Thread: Spread this John McCain Warning Far & Wide!

http://www.baltimoresun.com/health/sc-d ... ory?page=1

GOP candidates claiming to be the "new Scott Brown"

cont. in link.

Originally Posted by Reciprocity

I would reserve judgement on Scott Brown, his kudos to McLame may just be political garnish.

True, I guess we are just not willing to wait and see if it is more than that. Better safe than sorry. I do like the guy, I just do not want him to be swept away in the McCain mess. The only reason McCain helped him was so he could use him later to sway true conservatives in his direction....ain't happening!

Originally Posted by Judy

Also, it's vitally important that all our Massachusetts members contact him. Scott Brown isn't going to care much about what out-of-staters think. It's important that our Massachusetts based members call that number and make him aware of how they feel. Scott didn't think out-of-staters should influence his race in Massachusetts and perhaps a good point to make with him would be perhaps Arizonans don't think out-of staters should influence the race in Arizona so maybe Scott should stay in Masschusetts and DC.

Here's his campaign office number again:

781-444-0200

Well said Judy!!!

"To further shore up his position, McCain is also bringing in Scott Brown, the senator-elect from Massachusetts"

I will say this, Scott Brown should not be spending his new political capital as a Freshman Senator so early supporting anybody, it gives the wrong impression, especially since it seems Hayworth's platform seems to closely resemble his own and McLame's stance on issues is not even close. This is not looking good, but im taking a wait and see approach.

Originally Posted by Reciprocity

"To further shore up his position, McCain is also bringing in Scott Brown, the senator-elect from Massachusetts"

I will say this, Scott Brown should not be spending his new political capital as a Freshman Senator so early supporting anybody, it gives the wrong impression, especially since it seems Hayworth's platform seems to closely resemble his own and McLame's stance on issues is not even close. This is not looking good, but im taking a wait and see approach.

I totally agree. The purpose is to try and wow the Arizona Republicans to keep Hayworth out of the race for the primary nomination. That's McCain's strategy with both Palin and Brown. But Hayworth or someone who understands America's position on illegal immigration like he does is who Arizona needs, not another 6 years of McCain who not only doesn't understand the immigration issue, he defies the will of the American People on that issue.

Originally Posted by April

Originally Posted by Judy

Also, it's vitally important that all our Massachusetts members contact him. Scott Brown isn't going to care much about what out-of-staters think. It's important that our Massachusetts based members call that number and make him aware of how they feel. Scott didn't think out-of-staters should influence his race in Massachusetts and perhaps a good point to make with him would be perhaps Arizonans don't think out-of staters should influence the race in Arizona so maybe Scott should stay in Masschusetts and DC.

Here's his campaign office number again:

781-444-0200

Well said Judy!!!

Thank you so much April!

It might be too late already. According to Rasmussen, Maverick's up 53/31 on J.D. Hayworth and is already running attack ads against him - before he's even gotten into the race. Proof positive that he's worried, which only makes Sarahcuda's "true conservative" stamp of approval that much more important in possibly warning Hayworth away.

The weirdest part of this? I don't think anyone will be swayed by Palin's endorsement. No one seriously believes she'd be backing him if not for her personal loyalty to him, and McCain's sufficiently infamous for his centrism that even her support won't scrub him clean in the eyes of tea partiers. Which means this is actually a pretty shrewd move on her part: She gets credit for being a good soldier, especially in light of the sniping at her from his former campaign aides, whereas he gets maybe a few extra votes from conservatives. In fact, someone should make a video at her rally for McCain in the same mold as that now-famous video outside Obama's rally for Coakley, where college kids babbled about getting to see The One in person while showing no enthusiasm whatsoever for the candidate. That's what we're going to end up with here, I think.
=============

JD Hayworth is going to run against McCain and he is great on immigration, we need to encourge him to stay in the race.
http://www.jdhayworth.com/ & http://www.jdhayworth.com/contact.php

Update: Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

JD Hayworth quits radio show. To McCain: “It’s time for you to come home.â€

I wrote to both. Basically this is what I wrote.
I respect & admire Senator McCain as a man who has sacrificed for this nation. However, his positions on numerous issues leaves more than a lot to be desired. In fact, while he asserts his conservative stances, he is in fact what many of us call a RINO.
I will point to one issue as my example. Senator McCain has stood tall for amnesty for illegal aliens. While doing so, he has remained quiet about the serious lack of border enforcement & or interior employer enforcement. It is now fact that during the Obama presidency, enforcement at almost all levels has been reduced so significantly that its a wonder we are stopping anyone from coming in.
DHS reported earlier this year they capture nearly 28% of those sneaking in through our border crossing checkpoints. They said their goal for this year is a solid 30% capture rate.
ONLY a government bureaucracy would tout a 30% success rate as something to be proud of. John McCain knew of this and he did nothing. He knew we were being asked to accept a 30% rate as successful. He had the ability, and still has the ability, to stop this travesty, yet he remains silent. WHY?
Our southern border is our most porous border & most of the illegal aliens, the illegal drugs, the forced prostitution girls brought into America, criminal elements up to all sorts of nefarious conduct, and probable terrorists are coming in across this border.
Yet the Obama administration, DHS & Secretary Napolitano, Border Patrol, etc., all want us to believe they are doing a terrific job. I suspect the people on the ground are doing a great job based on the severe limitations placed on them.
However, policy makers, bureaucrats, politicians, & others are cramping their ability to do their jobs effectively. False electronic systems that do not work, poorly understaffed border crossing checkpoints & Border Patrols, immigration courts that permit entries based on "OR" (own recognizance) {are a joke}, & Federal bureaucrats who impose this administrations will on the nation.
John McCain knows this, has known this & would support some form of amnesty, while faking actual enforcement, and would still tell us he was behind us. He did it before & would again.
Please drop your support of this man. Please limit any support. Please know YOU lose credibility when you support a man who is decidedly not working for or advocating positions & policies that are good for America, when he supports amnesty.
Amnesty has been tried many times before. Each time, we got huge new crowds of illegal aliens sneaking in. Not a bad crime you say!? Yes it is! Because once in, they break multiple other laws to get employment {along with stealing those jobs Americans would do if they could get hired but who are ignored for the cheap slave labor illegal aliens}, & they are contributing significantly to our nations crime rates.
Illegal aliens do not contribute as much in taxes as they take out. We lose significant dollars supporting illegal aliens & their families which always follow. There are too many unemployed Americans for us to accept an amnesty or should I say, "ANOTHER amnesty."
John McCain is on the wrong side on this issue & in fact on many issues conservatives hold dear. You both know it & we need you to stick with us & help us with the election of multiple more conservatives so we can recapture America before liberals drive us into bankruptcy & surrender us to global socialists.
Please stand with us. W/o your support, we cannot support you & your efforts!
Now, will Palin & Brown stand with us? I doubt Brown will. Despite my happiness he was elected to stop nationalized health care, his other positions on a number of issues is unknown. I fear he may have many closeted liberal tendencies.
Palin was screwed by McCain & his campaign people. She is pandering to the party when she supports him. Perhaps she is paying back what she thinks is a debt. Too bad since she owes him less than nothing.
Anyway, I wrote & now I'll see what they have to say!

Maybe it's better if Palin shows her "true colors" early by campaigning for Juan McAmnesty if that is her inclination anyway. I for one have no specific loyalties to Sarah Palin anyway. My loyalties lie with the my Country, the Constitution and American Patriots so if Sarah Palin turns out to be a traitor, then thanks for the warning.

Terry Anderson did a piece on her a couple of weeks ago in which he pointed out her "closet" amnesty leanings. He reminded us that Alaska is a sanctuary state and it got to be that way under Palin's watch. As I recall, she never brought up the subject of the illegal alien invasion during the Presidential run last year and as far as I can tell, she was never asked about it either.

I understand she has taken some kind of a job with establishment Faux "News" which has been grooming her for future political aspirations with hour long full show length infomercial interviews by Hannity and she's been on many of the other shows there as well with softball interviews. They're working the left-right paradygme to the hilt with her.

Therefore it just might be a blessing if she comes out and campaigns for McAmnesty since it will most certainly cost her support big time from Constitution loving Tea Party activists and the Immigration Enforcement movement which is a huge part of the base.

This should render her politically irrelevent for the most part and we won't have to put up with being blindsided by another RINO. We can just move on to support patriot candidates and not have to soil our hands with Sarah or Juan McAmnesty. This way we know where we stand.

This will almost certainly cost her enough support to keep her from being elected to the Presidency. It looks like the global elites may have gotten to her. Now would be the preferrable time to find it out if that is the case instead of electing her to the Presidency and then finding out like we did with Jorge Boosh. She may have just done us all a big favor by stepping out of the shadows with this.

As for Scott Brown, who knows? We don't know much about him yet but I understand that he did run on a platform of Immigratioin Enfrocement and against amnesty. Since he got elected, I have yet to hear one word about that from the Lamestream Media or Faux "News." However, the Immigration Laws Enforcement (Patriot) community haven't forgotten it. I recieved emails from several enforcement groups immediately after the election so certainly it was not lost on us that this played a big part in his beating Coakley.

The lamestream Media, Faux "News" and even big talk radio shows have neglected this aspect of his campaign since the election in their efforts to analyze the reasoning behind the People of Mass electing this guy. I haven't heard it brought up by the establishment owned and operated media not even once. I've heard every other explaination for his election except his stated stance on the illegal alien invasion. Is it just me or have any of you noticed how this has been quietly swept under the rug by the globalist, corporate owned and operated media? HMMMMMM... Can you say "AGENDA"??

I felt terrible voting for John McCain because he is a wolf in sheep's clothing. But what other choice did we have?!
There was nobody good enough running for us!
I'm sorry to say as a mother and a woman - but I found Sarah Palin to be annoying. The whole 'you betcha!' thing was so ...I don't know...is pathetic the right adjective? Please don't 'dumb it down' when you talk Sarah! This doesn't represent intelligent conservative women in this country -at all.
Right now I am thinking Bobby Jindal /Newt Gingrich ticket would be better for America.(or similiar)
Let us see who emerges to lead us to victory!