Results 1 to 10 of 10
Like Tree16Likes
  • 4 Post By JohnDoe2
  • 3 Post By lsmith1338
  • 2 Post By Beezer
  • 1 Post By JohnDoe2
  • 2 Post By MW
  • 3 Post By Beezer
  • 1 Post By Judy

Thread: 214 protesters indicted on felony rioting charges from Inauguration Day

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    82,676

    214 protesters indicted on felony rioting charges from Inauguration Day

    More than 200 protesters indicted on rioting charges from Inauguration Day

    By Madison Park, CNN
    Updated 12:50 AM ET, Wed February 22, 2017

    (CNN) A total of 214 people have been indicted so far on felony rioting charges in connection with the Inauguration Day protests in downtown Washington.

    On the morning of January 20, protests over Donald Trump's inauguration turned violent when black-clad "anti-fascist" protesters smashed storefronts and bus stops, hammered out the windows of a limousine and eventually launched rocks at a phalanx of police.

    Officers responded by launching smoke and flash-bang devices into the street to disperse the crowds. Six police officers were injured and 230 protesters were arrested that day.


    A man is washed with water after being sprayed by police pepper spray during an anti-Trump demonstration on January 20, 2017 in Washington, DC.

    On Tuesday, a grand jury in DC charged five individuals. This was in addition to the 209 other defendants who've been indicted on rioting charges earlier this month.

    Felony rioting carries a maximum of 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $25,000.


    The indictment accuses the defendants of using a tactic called "Black Bloc" in which people conceal their identities with dark or black clothing and accessories such as scarves, sunglasses, helmets and masks.

    They assaulted a limousine driver, smashed windows of local businesses, destroyed a government vehicle and committed "violent and destructive acts," according to the indictment.

    The DC Police had said that the several hundred demonstrators who actively confronted officers were vastly outnumbered by the thousands of nonviolent protesters who swarmed the nation's capital for Inauguration Day and the Women's March, held the day after.

    CNN's Gregory Krieg contributed to this report.

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/22/politi....html?adkey=bn
    Judy, lsmith1338, Beezer and 1 others like this.
    NO AMNESTY

    DON'T REWARD THE CRIMINAL ACTIONS OF MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL ALIENS

    BY GIVING THEM CITIZENSHIP


    Sign in and post comments.

  2. #2
    Senior Member lsmith1338's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,631
    Yes felony charges have a much longer lasting affect and consequences, it should start deterring these protesters if enough of them get arrested.
    Freedom isn't free... Don't forget the men who died and gave that right to all of us....
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Senior Member Beezer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    5,232
    They need to start getting the ICE vans on the streets during these protests. Load them up and get them out of the Country.
    6 Million Dollar Man and Judy like this.
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  4. #4
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    82,676
    NO AMNESTY

    DON'T REWARD THE CRIMINAL ACTIONS OF MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL ALIENS

    BY GIVING THEM CITIZENSHIP


    Sign in and post comments.

  5. #5
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    82,676
    Beezer likes this.
    NO AMNESTY

    DON'T REWARD THE CRIMINAL ACTIONS OF MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL ALIENS

    BY GIVING THEM CITIZENSHIP


    Sign in and post comments.

  6. #6
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    82,676
    The first Inauguration Day protest trial ended in acquittals. But more than 150 defendants await their day in court.

    Police detain a protester on Jan. 20 in Washington during protests surrounding President Trump’s inauguration. (Stefan Jeremiah/AP)

    By Ellie Silverman
    December 29 at 2:15 PM

    Hundreds of people, wearing all black and hiding their faces, moved through more than 16 blocks of downtown Washington on Inauguration Day. Some carried hammers, crowbars and bricks. They shattered shop windows, and by the end there was more than $100,000 in property damage.

    Last week, the first six people to go to trial in the case were acquitted by a jury on all the charges of rioting and destruction of property — an outcome that illustrates the challenge for D.C. prosecutors who are preparing for trials of more than 150 others picked up in the Jan. 20 mass arrest.

    The six acquitted defendants said they were lawfully exercising their First Amendment right to free speech, while a few others broke away to cause damage. Prosecutors said there was no evidence to show the six participated in the destruction, but they argued that the defendants made a choice to stay with the group and provide cover for those who smashed windows and toppled newspaper boxes. At one point, a prosecutor referred to the protesters as “a sea of black masks.”


    It is not clear how many of the remaining defendants authorities believe they can prove participated in — or helped plan — protests aimed at vandalism.


    Legal experts said the U.S. attorney’s office in the District could weigh whether to continue moving forward on the less serious cases after the first trial’s jury rejected the government’s theory that the entire group of protesters bears some responsibility for the destruction.

    Defendant Brittne Lawson, with her back to the camera, is embraced by defendant Alexei Wood after the not-guilty verdicts in the first of the presidential inauguration riot trials. (Michael Robinson Chavez/The Washington Post)

    “The message from this jury is they’re not going to convict people by a guilty-by-association basis,” said Preston Burton, a former assistant U.S. attorney for the District and a partner at Buckley Sandler law firm. Burton is not involved in the cases.


    [The first six people on trial in violent Inauguration Day protests are found not guilty]


    A 38-year-old juror, who sought to remain private and asked not to be identified, said that during deliberations, some jurors “unloaded” because they could not hold someone responsible for the mayhem.


    During the trial, the panel watched hours of video that showed the destruction and heard from employees of businesses who described their fear in those chaotic moments. In the end, the juror said, the panel concluded there wasn’t enough evidence to convict the six people before them. The decision came after a nearly four-week trial and two full days of deliberation.


    “There was a frustration across the jury that we had to watch all this video about our city being torn up and destroyed and didn’t get to punish people that deserved to be punished based on evidence,” the juror said. “I’m hoping that some of the trials down the road really get some of these people that are clearly captured on video that are breaking property.”


    Prosecutors allege that a group called Disrupt J20 helped plan the protests, pulling in participants from across the country.


    More than 200 people were arrested. Twenty have pleaded guilty, prosecutors have dropped cases against 20 others, and the six were acquitted. The remainder are scheduled for trial, in groups of six or seven, through mid-2018.
    The defendants have been grouped into four categories based on the type of criminal conduct they allegedly committed and how similar it is to that ascribed to other defendants. Those groupings are based on factors that include the “level of seriousness” and “specific acts of destruction, planning/organizing of the riot, charging the police line, etc.,” prosecutors wrote in a March court filing.

    Betty Ballester, an attorney who represents a defendant scheduled to go on trial in April, said prosecutors “need to decide what’s important for them” as they continue.


    “We have a good history of allowing people to protest, and I think the jury really was wondering if these people were just protesting or were they rioting. There has been a distinct separation,” she said. “If somebody threw a brick through a window and it’s on video, then that’s pretty clear that’s a destruction of property and that’s not peaceful protesting.”


    [Were Inauguration Day protesters rioting or lawfully demonstrating? That’s the question for jurors.]


    Bill Miller, a spokesman for the U.S. attorney’s office, declined to comment on the government’s case.


    In a statement released after the acquittals, the U.S. attorney’s office said the damage done that day “impacted many who live and work in the District of Columbia, and created a danger for all who were nearby.”


    “We appreciate the jury’s close examination of the individual conduct and intent of each defendant during this trial and respect its verdict,” the statement said. “In the remaining pending cases, we look forward to the same rigorous review for each defendant.”


    Elizabeth Lagesse, a defendant who is scheduled for a trial in July, said she feels “cautiously optimistic” after the Dec. 21 verdict. She said she traveled from Baltimore to the District to protest Trump’s victory and then “got swept up in this crazy police battle basically, and then we just were held on the street for hours.”

    It is “chilling” that prosecutors are holding the group liable for violence not all committed, she said.

    “You only have control over what you yourself do,” Lagesse said. “Now that there’s been a jury of ordinary D.C. residents who you know just didn’t buy it, it’s time that we start dropping these charges.”


    David LaBahn, president of the Association of Prosecuting Attorneys and a former deputy prosecutor in California, said to win the upcoming cases, prosecutors need to be able to explain to a jury: “What’s the culpability? . . . Of the 200, why am I sitting in judgment of this man or woman?”

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/local...=.f4e92c5f3234

    NO AMNESTY

    DON'T REWARD THE CRIMINAL ACTIONS OF MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL ALIENS

    BY GIVING THEM CITIZENSHIP


    Sign in and post comments.

  7. #7
    MW
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    20,266
    Our lawmakers need to pass a law that makes the shielding of ones identity while participating in a violent protest grounds for felony prosecution.
    Beezer and Mayday like this.

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttp://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  8. #8
    Senior Member Beezer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    5,232
    Can U.S. Citizens shield our identity when we are pulled over by Law Enforcement?

    Can we LIE when we go to the Doctor and tell them we have no ID?

    Can we LIE at the welfare and food stamp office and give fake IDs and get benefits?
    Judy, MW and Mayday like this.
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  9. #9
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    43,135
    No, because ID is required to drive a vehicle and apply for those benefits. Protests are different, no ID is required for protests with good reason for that. Same reason we can all post anonymously on ALIPAC to hide our identity. Don't take this article on its face, it's a WAPO article, and the location of the trials were in DC, whose residents serving on the jury hate Trump, and love anyone trying to ruin his Inauguration Day. It's just politics, not a problem with our laws.
    Mayday likes this.
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  10. #10
    MW
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    20,266
    Quote Originally Posted by Judy View Post
    No, because ID is required to drive a vehicle and apply for those benefits. Protests are different, no ID is required for protests with good reason for that. Same reason we can all post anonymously on ALIPAC to hide our identity. Don't take this article on its face, it's a WAPO article, and the location of the trials were in DC, whose residents serving on the jury hate Trump, and love anyone trying to ruin his Inauguration Day. It's just politics, not a problem with our laws.
    We're not party to the physical destruction of private and public property while posting anonymously on ALIPAC. Sorry you can't decipher the difference between someone making non-threatening post on a website and someone hiding their face behind a mask while publicly participating with a group that is purposely doing physical violence for the sole purpose making a political point.

    Perhaps you're having difficulty understanding where the rights of one person ends and another persons rights begin. The KKK also had difficulty understanding that and shielded the possibility of personal identification by wearing hoods and operating during darkness when participating in mayhem back in the day.

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttp://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. More Than 100 Inauguration Day Protesters Indicted on Rioting Charges
    By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-30-2017, 07:32 PM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-18-2017, 08:11 AM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-05-2016, 09:52 AM
  4. Felony Snow Ball Charges?
    By ALIPAC in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-09-2010, 03:46 PM
  5. DWI suspect could face felony charges
    By Cindy in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-08-2006, 01:10 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •