Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    278

    AyatollahGondolas' Video from Sacramento MMP rally

    It will not be enough to send a letter. We will have to march on washington and dictate terms in the white house

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Oak Island, North Mexolina
    Posts
    6,231
    We need a new federal law: It is a crime to cover ones face during a protest or march....wait didn't they pass something like that because of the KKK ? Research time gang...............
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member JohnB2012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    4,168
    http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/01/20/rights.klan.reut/

    Appeals court allows N.Y. anti-mask law

    KKK's free-speech rights are not violated, court rules

    NEW YORK (Reuters) -- A federal appeals court Tuesday ruled that a New York state law barring public demonstrators from wearing masks is valid under the U.S. Constitution and does not violate Ku Klux Klan members' free speech rights......

    COI, you were partially right. No federal law I have found yet but NY State has one. I believe NC has some type of mask law but will have to check more.

  4. #4
    Senior Member JohnB2012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    4,168
    http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegi ... er_14.html

    Found the NC mask laws!

    § 14‑12.7. Wearing of masks, hoods, etc., on public ways.

    No person or persons at least 16 years of age shall, while wearing any mask, hood or device whereby the person, face or voice is disguised so as to conceal the identity of the wearer, enter, be or appear upon any lane, walkway, alley, street, road, highway or other public way in this State. (1953, c. 1193, s. 6; 1983, c. 175, ss. 1, 10; c. 720, s. 4.)

    § 14‑12.8. Wearing of masks, hoods, etc., on public property.

    No person or persons shall in this State, while wearing any mask, hood or device whereby the person, face or voice is disguised so as to conceal the identity of the wearer, enter, or appear upon or within the public property of any municipality or county of the State, or of the State of North Carolina. (1953, c. 1193, s. 7.)

    § 14‑12.9. Entry, etc., upon premises of another while wearing mask, hood or other disguise.

    No person or persons at least 16 years of age shall, while wearing a mask, hood or device whereby the person, face or voice is disguised so as to conceal the identity of the wearer, demand entrance or admission, enter or come upon or into, or be upon or in the premises, enclosure or house of any other person in any municipality or county of this State. (1953, c. 1193, s. 8; 1983, c. 175, ss. 2, 10; c. 720, s. 4.)

    § 14‑12.10. Holding meetings or demonstrations while wearing masks, hoods, etc.

    No person or persons at least 16 years of age shall while wearing a mask, hood or device whereby the person, face or voice is disguised so as to conceal the identity of the wearer, hold any manner of meeting, or make any demonstration upon the private property of another unless such person or persons shall first obtain from the owner or occupier of the property his or her written permission to do so, which said written permission shall be recorded in the office of the register of deeds of the county in which said property is located before the beginning of such meeting or demonstration. (1953, c. 1193, s. 9; 1983, c. 175, ss. 3, 10; c. 720, s. 4.)

    § 14‑12.11. Exemptions from provisions of Article.

    The following are exempted from the provisions of G.S. 14‑ 12.7, 14‑12.8, 14‑12.9, 14‑12.10 and 14‑12.14:

    (1) Any person or persons wearing traditional holiday costumes in season;

    (2) Any person or persons engaged in trades and employment where a mask is worn for the purpose of ensuring the physical safety of the wearer, or because of the nature of the occupation, trade or profession;

    (3) Any person or persons using masks in theatrical productions including use in Mardi Gras celebrations and masquerade balls;

    (4) Persons wearing gas masks prescribed in civil defense drills and exercises or emergencies; and

    (5) Any person or persons, as members or members elect of a society, order or organization, engaged in any parade, ritual, initiation, ceremony, celebration or requirement of such society, order or organization, and wearing or using any manner of costume, paraphernalia, disguise, facial makeup, hood, implement or device, whether the identity of such person or persons is concealed or not, on any public or private street, road, way or property, or in any public or private building, provided permission shall have been first obtained therefor by a representative of such society, order or organization from the governing body of the municipality in which the same takes place, or, if not in a municipality, from the board of county commissioners of the county in which the same takes place.

    Provided, that the provisions of this Article shall not apply to any preliminary meetings held in good faith for the purpose of organizing, promoting or forming a labor union or a local organization or subdivision of any labor union nor shall the provisions of this Article apply to any meetings held by a labor union or organization already organized, operating and functioning and holding meetings for the purpose of transacting and carrying out functions, pursuits and affairs expressly pertaining to such labor union. (1953, c. 1193, s. 10.)

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Oak Island, North Mexolina
    Posts
    6,231
    You are doing good, now how about Calif and A,zthats the hot spot. If there is a law the locals can be persuaded into enforce it. then we can get some good photos on the boards.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    239
    Look,IMO, we should NOT go on some legal crusade(probably in vain) to make these people stop wearing masks.

    You will have every MSMedia-type talking about the First Amendment Right to be a thug in a ski-mask. They will become the victims.

    This is the same media who probably works relentlessly to identify every
    patriot as possible from protest footage , in order to brand as many people as racists.




    We have to protect anonymity because it might be US who have to wear them in the future.


    I'll continue this in my next post because feel it is important to edit my thoughts properly on this one.......................

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Oak Island, North Mexolina
    Posts
    6,231
    phoenixashes wrote
    "We have to protect anonymity because it might be US who have to wear them in the future."


    Nope,
    Good guys don't have to hide behind a mask.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  8. #8
    Senior Member JohnB2012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    4,168
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlesoakisland
    You are doing good, now how about Calif and A,zthats the hot spot. If there is a law the locals can be persuaded into enforce it. then we can get some good photos on the boards.
    I'll check out the CA and AZ laws tomorrow.

  9. #9
    Senior Member JohnB2012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    4,168
    Quote Originally Posted by phoenixashes
    You will have every MSMedia-type talking about the First Amendment Right to be a thug in a ski-mask. They will become the victims.
    Phoenx, they don't have a right to wear masks under these circumstances if there is a state law that covers it. The federal court has already upheld this in NY.

  10. #10
    Senior Member JohnB2012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    4,168
    http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisg ... n=retrieve

    California Penal Code Section 185

    (185.) Section One Hundred and Eighty-five. It shall be unlawful
    for any person to wear any mask, false whiskers, or any personal
    disguise (whether complete or partial) for the purpose of:
    One--Evading or escaping discovery, recognition, or identification
    in the commission of any public offense.
    Two--Concealment, flight, or escape, when charged with, arrested
    for, or convicted of, any public offense. Any person violating any
    of the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of a
    misdemeanor.

    Looks like in CA they have to be commiting a crime while wearing a mask and then it is only an additional misdemeanor.

    I couldn't find anything for AZ in relation to wearing masks in public.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •