The Bizarre Media Blackout Of Hacked George Soros Documents
The Bizarre Media Blackout Of Hacked George Soros Documents
Scandal: Leaked documents released a few days ago provide juicy insider details of how a fabulously rich businessman has been using his money to influence elections in Europe, underwrite an extremist group, target U.S. citizens who disagreed with him, dictate foreign policy, and try to sway a Supreme Court ruling, among other things. Pretty compelling stuff, right?
Not if it involves leftist billionaire George Soros. In this case, the mainstream press couldn't care less.
On Saturday, a group called DC Leaks posted more than 2,500 documents going back to 2008 that it pilfered from Soros' Open Society Foundations' servers. Since then, the mainstream media have shown zero interest in this gold mine of information.
We couldn't find a single story on the New York Times, CNN, Washington Post, CBS News or other major news sites that even noted the existence of these leaked documents, let alone reported on what's in them.
Indeed, the only news organization that appears to be diligently sifting through all the documents is the conservative Daily Caller, which as a result has filed a series of eye-opening reports.
So what could possibly explain the mainstream media's disinterest?
Is the problem that the material is too boring or inconsequential? Hardly.
As we noted in this space on Monday, the leaked documents show how Soros' far-flung international organizations attempted to manipulate Europe's 2014 elections. The "List of European Elections 2014 Projects" details over 90 Soros efforts he had under way that year.
The documents reveal that Soros has poured nearly $4 million into anti-Israel groups, with a goal of "challenging Israel's racist and anti-democratic policies."
Here at home, they show that Soros proposed paying the Center for American Politics $200,000 to conduct a smear campaign against conservative activists.
More recently, an October 2015 document came to light showing that Soros' Open Society U.S. Programs had donated $650,000 to "invest in technical assistance and support for the groups at the core of the burgeoning #BlackLivesMatter movement." Since then, several BLM protests have turned violent.
That same document details how this group successfully used its "extensive networks" to pressure the Obama administration into increasing the number of refugees it would take to 100,000, despite concerns that Islamic terrorists could use the refugee program to infiltrate the U.S.
A separate memo details how Soros tried to use his clout to sway Supreme Court justices into approving President Obama's unilateral effort to rewrite immigration law. "Grantees are seeking to influence the Justices (primarily via a sophisticated amicus briefs and media strategy) in hopes of securing a favorable ruling in U.S. v Texas," the memo, dug up by the Daily Caller, states.
Anyone with this much power and influence demands close media scrutiny. Particularly when he has extremely close ties to the would-be next president of the United States.
This year alone, Soros has given $7 million to the Clinton-supporting Priorities USA super-PAC, and a total of $25 million to support Democrats and their causes, according to Politico.
And when Soros speaks, Clinton listens. A separate email released by WikiLeaks shows Soros giving what read like step-by-step instructions to then-Secretary of State Clinton on how to deal with unrest in Albania in early 2011, including a list of people who should be considered as candidates to become an official mediator sent to that country. Days later, the EU dispatched one of the people on Soros' list.
Thomas Lifson, writing in the American Thinker blog, said "Soros got the U.S. and other accomplices to intervene in the internal affairs of a sovereign state…. How is this not huge news?"
How, indeed.
If Soros were a rock-ribbed conservative who supported Republican candidates and causes, you can bet that a swarm of reporters would right now be lustily tearing into these documents determined to expose any and every shred of evidence of influence peddling and misdeeds.
But because Soros is a hard-core leftist, he apparently gets a pass. Shameful.
http://www.investors.com/politics/ed...ros-documents/
Soros' $6 Million For Hillary Speak Volumes
Soros' $6 Million For Hillary Speak Volumes
Purchasing Power: Leftist financier George Soros’ big contribution to a Hillary Clinton super PAC isn't about which Democrat is the most extreme. Today, all Democrat presidential candidates are.
If we’re to believe the familiar rhetoric of the left, hedge fund magnate Soros became one of the several dozen richest men in the world not from producing anything of value but because he and others in his field “manipulate and deceive using exotic shell games, skimming off money out of your retirements, your savings plans and your banks using a myriad of fees, schemes and other dishonest tactics.”
How do they do this? A lefty website such as the Democratic Underground tells us, “they sit behind a computer generating nothing for society but are clever enough to devise financial scams to steal at will. And it’s all ‘legal’ because they use their fortunes to buy as many political prostitutes in Washington as they want or need to write loopholes into laws or to gut regulations.”
As far as loopholes and regulations go, a dispassionate observer could easily conclude that the $5 million Soros gave to get Barack Obama elected president in 2008 was simply a Wall Street fat cat self-servingly purchasing the Dodd-Frank law that President Obama later happily signed.
As the Washington Examiner’s Tim Carney wrote, “if your goal were to foster more political cronyism, reward lobbyists, entrench incumbents, enrich the politically connected and get the revolving door spinning faster, you would have a hard time crafting a more useful piece of legislation than the Dodd-Frank financial regulation bill.”
Somehow, Soros’ fortune has more than doubled under the Obama presidency, which more than makes up for the $1 billion that Soros had to return to his hedge fund clients under Dodd-Frank. Such irregularities never bother the anti-capitalist political beneficiaries of Soros’ supposedly non-productive capitalism, of course. The MoveOn.org and Media Matters sugar daddy has now given another $6 million to Clinton’s super PAC Priorities USA Action, once again placing Soros “among the biggest givers in all of American politics.”
The Soros-financed MoveOn.org, meanwhile, has backed Clinton rival Bernie Sanders. The Hillary donation, however, is no “aha!” moment, even though her campaign will soon undoubtedly brandish the donation to try to cut into Sanders' support on the far left.
The truth is that this is not your father’s Democratic party. Sanders is not significantly any more socialist than Clinton would be. And we already have a socialist in the White House, whose health care reform, for instance, is encountering major problems. It could end up leading to the much-warned-of slippery slope to Euro-style single-payer health care that Obama originally proposed.
In 2004, Soros devoted himself fully to electing John Kerry president; now Kerry is secretary of state. That’s the job Hillary used to have. If a Clinton administration takes office next January, you'll be hearing “Secretary Bernie Sanders,” because chances are that the first woman president will offer him something in the cabinet.
In the excitement of the early party contests, many Americans are wondering -- even agonizing -- about whether the name “Clinton” or “Sanders” will be on the ballots placed before them this November. But the important thing to remember is what Soros does with his money roll: funding the Democratic party, which has come to fully embrace the causes on which he has spent billions.
So the name that might make the most sense to have printed on the Democrats’ presidential ballot this year is not that of the former first lady, or of the Vermont independent senator, but “Soros.”
http://www.investors.com/politics/ed...peaks-volumes/
