Results 1 to 1 of 1
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
04-09-2015, 05:39 AM #1
Blood Money: CIA Director Reveals Obama-Iran Nuke Deal Is a Bailout, Funding the Slau
The President.
Blood Money: CIA Director Reveals Obama-Iran Nuke Deal Is a Bailout, Funding the Slaughter of U.S. Troops
By lifting sanctions, the U.S. kickstarts the failing Iranian economy, and provides blood money to a ruthless killer of U.S. soldiers.
by Scott Ott
April 8, 2015 - 9:14 am
(1.3k)
Improvised Explosive Devices (IED), often provided by the Islamic Republic of Iran, kill and maim many American soldiers.CIA Director John Brennan certainly didn’t mean to say it this way, but he clearly implied that the Obama nuclear deal with Iran will boost funding for the world’s most active state sponsor of terrorism — a terror sponsor that was apparently “too big too fail,” so Obama ordered a bailout for the Islamic Republic.
Tuesday, the CIA director inadvertently suggested that President Obama’s nuclear deal would rescue the Iranian economy, providing more funding to this state sponsor of terror. The unintentional implication is, nevertheless, true.
By lifting sanctions, the U.S. kickstarts the failing Iranian economy, and provides blood money to a nation whose shrapnel is embedded in the brains and torsos of innumerable U.S. troops who left their shattered limbs scattered in the desert, a nation whose activity and weapons are the cause on countless American death certificates, and whose armed agents today work to conquer U.S. influence — from Yemen, to Syria and Iraq, to North Africa and beyond.
I deduce this from two Brennan quotes in today’s New York Times – remarks he made Tuesday night at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. First, the CIA chief notes that Iran was on the brink of economic collapse.
“I think over time [Iranian President] Rouhani was able to explain to [Grand Ayatollah] Khamenei just how challenging the economic environment was in Iran right now, and it was destined to go down,” he said. “The only way they were going to address” the problem was to get sanctions lifted.Then, at the end of the Times story, Brennan acknowledges that since the deal was about nukes and sanctions only, the Islamic Republic is free to continue its vigorous work as state sponsor of terrorism.
Mr. Brennan hinted he had little expectation that the agreement would change Iran’s behavior in the region, including its sponsorship of terrorism. And he acknowledged that the increased revenue Iran would receive as sanctions are lifted could bolster those efforts.So, whether you believe that the aggressive nuclear monitoring and reduction of centrifuges from 19,000 to 6,000 will increase or decrease Iran’s “breakout time” to a nuclear weapon, or the likelihood of war with Iran, one thing you can know for sure: Lifting the sanctions will increase cash flow to the Iranian terror network.
“I don’t think this is going to lead to a light switch and the Iranians are going to become passive, docile,” he said.
American troops — as well as noncombatants — will pay for Obama’s nuclear deal with their flesh, their blood and their lives.
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2015/04/08...of-u-s-troops/
Similar Threads
-
Charles Krauthammer: SUCKER’S DEAL - Barrack Obama & Valerie Jarrett's Deal W/ Iran
By AirborneSapper7 in forum General DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: 11-22-2013, 03:21 PM -
Court Reveals Iranian Operatives In Charge Of Obama’s Iran Policy Since 2009
By Newmexican in forum General DiscussionReplies: 0Last Post: 09-30-2012, 09:28 AM -
Tax Cut Deal Reveals Obama 2.0
By kathyet in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 0Last Post: 12-08-2010, 11:17 AM -
Why Bush will Nuke Iran
By CCUSA in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 12Last Post: 10-10-2006, 12:45 AM
Laura Loomer - Woke up this morning to a @nytimes article...
03-27-2024, 11:36 PM in General Discussion