Dirbin's amendment/Fairness Doctrine
A snowball in hell stands a better chance than my calling and reaching either of my senators. Boxer and Feinstein are impossible to reach and DO NOT GIVE A DAMN about what we the people want. They have their own agenda (Communism). Doubt what I say - Alan Lowenthal introduced Bill #1322 last year to allow Communist to hold public office (forbidden by U.S. Codes). It was overwhelmingly supported by Democrats; I did not find one Republican on the list and I do not know that Boxer or Feinstein made so much as a squeak. Also the Bay Area Council met in Sacramento this week to discuss the possibility of a Constitutional Convention. We can not allow the government or big business the opportunity to destroy our Constitution. Obama has enough people in his administration working on this already. Some idiot in New York introduced a bill in January to remove term limits for the president. You think Socialism; I know Communism is coming if we do not get our act together. United we stand, Divided we fall. Any of you folks signed up with the Patriotic Resistance? (resistnet.com) March to protect our constitution is in the process for September. Spread the word. Get more involved.
Re: this does not make sense
Quote:
Originally Posted by annamarie
Maybe it is me, but are these politicians that ignorant. How could these democrats vote Yes for Durbin's bill for the fairness doctrine and Yes for DeMints bill which is against the fairness doctrine. They must use magnifying glasses to read what is going on. I am so upset about this. Can anyone make sense of this. :roll:
WELCOME TO ALIPAC annamarie
They don't read the bills they vote on, they just do what the puppeteers tell them to do. The DeMint amendment was attached to a bill destined never to become law and is already tabled. They KNOW the American people are against the fairness doctrine, so this way they get their cake and eat it too. They can claim they voted against it, which technically they did, while still getting it passed.