During his usurpation of the Presidency, Mr. Obama's primary impeachable offense is sedition, i.e., overthrowing the Constitution of the United States, Art. ii, § 1, ¶ 5, and replacing our Constitutional republic and its democratically elected representatives with a totalitarian, Socialist oligarchy or dictatorship, thereby overthrowing the legitimate Constitutional government and perpetrating a coup d'etat.
The proper response NOW to his crimes committed BEFORE taking office is:
- a Quo Warranto (By What Warrant) lawsuit for election fraud and ineligibly holding office, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia - a suit which has been refused by Chief Judge Royce Lamberth;
- a U.S. House investigation into Mr. Obama's ineligibility for the Office of President, not being a "natural born Citizen," that is, a citizen
born in the country of parents who were citizens (at the time of his birth) - a course of redress which has been rejected by Rep. Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, and blocked by Rep. John Boehner, the Speaker of the House; or
- a military ouster of the fraudulent impostor unlawfully occupying the post of Commander-in-Chief - a recourse which has been ignored by the Joint Chiefs of Staff in their abandoning of Terry Lakin [ex-LTC-USA and former M.D.] to enemies of the Constitution who adhere to Mr. Obama.
Therefore, as then-Pres. John F. Kennedy said in 1962, "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
A U.S. House investigation is more likely to compel Mr. Obama's resignation than a trial of impeachment is to lead to a conviction and his removal from office.
On the other hand, a trial of impeachment which does not attain a two-thirds majority in the Democrat-controlled Senate will preclude a House investigation thereafter. Also, impeachment is not made for a criminal breaking into an office or an enemy combatant seizing the authority of the Presidency. Impeachment would cede to the fraudulent impostor the high ground of publicly representing himself as a legitimate President.
However, with ALIPAC choosing impeachment rather than a House investigation, I will support both.