BOGUS TAX SCANDAL PROVIDES COVER FOR HILLARY’S DUMPING OF TAINTED LATINA SURROGATE

BOGUS TAX SCANDAL PROVIDES COVER FOR HILLARY’S DUMPING OF TAINTED LATINA SURROGATE

OCTOBER 3, 2016|
BY DONN MARTEN

http://3m12dd41gw8bqlgg62dfsvyl.wpen...-600-x-338.jpg

While the establishment media is all over the ginned-up scandal over Donald Trump’s federal taxes, it has gone largely unmentioned that the big New York Times saga provides a timely smokescreen. Alicia Machado, the former Miss Universe who was cruelly victimized by the mean, mean man has virtually disappeared from headlines.

It is an unexpected turn of events for a woman who figured prominently in Clinton’s debate performance against Trump and briefly served as the new face of the racist war on women – even being featured in a Hillary campaign video. That was until a bit of digging into Machado’s tawdry past revealed such things as her allegedly threatening to murder a judge, having a Mexican drug lord baby daddy and appearing in porn videos. Hardly the wholesome image that Team Hillary was seeking to portray and another example of sloppy vetting and lack of attention to detail that has plagued her operation.

It was a good time to change horses in midstream and the Clinton flacks in the media are providing an assist be flogging the tax story for all that they’re worth today.

The Hill kinda, sorta explains the exiled Latina in the story “Trump’s taxes bump Miss Universe from headlines”:

The spotlight shifted on Sunday to Donald Trump’s tax returns, after a report surfaced showing the GOP nominee could have legally avoided paying federal income tax for up to 18 years.

The New York Times report quickly bumped the controversy surrounding his treatment of former Miss Universe Alicia Machado from the headlines, as the GOP nominee’s supporters sought to defend him, arguing the new information shows Trump’s genius.

But Democrats and supporters of Hillary Clinton said the fact that a $916 million loss Trump reported on his 1995 income tax returns could have allowed him to legally avoid paying any federal income tax for up to 18 years reveals a corrupt system and a candidate who only cares about himself.

The latest average of polls from RealClearPolitics shows Clinton ahead of Trump by 2.5 points and it remains to be seen how the information about Trump’s taxes will sit with voters.

The best bet is that the NYT “bombshell” won’t muss a hair on Trump’s head and considering that Mrs. Clinton herself has used the operating loss provision it will be a blip on the radar.

There also is the possibility of blowback with the Times choosing to selectively publish the tax details of a then private citizen as a politically motivated hit job. The tidbit that the small sample of Trump’s 1995 tax return was mailed to the paper by a mole inside Trump Tower just doesn’t pass the smell test. It’s far from a remote possibility that the documents came from within the bowels of Obama’s politicized IRS and were dropped down a mail slot in New York as a disinformation ploy. The Democrats are just the type of sleazy bastards who would do such a thing.

No matter though, by later this week the entire income tax smear campaign will be replaced by some new fake outrage and ‘Miss Piggy’ will have been swept away with it.

http://downtrend.com/donn-marten/bog...tina-surrogate

Quote:

---

There also is the possibility of blowback with the Times choosing to selectively publish the tax details of a then private citizen as a politically motivated hit job.

---

Funny isn't it while Hillary Clinton is worried about a pageant owner telling the pageant winner she was in violation of the weight clause in her contract and needs to lose weigh tto keep her job, the Clinton Clowns and Media Morons didn't even notice or care that these state returns if real are the private returns of TWO PRIVATE US CITIZENS, Donald Trump and Marla Maples Trump.

The Clinton Campaign, the Corrupt Media and the Disgusting Woman at the New York Times, Susanne Craig who found the envelope in her mail box and wrote the tax return story, didn't even care that they were violating the rights of not only Donald Trump, but Marla Maples. All the tax experts fail to even mention that this loss couldn't and wouldn't just be reported and claimed by Donald Trump, but Marla Maples as well, a major oversight on their part if you ask me.

And to the lawyers who weighed in like Judge Napolitano, Donald Trump may be a candidate for President, but that does not make him a "public figure". Running for President does not exempt you from your protections under the law on any level for any reason.

Marla Maples is not running for President, she is not a "public figure", she's no longer married to Donald Trump, and the publishing of these returns violated her privacy and other legal rights right along with Donald Trump's. The writers and editors involved in writing and publishing this story should be prosecuted for the felonies they committed through this story. A couple abiding US tax law has no public interest or right to know factor. None.

For the Clinton Campaign, the NYT and the CORRUPT MEDIA that then published and used these returns in their "reports" on the "story" are all guilty of violating both Donald Trump and Marla Maples privacy and legal rights, and that means Civil Rights.

The fact that not one Democrat has even mentioned the violation of Marla Maples rights, just shows that Democrats are more impressed with some big-eating floozy from Venezuela than they are with the rights and protections of American Women.

It's like Marla didn't even exist to them, as if her interests in this didn't even occur to them, and the reason it seems that way, is because she doesn't matter at all to them.

These Clinton Clowns and Media Morons are an evil infecting our nation, harming our citizens and stomping on the rights of women.