Thread: #1 priority picking the right president to stop illegals

The number one priority of all americans should be to pick the best President to stop illegal immigration and combat terrorism.

But who? Let's try to find a real man.

My research shows that Duncan Hunter looks good for border issues. He has built a triple border fence in the San Diego area.

Who are you supporting? Any ideas on Hunter or other candidates.

Lucky for us the dems are dumb enough to think that Hillary is their best candidate. I think that her only chance would be if conservatives divide up and do not back one single candidate or if they do not vote.

Every conservative needs to vote or all hopes of stoping illegals and repairing the damage wil be lost.

It is not that far until the first primaries and we need to make decisions now.

From my research of their individual sites (listed under issues), it looks like Romney is not very focused on border or immigration.

Let's get talking about potential candidates!

They were talking about this very thing on Fox this weekend. The number one priority for a Presidental Candidate is going to be illegal immigration. The Dems are fooling themselves thinking that it is going to be the war. It is not the war Fox stated it is illegal immigration.

Originally Posted by Paige

They were talking about this very thing on Fox this weekend. The number one priority for a Presidental Candidate is going to be illegal immigration. The Dems are fooling themselves thinking that it is going to be the war. It is not the war Fox stated it is illegal immigration.

There was already a study on this, I can't locate it. But the War was the Number #1 priority.

Illegal immigration is a HUGE issue, but not number one. To me, it should be in the top three.... Actually, to me - illegal immigration is just a symptom of the globalist agenda - as is war in iraq and soon iran... AND the precursors to the NAU.

IF you want to know who is best. Depends on where you lean as each has his strongpoints above the others. BUT, your search should start and end with the following.

Ron Paul
Tancredo
Hunter

That is my order. But those three are "it" -- anybody else and you will have complete chaos.

Welcome to Alipac "sendemhome" thanks for joining us , hope you stick around and work with us.

We have been doing alot of researching the canidates and have several threads with lots of information.

My first choice right now is Ron Paul, I beleive word of him is spreading across America fast. They are doing a fund raiser today you can go to his web site. But on C-span at 6:30 pacific time I heard he had already raised over $800,000.

Hunter and Tancredo are both great but don't seem to be moving up much. but the you can not believe the polls of the Main Stream media, they want one of their globalist buddies who will open our borders and give a mass amnesty to millions.

I just heard also this morning that Rommney was for enforcing the laws and giveing a path to the rest for citizenship....NO WAY can we go the route again!

Hunter is a good choice and my 2nd but 1 first place is Tancredo due to his decade long voting record. Tancredo & Hunter together would be great.

Ron Paul has dropped off my list. He was on it but no longer due to things that I'm finding out about him.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-E-1Bac62s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPindngYxvk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5N_fS-wj-8A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoTMIupUbsY
BTW Pauls pick is Chuck Hagle who is a big time globalist (CFR) and always votes YES for Amensty

NumbersUSA web site has their voting history
http://www.numbersusa.com/index

Once_A_Democrat wrote:

BTW Pauls pick is Chuck Hagle who is a big time globalist (CFR) and always votes YES for Amensty

Pick for what?

You're right about Chuck Hagle. Check this out:

http://profiles.numbersusa.com/improfil ... &VIPID=510

http://grades.betterimmigration.com/tes ... &VIPID=510

Surely Paul isn't associating himself with Hagel in any substantial capacity. I can't support Paul either. Regardless, this is the first I've heard of him having any connection to Hagel.

The question was if he wasn't running for president who would he pick, he said he did not know, but he would pick Hagel for his knowledge on foriegn policy.

The question was basically irrelevant.

SOSADFORUS wrote:

I just heard also this morning that Rommney was for enforcing the laws and giveing a path to the rest for citizenship....NO WAY can we go the route again!

Where did you hear that? Could you please provide a source. I'm not supporting Romney, however, an accusation of another flop deserves a source. I don't think we should thow that kind of information out without a direct quote from a credible source.

Originally Posted by MW

SOSADFORUS wrote:

I just heard also this morning that Rommney was for enforcing the laws and giveing a path to the rest for citizenship....NO WAY can we go the route again!

Where did you hear that? Could you please provide a source. I'm not supporting Romney, however, an accusation of another flop deserves a source. I don't think we should thow that kind of information out without a direct quote from a credible source.

It was on c-span this morning, the commentator read it out of a paper. I was a little surprised my self although not really I guess, there was someone there talking about Thompson and the host was reading different articles about cannidates from the papers. Doesn't surprise me though he has said he is not for amnesty, but we have to do something with the millions that are here, many times. He just doesn't elaborate on it. I would like to hear it from the horses mouth myself, not someones inturpetation . What have you heard?

SOSADFORUS wrote:

It was on c-span this morning, the commentator read it out of a paper. I was a little surprised my self although not really I guess, there was someone there talking about Thompson and the host was reading different articles about cannidates from the papers. Doesn't surprise me though he has said he is not for amnesty, but we have to do something with the millions that are here, many times. He just doesn't elaborate on it. I would like to hear it from the horses mouth myself, not someones inturpetation . What have you heard?

Only that he does not support amnesty of any sort. Guess I'll do some cruising around the internet and see what I can find. I'll get back with you.