Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    4,714

    "Birthright Citizenship" Bill Could be Soon

    November 22, 2010 4:30 PM
    Steve King: "Birthright Citizenship" Bill Could be Soon
    Iowa Republican Rep. Steve King said in an interview with CBS News today that he is "looking at dropping a bill early in the 112th Congress" to end the practice of giving U.S. citizenship to U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants.

    King, who will likely head the immigration subcommittee when the new Congress begins work in January, predicted that hearings on the bill would not be immediate, since there are "other priorities" to be dealt with. He said he expected hearings "in the next couple months" after the legislation is introduced.

    The practice of offering citizenship to babies born to illegal immigrants in the United States is known as "birthright citizenship," and defenders say it is protected by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. The 14th Amendment opens this way: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

    King says that the clause "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" means that babies born to illegal immigrants do not necessarily have Constitutionally-protected citizenship rights. He also argues that it is important to consider the history behind the amendment, which was adopted in 1868.

    "The 14th Amendment and that specific clause was put in place immediately post-Civil War for the purpose of ensuring that babies born to newly freed slaves would be American citizens," he said, adding that it had nothing to do with citizenship for the children of illegal immigrants.


    King told CBS News that the "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" clause was included at the time to exempt babies born to diplomats and certain Native Americans who were living on reservations, and that the clause can also be applied to children born to illegal immigrants.
    The Iowa congressman argues the change is necessary because of an "anchor baby industry" that exists to exploit the law, which he says incentivizes immigrants to enter the United States to have children. King says that between one in six and one in 12 (or between 340,000 and 720,000) babies born in the United States are born to illegal immigrants, who take advantage of the baby's legal status to gain government benefits.
    Those on the other side say the number of people who are motivated to come to America to create "anchor babies" is small and argue it could be dealt with by outlawing the practice, not eliminating birthright citizenship.

    Eliminating birthright citizenship "would punish the innocent children of undocumented immigrants, which flies in the face of American values," according to Michele Waslin, Senior Policy Analyst at the Immigration Policy Center.

    Asked about criticisms that eliminating birthright citizenship goes against the American values of inclusiveness, King said that by critics' arguments "everybody born on the planet should be included" as citizens.

    "You have to draw the line somewhere," he said.


    As McClatchy reports, Republican Reps. Tom McClintock and Dan Lungren are among those who agree with King on the issue.



    Americans are split on birthright citizenship: 49 percent said in an August CBS News poll that the law should be kept as it is, while 47 percent said it should be changed.



    King said he believes a law to change the policy should be passed without worrying about potential legal challenges. If the law is ultimately struck down in the courts, King said, he would push for a Constitutional Amendment to address the issue, though he acknowledged "it would be difficult" to get an amendment passed.


    If a law ending birthright citizenship passes the House, it would still need to get through the Democrat-led Senate and then be signed into law by President Obama to take effect - an unlikely proposition. King said he views his effort as just one step in a process, comparing his work on birthright citizenship to the six years he spent working to make English Iowa's official language, which took place in 2002.


    "I have a perspective about the degree of difficulty, but I think you have to do the right thing," he said.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162- ... 03544.html

  2. #2
    Senior Member southBronx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,527

    Re: "Birthright Citizenship" Bill Could be Soon

    Quote Originally Posted by topsecret10
    November 22, 2010 4:30 PM
    Steve King: "Birthright Citizenship" Bill Could be Soon
    mr king
    I don't think so Obama will fight tooth & nail to get the illegal immigrant .in Our country but we are the voice Of the American
    as for the baby Of Illegal immigrant they are not citizen Of the USA . the Parents came over to & think yes we are USA citizen I don't think so .& my baby is a citizen No way I don't think so we will fight this
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member roundabout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,445
    If a law ending birthright citizenship passes the House, it would still need to get through the Democrat-led Senate and then be signed into law by President Obama to take effect - an unlikely proposition.
    Perhaps it is time to abolish the 17th Amendment? Now that could create for some fun. If that was abolished and the power returned to the state to get rid of those not serving the people of said state, then the fire would burn their arses. This would also bring more attention to those serving in the state houses.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    Eliminating birthright citizenship "would punish the innocent children of undocumented immigrants, which flies in the face of American values," according to Michele Waslin, Senior Policy Analyst at the Immigration Policy Center.
    American Values have never supported legally, morally or socially giving children of non-citizens automatic birthright citizenship in our nation. Not before the 14th Amendment and not after. What happened is millions of children of illegal aliens have been given citizenship by clerks, people with no authority and no law, constitutional or otherwise.

    It's time to take our country back from the ignoramuses that comprise our technocracy and pass a law that specifically prohibits citizenship to children of illegal aliens. That keeps them out of our voting booths, off our MediCaid, denies them other public services, and gets them and their parents out of the country back to their homeland of real citizenship where they belong.

    I don't even know why we give automatic birthright citizenship to children of legal immigrants but that will change with the legislation that requires at least 1 parent be a US citizen for automatic birthright citizenship.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    3,757
    The children of illegals were never meant to be deemed citizens of this country , Speaking for myself , I think it should be retro and every one of them rooted out and deported

    I am not feeling charitable today

  6. #6
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,432
    Duplicate post and was put on the homepage Tues.
    Please place any further comments to:
    http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-218653-tom.html+mcclintock
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •