Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Ratbstard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Alien City-(formerly New York City)
    Posts
    12,611

    ‘Self-deportation’ is no joke

    nypost.com
    OPINION
    by Karol Markowicz
    Updated: 11:14 PM, January 29, 2012

    In a Republican primary season overloaded with second-tier candidates and gaffes, lots of people seem to be watching the never-ending debates with an ear for the next laugh line. After last Monday’s Florida debate, they seized on Mitt Romney’s suggestion that his immigration policy, rather than rounding up illegals, would have people “self-deport.”

    “The answer is self-deportation, which is people decide they can do better by going home because they can’t find work here because they don’t have legal documentation to allow them to work here,” Romney said.

    It was an instant joke; everyone was self-deporting. Rick Klein, senior Washington editor for ABC World News, tweeted “pretty soon I shall self-deport from my couch, to gather more liquid to drink.” Andrew Sullivan, hyperventilating, live-blogged that it was “a new Romney verb.” Roll Call’s Ryan Beckwith tweeted that self-deport was a “new phrase to me.”

    Later in the week, Newt Gingrich jumped on the Romney-mocking bandwagon, calling the plan “fantasy” and finding a way to work in class-warfare references to Swiss bank accounts, the Cayman islands and “$20-million-a-year income with no work.”

    But is it so funny — or new? Why would anyone self-deport?

    The answer is in the middle of Romney’s response: You’d self-deport because you don’t have legal documentation allowing you to work here.

    So the mockable, hilarious and unlikely idea is an enforcement of existing law. It remains illegal to work in America without proper documentation; that we collectively look the other way doesn’t, in fact, make it legal.

    The extremes don’t make serious arguments about “fixing” immigration. We can’t round up masses of people and send them home, despite Rick Santorum’s suggestion we do that because Mexico is “a great country” and “not Siberia.” We also can’t give blanket amnesty to people who broke the law to get here, unless we want to encourage millions more to do the same.

    Some paint Romney’s position as far-right because a version of it has been supported by more zealous immigration opponents, but it’s actually a fair compromise. Enforce the laws, secure the border and give those who self-deport a fair track to US citizenship.

    The immigration argument drifts leftward with time. The left will no longer accept anything but living with the fact that countless people break the law to come here. Even Gingrich, criticizing Romney in Thursday’s debate, painted the plan as pulling grandmothers from their homes and churches, separating them from their families and shipping them home.

    It’s impossible to have a reasonable discussion on immigration when any talk of enforcement is greeted by this kind of hysteria.

    Sure, critics can make the emotional argument that illegal immigrants come here for a better life, just as all of our ancestors did. But it’s not anti-Latino or anti-immigrant to believe that a nation must secure its borders for its survival; when the influx is unsustainable, there has to be a more practical approach.

    Mitt Romney’s plan, funny as it may sound, may be just that compromise.

    Read more: Mitt Romney’s border proposal—Karol Markowicz - NYPOST.com
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member misterbill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,084
    Roy Beck, Heritage, and other conservative facilities have long touted Attrition Through Enforcement, aka, self-deportation. France gives travel money to departing illegal aliens.

    Self deportation a reasonable, viable , not worthy of mockery idea that had it been practiced since 1986, there would not be a problem of the magnitude we have today.

  3. #3
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,266
    You’d self-deport because you don’t have legal documentation allowing you to work here.
    Sorry!!!! Not my idea of self deporting, to me you would self deport if all your freebenefits were cut off and you had no job....Now realistically who in their right mind thinks or expects they get to live for free?????? Worse than that is who in their right mind allows it??????

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Northern Arizona
    Posts
    528
    ‘Self-deportation’ WORKS! Look at Arizona, Alabama, Georgia or any other state that ENFORCES THE LAW!


  5. #5
    Senior Member Ratbstard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Alien City-(formerly New York City)
    Posts
    12,611
    Quote Originally Posted by AZres View Post
    ‘Self-deportation’ WORKS! Look at Arizona, Alabama, Georgia or any other state that ENFORCES THE LAW!
    Alabama's unemployment rate dropped quite a bit too.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  6. #6
    April
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by AZres View Post
    ‘Self-deportation’ WORKS! Look at Arizona, Alabama, Georgia or any other state that ENFORCES THE LAW!
    Absolutely, also if employers were not so greedy and hired Americans, the illegals would self deport and it would make a BIG difference for unemployed vets and citizens.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •