CA moving to license illegal alien doctors, security guards, pharmacists...

We hope you are listening, because we need a stronger response to our funds drive launch right away at http://www.alipac.us/donations/.

ALIPAC is fighting for you against SB 1159 in California by hitting the supporters of the bill hard in this article in the Los Angeles Times! This bill will create licenses for illegal aliens in more than two dozen occupations in California including health care workers, security guards, real estate agents, and pharmacists!

See ALIPAC fighting for you in the LA Times--
(Remember to put your comments beneath this article to create a powerful and lasting record of your opinions on this...)
California bill would ease professional licensing rules for illegals
http://www.alipac.us/alipac-californ...migrants-2896/

"It's insane," said William Gheen, president of Americans for Legal Immigration Political Action Committee. "By granting licenses to illegal immigrants you both aid and abet illegal immigration, which is a violation of federal law, and you are sending a message to the rest of planet Earth that says, 'Come on!'"

If you agree with our position in the LA Times and you realize the value of our presence in such national media reports, then we need to hear from you today at...
http://www.alipac.us/donations/

Can you imagine going to an emergency room and having an illegal alien working on you or putting in your IV? Can you imagine entering a building and the security guard who is searching you and your belongings being an illegal alien put in a position of dominance over you?

For several years, ALIPAC has warned the nation that the plan of the elites is to pass a form of amnesty for illegal aliens and then turn them into a new army of state and federal agents and employees put in positions of dominion over today's American citizens like you! Do you believe us now that California is moving to take those actions without the backing of new federal amnesty laws?

Every Californian receiving this email and every American in other states should be calling the CA Assembly in opposition to SB 1159.

Every Californian and American in other states on this list opposing this kind of legislation needs to consider a donation of any amount you can afford right now at http://www.alipac.us/donations/.

We need your strong support and we need it now! We just launched our funds drive and we need thousands of dollars in donations rolling in... not a few hundred!

Take action now to support our national efforts to fight against illegal immigration and send a message that you are in this fight! Don't acquiesce to these actions!

React with your support now at ALIPAC's secure online donations link to help us quickly raise the funds we need to continue our fight against illegal immigration at...
http://www.alipac.us/donations/

February 2, 2006

Will California become the first official Communist state?

By Sher Zieve

There are lots of people who believe that most of California is already a communist — or at the very least a socialist state. But, as yet, it isn't "official." However, Los Angeles and San Francisco already propose and vote for virtually every leftist concept currently known to humans, as they vigorously work toward developing new ones; or adding onto existing radical Marxist notions.

Both cities have firmly announced that they have no intention of following current federal immigration laws and are considered "safe haven cities" for illegal aliens. Even banners and billboards have proudly proclaimed the state's new name: "Mexifornia." It's difficult, if not impossible, to think of any state that more completely embraces communist principles than does California. By comparison, even New York seems conservative!

San Francisco residents regularly hold anti-war, anti-Bush, anti-military parades (actually anti-everything US) and burn US flags in "semi-riots" — as they did when President Bush was reelected. More often than not, the police are told by San Francisco officials: "Hands off. Leave the 'protestors' alone." California is also the home of the Cindy Sheehan anti-US and pro-communist type of being. Remember Sheehan's recent comment, when she met with Venezuelan communist strongman leader Hugo Chavez? Sheehan gleefully and flamboyantly praised Chavez and slice-and-diced the US, when she said: "I admire President Chavez for his strength to resist the United States!" Sheehan is the new California type of gal! Note: Chavez is one of the same corrupt leaders (another is Iran's tyrannical Islamo-fascist President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad) who have vowed to destroy the US. And, now radical Momma' Cindy may even take on Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) — for not being radical enough — and challenge her Senate post. In the leftist-indoctrinated State of California — "the Sheehan" just might win!

If California really does create many of the leftist viruses that vigorously spread to the rest of the country, as has been strongly suggested over the years, the Democrat Party truly has ended — once and for all. Soon, each and every other state's Dem contingent will be firmly in the communist camp. Note: As most Democrat leaders seem to embrace anti-US policies (or at lest pretend they do in order to gain deep-coffers' leftist funding), its "going communist" isn't the stretch that it once was. Besides, they will now have California (or Mexifornia) to lead their steps over the cliff. As the Dem leaders (with appropriate "translations" consistently tell us: "As long as you keep the money rollin' in, we'll be on whatever side you want us to be!"

California's all-leftist-Democrats-all-the-time statements beg the question: "Isn't it time for the Dem leaders of California to finally announce their true ideology?" The answer, of course: "Sure it is!" Democrats really must change the name of their political party. For some time now, along with the ACLU — the Dems' legal wing — Democrats have been following the principles of the "Communist Goals" for the US as written into the Congressional Record in 1963. At least then the voters would know the real choices presented to them. The Dems would finally be able to move away from their current lackluster and nonsensical stated 'programs' for the US, which include only "we can do better" and "just say NO to everything Republican propose" and provide them with some actually defined goals to pursue. And they wouldn't have to do anything more than printing them out! Note: For Dem leaders, who seem to have developed an exceedingly robust distaste for anything pertaining to actually developing any proposals for the country, this is an easy and simple way to express their true intent. There is no charge to you, Ms. Pelosi and Mr. Reid. In the true spirit of coming together, I present this as a gratis offering. Conservatives truly are a compassionate group.

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/zieve/060203

1159 Professions and vocations: license applicants: federal tax identification number.(2013-2014)


Text Votes History Bill Analysis Today's Law As Amended http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/re...info_popup.gif Compare Versions Status Comments To Author

BILL START

AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 07, 2014

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2013–2014 REGULAR SESSION

SENATE BILL

No. 1159

---

Introduced by Senator Lara

February 20, 2014

---

An act to amend Section 30 of the Business and Professions Code, and to amend Section 19528 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, relating to professions and vocations.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST

SB 1159, as amended, Lara. Professions and vocations: license applicants: federal tax identification number.

Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of various professions and vocations by boards within the Department of Consumer Affairs, among other requires those licensing bodies to require a licensee, at the time of issuance of the license, to provide its federal employer identification number, if the licensee is a partnership, or his or her social security number for all other licensees. Existing law requires those licensing bodies to report to the Franchise Tax Board any licensee who fails to provide the federal employer identification number or social security number, and subjects the licensee to a penalty for failing to provide the information after notification, as specified.

This bill would require those licensing bodies to require an applicant other than a partnership to provide either a federal tax identification number or social security number, if one has been issued to the applicant, and would require the licensing bodies to report to the Franchise Tax Board, and subject a licensee to a penalty, for failure to provide that information, as described above. The bill would make other conforming changes.

DIGEST KEY

Vote: majority Appropriation: no Fiscal Committee: yes Local Program: no

---

BILL TEXT

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1.

Section 30 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:
30.

(a) Notwithstanding any other law, any board, as defined in Section 22, and the State Bar and the Bureau of Real Estate shall at the time of issuance of an initial or renewal license require that the applicant provide its federal employer identification number, if the applicant is a partnership, or the applicant’s federal taxpayer identification number or social security number, if one has been issued, for all other applicants.

(b) Any applicant failing to provide the federal employer identification number, or the federal taxpayer identification number or social security number, if one has been issued to the individual, shall be reported by the licensing board to the Franchise Tax Board. If the applicant fails to providethat information after notification pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 19528 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the applicant shall be subject to the penalty provided in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 19528 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.

(c) In addition to the penalty specified in subdivision (b), a licensing board shall not process an application for an initial license unless the applicant provides its federal employer identification number, or federal taxpayer identification number or social security number, if one has been issued to the individual, where requested on the application.

(d) A licensing board shall, upon request of the Franchise Tax Board, furnish to the Franchise Tax Board the following information with respect to every licensee:
(1) Name.
(2) Address or addresses of record.
(3) Federal employer identification number if the licensee is a partnership, or the licensee’s federal taxpayer identification number or social security number, if one has been issued to the individual, for all other licensees.
(4) Type of license.
(5) Effective date of license or a renewal.
(6) Expiration date of license.
(7) Whether license is active or inactive, if known.
(8) Whether license is new or a renewal.
(e) For the purposes of this section:
(1) “Licensee” means a person or entity, other than a corporation, authorized by a license, certificate, registration, or other means to engage in a business or profession regulated by this code or referred to in Section 1000 or 3600.
(2) “License” includes a certificate, registration, or any other authorization needed to engage in a business or profession regulated by this code or referred to in Section 1000 or 3600.
(3) “Licensing board” means any board, as defined in Section 22, the State Bar, and the Bureau of Real Estate.
(f) The reports required under this section shall be filed on magnetic media or in other machine-readable form, according to standards furnished by the Franchise Tax Board.
(g) Licensing boards shall provide to the Franchise Tax Board the information required by this section at a time that the

Franchise Tax Board may require.
(h) Notwithstanding Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, a federal employer identification number, federal taxpayer identification number, or social security number furnished pursuant to this section shall not be deemed to be a public record and shall not be open to the public for inspection.
(i) Any deputy, agent, clerk, officer, or employee of any licensing board described in subdivision (a), or any former officer or employee or other individual who in the course of his or her employment or duty has or has had access to the information required to be furnished under this section, may not disclose or make known in any manner that information, except as provided in this section to the Franchise Tax Board or as provided in subdivision (k).
(j) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to utilize the federal employer identification number, federal taxpayer identification number, or social security number for the purpose of establishing the identification of persons affected by state tax laws and for purposes of compliance with Section 17520 of the Family Code and, to that end, the information furnished pursuant to this section shall be used exclusively for those purposes.
(k) If the board utilizes a national examination to issue a license, and if a reciprocity agreement or comity exists between the State of California and the state requesting release of the federal taxpayer identification number orsocial security number, any deputy, agent, clerk, officer, or employee of any licensing board described in subdivision (a) may release a federal taxpayer identification number or social security number to an examination or licensing entity, only for the purpose of verification of licensure or examination status.
(l) For the purposes of enforcement of Section 17520 of the Family Code, and notwithstanding any other law, any board, as defined in Section 22, and the State Bar and the Bureau of Real Estate shall at the time of issuance of the license require that each licensee provide the federal taxpayer identification number or social security number, if any has been issued to the licensee, of each individual listed on the license and any person who qualifies the license. For the purposes of this subdivision, “licensee” means any entity that is issued a license by any board, as defined in Section 22, the State Bar, the Bureau of Real Estate, and the Department of Motor Vehicles.

SEC. 2.

Section 19528 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:
19528.

(a) Notwithstanding any other law, the Franchise Tax Board may require any board, as defined in Section 22 of the Business and Professions Code, and the State Bar, the Bureau of Real Estate, and the Insurance Commissioner (hereinafter referred to as licensing board) to provide to the Franchise Tax Board the following information with respect to every licensee:
(1) Name.
(2) Address or addresses of record.
(3) Federal employer identification number, if the licensee is a partnership, or the licensee’s federal taxpayer identification number or social security number, if any has been issued, of all other licensees.
(4) Type of license.
(5) Effective date of license or renewal.
(6) Expiration date of license.
(7) Whether license is active or inactive, if known.
(8) Whether license is new or renewal.
(b) The Franchise Tax Board may do the following:
(1) Send a notice to any licensee failing to provide the federal employer identification number, federal taxpayer identification number, or social security number as required by subdivision (a) of Section 30 of the Business and Professions Code and subdivision (a) of Section 1666.5 of the Insurance Code, describing the information that was missing, the penalty associated with not providing it, and that failure to provide the information within 30 days will result in the assessment of the penalty.
(2) After 30 days following the issuance of the notice described in paragraph (1), assess a one hundred dollar ($100) penalty, due and payable upon notice and demand, for any licensee failing to provide either its federal employer identification number (if the licensee is a partnership) or his or her social security number (for all others) as required in Section 30 of the Business and Professions Code and Section 1666.5 of the Insurance Code.
(c) Notwithstanding Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, the information furnished to the Franchise Tax Board pursuant to Section 30 of the Business and Professions Code or Section 1666.5 of the Insurance Code shall not be deemed to be a public record and shall not be open to the public for inspection.

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/fa...01320140SB1159