded the federal Witsec program. I believe around the 30-minute mark he says that they don’t need to do elaborate schemes to make it appear that somebody died because the US is a big enough place that a person can effectively be hidden. (Note that this was in 2002 – before we had surveillance cameras, drones, etc all over the place.) And that’s probably true for low-profile people. It might not be as true for somebody widely-known, and especially if it is somebody people all over the country might recognize and suspect as still being alive.

Such a person might not so easily hide in this age of surveillance and social media – as evidenced by the fact that by the time of Fuddy’s funeral, a dear Freeper sleuth had discovered Fuddy’s alternate Facebook account using the name she thought only her friends would recognize: Deliana Antone, the name under which it is claimed that she bought with cash a multi-million-dollar house in Florida shortly after her alleged death.

An interesting factoid about the FEDERAL WITSEC program: people in the program are not allowed to contact their non-protected friends and relatives after getting their new identity and are urged to choose a new LAST NAME but to keep their original first name. By using Deliana instead of Loretta, Fuddy would have ensured that her friends and family would be able to know it was her – and especially since she already had a Facebook account under that name (though it is impossible to know who set up that FB account or when…)

Another interesting factoid: the feds will not provide a credit record for the new identity taken by people in the WITSEC program. If such a person wanted to buy a house, they would not have the credit references needed to get a loan. They would have to pay cash.

The introduction to that audio clip says, “From arranging fake funerals to obtaining breast implants for a mobster’s wife — the federal witness protection program has done and seen it all. Gerald Shur, the man who created the program, joins Kojo for a behind-the-scenes discussion.” That is just one of the places where it is mentioned that a fake funeral can be part of the process of giving somebody a new identity. As I’ve mentioned elsewhere, the Obama regime gave dozens of Benghazi witnesses new identities in order to keep them hidden from Congressional investigators, so the Obama regime probably has the fake funeral streamlined pretty well by now…

HRS 338-17.7 [authorizes] the HDOH (under the control of the Director) ... to give a new, totally fake BC for somebody with a Hawaii BC if law enforcement says a BC with different claims is necessary for that person’s protection. This may be the law that Fuddy relied upon as a legal fig leaf to cover her behind when she ordered the creation of Obama’s fake BC. As far as I know, a death certificate is not similarly authorized, BUT in HRS 28-101 (seen at www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol01_Ch0001-0042F/HRS0028/HRS_0028-0101.htm ) the Attorney General is given permission to do ANYTHING he/she deems necessary to protect a potential witness in what could potentially be a case (or a mere INVESTIGATION…) with high public interest. Here’s what it says (emphasis mine):

“(a) The attorney general shall establish a statewide witness program through which the attorney general may fund or provide for the security and protection of a government witness or a potential government witness in an official proceeding or investigation where the attorney general determines that an offense such as those described in section 710-1071 (intimidating a witness), 710-1072 (tampering with a witness), or 710-1072.2 (retaliating against a witness) is likely to be committed or which involves great public interest…

“(b) In connection with the security and protection of a witness, a potential witness, or an immediate family member or close associate of a witness or potential witness, the attorney general may fund or take ANY ACTION the attorney general determines to be necessary to protect such person from bodily injury, or to assure the person’s health, safety, and welfare, for as long as, in the judgment of the attorney general, such danger exists.”

Notice this covers a “potential government witness” for any kind of investigation or proceeding. This could be applied to almost any situation that the AG could imagine cropping up in the future, as long as he/she thinks the case would have high public interest.

And “any action” would cover a fake autopsy and death certificate, or anything else. The state AG would have the authority to order the Maui County Police Chief to fake an autopsy, for instance, or request the [U.S. Coast Guard] to lie about what happened in a [fake,] staged rescue call.

That is a LOT of leeway. The state AG has a signed blank check in that statute. And that would be David Louie – the guy who would never say for sure whether Neal Palafox was being investigated for Medicare billing fraud, when they forced Palafox to resign (while lying and saying he resigned for “personal reasons”) so they could get Fuddy as HDOH director instead, the day after BirtherReport reported that Gov. Abercrombie had told Mike Evans there wasn’t a birth certificate for Obama in Hawaii…

And of course, though the state statute probably means the STATE AG in that statute, rather than the US AG, it is interesting to note that when the Maui County Police Chief was deciding on the cause of death for Fuddy, the US Attorney General’s wife was there in Maui along with Michelle Obama and Valerie Jarrett, demanding the chief provide lots and lots of security for them, so they were constantly in his face. Michelle was staying there indefinitely, but the day that the Police Chief announced cardiac arrhythmia as the accidental cause of death, it was revealed that Michelle would be going back to DC.

At en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faked_death, it lists some notable faked deaths.

Another list of faked deaths is at marlowe-shakespeare.blogspot.com/2010/01/in-plain-sight-what-witness-protection.html, where it says:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Daryl Pinksen

I thought it might be useful to provide a list of links to stories about people who tried, and ultimately failed, to fake their own deaths. (It is worth noting that those who are successful in the attempt do not make the news.)

Consider that these cases date only from the past decade or so, and represent only those that turned up in a quick Google search. If we extrapolate this rate back 400 years, the scenario does become mundane.

The point is that while faking one’s death may be sensational, it is far from extraordinary. [ED.: while faking one's own death may well be possible, it is much easier for one's death to be staged by someone else who is alive and on the scene to tie up any loose ends.]

1. Bruce Leyte
www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2009/03/11/leyte-guilty-plea.html
2. Patrick McDermott (suspected, Olivia Newton-John’s husband)
www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1129814/Olivia-Newton-Johns-partner-staged-death-alive-U-S-investigators-claim.html
3. John Stonehouse
news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/december/24/newsid_2540000/2540557.stm
4-6. Carl Hackett, Graham Cardwell, Thomas Osmond
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-499515/The-men-decided-Reggie-Perrin.html
7. Bennie Wint
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1132483/Man-faked-death-went-run-20-years-believing-police-They-werent.html
8. Marcus Shrenk
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28623108/
9. Jenaro Hernandez
www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/aug/13/missing-businessman-arrested-spain
10. John Sung Park
www.cdnn.info/news/safety/s090101.html
11. Daniel Kinge
www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/01/10/paedo-sir-faked-his-own-death-115875-21955207/
12. Harry Gordon
www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/55130
13. Bill Grothe
nashvillecitypaper.com/content/city-news/police-allege-music-row-attorney-faked-his-own-death
14. Gubraman Subramaniam
www.reuters.com/article/idUSPAT26223520080602
15. Sean Lovelock-Woodall (suspected)
www.thisissouthwales.co.uk/news/Man-defends-brother-claims-faked-death/article-1589692-detail/article.html
16. Bruce Dale
www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10521036&pnum=1
17. Jason Hart
www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/s/1099850_ebay_conman_faked_his_death
18. John Darwin
www.chroniclelive.co.uk/north-east-news/todays-evening-chronicle/2009/08/17/canoe-man-tells-how-he-faked-his-own-death-72703-24459513/
19. John Fossett (suspected, later disproved)
www.theaustralian.com.au/news/fossett-may-have-faked-his-death/story-e6frg6tf-1111117040246
20. Jeremy Daniel Oakley
www.canada.com/nanaimodailynews/news/story.html?id=d3ed0c94-2e62-47af-9231-cb656b8cb5a5

---

There are other links somebody gave me too, but I can’t find them right now. It’s been a long day and I need to go to bed. Those who want to laugh at me are going to do so no matter what I say anyway, so this is really just for the benefit of anybody who cares to know some factual information instead of guffawing based on ignorance.

Means, motive, and opportunity. They were all there that day. Just a couple [of] weeks before this crash, Mike Zullo had told [Pastor] Carl Gallups[, a.k.a. PP Simmons,] that they had universe-shattering evidence that was going to require a response from the feds – the feds who could appoint a Congressional investigation having the ability to override Eric Holder’s fox-guarding-the-henhouse position of sabotaging real justice. Given what we know about the NSA, it’s a really good bet that Obama’s people know what evidence Zullo and Arpaio have. They knew this was serious. And it is, people. It is VERY serious.

Serious as a heart attack.

butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2014/05/16/some-background-information/

Faithless Execution: Building the Political Case for Obama's Impeachment

Suzanne Hamner 15 hours ago



Americans today are witnessing the last segments of the "transformation of America" from the country once based on upholding individual God-given rights, maintaining freedom and liberty, and limiting central government to an authoritarian, lawless type of government where an obedience by the law of the citizenry is in jeopardy. At least, that is the viewpoint of former prosecutor and author Andy McCarthy in his two-part interview with Ginni Thomas for the Daily Caller.
The interview comes on the heels of the release of McCarthy's new book, "Faithless Execution: Building the Political Case for Obama's Impeachment." McCarthy makes the point that impeachment is "not partisan or ideological" as the framer's included impeachment, along with elections and with-holding funding, as a remedy for presidents who over-step their use of office to usurp power from the other branches of government or who engage in lawless behavior.

The two-part interview can be viewed below.
Obama was re-elected to a second term in 2012 thereby making the power of election moot, even amid repeated reports of voter fraud, allegations of election tampering and voter intimidation, along with evidence of a president who ignores the Constitution. Congress has been derelict in exercising their power of the purse. When looking at the "government shut-down" and then the subsequent surrender of the Republicans, it would seem the House is reticent in exercising its power. While McCarthy admits with-holding funding because of a Democratic Senate is difficult, he contends Republicans are making it seem impossible. Difficult is not impossible and Republicans are unwilling to suffer through difficulty in order to restrain lawlessness. The only remedy left to contain a president who engages in lawlessness is impeachment. With the partisan political environment currently pervasive in Washington, articles of impeachment are unlikely to be filed much less any type of impeachment proceedings to be forthcoming.
According to McCarthy, the failure to follow the remedies outlined in the Constitution for a lawlessness president presents a danger when partisan politics and ideology reign more so than the rule of law as tides can turn resulting in the popular ideology now becoming the desecrated ideology of tomorrow.
It is interesting to hear McCarthy give his impression of how the Republicans may be viewing impeachment after the Clinton incident – being almost a hands off type approach because of the nature of the charges filed against Clinton that may not have been deemed "high crimes and Misdemeanors." Excuses have been plentiful on impeachment; one is "the Senate will not convict." McCarthy openly states impeachment is a political remedy; however, there must be a political will of the people to remove the president from power. If there is not a will of the people to impeach, it is doubtful impeachment would happen but still must be considered.
McCarthy mentions the numerous scandals surrounding the Obama administration along with the use of executive order to make legislation. Americans are witness to Obama's misuse of executive orders to by pass Congress and basically implement his agenda to "transform" America. Regardless of politics, this is an authoritarian manner of "forcing" upon the American public an agenda to systematically trample the Constitution in order to remove the God-given rights of individuals. Amazingly, there are Americans calling for Obama to use "his pen and phone" to make legislation thereby supporting lawlessness. Let's also not forget how many illegal aliens are calling for the same thing – individuals who are not citizens and have NO say in government.
Lawlessness is lawlessness. To favor lawlessness because of a political party affiliation is nothing more than a supportive vote for tyranny. The often used phrase to describe the Republicans and Democrats as "different sides of the same coin" appear to be accurate when watching the activities of Congress in dealing with this lawless man in the Oval Office. As the American public witnesses more lawlessness from government, McCarthy surmises that citizens could begin to cease to follow law in emulation of government bringing about a state of anarchy.

Longtime liberals, Alan Dershowitz and Jonathan Turley, warn against the authoritarian direction of Obama by "raising red flags."
Regardless of party, representatives are unresponsive to the people. Just as Obama has bold-faced lied to the American public, citizens are witness to representatives lying in order to obtain votes to win a congressional seat or keep their congressional seat. More double talk is coming out of Washington now than can be issued by the very best of lawyers engaged in law interpretation or individuals charged with drafting of law. Where is the enforcement power of Congress? It is there in law; however, Congress refuses to exercise it based all on partisan party politics. We are now engaged in an "us versus them" form of government – Congress and all in Washington are acting as the "us" with the American people being defined as "them." How long before Congress is relegated to "them" status by the increasing lawlessness of one man?

The phrase, "never sell the American people short," keeps rolling around but when it comes to Congress and their refusal to redress grievances, the complaints and concerns of the American public are mere echoes on the wind. And, with the infectious disease of selfish special interest, self-absorption, and multi-culturalism coupled with political correctness that has now spread throughout society, one can't help but question the will of some of the American people. Some are hunkered down trying to get by as if they were caught up in a tornado that will dissipate when the weather conditions change, choosing to protect themselves by flying under the radar. Others are calling for tyranny as if it is some great liberator of perceived oppression – an oppression they believe is caused by the Constitution. Still others are calling for acceptance of any and every political ideology to have some place in law, such as those who insist Muslims have the right to have Islamic Shariah law integrated into our justice system. Then, there are those who are dedicated to supporting, protecting and defending the Constitution at any and all cost. In this mix, there are those Americans who do not know which side to choose but change with the popular ideology of the time.
How does freedom stand in a house so divided? The answer is it cannot. For as exceptions are made for one group or special interest to "correct" their perceived oppression, those exceptions trample on the individual freedoms of others. It is lawlessness supreme. Once one group has been trampled into submission, the focus will become another group, then another. If the activities meant to bring about surrender fail, the only other alternative is extermination of those who refuse to surrender. This is what history has revealed in the past.
America is headed on a fast moving train toward the total annihilation of freedom. Are we willing to voluntarily purchase a ticket?

2 videos at link below


Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/06/fa...OIs757LhRM7.99

Breitbart Senior Editor Ben Shapiro's Stunning New Book: Prosecute Obama--Now! by Stephen K. Bannon
In the wake of new accusations about illegality in President Obama’s handling of the trade of five senior Taliban commanders/terrorists for accused AWOL Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, millions of Americans are now beginning to understand just what CNN’s Joe Johns asked White House press secretary Jay Carney: does President Obama feel as if “he’s above the law”?
More


Breitbart Senior Editor Ben Shapiro's Stunning New Book: Prosecute Obama--Now!

http://cdn.breitbart.com/mediaserver...ama-cover2.jpg

---

by Stephen K. Bannon 3 Jun 2014

In the wake of new accusations about illegality in President Obama’s handling of the trade of five senior Taliban commanders/terrorists for accused AWOL Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, millions of Americans are now beginning to understand just what CNN’s Joe Johns asked White House press secretary Jay Carney: does President Obama feel as if “he’s above the law”?


The answer: of course he does. And one week from today, on June 10, Breitbart News Senior Editor-at-Large Ben Shapiro explains what Americans can do about it in his explosive new book, The People vs. Barack Obama: The Criminal Case Against The Obama Administration.





On the evening of June 9, Ben Shapiro will have an exclusive interview on Fox News' Hannity, followed by an exclusive radio interview on The Sean Hannity Show the following day.



In the book, Shapiro makes the case for both civil and criminal prosecutions against members of the Obama administration based on scandals ranging from Benghazi to the IRS’ persecution of conservatives – from Fast and Furious to Solyndra, from leaks of national security information to violations of privacy by the National Security Agency.


The book runs the gamut of high crimes and misdemeanors from President Obama to senior members of the executive branch.

“[T]he Obama administration is a quasi-criminal syndicate, a top-down system in which policies are decided at the highest levels, signals are sent, and low-level bureaucrats receive and implement them,” Shapiro writes.

video at link below


Shapiro’s comprehensive assault on the Obama administration explains the legal precedent under which particular Obama officials could be charged and makes the case for legislation that would allow prosecution and civil cases against the president directly, including broadening the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) to allow for suit against the president of the United States.
The book is relentless in its exposé of the Obama administration, a stunning indictment of a presidency out of control, and a roadmap for citizens and legislators.

Pre-sales are available at Amazon.com.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...&utm_term=More

[ED.: I don't recall posting here this nearly.two-year-old article by Dan Crosby for Pen Johannson's blog, The Daily Pen. But even if I did, it's so well written, diligently documented, and persuasively presented as to make it eminently worth reading again.]
________________________________________

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_4F7FHZurD4...tizenship2.jpg

From Conception...To Election

"Preventing an individual with plural loyalties, whether by biological, political or geographic origins, which may present lawful or perceptible doubt as to his allegiances thereof, other than one with the fullmost sovereignty of advanced citizenry, which is that of one who remains Natural-born from conception to election, from assuming the great power of this fragile office, was, without tolerance or vulnerability, the exaction of purpose of our fathers to induce the mandate of presidential eligibility upon our blood-ransomed Constitution..." Pen Johannson ----------------------------------------------------------

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

OBAMA’S KENYAN BIRTH RECORDS DISCOVERED IN BRITISH NATIONAL ARCHIVES

WHERE LIES GO TO DIE – Evidence discovered shows British Protectorate of East Africa recorded Obama’s birth records before 1963 and sent returns of those events to Britain’s Public Records Office and the Kew branch of British National Archives.

([The Daily Pen] Editor's note: The records alluded to in this story were discovered through a May, 2012, search through BMD Registers, a BNA partner site, using the search term "Obama". Corroborating evidence through public sources only implicates the identity of those involved but does not explicitly prove their identity in the absence of the availability of original documents.)

By Dan Crosby
of The Daily Pen

(Updated 7/23/2012)

KEW, SURREY, GB – The last place anyone would think to look for a birth record of someone claiming to be a “natural born” U.S. citizen is Great Britain. The very inclusion of the Article II eligibility mandate in the U.S. Constitution was explicitly intended by the founding fathers of America to prevent a then British-born enemy usurper from attaining the office of the U.S. presidency and thereby undermining the sovereignty of the newly formed nation.

In the absence of honor, courage and justice on the part of those serving in the U.S. Congress and Federal Judiciary, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case investigative group has concluded the only law enforcement analysis of the image of Obama’s alleged “Certificate of Live Birth” posted to a government website in April, 2011 and found it to be the product of criminal fraud and document forgery.

The seeming endless evidence against Obama has now taken investigators to the foreign archives of Great Britain wherein it has been discovered that vital events occurring under the jurisdiction of the British Colony in the Protectorate of East Africa prior to 1965 were recorded and held in the main office of the British Registrar in England until 1995 before being archived in the BNA.

It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963.

Recall, investigative journalists working for Breitbart.com have already discovered biographical information published by Barack Obama’s literary agent in which he claimed he was born in Kenya. Prior to Obama’s ensconcement to the White House, many international stories also stated that Obama was Kenyan-born as did members of Kenya’s legislative assembly. Since then information on Obama’s ties has been curtailed by government officials as the Obama administration has coincidently paid nearly $4 billion dollars for capital projects in Kenya.

Also, the presence of Obama's mother, [Stanley] Ann Dunham, cannot be accounted for from February, 1961, the alleged month of her marriage to Obama, until three weeks after the birth of Obama II in August, 1961, when she allegedly applied for college courses at the University of Washington. Theories about her whereabouts have included that she participated in the Air Lift America project as an exchange student and traveled to Nairobi as one of many recent high school graduates (see AASF Report 1959-1961).

The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is significant because biographical information about Obama’s family indicates Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s birth.

Based on procedures defined in Britain’s Births & Deaths Registration Act of 1953, The British Foreign & Commonwealth Office states the following:

Quote:

---

Registering A Birth

If your child is born outside the United Kingdom you can register the birth with the nearest consulate (Local British Foreign & Commonwealth Regional Registrar Office), or with our consular department in London if you’ve returned to the United Kingdom...

The standard of birth registration in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Republic of Ireland, Africa and Overseas Territories is similar to the standard of birth registration of the UK.”

The British Registration Service Act of 1953 (UK Revised Statutes) states that the Queen appoints one Registrar General for the registration of vital records. His or her name would appear the same on all birth certificates of children born under British common law in 1961 until the end of their service. Article 1 of the Registration Service Act of 1953 states:

“1 Registrar General…Her Majesty may from time to time under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom appoint a Registrar General…and any person so appointed shall exercise the powers and perform the duties conferred or imposed by or under any enactment on the Registrar General, whether described by that title alone or with any additional description, and shall hold office during Her Majesty’s pleasure.”

The specific sources of information pertaining to births of Kenyan nationals under British jurisdiction can be researched in the following BNA files:

General Register Office SERIES RG36 Registers and Returns of Births, Marriages and Deaths in the Protectorates etc of Africa and Asia

Legal status: Public Record(s)

Language: English

Creator names: General Register Office, 1836-1970

Covering Birth Registration dates: 1895-1965

Physical description: 15 volume(s)

Access conditions: Available in microform only

Held by: The National Archives, Kew

Scope and content: Notifications forwarded by officials responsible for civil registration under administrative ordinances in Nyasaland, Kenya, Somaliland, Uganda, Sudan, Palestine, Sarawak, Malaya, including Johore and Selangor, and British North Borneo, commencing at varying dates.

Publication note: Geoffrey Yeo 'The British Overseas, A Guide to Records of Their Births, Baptisms, Marriages, Deaths and Burials Available in the United Kingdom', London, 2nd edn, 1988.

Related material: Some earlier returns from the East African territories in the period during which they were under Foreign Office control are in the consular registers retained in the custody of the registrar general.

Place: Kenya, Africa (Territory Thereof): 1920 - 1963

Subjects: Birth: registration

Courtesy: British National Archives

---

Recall, on August 1, 2009, Dr. Alan Keyes, Pamela Barnett and 42 other plaintiffs filed evidence in a lawsuit challenging Obama eligibility which included a copy of an image of an alleged Kenyan Copy of Certification of Registration of Birth (CCRB). In the hours after the image appeared on the internet, MSNBC and other liberal mainstream, pro-Obama networks went ballistic attempting to debunk the idea that such a document exists.

The liberal media went out of its way to discredit the image, protesting too much, going as far as to claim that the Kenyan CCRB image was forged based on an Australian birth certificate which was miraculously discovered by an unnamed blogger for a man named Bomford.

On August 2, Keith Olbermann led the deranged effort on his now defunct "Countdown" show to lie and propagandize the CCRB using insults and baseless criticism of unknown "birthers" who he claimed "attempted and failed to pass off a forgery."

Strangely, however, no one in the mainstream liberal media would address the question now answered by the recent discovery at the BNA. The Bomford document and the Kenyan CCRB would indeed appear the same under British birth registration processes and documentation formats because both municipalities in Kenya and Australia, in 1961, operated under the Registrar General of the British government.

It is now supported by the evidence discovered in the BNA that the Bomford document image from Australia was accessed and used by pro-Obama operatives as a template to alter the image of the Kenyan CCRB image in order to make it appear that "birthers" had created a bad counterfeit of a Kenyan birth record for Obama. This was done by Obama's forgers to create "shell game" confusion among the public and misdirect media attention from the truth that an original, unaltered Kenyan CCRB, which was never allowed to be publicly seen in its original form before Obama's forgers were able to access and change it, was actually an image of a legitimate document posted by unknown individuals who were known by Obama to possess the document before hand.

Essentially, the Bomford affair was just another coverup to hide Obama's foreign birth records.

The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to Obama are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA. The hand written line records first discovered in 2009, indicate several events were registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be handwritten and spelled “Burack” and “Biraq”) beginning in 1953 and include two births recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a birth in 1961. Barack Obama is said to have died in 1982 and had married at least once more in Kenya and had at least one more child in 1968, but no record of these were found in the BNA because, according to the Archives’ desk reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved independence from British colonial rule in 1963.

To date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963.

A request for information from the BNA on the specification of birth information contained in the series of thousands of logs indicates that only vital events registered in Kenya’s Ministry of Health offices were recorded in the registration returns and were placed in the National Archives care before they reached 30 years old (the law was amended to 20 years after creation in 2010).

The line records do not specify the identity or names of the children, only gender. However, the line records are associated with index numbers of actual microfilm copies of certificates, licenses and registration applications filed in the archives. According to researchers, Obama’s line records were discovered in Series RG36, reference books. Not surprisingly, when researchers specifically requested access to the relevant microfilm for the Obama birth registrations, they were told that the records were currently held under an outdated “privileged access” status, meaning researchers were denied access under Chapter 52, Sections 3 and 5 of the British Public Records Act of 1958.

However, evidence shows these records were available for public access before August of 2009, the approximate date of arrival of Hillary Clinton in Great Britain during her trip to Africa that year.

www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/access-to-public-records.pdf

Several sources show that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made a sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial protectorates, to speak with the Chief Executive of the Archives in early August of 2009. African news agency expressed surprise at Clintons arrival since she did not announce her intentions of stopping in Great Britain before embarking on her two week trip to Africa.

OBAMA’S FATHER FAILED TO INCLUDE BIRTH OF “SON” ON INS APPLICATION

For someone who wanted to remain in America, it’s difficult to imagine any reason why Barack Obama’s alleged father, Barack the elder, would omit the birth of an “anchor baby” son on an application to extend his visa, just days after the birth occurred, unless…

The American people were told by Barack Obama, unequivocally, that his father was a former goat herder from Kenya. However, INS documents filed in the very same month after Obama’s birth suggest the goat herding elder Obama didn’t “get the memo” that he was a daddy.

On August 31^st, 1961, just weeks after Obama’s birth was allegedly registered in a regional office of the Hawaiian Health Department, Obama the elder neglected to name his newborn son on an application for extension of his temporary visa to stay in the U.S..

Obama’s omission of the birth is astonishing and illogical given the fact that the acknowledgement of the birth would have fortified Obama’s application for an extension. The INS has long been more willing to extend the visa of a foreign parent of children born in the U.S., especially when the other parent is an American citizen.

Despite the recent release of a documentary film “Dreams From My Real Father” presenting evidence that Barack Hussein Obama is not the biological father of the younger Obama, the elder Obama is the man named as the father on the digital image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” which was posted to the internet by the administration in April of 2011. The document image has since been forensically examined by law enforcement investigators and determined to be a digitally fabricated forgery using Adobe software.

THE UGLY TRUTH

However, the sad and pathetic truth about Obama’s covert natal history and his illegitimacy lies at the bottom of a sordid pit of lies surrounding the paternity of his birth. Doubts about his identity, his eligibility, his intentions, his honesty and his honorability as a man stem from what appears to be an ugly truth about his mother’s probable sexual involvement with multiple men associated with the radical socialist movement in 1960’s Hawaii.

Obama and his horde of abettors defend an improbable narrative about his identity. The veracity of this narrative has been damaged under the weight of a steady stream of crushing evidence demonstrating more than 180 disparities and contradictions to Obama’s claims of natal legitimacy as president.

If Obama’s cause as a usurper of power is to avenge his father’s culture, he made the worst possible error in lying about who he is. Vintage America is on to him. Their instincts are slowly turning Obama’s fantasy of a socialist utopia for those he believes are humanity’s offended into a laughingstock. By building his vision for America on clay feet of lies about his who he is, he has undermined any intention of doing something good and right. He is not to be trusted.

Moreover, Obama is learning the painful lesson that a message of “Hope and Change” means something vastly different to vintage America, the most powerful and affluent culture in human history, when that message has been proven to come from someone as audaciously dishonest and deceptively calculating as this son of otherness.

Recall, in 2011, it was reported by The Daily Pen after an investigation of the State of Hawaii’s birth statistics collection protocols and vital records history that birth certificates are often amended after the birth while the original paper document is sealed under strict confidentiality rules when the identity of the father is either determined after birth or when the father named on the new version of the certificate has adopted or assumed paternal responsibility for the child.

In the latter case, the original birth record may not contain the biological father’s name because the mother does not provide it, or it may list paternity as “unknown”, but this version is kept confidential under HRS 571. In some cases, the biological father may not even know he is the father if the mother has had more than one sexual partner prior to the pregnancy. There was no DNA test in 1961, however the 1961 Vital Statistics of the U.S. Report shows there were more than 1000 such “illegitimate” births reported in the state of Hawaii during that year, about 1 in 17.

Therefore, the paternity of the child at the actual time of the birth is not disclosed while the new amended certificate is upheld as the original version displaying the name of the newly identified or adoptive father as indistinguishable if different from the biological father. This law is meant to protect the child from stigmas resulting from illegitimacy, rape, incest or adultery. Under these circumstances it is not possible to know the paternal status of a child at birth unless the original birth record is made accessible by authorized persons under Hawaiian law.

However, notations indicating that a certificate contains updated paternal information would be typed or printed in the lower margin of the new certificate, below the signature section. This lower margin of the image of Obama’s certificate has been shown by computer experts to be concealed by forgers using a “clipping mask”. A clipping mask is a feature available in Adobe software which limits the viewable area on a document image through which only selected information can be seen. In the case of Obama’s forged certificate, the information we have been allowed to see within the frame of the clipping mask may merely reflect an amended birth record while concealing notations of the amendments which exists in the lower margin outside the frame of the clipping mask.

Regardless of any level of truth about any individual piece of information in the image, overall, the final image is the product of criminals and liars.

If Obama is not the biological father, or if paternal information is listed on the original certificate as “unknown”, the state of Hawaii keeps this information secret until a court orders the documents to be released for discovery purposes in determining Obama’s eligibility. Thus far, courts have lacked courage to uphold the Constitution thereby propagating the greatest political fraud in American history. Judges are simply washing their hands of the issue by refusing to even consider actual evidence against Obama, denying citizens of justice and their Constitutional right to a redress of grievances, because they simply do not have the courage to face the legal crisis such a revelation would cause.

Cowardly judges refuse to allow any exposure Obama’s actual natural born identity and, in their dereliction, have conjured a legal fantasy filled with pressurizing wrath in which a candidate’s eligibility for president is not only declared legally uncontestable but is also automatically preeminent. In allowing this, judges have allowed a dangerous precedent in which any foreign invader can covertly usurp the power of the U.S. government simply by lying about their citizenship status and hiding documentation with the help of the American media and a complicit legal system.

THE MARRIAGE SHAM

On his application, when asked the name and address of his spouse, it appears Obama may have first written the name of his actual wife in Kenya before blacking it out and writing “Ann S. Dunham”.

Despite evidence indicating that Obama was simultaneously married to a woman in Kenya, it is suspected that he claimed to be married to Dunham in order to use the marriage as leverage to remain in the U.S. There is no evidence or testimony that Obama ever loved Dunham or that the two had ever been engaged. The two did not live together before or after being married and there were no letters, no ring, no announcement or, most importantly, no legal marriage registration with the State of Hawaii.

Despite a complete void of documented proof of the marriage, it appears Dunham was granted a statutory divorce from Obama in 1964. However, images posted of the court documents from the decree contain no original documented proof of a marriage or legal documents showing that Obama was the father of Dunham’s child. A review of the court documents shows that at least one document, perhaps an original birth certificate for baby Obama, was missing from the numbering sequence.

THE INS’ PERSPECTIVE

Being legitimately married to a U.S. citizen would be a benefit toward allowing a foreign spouse to remain the U.S.. However, no marriage license application or public announcement has ever been found to indicate that Obama and Dunham were ever married or that Obama had even divorced his Kenyan wife prior to an alleged wedding with Dunham. This fact supports the contents of memos from college and INS officials who expressed doubts about the legitimacy of Obama’s relationship with Dunham, even questioning the motive of such a union between a teenage woman and a foreign student facing visa expiration just days after the birth of her child.

From the perspective of an INS agent, the circumstances surrounding Obama’s relationship with Dunham would have raised suspicions. Immigration fraud was rampant during Hawaii’s foreign birth accommodation era in the 1960’s.

Since Obama was a foreigner wanting to extend his temporary visa, the INS certainly understood that by claiming a marriage to Dunham, it would promote INS approval of an extension, but in Dunham’s case there was an added risk to the relationship for Obama… she was pregnant.

It appears, from the contents of documents in Obama’s INS file, when pressed by INS agents and school officials on the actual validity of his relationship to Dunham and baby Obama, having certainly been advised of legal ramifications for lying, he refused to name Obama as his child but maintained that he was married to Dunham. This indicates that Obama was either not certain if he was the biological father, or that he knew he wasn’t.

Under child protection laws in many states, including Hawaii, when the biological father is deceased or unidentified by the mother, the man who is married to the mother at the time she gives birth automatically becomes the father named on the official birth certificate until it is proven in court that he is not the biological father. “Mandatory Legitimacy” applies even if the birth is the result of adultery, when the mother is married at the time of birth, until paternity is successfully contested. Today, DNA testing allows for conclusive determinations about paternity, but in 1961, it was more difficult to determine paternity. Hawaii’s child welfare statutes indicate the “statutory” father’s name on the certificate may be removed by court order, if paternity is successfully contested, after a judge has decided the case in the interest of the child’s welfare. This law is intended to protect the child if the mother dies.

DELUSIONS OF LEGITIMACY

Government officials in Hawaii, including Governor Neil Abercrombie, Lt. Governor Brian Schatz and former Hawaiian elections official, Tim Adams have all indicated that they could find no original record of Obama’s alleged birth in any hospital in Hawaii in the course of their duties to verify his eligibility. The absence of verifiable birth documentation was so apparent that Schatz, serving as the chairman of the Democrat Party of Hawaii in 2008, refused to certify that Obama was indeed constitutionally eligible to hold the office of president when he submitted the Official Certification of Nomination of Obama. Schatz deferred the responsibility to Nancy Pelosi and DNC, and then Chair of the Hawaiian Elections Commission, Kevin Cronin. Cronin resigned suddenly after controversy surrounding his decision began to strain his relationship with the commission.

Ignorance, lies and lack of understanding about the difference between a medically verified birth and a legal registration of birth has confused the public about Obama’s natal history and eligibility.

Liars and abettors in media and government, drudging on behalf of the Obama administration, have anchored their Alinsky-style ridicule of those questioning Obama’s eligibility in a delusion that he must be legitimate because his birth was announced in two Hawaiian newspapers.

The elder Obama’s name appears as the father of a newborn son in images of two birth announcements appearing in two Honolulu newspapers on August 13^th and 14^th, 1961. Birth announcements in Hawaii in 1961 were published automatically from a birth registration list provided directly to the papers by the Hawaiian Department of Health. The notifications of births provided to the Health Department, however, were not only the product of information provided by hospitals and doctors, alone.

The distinction between the information used by the hospital to create a “Certificate of Live Birth” and the information used by the Department of Health to create a birth registration is that information used to create birth registrations were allowed to be submitted from anyone possessing credible information about the birth, including family members, witnesses or attendants, regardless of the actual location of the birth. Contrarily, the information on a “Live Birth” record must be verified and attested by a licensed medical doctor qualified to determine the characteristics of a live birth event. This is important in cases when a distinction was needed between a “still birth” and a baby that may have been born alive but then died upon delivery. In the latter case, both a birth certificate and a death certificate are required while a still birth requires only a death certificate because of the definition of a live birth under HRS 338-1.

Hawaii has a long history of allocating foreign births to the mother’s claimed Hawaiian residence regardless of the actual location of the birth, which was in compliance with guidelines established by the National Center for Health Statistics in order to accurately attribute data from births with decadal Census figures. Unfortunately, these vital statistics reporting guidelines are not conducive with determining the natural born status of the child.

For example, the Bureau of Census in 1961 counted all residents by county regardless of their temporary absence at the time of the Census when the Census worker was able to identify residents of a county through the information provided by others. This applies even today.

Therefore, beginning in as early as 1933, it was determined that births must be accounted the same way for all usual residents regardless of the mother’s location at the time of the event when that resident mother intended to return to that county. In Hawaii, if a child did not have an official certificate prior to the mother’s return, the local Health Department was obligated to provide one under the Model State Vital Statistics Act of 1942, Section 8 of Hawaii’s Public Health Regulations and HRS 338.

The impact of population figures on the Hawaii’s economy and agency resources was very significant in 1961. The accuracy of the Census takes precedence over the accuracy and veracity of vital statistics in the U.S. Vital statistics are reported annually, but the Census only occurs every ten years which means there is large volume of population which goes untracked between Census years. If births and deaths were not allocated to the residents of each county, regardless of the location of the vital event, the results would cause large disparities when compared with the Census data.


Posted by Penbrook One at 3:03 PM [Wednesday, July 18, 2012]
----------------------------------------------------------

The original article and 158 comments may be read at:
thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012/07/obamas-kenyan-birth-records-discovered.html

Progressives will Underwrite the Impeachment of Barack Obama http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/06/pr...-barack-obama/


https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pr...3A=w426-h255-p
Progressives will Underwrite the Impeachment of Barack Obama - Freedom Outpost
freedomoutpost.com
Editor's Note: Rob wrote this piece in May 2013, and updated it today. He still believes it to be true, and we submit it for your consideration. Obama will NOT complete his 2nd term as President. First, for Obama's repeated lies, coverup and abandonment of two heroic Navy Seals, leaving both to die on the …

Progressives will Underwrite the Impeachment of Barack Obama
Rob Cunningham 2 hours ago

Editor's Note: Rob wrote this piece in May 2013, and updated it today. He still believes it to be true, and we submit it for your consideration.

Obama will NOT complete his 2nd term as President.

First, for Obama's repeated lies, coverup and abandonment of two heroic Navy Seals, leaving both to die on the Benghazi battlefield on 9/11/2012, while the liberal media openly carried his YouTube video water for eight months. During last week's House hearings, the mainstream media was shamed and embarrassed before the entire world, exposed as being lazy, partisan and incurious. The Obama-fawning media was highlighted as being unwilling to honestly report to their fellow citizens.

Secondly, the 60-day electronic DOJ surveillance blanket thrown over the Associated Press, monitoring 100 reporter's work and personal phone calls, has and will continue to infuriate Obama's liberal media base. This invasive crime against our freedom of the press is an illegal abuse of power that has blown a chilly wind up Obama's cheerleader's skirts. Now that the media's ox has been gored, they are outraged.

Thirdly, the IRS's (supposed) single Cincinnati villain targeted ALL Tea Party, pro-Constitution, limited government and pro-Israeli groups since 2010, using the most powerfully destruction agency of the federal government. One single progressive individual, one person, was empowered at the IRS to target every conservative, tax-exempt group in America? This coordinated abuse of power is far worse than the first article of impeachment against Richard M. Nixon during Watergate, one ironically drafted with Hillary Clinton's help. Ah, the karma. This IRS scandal will greatly damage ObamaCare's implementation in 2014 because citizens will never stand for criminally abusive IRS activists entering our homes and offices to gather personally invasive questions about our intimate health history, insurance premiums and policy coverages. Any IRS "promise" to never share, leak or abuse our personal health information with any biased, political or destructive intent – the manner in which the IRS just abused conservatives simply for being conservative, will never "fly" with the public, congress or media.

Lastly, most infuriating to the liberal media and progressives will be this realization: Barack Obama, through his narcissistic overreach and criminal abuses of power, has validated virtually every claim, criticism and "conspiracy theory" of the so-called "evil, far right, racist Tea Party extremists"; Americans most despised by the liberal left. Obama has been mockingly coined the NRA's best salesman for 5 years running. He will now, most assuredly, be mockingly credited as the TeaParty's Number One Salesman for decades into the future. For this utterly unpardonable sin, media progressives will allow Obama's impeachment proceedings to begin, and end, successfully.

Obama has managed to fundamentally transform the media against him for his egregious sins against progressivism: he has inadvertently aided and abetted the "Taliban wing of the Republican Party." For this abomination, progressives will seek a political death sentence.

High Crimes and Misdemeanors

Benghazi + IRS + AP + Public Deception + DOJ + Fast And Furious + Witness Intimidation + Obstruction of Justice + Abuse of Power.

"But the greatest of these is Benghazi."

The multi-billion dollar, news media franchises of ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN are now at risk of collapse if their "journalists" are perceived as continuing to carry Obama's fouled water. Luckily for these failed news media outlets, the Obama Impeachment trials will be the most viewed media event in world history. And the irony of ironies is the very progressive media that helped elect Barack Obama twice will inadvertently help educate the world, via coverage of Obama's impeachment trial, just why America is a shining city on the hill.

The great fundamental transformation has run into a dead end. The political pendulum is swinging rapidly to the right. And Barack Obama will not complete his second term. As a lovely parting gift to conservatives and Tea Party minded citizens, Barack has managed to destroy Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential hopes.

God does work in mysterious ways.

[ Updated: June 16, 2014 ] Since this original publication, the gates of hell have been opened by Barack Obama. He has singularly, lawlessly and contemptuously, choreographed a massive invasion of our southern border via thousands of "children" per day, willfully aided and illegally re-staffed enemy Taliban combatants in a time of War with hubris never before witnessed in US history, is claiming 2+ years of IRS emails pertaining to criminal activities between the IRS, DOJ and White House have curiously "gone missing", and on his watch hundreds of veterans have died after being covertly placed on illegal waiting lists, for which Veteran Administration officials were paid thousands in financial bonuses. With each of these mind-numbing, disastrous and criminally negligent acts, Obama has continued his pattern of pathological lies, contempt of Congress and obstruction of justice into all attempts to hold him accountable. In 2015, with control of the House and Senate in the hands of the only party with even the remotest degree of intestinal fortitude, Obama's narcissistic nature will be his undoing. Even "his" media will turn on him, for the ensuing death, chaos, crimes and public outrage will be even too much for a gutless, soulless media to defend. Mark my words.


These two pieces will serve to highlight Obama's criminal mendacity and validate the depths of his High Crimes and Misdemeanors:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kD5oXONQHBg


For Love of Country, Impeach Obama – Diana West

Source
Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.
You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/06/pr...iuw3sMs8A4i.99

US District Court Put on Notice of Obama’s Treason Following Bergdahl Trade

Tim Brown June 16, 2014

On Friday, California Attorney Orly Taitz put US District Court Judge Ellen L. Hollander on notice of Barack Hussein Obama's treason following the release of five top Taliban jihadists in an illegal prisoner trade for an American deserter, Bowe Bergdahl.

Attorney Taitz has been involved with Judge Hollander in a case to expose the fraudulent use of a Social Security number by Barack Obama. Many question whether Judge Hollander will pursue this matter seriously, considering that she was appointed by Obama in 2010.
On Friday, Taitz not only filed the notice (civil docket #: 1:13-cv-01878-ELH) in the District of Maryland, but also talked about the issue on KABC radio, explaining how Social Security number 042-68-4425, which is from Connecticut and belongs to Harry Bounel, but has been used by Obama to file his tax returns. This, in conjunction with the use of fraudulent ID's and the appeasement of America's enemies, indicates that there is a usurper in the White House and that his actions are not in the interests of the United States.

In her emergency motion, Orly Taitz stated:

NOTICE OF TREASON COMMITTED BY THE HOLDER OF THE STOLEN CONNECTICUT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER xxx-xx-4425 OF HARRY BOUNEL, RISK TO NATIONAL SECURITY.

MOTION TO EXPEDITE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, EXPEDITE RELASE OF THE SS-5 TO SSN XXX-XX-4425 OF HARRY BOUNEL FRAUDULENTLY ASSUMED BY BARRY

SOETORO, AKA BARRY SOEBARKAH, AKA BARACK OBAMA.

MOTION TO EXPEDIENTLY FORWARD TO THE FEDERAL GRAND JURY UNDER 18 USC 3332 OR ORDER BY THE COURT TO THE US ATTORNEY TO FORWARD TO THE FEDERAL

GRAND JURY EVIDENCE OF OBAMA'S USE OF A STOLEN CT SSN XX-XX-4425 AND BOGUS IDS, AS WELL AS RECENT ACT OF TREASON BY OBAMA, AKA SOETORO, AKA SOEBARKAH.

Taitz defined treason as 18 U.S. Code § 2381 does:

"Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."

I have previously defined treason, using merely the US Constitution and provided the evidence as to Obama's treason on the basis of his aiding and abetting the Muslim Brotherhood jihadist organization.

In her motion, Taitz provided the background of Khairulla Khairkhwa as a top Taliban leader, who was transferred to the control of Qatar along with five others earlier this month. She then wrote in her notice, "So, if the US District Court Senior Judge, Royce C. Lambeth, who was overseeing the case after resignation of Judge Urbina, wanted to stay this release due to prior finding of threat to national security, this could not have been done, since Obama notified the court four days after he sent the detainee to sunbathe in Qatar. Similarly, Obama did not provide 30 day notification to the US Congress, which was required under 2014 NDAA, so the two co-equal branches of the US government were not able to stop this egregious act of treason and this transfer which greatly endangered US National security. Consequently, Taliban commanders made statements that this release was equal to gaining 10,000 Taliban fighters."

"It is further noteworthy that Obama did not title the document as a release from GITMO, but titled is as a transfer," Taitz continued. "Further, the name of the detainee was written differently from the name in the caption in the case, which made it difficult to find the document. In the caption the first name of the detainee is Khairulla. In the release, titled as transfer, the first name was divided into two names: 'KHAI ULLA.' Moreover, two middle names, which were not in the original caption were inserted: 'SAID WALI.' So the original name from the caption in the case 'Khairulla Khairkhwa' looked completely different 'KHAIR ULLA SAID WALI KHAIRKHWA.' Plaintiff believes that it was done to obfuscate the record."

Mrs. Taitz also informed the court that the actions of Obama, "greatly encouraged and invigorated jihadists and Taliban fighters took over the airport in Karachi and murdered 12. Five US soldiers were killed reportedly with stinger missile, jihadists groups went into offensive and took over the whole area between central Syria to central Iraq and took over Mosul and Tiqrit. This caused fleeing by 500,000 refuges and the jihadist army is now rapidly closing in on the capital of Iraq, Bagdad. Based on all of the above over 4,000 lives of the US soldiers lost in operation 'Iraqi Freedom,' were lost in vain, not mentioning 68,000 soldiers, who were severely wounded, paralyzed, lost limbs and became disabled for life."

Therefore, Taitz has requested that the court expedite a motion for reconsideration and release of the information pertinent to the Social Security number of Harry Bounel that has been assumed by Obama, and to forward to the federal grand jury, under 18 USC 3332 the evidence of Obama's use of a stolen Connecticut Social Security number, as well as bogus IDs.

Acting Director of the Social Security Administration Carolyn Colvin, is the defendant in the case and apparently is unwilling to deal with the apparent fraud in her federal agency, with regard to the occupant of the White House.

Mrs. Taitz's case has been so compelling, it has led California Congressman Dana Rohrabacher to question why Obama doesn't have valid IDs and Social Security number. Meanwhile, Taitz also joined others on Saturday in protesting Obama during his commencement speech at Anaheim stadium for University of California at Irvine students.

While Taitz works the legal angle, most of the members of Congress have failed to do their do their duty, and in some cases quite arrogantly. There are even claims that have surfaced by members of the media that claim conservatives even kept a lid on Obama's ineligibility out of fear of their government and some politicians who wouldn't pursue the matter because of "future political aspirations."

UPDATE: A Reader provided the court's ruling in the matter, which I did not previously have. Here is Judge Hollander's ruling.
In it, she writes:

"Plaintiff’s “Emergency Motion” and the various forms of relief requested therein will be denied. It has literally no relation to plaintiff’s case in this Court. Instead, plaintiff uses the motion to attack President Obama for recent actions he has taken in his capacity as President of the United States. Needless to say, plaintiff’s disagreement with President Obama’s presidential decision-making does not provide support for her allegation that the SSA’s response to her FOIA request was inadequate."

She then concludes, "For the reasons stated previously, and for the reasons expressed here, the Court will grant the Motion to Expedite, will deny the “Emergency Motion” in all other respects, and will deny the Motion for Reconsideration. A separate Order follows."

Hollander seems to show some prejudice in the matter as she claims Taitz took the time to attack Obama in his capacity as President. However, everyone knows, including those in his own party that the transfer of top Taliban leaders, apart from notifying Congress, is not "in his capacity as President," but is a violation of law. What does that have to do with the case of the Social Security number? To be fair they are two different things. However, consider that if Obama is willing to break the law in aiding and abetting the enemies of America, does anyone seriously think he would have an issue with falsifying documents in order to obtain the highest office in the land? I think not.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/06/or...MvB4dO3fIwQ.99

Principles Governing Kings

“When you come to the land which the Lord your God is giving you, and possess it and dwell in it, and say, ‘I will set a king over me like all the nations that are around me,’ you shall surely set a king over you whom the Lord your God chooses; one from among your brethren you shall set as king over you; you may not set a foreigner over you, who is not your brother."
- Deuteronomy 17:14-15

It appears that the Lord your God had spelled out the principle for His people Israel, even 3419 years ago. It also seems that man makes no end of trouble for himself by insisting on doing things his own way.

In reply to "What Are Your Favorite TV Series Of All Time?"

A most addictive entertainment is the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of (good and) evil, e.g., the CBS Evening News with Walter Cronkite, later on ABC News, or likewise on NBC, the Huntley-Brinkley Report with Chet Huntley and David Brinkley.

As a child, I thought the news on TV was true, hard-hitting reportage of all the primary news stories of the day. Only when I became a man did I realize that the news was a diversion and a distraction from the greater villainies and power manias of the filthy rich and infamous influenczars behind the curtain. Though the evening news could not be considered fiction, it was the classic shell game: keep the mark's attention on one hand so he doesn't see the other hand stealing his lunch.

Quote:

---

Polls conducted by Elmo Roper and Associates in 1959, 1961, 1963, 1964, 1967 show that most Americans considered television to be their primary source of news. These same polls also indicated that Americans found television to be the most believable news source (as compared to radio and print journalism). Sources for television news were restricted to the Big Three networks, which gave unprecedented power to the network executives and broadcast journalists responsible for on-air news content. In his “Television News Coverage” speech in Des Moines, Iowa on November 13, 1969, Vice-President Spiro Agnew notes that “a small group of men, numbering perhaps no more than a dozen anchormen, commentators, and executive producers, settle upon the 20 minutes or so of film and commentary that’s to reach the public.”

... the network executives affected public perception of the war in Vietnam through their choices of what was “newsworthy” material. Sometimes news networks even made a statement about the war through the types of news they chose not to cover.
web.wm.edu/americanstudies/370/2007/sp3/thebigthree.htm

---

News they chose NOT to cover, such as Mr. Obama's Constitutional ineligibility to the Office of President, not being "a natural born Citizen," which the U.S. Supreme Court, in a unanimous opinion, interpreted as "one born in the country of parents who were citizens."* Mr. Obama's father of record most obviously was not a U.S. citizen - just a student visa holder.

Can you remember what else was happening during the 24/7 "news" coverage of O.J. Simpson, Michael Jackson, or Anna Nicole Smith? Just keeping your eyes off the ball.

For further information, read:
www.theobamafile.com/obamanaturalborn.htm
www.alipac.us/f31/barack-obamas-citizenship-questioned-129743/

* Minor v. Happersett 88 U.S. 162 (1875) [p. 167], quoted in Wong Kim Ark 169 U.S. 649 (1898 ) [pp. 679-680] as the controlling interpretation of "natural born Citizen," which is a legal idiom or term of art meaning precisely, "one born in the country of parents who were citizens."

#Obama: Dreams From My Real Father (2012)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDQTi-U4sdg&feature=share


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDQT...&feature=share

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC

SIGN OUTSIDE TACTICAL FIREARMS IN KATY, TEXAS, HAS PEOPLE TALKING

http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/images/kt...97_600x338.jpg
The marquee outside Tactical Firearms takes on two hot button political issues

May 11, 2014 4:25:37 AM PDT
KATY, TX -- Once a sign for advertisement, a Katy business uses its marquee as a sign of the times, echoing America's divided political views. And nothing makes a statement more than politics.Tactical firearms in Katy is known for igniting intense debate. Currently on the sign outside the business is a message that reads, 'I like my guns like Obama likes his voters. Undocumented.'

The store gained national attention last year when its owner discussed gun rights with rocker Ted Nugent and Texas politicians.

People who live near the store on Mason Road make it a point to check out its sign. It's known for its catchy phrases that appear every Wednesday.

"I think that so much is going on in the government that we need to speak up and say what we believe," said Katy resident Nancy Newbrough.

The phrases are apparently a team effort. Employees at the gun shop get together and come up with an eye-catching statement each week.

"Political statement, yes. Freedom of speech? Yeah," said Katy resident Jason Wilfon. "Some people might not like it, some will."

Tactical's owner, Jeremy Alcede, didn't want to talk on camera, but he released this statement to ABC-13: "Thank God for our 1st and 2nd Amendment rights. It's meant as a joke. It's meant to be funny."

abc13.com/archive/9534105/

Alcede is no stranger to the politics of gun control. Last year, he was on the now-defunct CNN program hosted by Piers Morgan, the vocal anti-gun zealot who’s since lost his show. The experience was not a happy one.

But Morgan’s show is history. Alcede's position hasn’t changed.

www.bizpacreview.com/2014/05/13/bold-texas-gun-store-sign-has-towns-tongues-wagging-i-like-my-guns-like-obama-likes-118593

---

http://tellmenow.com/2014/06/obamas-doj-shutting-down-popular-texas-gun-store/



http://tacticalfirearms.us/wp-conten...9/gofundme.jpg


Obama’s DOJ Shutting Down Popular Texas Gun Store

tellmenow.com
The owner of the Texas-based gun store that has been making headlines recently with it's creative marquee bashing Obama and the Democrats says that he’s come under political attack and is going to be forced to shut down.