I did the five letter thing.
Printable View
I did the five letter thing.
I was going to give them the five letter thing but decided to give them the middle finger thing instead.Quote:
Originally Posted by hardlineconstitutionalist
...
Oooops. Who's at my door at this hour?
"Yes, Officer, I was just blogging. How did you know? You say you've been watching me? Really..."
Double post. Sorry. Something went sideways.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BetsyRoss
BetsyRoss, I wish you hadn't identified your location. I trust W to keep our identities secret no matter what, but we still have to do our part in being discreet. I'm not any more afraid of the FBI, Interpol, the CIA, or DHS than of burglars, but neither am I hanging a sign on my mailbox, "Here I am, come and get me."
Things are getting worse month by month, and I don't want to log on one day only to find that BetsyRoss is POW/MIA. Be certain that if the socialists in power can confiscate General Motors, they will certainly confiscate the homes and properties of dissenters whom they incarcerate. I wouldn't want that to happen even to one of the Obots that pay us nuisance calls now and then.
If we wake up four months from today and, by any miracle of Providence, have a new hope for change back to a Constitutionally legitimate government, may God the Father and the Lord Jesus be praised. But if continued election fraud thwarts the will of the people, the deterioration of the situation will accelerate. In that event, there will be no meaningful elections on Nov. 5, 2012, courtesy of amnesty, ACORN, and the Chicago way. Neither will there remain any public dissent against the totalitarian state. By then I anticipate that - if the state can locate us - none of us here will be free to come and go... not even you, BetsyRoss. Please don't make yourself a target for bad cops who say, "I'm sorry I have to do this - I'm just doing my job."
If Tennessee law enforcement can tase a handicapped older gentleman for attempting to carry an American flag into a public outdoor meeting in Monroe, Tenn., then anything can happen where you live too.
LOOSE LIPS SINK SHIPS!
No matter how hard W and his crew try to keep our identities private, you can't assume anything in this day and age especially if you donate.
I remember the last big job-loss recession, the one that targetted mostly tech workers. It was like in the Bible, two in a field, one taken and the other one left. This mess is much bigger than that one was.
Did you see the book about IBMs role in the Holocaust? I was surprised at the thought of that technology being applied back then. Do people understand that if you're carrying a modern cell phone, you're carrying a tracking device? Even if you don't call anyone?
People are always amazed at how forensic investigations can determine a case based on things like fibers or skin flakes people leave around. People leave around many more digital traces than biological ones. I am in the computer field and you would not believe the recoveries I have been called upon - and was able - to do.
The coming months are going to be very weird, in a bad way, I'm sure. Interesting though, that Obama is being vilified in the press anymore. The detractors are now drowning out the cheering section by quite a bit, or so it seems to me.
PS - I don't live in the city I mention, but in one of its many sprawling suburbs.
I think one of my Scribd postings may have introduced Mario Apuzo to David Ramsay ( http://www.scribd.com/doc/28533750/Davi ... olution-V1 and http://www.scribd.com/doc/28533979/Davi ... olution-V2 ), and like all good researchers, Mario found another Ramsay document that is apparently part of his legal submissions in Kerchner case, and quite on point regarding citizenship.
"The Character and Privileges of a Citizen of the United States"
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33807636/A-Di ... amsay-1789
Regarding David Ramsay:
David Ramsay, a physician, was born in Lancaster county, Pennsylvania, 2 April, 1749; and died in Charleston, South Carolina, 8 May, 1815. He was graduated at Princeton in 1765, at the medical department of the University of Pennsylvania in 1773, meanwhile teaching for several years. Settling in Charleston, he soon acquired celebrity as a physician, and also was active with his pen in behalf of colonial rights.
At the beginning of the Revolutionary war he took the field as a surgeon, and served during the siege of Savannah. He was an active member of the South Carolina legislature in 1776-'83, and a member of the council of safety, in which capacity he became so obnoxious to the British that, on the capture of Charleston in May, 1780, he was included among the forty inhabitants of that place that were held in close confinement at St. Augustine for eleven months as hostages.
Dr. Ramsay was a delegate to the Continental congress in 1782-'6, long a member of the South Carolina senate, and its president for seven years. His death was the result of wounds that he received from the pistol of a maniac, concerning whose mental unsoundness he had testified. During the progress of the Revolution, Doctor Ramsay collected materials for its history, and his great impartiality, his fine memory, and his acquaintance with many of the actors in the contest, eminently qualified him for the task.
His occasional papers relating to the times had considerable popularity. Among these was a " Sermon on Tea," from the text "Touch not, taste not, handle not," and an "Oration on American Independence" (1778). His other works include "History of the Revolution of South Carolina from a British Province to an Independent State " (Trenton, 1785); " History of the American Revolution" (Philadelphia, 1789); " On the Means of Preserving Health in Charleston and its Vicinity " (Charleston, 1790) ; "Review of the improvements, Progress, and State of Medicine in the Eighteenth Century" (1802) ; " Life of George Washington" (New York, 1807); "History of South Carolina from its Settlement in 1670 to the Year 1808" (Charleston, 1809) ; "Memoirs of Mrs. Martha Laurens Ramsay, with Extracts from her Diary" (1811) ; "Eulogium on Dr. Benjamin Rush " (Philadelphia, 1813); "History of the United States, 1607-1808," continued to the treaty of Ghent by Samuel S. Smith and others (Philadelphia, 1816-'17), forming the first three volumes of "Universal History Americanized, or an Historical View of the World from the Earliest Records to the Nineteenth Century, with a Particular Reference to the State of Society, Literature, Religion, and Form of Government of the United States of America" (12 vols., 1819).
Citizen has Standing!
Well, we have an interesting article and interview by Sharon Rondeau in the Post & Email from yesterday regarding 'Standing.' It seems there is a humble citizen in Illinois who has found 'standing.' What wonders never cease! Good reading for all. This article is downloadable from Scribd.com.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33882229/Shar ... s-Standing
Sharon Ann Meroni gave her first exclusive interview on her petition to The Post & Email and discussed the ramifications it could have on future elections in her state and throughout the country in regard to determining candidate's eligibility for office.
On December 6, 2008, third party and reform group leaders from across Florida met to discuss how to reform our government and restore liberty and justice. Concerns were expressed about the dangers of counting votes in secret, about the economic crisis, about abuses by government agents, and about the inability of victims to obtain justice. This video addresses these issues, and includes comments and speeches by Attorney Mark Adams and Patrick Henry.
http://blip.tv/file/1548118
Patrick Henry's written speech is found here and is as appropriate today as it was in 1775:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33880706/Patr ... e-Me-Death
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
This line made me shudder from the Henry speech
Quote:
it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to
shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she
transforms us into beasts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BetsyRoss
HELLO WORLD. BetsyRoss broadcasting location; home address, place of employment, phone number, Social Security Number, driver's license number, mother's maiden name, family doctor's name, account number and PIN, hospital URN, URL, VIN, shoe size, and children's school address to follow...
I guess that if you live outside the city limits, BR, you're safe from the totalitariat. They lack arresting authority in the 'burbs, right? :wink:
But hey, if you steadfastly refuse to be paranoid, I can be paranoid for you...
Great letter!
=====================
Sharon Ann Meroni
One Surrey Lane
Barrington Hills, Il 60010
July 4th, 2010
Dear Candidate _________________________________________:
I am a citizen living in the following voting districts: 16th Federal Congressional, 26th State Senate, 52nd State Representative, County Board 1, 22nd Judicial and 2nd Appellate.
I am the citizen that posted 32 (+1) “Objectionâ€
My point is, it's already all out there. All they have to do is connect dots. For anyone! Probably the safest (and I mean this in a relative sense) means of avoiding unwanted attention is through herd/white noise. The thing is, how do you avoid having your real self being selected for follow-up and dot-connecting?Quote:
Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC
I never suggested the burbs were out of their jurisdiction. Merely that I was a needle in a large haystack. Once they are after you, failing to have given your city of residence at some point is not a speed bump for them.
Merely being closemouthed will not save you if they come looking for you. If they notice you at all, they are on your trail already.
It is still possible to hide in all the Internet noise though. For how long, I don't know. The Internet is being archived for later perusal, you know?
You are aware of the actual lawsuit against the anti-H-1B activist "Tunnel Rat"? (http://www.vdare.com/sanchez/091227_tunnel_rat.htm). It just got thrown out, but for months they were able to a) demand from ISPs the real identity and other info for several web sites, b) shut down said web sites. He had to move one offshore to get it back up under a different. name. Oh, and the domain names were frozen. I can foresee something like this happening to W if things continue as they are.
So, yeah, let them go looking in the haystack for me. They'll have better odds finding paydirt using other tactics that I think they will use instead. Do they want to catch us or just silence us? And now that they've destroyed our job market and have no use for us as producers, maybe there's a third, worse, possibility.
Betsy & MinuteMan,
Fortunately, we outnumber them and they have to be careful if they go too far. They have to win through intimidation, fear, and deceit. We win by telling the truth and by following the law.
We don't have to worry so much.
You're right, we outnumber them, and have been gaining with every failure of the government that "knows best" for us. For me, this includes the pre-Obama adminsitrations that also screwed up. Right now there are so many people PO-ed at the powers that be, they'd need the entire planet for a FEMA camp (perhaps that explains some plans we've been hearing about).
And, the more we outnumber them, the more noise for any one individual to hide in.
The courts stating that a citizen and certainly a military person not having standing has always been ludicrous. But...this is just another test for the courts.
I so appreciate the information you guys and gals bring to the table in this very worthy discussion of eligibility. It obviously gains more interested socially every day.
This was some read...very interesting...thanks:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33807636/A-Di ... amsay-1789
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
We win by telling the Father and by following His Son.
And by getting out of the tar pits of sin and calling out to YHWH in the name of Jesus to deliver this God-born nation from those who defy the G-d of Israel and seek world domination (Genesis 10, Daniel 9, Revelation 13)... the atheist elite of Europe who rally the masses behind the aegis of international communism and global governance, and the followers of the desert goat-demons which they worship as their moon god.
As necessary as ethical conduct is, the Lord's enemies in heavenly places do not lie awake at night worrying about us telling the truth and following the law. But they tremble at the thought of blood-bought, born of the Spirit, Christians on our knees.
In the mid-1700's, Americans made little progress against the tyranny of the Crown and the Tories, though they made valiant efforts, and some paid with their lives. But when (4thQ 18th c.) godly American prayer warriors dedicated "our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor" to gain liberty, the Author of liberty moved heaven and earth on our behalf.
"Stand fast therefore in the liberty by which Christ has made us free [from sin and the law of Moses], and do not be entangled again with a yoke of bondage." "For freedom Christ has set us free [from the Mosaic law and the necessity to sin]; therefore keep standing firm and do not be subject again to a yoke of slavery." (Galatians 5:1)
A principle: God set America free from the tyranny of King George III and taxation without representation. Therefore, stand fast and do not become subject again to transatlantic tyranny and taxation.
IN GOD WE TRUST.
hussains mug is on the cover of one of the big tabloids" NO BIRTH CERTIFICATE!" "illegal alien", the whole thing. look in the checkout line at your supermarket.
With everything good, there is often some bad. The Tim Adams video found in this WND article says Obama was not born on U.S. soil, but the discussion about Obama's eligibility is that 1) Obama was NOT born in Hawaii (probably accurate), and 2) the legal issue about Obama NOT being a natural born citizen (not accurately answered).
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=175013
Too bad Tim Adams didn't seek Alipac help before his interview.
Will be interesting to see if this article by Globe gets any traction. Wasn't it a tabloid (forgot which one) that blew the John Edwards scandal wide open?Quote:
Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
Yes. Sometimes the tabloids go all crazy about Batboy and Nostradamus, but sometimes where there's smoke, there's fire. However, if this is real, the outcry will only become general if the 'respectable' press takes it up. The tabloids alone do not have enough credibility to cause anyone's downfall even when they are right.
Actually, the Globe has broached this subject of Obama's eligibility many months in the past. I don't read the Globe (or any of the other tabloids) so I can't tell you if they did a piece on Edwards.Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasBorn
It was the National Enquirer. It looks like at first their entry was denied for the Pulitzer and then later accepted. So...will watch the Globe story and see what happens. Enquirer has set a precedence.
Pulitzer Committee Says National Enquirer 'Ineligible' for Top Journalism Prize
Eligibility Rather Than Ethics Cast Doubts on Tabloid's Chances for Top Prize
http://abcnews.go.com/US/national-enqui ... ?id=962722
IT'S OFFICIAL! ENQUIRER ACCEPTED INTO PULITZER PRIZE COMPETITION
Photo by: a doc_furious illustration
The BIG secret is out of the bag as mainstream media trumpets the historic news that the NATIONAL ENQUIRER has been accepted into the Pulitzer Prize competition for its exhaustive investigation of the John Edwards Conspiracy and Cover-Up.
The scoop was broken by Emily Miller at Huffington Post as rumors of our acceptance into the competition by the prestigious journalism committee ignited the blogosphere.
"The Pulitzer Prize Board has officially accepted The National Enquirer's submissions for breaking the John Edwards scandal, according to sources close to the Board. In a historic move, the Pulitzer Board conceded that the self-proclaimed tabloid is qualified to compete with mainstream news outlets for journalism's most prestigious prize.
"The Enquirer is in the running for the Pulitzer in two categories: "Investigative Reporting" and "National News Reporting" for The National Enquirer staff," Ms. Miller announced exclusively at HuffPo.
Quickly The New York Times - for many THE Paper of record - made it even more official with their elegant headline: "Enquirer Is Eligible for Pulitzer". Writer Richard Perez-Pena analyzed the Pulitzer committee's turn-around in accepting the ENQUIRER entry after initially dismissing the very notion.
The Times reported: Sig Gissler, administrator of the prizes, says he and his colleagues never publicly discuss the eligibility of any specific publication. "We apply our criteria, and if publications meet them, we allow them to participate."
But with a grassroots effort steamrolling the viral landscape, Gawker.com analyzed the situation point by point in their historic article: "There's NO Good Reason the National Enquirer Shouldn't Win a Pulitzer Prize"
And MediaBistro even has a poll (yes, you can vote in it) on whether or not the Pulitzer Committee should award The ENQUIRER investigation into John Edwards' alleged abuse of campaign funds to fund a conspiracy of silence:
Ms. Miller concluded in her Huffington Post exclusive: "The massive grassroots campaign by the public to push the Pulitzer Board to recognize the national importance of The Enquirer's reporting of John Edwards shows the best of Americans' core values - hard work, fairness and equality for all - even for tabloids."
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/nationa ... rity/68188
When is the Constitution like a Crocodile?
Apparently it is when you are a federal judge with lifetime (taxpayer-paid) tenure on either the District Court of New Jersey or the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, as is clearly demonstrated by case 09-4209, Kerchner et al v. Obama & Congress, et al. If you remember in the District Court, Judge Simandle took it upon himself at the behest of the DOJ lawyers striving to defend Obama (who was initially sued before he took the Oath of Office and while still a private person) by repeatedly violating his judicial oath (meaning violating the Constitution that he swore to uphold).
See the Post & Email/Scribd doc here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33966624/JTX- ... -Crocodile
All these legal cases strike me as so much wasted effort any more. Taking this to court is like taking a toothache or a ruptured disk to a G.P. or family doctor.Quote:
Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
THE COURT SYSTEM IS BROKEN, PEOPLE!!!
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-conte...s-743x1024.jpg
THE SYSTEM IS DOWN; USE ALTERNATE PROCEDURES.
First we pray. Rendering this case through a lawyer gets a lawyer's results;
rendering it through a Congressman or a Senator likewise goes nowhere;
submitting it to the lamestream media gets the truth totally squelched.
Now where else are you going to take it? To your mommy?
The following scenario is only my opinion, but to me, it makes much more sense than anything the LSM have to say.
As long as Mr. Obama has the armed forces under his command, he can laugh at the facts and thumb his nose at the people of the United States. If his ineligibility for office is ever really challenged, he can declare martial law with the stroke of a pen (assuming that the H1N1 National Emergency continues indefinitely, which serves his purposes).
But if the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who know that Mr. Obama is ineligible, decide that he is a clear and present danger to the United States - which he has been since arriving in Washington in 2004, but the JCS haven't declared it yet - the JCS will oust him from office in a banana republic replay of the ouster of Honduras Pres. Manuel Zelaya on June 28, 2009.
The difference in Honduras was that the army, the Supreme Court, and the Congress all wanted Zelaya out and gone. In the U.S. now, the military is largely disgusted with the Obama usurpation, but the Supreme Court is on the fence. Meanwhile, the Congress has a large Democrat majority in the House and the Senate. Without Congressional approval, the JCS lack the legal authority to act in defense of the U.S., even though they have the power of armed force.
So the JCS are biding their time until the sea change on Nov. 2 or the Turkey-Syria-Iran(-Libya?) attack on Israel, whichever comes first. If Mr. Obama (raised as a Mus|im) sides with the Mus|ims, as he indicated he will do (The Audacity of Hope, p. 261), and against Israel, the military will have to restrain him for treason for not defending our only ally in the Middle East.
Is|am's political operatives in the U.S. surely recognize that the Democrats may well lose either the House or the Senate, or even both, on Nov. 2. Therefore, leaders of Mus|im Brotherhood-connected organizations in the U.S. will keep the pressure on Turkey, Iran, and Syria to provoke a war with Israel before the Democrats lose control of Congress, where the Constitutional authority to declare war resides (Art. I, § 8, ¶ 11).
But that's just my opinion and not a "prophecy" of any kind. Anything could happen. PRAY.
MinuteMan, one veteran believes the military is being destroyed at the same time.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33854024/RC-M ... fect-Storm
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
HighlanderJuan, Einstein said that the only things that are infinite are the universe and human stupidity, and he was not sure about the universe. But I cannot attribute the actions of this usurpation entirely to stupidity. There's not that much stupidity concentrated in any one place, even if stupidity is infinite.
Never imagine a conspiracy to account for what can be explained by stupidity. But neither should we blame stupidity for any bad outcome which a malevolent conspiracy actually caused.
Remember that we're talking about outlaws in government posts... very capable and competent outlaws.
I cannot read anyone's mind to determine his or her motives. But some of what appears to be incompetence has to be intentional malevolence. Why? Because over and over again, the results of apparent incompetence are what would result from intentional malevolence. If it looks like incompetence but causes bad outcomes like sabotage, it is not blind justice but just blindness to automatically, every time, blame incompetence for those destructive consequences.
Obama “Kenyan-Bornâ€
Quote:
Originally Posted by On Sunday, June 27, 2004, the Eastern Standard of Nairobi, Kenya,
No, no, no, April, you've got it all wrong! See the escape terminology, "appeared set to take over"? As in, "alleged"?
That is "Barrack Obama" - the famous Kenyan-born double of The One (pbuh), Anointed Potentate and Ruler, etc. etc..
http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/118/obamamalcolmx.gif
Although, given the truly remarkable family resemblance, it's easy to see how so much confusion has come to be. :roll: :wink:
/ SARC
Yea I know it's the Globe but interesting pic of barry and his kenyan family...hmmm
http://tinyurl.com/28telqo
Our courts turned against us and created a dictatorship.Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasBorn
The courts in 1937 decreed that treaties, known as executive agreements, signed by presidents Executive Orders do not require consensus or approval by either the legislative (Congress) or judicial (U.S. Supreme Court) branches of the government.
http://vactruth.com/2010/06/14/fourth-s ... ve-orders/
[quote="April"]Obama “Kenyan-Bornâ€
Quote:
Originally Posted by April
Is anyone else thinking what I'm thinking?
__________________________________________________ _____
[img]http://c2.api.ning.com/files/cX1ydhHtYU2nfO9zju9Dme98Wk-w0BaCG4jgeL74i2cRVyyLm1346wAHsAwS1LNcRuOEIdfkhQSxP EGDyglIr*FcCmGIPpH8/obamaglobestory_notborninUS.jpg[/img]
Hawaiian state records clerk reveals:
NO PROOF OBAMA WAS BORN IN U.S.A.
Now his critics insist presidency is totally illegal
Only in GLOBE!
Former records clerk Timothy Adams insists Obama has no Hawaiian birth certificate
and others insist his Certificate of Live Birth (above left) is a fake and forgery
A FORMER Hawaii records official is sending shock waves through Washington, D.C.,
by revealing there is absolutely no birth certificate for Barack Obama!
The bombshell revelation backs up long-standing claims that Obama - who insists
he was born in a Honolulu hospital - really took his first breath in Kenya and, as a
result, violates the U.S. Constitution's requirements for the President to be a
"natural born" American [citizen].
Direct access
"I had direct access to the Social Security database, the national crime computer,
state driver's license information, international passport information, basically just
about anything you can imagine to get someone's identity," says Timothy Adams, who
served as senior government records clerk in Honolulu in 2008. "There is no birth
certificate. I was informed by my boss that we did not have Obama's birth record."
America's current [de facto] Commander-in-Chief, 48, has not only refused to
produce his official birth certificate but has gone to great lengths - and expense -
to seal records from his past, according to sources. He once mistakenly named
two different hospitals where he was supposed to be born - and his paternal
[step-]grandmother insists she witnessed his birth in Kenya!
As questions about the REAL land of Obama's birth began pouring in during the
2008 presidential campaign, Adams says he asked two local hospitals to provide
the Democratic candidate's birth certificate - and was told no such record existed!
"Neither hospital has a document that a doctor signed off on saying they were
present at this man's birth," notes Adams. "It's like an open secret. Everyone
in the government knows this."
The repercussions of Adams' stunning disclosure could bring Obama's presidency
to an untimely and disastrous end, warn experts.
"This is HUGE, and it's got a lot of people in Washington worried," a Beltway insider tells
GLOBE. "If these comments turn out to be the smoking gun everyone has been talking
about from the beginning, Obama will have some very serious problems on his hands."
Experts say Obama wouldn't qualify to be President if he was born in Kenya because
his late father, Barack Obama Sr., was not a U.S. citizen. Other constitutional
technicalities would also make his time in the Obal Office illegal, experts say.
Adams, who was employed by the elections office in Hawaii, maintains he was
just doing his job checking the validity of voters' registrations and citizenship
when he made the shocking discovery.
"It was my job to verify the voters' identity, and in my professional opinion,
Obama definitely was NOT born in Hawaii," he declares. "I can say that without
a shadow of a doubt because there is no legal record of him being born there.
"And the things I've said, I don't mind testifying about in court."
Coming on the heels of Adams' charges, a damning photo of Obama in Kenya with
relatives has surfaced. Snapped in 1987, some people believe it offers more proof
that the [putative] President was born in his father's African homeland.
No escaping
"This is the picture that will haunt Obama," predicts the insider. "There is no escaping
the claims he was born in Kenya. His family lives there. He visits there. There is no
U.S. birth certificate. It's a big problem."
Back in January 2009, GLOBE reported a Kenyan birth certificate shows Obama was
born in Mombassa's Coast Provincial General Hospital at 7:24 p.m. on Aug. 4, 1961.
But hospital officials there have, so far, refused to admit the document exists.
Adding fuel to the firestorm, Obama's granny, Sarah Hussein [Onyango] Obama, claims
she was "in the delivery room in Kenya" when the [putative] President was born.
In an effort to kill the controversy when Obama's citizenship was first challenged,
his staffers produced a Hawaiian Certificate [Certification] of Live Birth to prove
his eligibility to hold the highest office in the land. But critics question its validity -
and if there is no official birth certificate to back up the form, as Adams insists,
it MUST be a forgery and a fraud, say insiders.
But Hawaii State Department of Health Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino says she checked
the official records and can verify that Obama is a natural born citizen. And the state's
Republican [RINO] Gov. Linda Lingle claims the birth certificate says Obama was born
at Kapi'olani hospital.
Meantime, Adams' boss Glen Takahashi, administrator of the Honolulu City Clerk's
Office, disputes Adams' contention that he had access to birth records.
But Adams, now a graduate teaching assistant at Western Kentucky University,
insists that as a senior supervisory clerk, he DID have access to the documents.
"Of course, officials in Hawaii are going to go out of their way to discredit this guy,"
says the insider about Adams. "But no matter what the White House tries to do,
this whole thing just won't go away.
"It's ugly and it promises to keep getting worse."
I don't know what you are thinking, MinuteMan. I'm at a point of 1) assuming that Obama is a real, live, usurper, 2) believing our republic is really in the Schlitz, and am working on what to do about restoration or getting the heck out of Dodge.Quote:
Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC
This morning I'm re-reading Stephen Yates brilliant article about the four cardinal errors ( http://www.scribd.com/doc/21992009/Stev ... nal-Errors ) and am doing background research of my own to determine the Founding Father's intentions with regard to state sovereignty.
It is my humble opinion at this time that the federal government is simply too large and too corrupt and lawless to allow our country to survive as is. We will have to make changes in our confederated structure if we are going to continue on successfully from this point in time forward.
So, what is the solution for our country? Will the states have to rebel against and nullify the federal government? Will our process of change simply take time (many years?) and effort on everyone's part? Will we remain an operating communist regime as we are at this time?
What's to happen now? IDK. I think we all have to do our own homework and prepare to support our families and friends during a really ugly period looming ahead of us. We have let things slide for too long and will soon pay the price for our inattention at controlling our own government.
And we have to keep talking with each other. We are not alone, and since we are the good guys, we can learn from each other and from our history the lessons necessary to cancel out the vicious and corruptive things the progressives have been teaching us for years.
The Face of Treason
HOW CAN THERE BE AN ARRAIGNMENT WITHOUT ANY CHARGES OR ACCUSER?
by Sharon Rondeau
Monroe County Courthouse in Madisonville, TN
(Jul. 7, 2010) — On March 17, 2009, Walter Fitzpatrick III filed a criminal complaint against Barack Hussein Obama II with the U.S. attorney’s office in the Eastern District of Tennessee charging him with Treason. The complaint reads:
THE UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY
Tuesday, 17 March 2009
To: Mr. Barack Hussein Obama
Via: U.S. Attorney Russell Dedrick, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Edward Schmutzer, Eastern District, Tennessee
From: Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III, United States Navy Retired
Distribution: Wide
SUBJECT: CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS REGARDING THE COMMISSION OF TREASON
I have observed and extensively recorded treacherous attacks by military-political aristocrats against the United States Constitution for twenty years.
Now, in yet another betrayal, you have broken in and entered the White House by force of contrivance, concealment, conceit, dissembling, and deceit. Posing as an imposter president and commander in chief you have stripped civilian command and control over the military establishment. Known military criminal actors—command racketeers—are now free in the exercise of military government intent upon destruction of America’s constitutional government.
Free from constitutional restraint, and following your criminal example, military commanders deployed U.S. Army active duty combat troops into the small civilian community of Samson, Alabama last week in a demonstration of their newly received despotic, domestic police power.
We come now to this reckoning. I accuse you and your military-political criminal assistants of TREASON. I name you and your military criminal associates as traitors. Your criminal ascension manifests a clear and present danger. You fundamentally changed our form of government. The Constitution no longer works.
Confident holding your silent agreement and admission, I identify you as a foreign born domestic enemy.
My sworn duty Mr. Obama is to stand against what you stand for. You are not my president. You are not my commander in chief.
Obedient to the Constitution in submission of this criminal accusation I remain steadfast, and
Born fighting,
Walter Francis Fitzpatrick III
Class of 1975
To date, U.S. Attorney Russell Dedrick has taken no action on the complaint, saying that in order for him to do so, he would need an order from a federal judge. The complaint was incorporated into the American Grand Jury presentments which were filed with various courts, judges, U.S. attorneys, governors, sheriffs, attorneys general, and FBI offices across the country since May 2009. Judge Royce Lamberth of the U.S. District Court in Washington, DC eventually responded to the presentments but refused to act.
Fitzpatrick received a visit from two Secret Service agents after filing the complaint, but he was not arrested or court-martialed. No one at the Department of Justice answered the criminal complaint, nor did Obama.
there is more at the link it was too long to bring over...
http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/07/07/ ... f-treason/
Kathyet
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III, United States Navy Retired
U.S. Army troops were temporarily deployed in Samson to direct traffic around a crime scene and protect it from tampering while all available civilian law enforcement officers were engaged in the manhunt for an armed and dangerous murderer. While that was in fact an illegal posse comitatus violation, charging the de facto POTUS with treason, for the sole reason that U.S. Army MPs directed traffic in town while state and local LEOs were dedicated to a life-and-death manhunt, won't get much traction in the courts, IMO. Among the treasonous acts available for prosecution, this was not the best choice.
[quote="On May 17, 2010, interviewing Miki Booth, a witness at the C.I.A. Columbia Obama Trial, Sharon Rondeau of the Post & Email"][size=117]MIKI: ...what really made an impact on all of us was there was an investigator named Al Landry who called in on Skype, so we were able to see and hear him answer Dr. Manning’s questions. He found out that Stanley Ann Soetoro lived in Karachi, Pakistan for five years at the high-dollar Hilton Hotel.
SHARON: Did he present proof in the form of documents or some other evidence?
MIKI: He was testifying by Skype, so he was just saying this as if it was in his head, and he didn’t have the notes in front of him but was just relating what he had discovered. There is something interesting that he said: in Pakistan there is a log or journal of all of the heads of state; kings, queens, that sort of thing, and he found on that list “Barack Obama, 44th President of the United Statesâ€
Dr. Charles Stanley, pastor of First Baptist Atlanta, is calling for 140 days of prayer for our great nation, from July 5 through Nov. 21. This call to prayer is for the nation and does not mention Mr. Obama specifically.
If you choose to do this good thing, do not take this commitment lightly, for God has no patience with fools. It would be better to not make the commitment than to commit and then not pray for America for each of the 140 days.
Quote:
Originally Posted by In Touch Ministries
I found this pretty interesting. I've posted some of the interview here. Why not sue any state that asks for proof of citizenship when running for office?
BORN IN THE USA?
Senate-seeker wants Obama birth-certificate treatment
Mexican-born candidate: 'If I didn't prove citizenship, I'd be removed from the ballot'
Posted: July 08, 2010
9:20 pm Eastern
By Chelsea Schilling
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
A Mexican-born candidate for U.S. Senate said he is considering a lawsuit against the Missouri secretary of state for discrimination because her office forced him to produce a birth certificate but "didn't make Obama show proof of citizenship" to appear on the ballot.
Hector Maldonado, 38, a self-described "Lincolnian Republican conservative," is seeking the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate in Missouri. He was born one of 10 children in Durango, Mexico. His father is a migrant field worker who owns a small hog ranch in Perris, Calif.
Here's the movie Obama does not want you to see: The investigation into this unprecedented presidential-eligibility mystery!
During the following July 5 interview with Karen Berka of Branson Radio Live posted on YouTube, Maldonado explains why he thinks his rights were violated when the secretary of state's office asked for proof of U.S. citizenship when he filed to run for the Senate:
Maldonado, a U.S. Army combat veteran who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, explains on his website that he became a U.S. citizen in 1995. But he said Secretary of State Robin Carnahan sent him a letter in May asking him to produce documentation.
"It said, 'Hey, you have to prove you're a citizen.' I ignored it," he said. "You know, Obama ignored it, so I figured I could get away with it, too."
The audience began laughing, applauding and cheering during his statement.
Maldonado continued, "But it's not that simple. I didn't get away with it. I got a certified letter from Ms. Robin Carnahan's office saying that if I did not prove that I was a U.S. citizen, then I would be removed from the ballot."
He claims Carnahan's office gave him a deadline of May 12.
"I got all my documents together: my birth certificate, which is a Mexican birth certificate; my naturalization certificate; my orders sending me to Iraq and Afghanistan; my bronze-star citations and a couple of officer evaluations that say I'm a pretty good and effective leader," he said. "So I brought all this documentation, and they were only interested in the naturalization certificate. They made a photocopy of it."
Maldonado said he asked Carnahan's office if his citizenship documentation would be public record and available to anyone who wants a copy.
"They said, oh yes, absolutely, anyone that wants proof, we have it," he explained. "I said, OK, can you do me a favor then? I'm sure Ms. Carnahan requested the same of Barack Obama when he petitioned to get on the Missouri ballot to become president."
He added, "They had no response. They had nothing."
(Story continues below)
Maldonado said he thought about picketing during Obama's visit to Missouri today to raise money for Carnahan's U.S. Senate campaign. Obama arrived in Kansas City this morning to make appearances at two fundraising events for Carnahan. Missouri's primary election will take place on Aug. 3.
"But I decided something different. I'm actually considering suing Ms. Robin Carnahan because she discriminated against me," he said. "She has said that her job is to protect Missouri from fraud and corruption. But the fraud that she created if she did not make Mr. Obama show proof of citizenship when he petitioned to get on the Missouri ballot … all the votes that he got should be taken back."
He said he hopes citizens of other states sue their own secretaries of state if they cannot show they requested proper documentation from Obama before allowing him to appear on the state ballot.
"Sooner or later, he's going to have to prove – based on our demand – that he is in fact a U.S.-born citizen," he said.
In an earlier interview on the subject, Maldonado said he spoke with other candidates running for the same office and asked if they had to show proof of citizenship or prove that they were citizens.
"They said no. I was the only one," he said. "... I just don't know, if I were running as a Democrat, would I have to prove the same thing? Or is there a more stringent process for the Republican candidates?"
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=176325
I believe this may be the most active discussion in the history of ALIPAC.
W
Pretty important stuff here. You should be pleased.Quote:
Originally Posted by ALIPAC