Bill Gates Crosses The Digital Rubicon, Says "Mass Gatherings" May Not Return Without

Bill Gates Crosses The Digital Rubicon, Says "Mass Gatherings" May Not Return Without Global Vaccine

April 8, 2020

Authored by Robert Bridge via The Strategic Culture Foundation,

A recurring theme among conspiracy theorists is that the elite are just waiting for the right moment to roll out their ‘mark of the beast’ technology to remotely identify and control every single human being on the planet,thus sealing their plans for a one world government. And with many people willing to do just about anything to get back to some sense of normalcy, those fears appear more justified with each passing day.


In the Book of Revelation [13:16-17], there is a passage that has attracted the imagination of believers and disbelievers throughout the ages, and perhaps never more so than right now: “And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark…”


Was John of Patmos history’s first conspiracy theorist, or are we merely indulging ourselves today with a case of self-fulfilling prophecy? Whatever the case may be, many people would probably have serious reservations about being branded with an ID code even if it had never been mentioned in Holy Scripture. But that certainly has not stopped Microsoft founder Bill Gates, who has been warning about a global pandemic for years, from pushing such controversial technologies on all of us.


https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b...-930x520_0.jpg


In September 2019, just three months before the coronavirus first appeared in China, ID2020, a San Francisco-based biometric company that counts Microsoft as one of its founding members, quietly announced it was undertaking a new project that involves the “exploration of multiple biometric identification technologies for infants” that is based on “infant immunization” and only uses the “most successful approaches”.

For anyone who may be wondering what one of those “most successful approaches” might look like, consider the following top contender for the contract. Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) have developed what is essentially a hi-tech ‘tattoo’ that stores data in invisible dye under the skin. The ‘mark’ would be delivered together with a vaccine, most likely administered by Gavi, the global vaccine agency that also falls under the umbrella of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

“The researchers showed that their new dye, which consists of nanocrystals called quantum dots… emits near-infrared light that can be detected by a specially equipped smartphone,” MIT News reported.

And if the reader scrolls to the very bottom of the article, he will find that this study was funded first and foremost by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Today, with the global service economy shut down to prevent large groups of infectious humans from assembling, it is easier to imagine a day when people are required to have their infrared ID ‘tattoo’ scanned in order to be granted access to any number of public venues. And from there, it requires little stretch of the imagination to see this same tracking nanotechnology being applied broadly across the global economy, where it could be used to eliminate the use of dirty money. After all, if reusable bags are being outlawed over the coronavirus panic-demic, why should reusable cash get special treatment?

Writing earlier this month in these pages, geopolitical analyst Pepe Escobar provided a compelling argument that the coronavirus, which is driving the world towards a New Great Depression, is “being used as cover for the advent of a new, digital financial system, complete with a forced vaccine cum nanochip creating a full, individual, digital identity.

As one possible future scenario, Escobar imagined “clusters of smart cities linked by AI, with people monitored full time and duly micro-chipped doing what they need with a unified digital currency…”
Those fears took on greater significance when Bill Gates sat down over the weekend for a breathtaking interview with CBS This Morning. Gates told host Anthony Mason that mass gatherings might have to be prohibited in the age of coronavirus unless and until a wide scale vaccination program is enacted.

“What does ‘opening up’ look like,” Gates asked rhetorically before essentially changing the entire social and cultural makeup of the United States in one fell swoop.

“Which activities, like schools, have such benefit and can be done in a way that the risk of transmission is very low, and which activities, like mass gatherings, maybe, in a certain sense more optional. And so until you’re widely vaccinated those [activities] may not come back at all”

[The interview can be watched in its entirety here].


According to Gates, anything that could be defined as a “mass gathering” – from spectators packed into a stadium for a sporting event, to protesters out on the street in demonstration – would be considered an act of civil disobedience without a vaccine. Little surprise that Gates chose the concept of “mass gathering” to snag all of us, for what is modern democratic society if not one big mass event after another? Indeed, since nobody will want to miss the next big happening, like the Super Bowl, or Comic-Con, or, heaven forbid, Eurovision, millions of people would predictably line up for miles to get their Microsoft-supported inoculation, even if it contains tracking technologies.

ly recap featuring a curated list of must-read stories.
Just last month, Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director, told a Senate Subcommittee that over 80 percent of the people who get infected by the coronavirus “spontaneously recover” without any medical intervention. This makes one wonder why the global lockdown was designed for everyone instead of just the sick and elderly. Meanwhile, the drug hydroxychloroquine, which has been downplayed in the media despite being named as the most effective coronavirus treatment among physicians in a major survey, is starting to get a fresh look.


Just this week, following Nevada’s lead, Michigan just reversed course and is now the second democratic state to request the anti-malarial drug from the Trump administration.

So now it looks as though we are off to the races to see what will become the approved method of fighting the global pandemic – a hastily developed vaccine that may actually worsen the effects of the disease in those who contract it, or the already proven inexpensive drug hydroxychloroquine.

If the winner turns out to be a global vaccine, possibly one that carries ID nanotechnology, don’t expect the wealthy to be lining up with their kids to be the first to get it. In 2015, The American Journal of Public Heath surveyed some 6,200 schools in California – the epicenter of biometric ID research – and found vaccine exemptions were twice as common among kindergartners enrolled in private institutions.

It seems that the elite are betting heavily on the development of an ID-tracking vaccine that would bring all races and institutions together under one big happy roof, but clearly they will continue living in their own fenced-off neighborhood in this one world government. Whether or not they will get a ‘special pass’ from receiving the new-age mark is another question.



(Tweets at Link)

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitic...without-global

About the source: zerohedge.com
--------------------------------------


10 Things You Didn’t Know about Zero Hedge

Garrett Parker 1 Year Ago

https://moneyinc.com/wp-content/uplo...19/02/Wall.jpg


Zero Hedge is a blog that is supposed to be focused on the financial markets. However, it is important to note that its reputation is controversial at best, not least because it spreads a number of financial theories that are considered to be either conspiratorial or flat-out wrong by most economists. Here are 10 things that you may or may not have known about Zero Hedge:

1. Its Writers Post Under the Pseudonym of Tyler Durden

The in-house writers for Zero Hedge post under the shared pseudonym of Tyler Durden. For those who are unfamiliar with the name, it refers to the Fight Club narrator’s hallucination, who is one of the co-founders of the titular Fight Club. Said novel was very popular with a certain subset of young American men in the 1990s, meaning that the choice of name was wholly unsurprising.

2. Founder Has Been Barred from the Securities Industry

In 2009, it was revealed that the founder of Zero Hedge was a man named Daniel Ivandjiiski, who was born in Bulgaria but had been educated in the United States. It is interesting to note that Ivandjiiski had once been a hedge fund trader. However, he was barred from the securities industry by FINRA in 2008 because he had been caught engaging in insider trading, which is a huge no-no in the field.

3. Has a Reputation for Being a Bear

Zero Hedge has a reputation for being a bear, meaning that it tends to have a negative opinion on the overall course of the economy as a whole. In fact, the blog is so consistently bearish that there are those who call it a permabear.

4. Believes in the Austrian School

One of Zero Hedge’s most noticeable choices is its belief in the Austrian School of economics, which is named thus because it sprung up in late 19th and early 20th century Vienna. There are small bits and pieces of the Austrian School that has been incorporated into mainstream economics, but for the most part, it is seen as being heterodox for very good reasons. For example, the Austrian School rejects the use of mathematical modeling, which is perhaps unsurprising when it is less than enthusiastic about empirical evidence as a whole.

5. Has Other Conspiratorial Views About Finance

With that said, a belief in the Austrian School is far from being Zero Hedge’s sole conspiratorial view when it comes to finance. For example, it thinks that central banks are intervening in markets on a frequent basis for the purpose of propping up prices. Likewise, it thinks that US investment banks are frontrunning the US Federal Reserve.

6. Loves Personalized Attacks

Content-wise, Zero Hedge is famous for its personalized attacks on finance professionals that it doesn’t like. For proof, consider the fact that it contains hundreds and hundreds of articles directed towards figures such as the commodity analyst Dennis Gartman and the economist Paul Krugman. This doesn’t mean hundreds and hundreds of articles directed towards them in total, this means hundreds and hundreds of articles directed towards each of them.

7. Has Been Accused of Taking Other People’s Research

Zero Hedge has been accused of taking other people’s research, adding its own slant to the interpretation, and then publishing it on its own without permission. This has happened to both Merrill Lynch’s chief economic David Rosenberg and Morgan Stanley.

8. Claimed Up to 40 Writers

At one point in time, a contributor claimed that up to 40 writers could be writing under the Tyler Durden pseudonym. However, when a Seeking Alpha writer named Colin Lokey came out to the public about his involvement in 2016, he revealed that there were just three writers using the pseudonym including himself.

9. Lokey Criticized Profit Motive

Lokey criticized the profit motive that drove Zero Hedge’s writing, which the writers’ very luxurious lifestyle. He saw it as being particularly deceptive considering the blog’s use of an anti-capitalist, anti-establishment figure, which played an important role in attracting that crowd to the blog’s readership.

10. Lokey Criticized Support of Authoritarian, Autocratic Governments

Besides that, Lokey also criticized Zero Hedge for its support of authoritarian, autocratic governments. On a related note, this is one of the reasons that some people see Zero Hedge as being affiliated with the alt right.

https://www.google.com/search?q=what...hrome&ie=UTF-8