Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member mkfarnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Oklahoma (formerly So, California)
    Posts
    4,208

    287 (g) hits hard in Hispanic communities=[Translated]

    [translated]


    287(g) hits hard in Hispanic communities
    Jan 30/2011

    The controversial program that gives local police immigration laws to strengthen rights caused the sharp decline in the Latino population in many parts of the country, including the counties of Prince William and Frederick, Virginia, as reported by The Washington Post based on a study presented Monday by the Migraties Policy Institute.

    In some cases, the initial desdenso was dramatic, as in Frederick County, where 61 percent of its Latino population disappeared 2007y 2009, and in Prince William County was down nearly 21 percent over the same period, seg {un senso data and school enrollment. Since then, Hispanic communities have emerged, but not to previous levels, says the Post.

    The study of Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan organization, focused on-site locations including the counties listed above, which adopted the 287 (g), which is used by at least 68 law enforcement agencies and municipal authorities, the paper said.



    http://www.vivelohoy.com/noticias/eeuu/ ... s-hispanas
    ------------------------

  2. #2
    Senior Member stevetheroofer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    somewhere near Mexico I reckon!
    Posts
    9,681
    Thanks mkfarnam for translating that for us my spanish is mostly cuss words and food items!
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Senior Member mkfarnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Oklahoma (formerly So, California)
    Posts
    4,208
    Quote Originally Posted by stevetheroofer
    Thanks mkfarnam for translating that for us my spanish is mostly cuss words and food items!
    Here's a different and more specific version in English on "The Washington Post"
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... eheadlines
    ------------------------

  4. #4
    Senior Member mkfarnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Oklahoma (formerly So, California)
    Posts
    4,208
    Quote Originally Posted by stevetheroofer
    Thanks mkfarnam for translating that for us my spanish is mostly cuss words and food items!
    I'm with ya there.
    ------------------------

  5. #5
    Senior Member Ratbstard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Alien City-(formerly New York City)
    Posts
    12,611
    Here's the article mkfarnam posted a link to:

    Illegal-immigration enforcement program takes a toll on U.S. Hispanic populations, report says

    By Tara Bahrampour
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Monday, January 31, 2011; 6:34 PM

    A program that deputizes local police officers to enforce immigration laws sent the Hispanic population plummeting in many places across the United States, including Prince William and Frederick counties, according to a report released Monday by the Migration Policy Institute.

    In some cases, the initial decrease was dramatic: Between 2007 and 2009, Frederick County lost 61 percent of its Hispanic population, and Prince William County lost almost 21 percent, according to the report from the nonpartisan institute, which used census data and school enrollment figures. The Hispanic populations have rebounded, but not to their previous levels.

    The study focused on seven places - including Prince William and Frederick - that have adopted the federal 287 (g) program, which is in use by at least 68 state and local law enforcement agencies.

    Under the program, local police officers are trained to determine the immigration status of people they arrest and flag those found to be in the country illegally to Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Once illegal immigrants are transferred to ICE custody, the U.S. government decides whether to begin deportation proceedings.

    Although ICE has said it prioritizes deportation of people with serious criminal backgrounds, some of the jurisdictions participating in the program seek to remove as many undocumented immigrants as possible, regardless of their criminal background, the study found.

    Frederick was among them, the institute found. In fiscal 2010, the county detained 198 undocumented immigrants through the 287 (g) program, and 120 were traffic offenders, the study says.

    Prince William took a more target approach, the study found. The county detained 846 illegal immigrants in 2010, including 237 traffic offenders. In Loudoun County, 12 of the 47 people detained had committed a traffic offense.

    In Frederick and Prince William counties, fewer than 10 percent of those detained were arrested for the most serious, Level 1 crimes, which include murder, rape and armed robbery. In Las Vegas, by contrast, more than 50 percent of illegal immigrants detained were arrested for the most serious crimes.

    "The wide variation reflected in our study suggests that state and local actors, rather than ICE, are significantly defining the program's enforcement priorities," says the report, which based its findings on ICE data and interviews conducted in the seven localities.

    Frederick County Sheriff Chuck Jenkins denied that the county is trying to deport as many illegal immigrants as possible but said that undocumented traffic violators are potential threats.

    "How do you say that a [serious] Level 1 offender is more dangerous than an immigrant who's out driving a car illegally who could potentially hit someone and kill them?" Jenkins said, noting that those arrested are "in the country illegally to start with, and beyond that, they've committed a crime. How many free passes do you give someone?"

    The report says that targeting serious criminals makes more sense as an enforcement strategy, particularly when government resources are limited.

    Pursuing unauthorized immigrants who haven't committed serious crimes "takes away resources to go after what everybody believes are the high-priority criminals," said Marc Rosenblum, a senior policy analyst at MPI and one of the report's authors. "You can't have them be a top priority and then have the waitress or the gardener who's never broken a law except to be here illegally, you can't have them both be the top priority. When these state and local enforcement agencies fill up the detention centers and jails with low-priority cases . . . it compromises ICE's ability to do high-priority enforcement."

    It also sows fear and distrust between local immigrant communities and the police, the report says.

    Immigration advocates have long decried the 287 (g) program, saying that it leads to racial profiling and destroys relationships between police and immigrant communities.

    Because of the controversy surrounding it, the program's growth has stalled. Another enforcement program, Secure Communities, has largely replaced it at the local level, although Secure Communities has been attacked for some of the same reasons.

    Nationally, 686 jurisdictions in 33 states participate in Secure Communities, including the District and parts of Northern Virginia and Maryland. The program has been criticized in the Arlington County and the District, where local officials worry that it is discouraging undocumented immigrants from reporting crimes.

    ICE has said it plans to expand the program to every state by 2013.

    Corey A. Stewart (R-At Large), chairman of the Prince William Board of Supervisors and a supporter of both enforcement programs, said he thinks that allowing jurisdictions to apply the 287 (g) program differently is a positive thing, especially given variances in concentrations of immigrants in different areas.

    "I would say that's a plus," he said. "I think it's an example of localities and states being the great laboratories for policy development."

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... eheadlines
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  6. #6
    sugarhighwolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    408
    Something I posted a while ago I thought might be relevant here.

    I live in Prince William County, VA. In the mail I got a book called Prince William County Reports. In it is an article called "University of Virgina Analyzes Impact of Immigration Policy". I made a post about it with a link to the study but I'll copy over the main parts.

    http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-225343-.html

    1) Aggravated assault declined substantially since the policy was announced

    2)There was a sharp decline in serious hit and run accidents

    3)The policy provides a reasonable method for addressing the illegal
    immigration issue in the community

    4)The police reputation was not irreparably damaged

    5)Prince William County is viewed by its residents, regardless of race
    or ethnicity, as inclusive and as a great place to live

    6)There is no evidence of racial profiling

    7)The fear of costly litigation stemming from the policy never materialized

    There was no exodus of legal immigrants, and the largest immigrant
    population (Hispanics) remained stable

  7. #7
    Senior Member miguelina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    9,253
    Since then, Hispanic communities have emerged, but not to previous levels, says the Post.
    There ya go! Hispanics have nothing to fear in the US. Illegal aliens, on the other hand, need to be caught and deported.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
    "

  8. #8
    Senior Member vistalad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    3,036
    Quote Originally Posted by sugarhighwolf
    Something I posted a while ago I thought might be relevant here.

    There was no exodus of legal immigrants, and the largest immigrant
    population (Hispanics) remained stable.
    And reputable polls show that majorities of Hispanic Americans, black Americans, and Asian Americans are increasingly wary of illegals and do favor enforcement.
    ************************************************** ***************************
    Americans first in this magnificent country

    American jobs for American workers

    Fair trade, not free trade

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •