Results 1 to 7 of 7
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: Judge Jeanine Pirro: - Justice - For Benghazi:- Blasts Hillary - YOU KNEW! Video

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    Judge Jeanine Pirro: - Justice - For Benghazi:- Blasts Hillary - YOU KNEW! Video



    Judge Jeanine Pirro: - Justice - For Benghazi:- Blasts Hillary - YOU KNEW!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=jIH-H38_5AU

    If Benghazi Was Preventable, Should It Derail A 2016 Run Hillary Clinton 2016? Judge Jeanine Pirro Opening Statement - Justice For Benghazi
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012
    Fmr Navy SEAL Tells Judge Pirro: Nobody That Wears a Navy SEAL Trident is a Fan of Obama or Hillary

    Posted on January 18, 2014 by BMartin1776
    <strong>

    J
    udge Pirro spoke with fmr Navy SEAL Christopher Mark Heben over the criticism Marcus Luttrell’s “Lone Survivor” is receiving from the left and crap media. The left seem to question the events and the mission not understanding the purpose of the SEALs. They aren’t primarily there to nation build and be peacemakers, as Heben points out SEALs are the “nation’s a 911 response team… to make a person place or thing disappear”!

    The discussion moved into Benghazi cover up where Heben made it clear the administration is positioning Hillary for her 2016 presidential run. This when he made a very clear statement that we the people can be thankful to hear “…let me make something very clear: nobody that wears a Navy SEAL Trident on their chest.. nobody is a fan of Obama, nobody is a fan of Hillary Clinton period” He then closes saying he and other former SEALs are planning to “expound upon everything that is out there right now on Benghazi”.

    We the people could really use hearing more of this from servicemen and women. Our elected leaders do not have our back so we need to know the military active and retired do!

    http://savingtherepublic.com/blog/2014/01/fmr-navy-seal-tells-judge-pirro-nobody-wears-navy-seal-trident-fan-obama-hillary/

  3. #3
    Senior Member southBronx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,758
    Quote Originally Posted by AirborneSapper7 View Post


    Judge Jeanine Pirro: - Justice - For Benghazi:- Blasts Hillary - YOU KNEW!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=jIH-H38_5AU

    If Benghazi Was Preventable, Should It Derail A 2016 Run Hillary Clinton 2016? Judge Jeanine Pirro Opening Statement - Justice For Benghazi
    Judge Jeanine
    boy you are good & right in everything you said thank you I don't like hillary Or Obama all they do is lie

  4. #4
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Judge Jeanine DESTROYS Obama…Again

    Posted on Tuesday, January 21st, 2014 at 1:15 am.
    by: Benjamin Franklin





    http://www.conservativeinfidel.com/u...estroys-obama/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Did The White House Threaten A Reporter’s Career Over Benghazi? Greta Van Susteren Says Yes

    January 21, 2014 by Ben Bullard

    SPECIAL

    Love her, hate her or ignore her outright, Greta Van Susteren isn’t a media figure who makes her living by testing the bounds of plausibility along the outermost fringes of conspiracy theory. That’s why it’s hard not to sit up and take notice when she writes that someone inside the Obama Administration threatened to end the career of a fellow reporter who was digging too deep into the Benghazi story.
    Late last week, Van Susteren posted a damning account of how the Administration of President Barack Obama handled inquiries from FOX News after the Sept. 11, 2012 U.S. Consulate attack in Benghazi, Libya, took the lives of one ambassador and three other Americans.
    Given the demographics of its viewer base, it’s not remarkable that FOX News would go after the White House with more ardor than other mainstream news agencies when it comes to the concocted narrative spun by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Obama Administration. But Van Susteren spoke with jarring conviction when she offered this (boldface and underline features are preserved from the original text):
    As an aside, does the Obama Administration think politics is the reason theDemocratically led Senate Intelligence Committee opened its investigation [into Benghazi]? Obviously not.
    It is also interesting to note that The New York Times, thought by many to be the gold standard in journalism, recently reported that it was not Al Qaeda. According to the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report, the NY Times reporting is wrong. (Yes, the same New York Times that reported there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. That was wrong, too.)
    And then as I was sitting at my desk thinking about the reporting since September 2012, I thought about the weirdest of all and the worst of all for me personally! I remembered a disturbing phone call from a good friend in the Obama Administration. I have known this friend for years. The call was a short time after 9/11 (maybe Oct. 2012?) In the call, my friend told me that my colleague Jennifer Griffin, who was aggressively reporting on Benghazi, was wrong and that, as a favor to me, my friend in the Administration was telling me so that I could tell Jennifer so that she did not ruin her career. My friend was telling me to tell Jennifer to stop her reporting. Ruin her career?
    In 20 plus years, I have never received a call to try and shut down a colleague — not that I even could — this was a first. Here is what I know: Jennifer is a class act….experienced..and a very responsible journalist. One of the absolute best in the business — no axe to grind, she just wants the facts.
    I told my friend before I go to Jennifer telling her she is wrong, I need proof she is wrong, strong proof and you need to be specific — what are you saying she is getting wrong? We went around and around — including the statement again that this was just a call as a favor to Jennifer and me to save Jennifer’s career from reporting incorrect information. I got no proof. Zero. I smelled a rat. Favor to me? Hardly. My friend was trying to use me. I feel bad that a friend did that to me, tried to use me for a dirty reason. I knew then — and it is now confirmed by BIPARTISAN Senate Intelligence Committee — Jennifer was getting her facts right. I think it is really low for the Administration to stoop this low.

    Even as the left dissembles away the Benghazi conspiracy (after all, an election’s coming up), the scandal just won’t go away. With mainstream reporters like Susteren and CBSs Sharyl Atkisson coming forward not only with new information about the attack itself, but also the Obama Administration’s iron-fisted damage control, it’s an open question whether the American public has truly heard the last explosion in the long series of Benghazi bombshells.


    Filed Under: Conservative Politics, Liberty News, Staff Reports

    http://personalliberty.com/2014/01/2...eren-says-yes/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  6. #6
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696


    SEAL: Nobody Who Wears A Navy SEAL Trident Is A Fan Of Obama Or Hillary

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9A0J...layer_embedded
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  7. #7
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    What Difference Does It Make?: Blaming The Dead For Benghazi

    January 24, 2014 by Sam Rolley


    “What difference does it make?” –Hillary Clinton on Jan. 23, 2013, in response to Congressional questions about the obvious holes in the official narrative provided by her and the White House surrounding the Benghazi terror attacks that killed four Americans in Sept. 2012.
    Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and other ranking Obama Administration officials lied about what happened in Benghazi on Sept. 11, 2012.
    But Clinton wasn’t the one out pushing the lies. Instead, the State Department suckered then Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice into hitting the television news gamut to lie in an effort cover Clinton’s derelict of duty as the Nation’s top diplomat.
    For serving as Clinton’s stunt double, Rice would later get a raise.
    After failing in its attempts to push on a skeptical public the lie that U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and his colleagues died as a result of a poorly produced video insulting Muhammad, the Administration quietly backed down. The new Democratic strategy for protecting lefty it-girl Clinton and her boss, President Barack Obama, was to stay quiet and accuse anyone who dared bringing up the dead Americans in Benghazi of fueling a false controversy.
    By claiming that any questions about the strange events leading up to Benghazi should only exist in the minds of conspiracy theorists until the government’s official review of the attacks was completed, Democrats brilliantly set in motion what could be the Nation’s most shameless passing of the buck.
    By not accepting responsibility, the Democrats helped themselves in three major ways. Obama was afforded the ability to brush off any questions about his leadership until after he was comfortably re-elected. Clinton was allowed to bow out of office with ample time to rebuild her image before her next Presidential bid. And while Americans waited for answers, recollections of the initial government explanations were dulled.
    When Clinton was asked about the lies just over a year ago, she said that they didn’t matter.
    Last week, Americans who have followed the Benghazi saga from the very beginning found out exactly why it matters that top Administration officials lied with the release of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence’s report on the attacks.
    The report concluded that the attack was preventable; but, oddly enough, it also went out of its way to absolve Clinton of any responsibility for the American deaths.
    The report does fault the State Department for a lack of security in Benghazi. But Clinton’s name doesn’t appear in the body of the report; instead surfacing only once, in an addendum included by Republican lawmakers.
    Republican Senators Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, Richard Burr of North Carolina, Jim Risch of Idaho, Dan Coats of Indiana, Marco Rubio of Florida and Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, asserted in the addendum: “Ultimately, however, the final responsibility for security at diplomatic facilities lies with the former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton. At the end of the day, she was responsible for ensuring the safety of all Americans serving in our diplomatic facilities. Her failure to do so clearly made a difference in the lives of the four murdered Americans and their families.”
    The addendum was condemned by Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who said in a statement, “I want the record to be clear: I condemn any efforts to use this report for political purposes.”
    And mainstream media pretty much ignored the addition, instead turning the blame for the attacks on someone who, because of the State Department’s negligence, is no longer able to defend himself: Ambassador Stevens.
    Former Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy Gregory Hicks noticed the blame-Stevens trend and, in a Wall Street Journal editorial this week, condemned media for doing so:
    When I arrived in Tripoli on July 31, we had over 30 security personnel, from the State Department and the U.S. military, assigned to protect the diplomatic mission to Libya. All were under the ambassador’s authority. On Sept. 11, we had only nine diplomatic security agents under Chris’s authority to protect our diplomatic personnel in Tripoli and Benghazi.
    I was interviewed by the Select Committee and its staff, who were professional and thorough. I explained this sequence of events. For some reason, my explanation did not make it into the Senate report.
    To sum up: Chris Stevens was not responsible for the reduction in security personnel. His requests for additional security were denied or ignored. Officials at the State and Defense Departments in Washington made the decisions that resulted in reduced security. Sen. Lindsey Graham stated on the Senate floor last week that Chris “was in Benghazi because that is where he was supposed to be doing what America wanted him to do: Try to hold Libya together.” He added, “Quit blaming the dead guy.”
    Clinton was aware of what she was doing from the moment Steven’s blood ceased to flow through his body. That’s why the State Department’s initial lies are and were so important.
    While Rice bought time pushing a bogus narrative, Clinton huddled — likely with some of the same strategy friends responsible for her political hit list — to come up with the best plan to protect her 2016 ambitions in light of her failures.
    Unfortunately for Clinton, she couldn’t have anticipated the other scandals which have poured from the Obama Administration in the past year, making Americans more skeptical of political elitists than ever before. If Clinton is preparing for a White House bid, she’s going to have to come to terms with the fact that her failures led to American deaths is still, and will remain, to borrow from Joe Biden, a big f***in’ deal.

    Filed Under: Liberty News, Staff Reports, Voices

    http://personalliberty.com/2014/01/2...-for-benghazi/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •