Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    19,605 to zero is statistical proof of outright vote fraud in 2012 presidential elect

    19,605 to zero is statistical proof of outright vote fraud in 2012 presidential election

    J. D. Heyes
    Natural News
    November 14, 2012

    In the weeks leading up to the Nov. 6 election, there were scattered concerns from across the political spectrum that vote fraud could occur in some sections of the country. While many of those fears did not come to fruition, based on final vote tallies in some polling districts, it’s hard to fathom that some form of fraud did not occur.

    Take Philadelphia, for instance – the “city of Brotherly Love” – where, once again, New Black Panther Party members were seen at some of the same polling places they were at in 2008, when charges of voter intimidation were leveled against them. In 59 districts around the city, GOP presidential challenger Mitt Romney got zero votes.

    Zip. Nada. None.

    Granted, in heavily Democratic urban districts in the city, it’s not unusual for that party’s candidate – in this case, President Obama – to win a heavy proportion of the vote. But all of them?

    Sure, say analysts. It’s not unusual at all. Nothing to see here.

    Saddam Hussein always got nearly 100 percent of the vote too

    “We have always had these dense urban corridors that are extremely Democratic,” Jonathan Rodden, a political science professor at Stanford University, told Philly.com, a joint website of the Philadelphia Inquirer and Philadelphia Daily News newspapers.

    “It’s kind of an urban fact, and you are looking at the extreme end of it in Philadelphia,” he said.

    That’s because most large cities are 75-80 percent Democrats, making them practically politically homogenous and much easier to organize than, say, rural areas where folks live far apart, said Sasha Issenberg, author of The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns.

    “One reason Democrats can maximize votes in Philadelphia is that it’s very easy to knock on every door,” she said.

    But isn’t it just as easy to knock on doors in Republican strongholds, even if they are farther apart? And that’s another issue – if we are to believe there are Democratic “corridors,” doesn’t it follow that there are Republican “corridors” as well?

    Some GOP officials are asking these very same questions, especially after learning that, in 59 Philadelphia voting districts Obama out-polled Romney by a stunning 19,605 to zero. Even in heavily Democratic Philly, are we to believe that in nearly 60 polling districts there is not a single dissenting voter? The last political candidate in recent member to poll that overwhelmingly was Iraq’s Saddam Hussein.

    Those districts were concentrated in overwhelmingly black sectors of the city. But again – not a single Romney supporter? Not even one?

    That’s a huge stretch, to say the least, says Steve Miskin, a spokesman for Republicans in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives.

    “We believe we need to continue ensuring the integrity of the ballot,” he said, referencing his party’s voter ID initiative that, perhaps not surprisingly, was held off the state ballot for this election.

    No such thing as a 100 percent Republican voting precinct

    University of Virginia political scientist Dr. Larry Sabato, who has studied voting in African American-dominated precincts, told Philly.com he had occasionally seen instances where 100 percent of the vote went to the Democratic candidate, citing precincts in Chicago and Atlanta which recorded no votes for the GOP’s candidate, Sen. John McCain, in 2008.

    “I’d be surprised if there weren’t a handful of precincts that didn’t cast a vote for Romney,” he said.

    Still, the high number of zero precincts in Philadelphia deserves examination, he added.
    “Not a single vote for Romney or even an error? That’s worth looking into,” he said.
    In a city with 1,687 of the ward subsets known as divisions, each with hundreds of voters, 59 is about 3.5 percent of the total, Philly.com reported.

    Not much has been made about this voting phenomenon by the mainstream media, but we suspect the outrage and uproar would have been loud and boisterous, to say the least, if there were wide swaths of voting districts where not a single Democratic vote was cast.

    Sources:
    http://articles.philly.com
    http://www.foxnews.com
    http://marketdailynews.com


    » 19,605 to zero is statistical proof of outright vote fraud in 2012 presidential election Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

    Similar/Related Articles

    1. Election Fraud? Obama Won More Than 99 Percent Of The Vote In More Than 100 Ohio Precincts
    2. 22 Signs That Voter Fraud Is Wildly Out Of Control And The Election Was A Sham
    3. Presidential Election: One Giant Fraud
    4. The 2012 US Presidential “Non-election”: Which Brand of “Fascism” this Time?
    5. Recipe for Vote Fraud: Global Internet Voting Firm Buys U.S. Election Results Reporting Firm
    6. Vote Fraud Expert: Romney Votes Not Counted in Key States
    7. Angle campaign attorney: Reid “intends to steal this election if he can’t win it outright”
    8. Karzai and Warlords Mount Massive Vote Fraud Scheme
    9. Poll: Ron Paul 3rd Party Bid Could Transform 2012 Election
    10. Ron Paul Takes Second Place in New Hampshire
    11. Could ‘Frankenstorm’ Delay Presidential Election?
    12. New 3rd Party Candidate For 2012 Presidential Election Announced!
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    just like in sports when a player sets a record as in Home runs but have used doping medication... they have an asterick beside that name and record indicating it was done fraudulantly by doping

    the same should hold true with the 2012 Election

    He should not be called President ...

    Just Obama with an *

    Obama*

    * Cheated to become a fraudulent Potus
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    No One in the GOP or RNC is complaining about

    OBVIOUS VOTE FRAUD

    NO ONE

    its time to ask WHY

    I am going with the belief that Romney was selected by the Elite to knock out any contenders against Obama; more so than to be elected himself

    go back and see what McCain did... he made the most unbelieveable crack head statements... ONLY after he was the GOP /RNC Nominy and just weeks leading up to the election

    I watched Romney do the same damn thing

    you better start asking why no one is talking about chucking these fake debold machines
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •