Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member HAPPY2BME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    17,895

    Bundy Responds to Race Storm, As Media Attempt to Divert Away From BLM Crimes

    H2 Note: For all those buying into the 'he's a racist, thug, and terrorist' firestorm, you have swallowed the same 'Duckhunter Hater' pill that the socialist media engine powering Obama has put in your mouth. Does it taste good?

    ----------------------------------------------------------


    Bundy Responds to Race Storm, As Media Attempt to Divert Away From BLM Crimes


    SPECIAL REPORT
    21st Century Wire

    April 24, 2014

    Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy took to the podium at this morning’s press conference at the Bundy Ranch expecting a media race storm, and that’s exactly what happened.

    For the family patriarch, it was baptism by fire into the unforgiving world of public relations. Press appeared somewhat shocked, as Bundy stood up and took the media punches for 25 minutes, and somehow managed to use the media’s race inquisition as an opportunity to articulate his own emotions, and his personal views on America’s failing socialized state and the need for more freedom and liberty – and not a racist in sight.

    It was clear from the onset that many of the press who were present were there looking for controversy not related to the previous weeks armed federal occupation and forced animal slaughter. Instead media were fixated on Bundy’s previously reported racial comments, hoping that Bundy would say something outrageous. Only he didn’t.


    A few members of the press could be seen storming out towards the end of the conference (see full video below), almost as if they were cheated by Bundy’s surprisingly insightful and socially relevant remarks.

    Last weekend, the New York Times had gathered a statement from Cliven Bundy, but intentionally held it back until last night as part of the White House’s plan to submerge today’s scheduled press announcement of legal action against members of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). And it worked. The shrewd PR move gave Washington a brief stay of execution, as the media carry on their feeding frenzy over Bundy’s alleged ‘racist remarks’ and him using the word “negro”.

    The story then cascaded across national media, most of whom re-spun the story to claim that Cliven Bundy was somehow ‘advocating slavery’. The controversy sent politicians and other media personalities who had previously supported Bundy – all running for cover.

    Race Hoax Exposed

    Critics cite how the New York Times had, in fact, taken Bundy’s comments last week out of context and cynically took advantage of his provincial vocabulary, spinning it against him, willfully ignoring the actual meaning of his statement. A pro-federal government media bias combined with a left-wing blood lust to crucify the embattled rancher prompted mainstream media outlets to completely flip the meaning, so as to demonize him in a politically correct court of public opinion.

    As it turns out, Bundy’s speech was cleverly twisted by a left-wing outlet Media Matters, in concert with the New York Times.

    According to media watchdog Pat Dollard, “
    It is 100% clear that Cliven Bundy is not saying that blacks should be slaves picking cotton, but that the Federal government has created conditions for them so terrible, that their current situation may actually be worse.
    Read more at http://patdollard.com/2014/04/shock-...Ogo2W6GDkUp.99

    It is 100% clear that Cliven Bundy is not saying that blacks should be slaves picking cotton, but that the Federal government has created conditions for them so terrible, that their current situation may actually be worse.
    Read more at http://patdollard.com/2014/04/shock-...Ogo2W6GDkUp.99

    It is 100% clear that Cliven Bundy is not saying that blacks should be slaves picking cotton, but that the Federal government has created conditions for them so terrible, that their current situation may actually be worse.
    Read more at http://patdollard.com/2014/04/shock-...Ogo2W6GDkUp.99
    It is 100% clear that Cliven Bundy is not saying that blacks should be slaves picking cotton, but that the Federal government has created conditions for them so terrible, that their current situation may actually be worse”.

    Not surprisingly, all of the press and media presently engrossed in the Bundy gang-tackle were no where to be found two weeks ago when 200 armed paramilitary federal agents had their guns, tasers, dogs, and sniper rifles, all trained on the ranch’s unarmed residents – including women.

    Unabashed, Bundy used the media opportunity to clarify the statement which was spun by the New York Times. He explained, “I didn’t say they’d be better off as slaves… I didn’t say that, I said I said I was wondering“.

    Bundy explained, “I’m a wondering, are (blacks) better off with their young woman aborting their children? Are they better off with their young men in prison? Are they better off on the sidewalk in front of their government issued house?”

    Onlookers were not expecting Bundy’s recounting of his experience in Los Angeles during the 1965 Watts Riots, telling the story of how a black residents had escorted him 20 miles to safety in one of the worst hit areas of LA. “It took me 40 years to realize it, but those people were my angels, they protected me”.

    Minutes after the press storm, rancher Cliven Bundy was tending to a new born baby calf.

    “What I’m really excited about is the fact that our Constitution was formed so all of us people could have some liberty and freedom – and be able to exercise our Conscience“.

    On the false media charge that Cliven was somehow endorsing slavery, he explained, “I might not have a very big word base or vocabulary, but let me tell you something… I understand what slavery is all about and there is no question in my mind that I don’t know what slavery is about. Slavery is about when you take away choices for people, and when you have forced labor and transfer people and sell them.”

    Bundy added, “If you think that’s what I’m all about, then you’re wrong. I don’t believe in any of that.”

    “I’m not just talking to you the media here, I’m talking to America, and I’m talking to the world. What I want to see the world have is that individual freedom and liberty to be able to express themselves. That’s what America is all about.”

    What wasn’t covered at the conference were some serious legal questions regarding the behavior of the federal government, including:

    Was Sheriff Douglas Gillespie grossly negligent or at least negligent in a reckless way during the Bundy Ranch standoff April 12th? Was Sheriff Douglas Gillespie in violation of his oath of office?

    Was the BLM grossly negligent or at least negligent in a reckless way during the time leading up to, as well as during the Bundy Ranch standoff April 12th, and did the special agent in charge inform Sheriff Gillespie that the BLM was going to “stand down”?

    Did the BLM evade and impede a law enforcement investigation initiated by the local residents of Bunkerville, when they had reason to believe that the BLM was killing cattle and maliciously destroying private property owned by the Bundy Family (two crimes which were later found to have taken place)?

    Did any BLM agents personally benefit from issuing no-bid contracts to Utah cattlemen who were hired by the BLM?

    Is the BLM a private corporation, or a government agency? If the BLM is a privately held organization, do they have the power of arrest, or the authority to use deadly force against peaceful American citizens?

    Should Harry Reid and his son Rory be investigated and tried under the Racketeering Influenced and Corruptions Act (RICO)? Are the threats from Harry Reid and his son related to their possible attempts to profit from removing the Bundys from their land?

    Important questions indeed – arguable much more important than the ensuing race-baiting sideshow which has since overtaken to the saga at the Bundy Ranch.

    Watch the full press Conference in full, recorded LIVE on the GMN stream:



    http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/04/2...inal-activity/
    Last edited by HAPPY2BME; 04-25-2014 at 11:34 AM.
    Join our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & to secure US borders by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member HAPPY2BME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    17,895
    Bundy's son: N.Y. Times quote 'out of context'
    Newspaper reports 'racist' comments by Nevada rancher


    They took what they wanted. They knew when they were there his comments were not racist. He wasn’t able to completely articulate,” Ammon Bundy told WND. “That’s just my dad. He is a very principled person.
    Last edited by HAPPY2BME; 04-25-2014 at 03:00 PM.
    Join our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & to secure US borders by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Senior Member HAPPY2BME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    17,895
    H2 Note: Do you recall the entities that SHUT DOWN our national parks and war memorials in Washington D.C. and arrested those crossing the closed barriers? THAT is what Cliven Bundy is fighting against.

    ------------------------------------------------------------


    Bundy’s Critics Overlook How The West–Or Turf Anywhere–Was Won In The First Place


    By Donald Joy
    23 April 2014

    My position is that if (and that’s a Mojave-sized if) Bundy and his supporters can successfully hold off the feds indefinitely, then what we are witnessing is the beginning of a bona-fide secession movement, not in theory but in actuality; secession from what even many of Bundy’s detractors acknowledge is in many respects an out-of-control, overreaching, and corrupt federal Leviathan.
    Even among some Tea Party types, there are voices who are saying Cliven Bundy is just a free-loading, renegade rancher who should have been paying the fees to the feds for these last couple of decades, for his herds’ foraging around on “federal lands.” They say Bundy is flat-out wrong in the showdown with the Bureau of Land Management. Such commenters miss an all-important point when arguing about who really owns the Nevada territory in question, who has jurisdiction over it, the right to use it, to demand payment for use, and so on.

    In the paragraphs which follow, I will lay out the case that although might does not necessarily make “right,” the prevalence of stealth and superior physical force in acquiring, administering, and defending territory is and has always been the way of the world since time immemorial. To think that preceding tribal prerogatives, treaties, or modern legal arguments can or will ever change this fact is quite naive.

    The most strident Bundy-bashers insist that the federal government has a clear-cut case against Bundy, and they point to the fact that multiple courts have already ruled against him–just who does he think he is, anyway, to think he can just skip out on paying twenty years’ worth of grazing fees to a *cough* “legitimate” government administration? Where does the Bundy family get off, rallying these heavily-armed militia types from all over the country to help them defy the feds when the heat comes down?
    Well, I ask, in reply–just who did the Sons of Liberty think they were, when in 1773 they conducted a blatantly illegal midnight raid in Boston harbor, boarding ships disguised as Indians and dumping loads and loads of a shipment of tea overboard, in their now-legendary political protest against what they saw as a tyrannical government; a daring act of violence against property which helped spark the American Revolution?

    Americans have traditionally seen that episode in our nation’s history, the Boston Tea Party, along with other famous protests and the bloody war which ensued, as an heroic struggle of defiance against corrupt authority, ushering in an unprecedented age of human experience: The birth of a new country and a new society in which government power–with its tendency to grow, encroach, and abuse–is held in check by citizens (instead of the other way around), and based on carefully written documents spelling out the paramount rights of individuals and the specific, strictly limited role and powers of government.

    However, before our early leaders could finally, formally codify all of the ideas and principles upon which America was founded into systematized law and courts and agencies–they first had to sneak around, plotting and conspiring against the royal British colonial government, and then they had to openly confront and kill as many of the king’s warriors on the battlefield as necessary to obtain Cornwallis’ surrender, to be able to ultimately say, with triumphant confidence, that the territory “belonged” to the United States of America–not to the crown.

    Oh yes, and before that, Europeanexplorers and pioneers and settlers and armies had to first cross the ocean and “steal” the land, as conquerors, from the Indians, or Native Americans, aboriginals, redskins or whatever we are to call them. I mean the tribes of once-migratory nations who had also “stolen” this land from whichever tribes held it or used it before them, those wandering tribes having defeated prior tribes, and down through the ages.

    By the way, paleface and non-paleface readers, did you know that there’s fairly recent, good archaeological evidence (Google “Solutrean hypothesis”) that white people populated this continent centuries before the so-called “Indians” did, but that those old honkies were eventually genocided out of existence here by later invading tribes of non-whites? Kind of like what’s happening now, with La Reconquista, AZTLAN…”history repeats,” as they say…

    I wonder if any of those who say Bundy is wrong for not paying to use property they say doesn’t belong to him, would also look back throughout history and declare all of our civilization’s explorers, pioneers, conquerors, rebel armies, and founding fathers as more or less equally wrong? What about the Israelis, who founded and won their Zionist homeland through incredible feats of agricultural reclamation and all-out battle against foes who insisted (and still insist) that the territory was/is really theirs?

    What about the Falkland Islands? What about Ukraine? Cyprus? Taiwan? East Germany, The Balkans, Kurdistan, Armenia, Tibet, Kashmir, Northern Ireland, Kuwait? Grenada? Those examples are just some of the more modern ones; never mind the centuries and centuries of Thermopylaes and Bunkervilles and Stalingrads and Viennas which came before, throughout the globe.

    To the victor go the spoils.

    There’s no real difference between the supporters of Cliven Bundy and the original Sons of Liberty of America’s founding at the Boston Tea Party (or at the Boston Massacre, or at Lexington Green)–none, that is, except in this case it’s the government, not the rebels, who are violently destroying property–killing Bundy’s cattle and dumping them in mass graves, whereas the Tea Partiers only dumped chests of tea into the harbor. And the feds have held their fire at Bunkerville. So far.

    In common, the Sons of Liberty and Bundy’s supporters share an identical Declaration of Independence; specifically, the desire to live productively, free from oppressive micro-management by the dictates of distant, unelected bureaucrats and usurpers.
    At the time of our Constitution’s ratification, the federal government was created by the several states to serve the individual states’ united interests–not the other way around. After the Civil War, which was yet another case of sheer, brutal and ruthless armed violent force determining the outcome of all-out conflict over territorial jurisdiction, the federal government obtained massive and heavy new powers over the states, under which the states have been chafing ever since.

    My position is that if (and that’s a Mojave-sized if) Bundy and his supporters can successfully hold off the feds indefinitely, then what we are witnessing is the beginning of a bona-fide secession movement, not in theory but in actuality; secession from what even many of Bundy’s detractors acknowledge is in many respects an out-of-control, overreaching, and corrupt federal Leviathan.

    If secession takes hold and spreads, we will see an outright revolution. I’m not saying I think it will happen, since the feds could squash it with enough ruthlessness, but who knows? Perhaps there simply aren’t enough willing corrupt-ocrats at the controls to put down the revolt, and ultimately, maybe the ranks of Obama’s minions contain enough “Oathkeeper” types to make revolution possible, given that such conscientious people find the movement sufficiently about more than mere turf to come along.

    I wonder of what, who, and where, exactly, a new country on this continent would consist.

    Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2014/04/bundys...lZiJD847cRM.99


    Join our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & to secure US borders by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  4. #4
    Senior Member HAPPY2BME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    17,895
    From the blog ..


    Russ • 2 days ago

    this is no longer a government. it is nothing more than armed thugs hired by mob bosses driven by greed and an uncontrollable desire to control everything and every one. and these friggin morons think we are stupid enough to give up our guns. right!! here is a word for them SCREW YOU!!!

    3

    Reply

    Share ›

    Avatar
    MontieR • 2 days ago

    I really don't care about the grazing fees. What I do care about is our government sending mercenaries against an American citizen. Aside from the fact the federal government is EXPRESSLY forbidden from using military force on US soil. It SHOULD scare the hell out of even the most dedicated liberal that the government is now willing to use deadly force to collect it's tribute from ANYONE it CLAIMS is a terrorist.

    5

    Reply

    Share ›

    Avatar
    Ericsr MontieR • 2 days ago

    So well Stated. I've been searching for these same words for days now but at 72 my brain is sometimes tongue tied. I want to know who these mercenaries are? If they are Us citizens or what ? If they are Us then they should be ashamed of themselves.
    2

    Reply

    Share ›

    Avatar
    Markus • 2 days ago

    In Nevada, I have stated that this land grab from Bundy was another corrupt move by Reid and had no legitimate basis in fact – just another money grab. The cover-up is in full swing to prevent any investigation whatsoever. Now there is a video out on the corruption and you have to understand how these people operate. They do not accept money directly, but their family and friends can line their pockets until the cows come home – as they say.

    Third parties are starting to rise everywhere standing against this pervasive corruption. This is a global trend and what was taking place in Ukraine is in Thailand as well. There is a third-party rising in India against corruption. Representative government SUCKS. Hopefully, the next evolution in our political-economy will be toward direct democracy with term limits one-time only to prevent people like Reid from staying for life outside of question or law.

    2

    Reply

    Share ›

    Avatar
    reggiec Markus • 2 days ago

    President Woodrow
    Wilson has been quoted as saying, “This country is no longer a Republic, but is now a Democracy.” The following quote that has been attributed to either Alexis de Tocqueville or Professor Alexander Fraser Tyler, made clear what happens to a society on the road toward Socialism,

    “A Democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover they can vote themselves largess out of the public treasury. From that moment on the majority always VOTE for the candidate promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that Democracy always collapses over a loose fiscal policy, and followed by a Dictatorship and then a Monarchy.”

    HUMMMMMMMMM From what is going on now in the US maybe Wilson was right and so was Tocqueville.
    1

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    Donald Joy Markus • 2 days ago

    Notice that social media and cell phones are driving most of it...
    1

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    Markus Donald Joy • 2 days ago

    Which is probably why BHO wants to turn the power of the internet over to the UN, which is run by a bunch of dictators and commies.
    5

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    Donald Joy Markus • 2 days ago

    Good point.
    2

    Reply

    Share ›

    Avatar
    Roger Stancill • 2 days ago

    We need to get the focus off of Mr. Bundy and look much harder and
    aggressively at the father and son team known as the Reids.
    Also, the focus needs to be on who's running the BLM .
    What we really need is a corral full of Gowdys on the job and
    doing their job as Trustworthy servants of the People of America.

    4

    Reply

    Share ›

    Avatar
    Markus • 2 days ago

    Sorry, but to all the left-wing commentators who call Bundy a tax-cheat and an outlaw, be careful of what you speak for the Supreme Court has made it clear in 1845 that the Constitution forbids the federal rangers to be out there to begin with for the Feds could not retain ownership of the territory and simultaneously grant state sovereignty. At the very minimum, it became state land – not federal.

    3

    Reply

    Share ›

    Avatar
    Markus • 2 days ago

    Do the Fed’s Really Own the Land in Nevada? Nope!
    http://armstrongeconomics.com/...

    4

    Reply

    Share ›

    Avatar
    drkangel • 2 days ago

    How would you feel if you had a government loan and you were deliquent on your payments and the federal government showed up at your house with a few hundred armed officers with automatic weapons, helicopters, snipers, dogs etc? Then they went around your house and dug burial pits to accommadate the animals you own that they were killing and going to kill. I support the Bundys and all the armed people that showed up to support them. If he owes the govenment money there are ways to collect that money without using armed officers an threats. The government overstepped their bounds and made a stupid move. One thing that was shown by this incident is that Americans are pissed and will no longer back down from a government that is out of control.

    7

    Reply

    Share ›

    Avatar
    Omer the 3rd drkangel • 2 days ago

    It's about time...
    3

    Reply

    Share ›

    Avatar
    foxxybey • 2 days ago

    The government owns nothing, We the People own all the land and time to kick the government off our land and out of our buildings as all they do is stink things up.

    7

    Reply

    Share ›

    Avatar
    patrioticvigilantie • 2 days ago

    Good read with outstanding points.....ive made sim arguements with pro gov, people. but i do find these people are living with blinders on.

    6

    Reply

    Share ›

    Avatar
    Psychodad • 2 days ago

    Stupid cows grass is for smoking not eating .

    2

    Reply

    Share ›

    Avatar
    violater1 Psychodad • 2 days ago

    What you never had brownies laced with grass Psycho?

    Reply

    Share ›

    Avatar
    The Reactionary Researcher • 2 days ago

    Unlike the Bundy protests and grazing fees, many of the founding fathers thought the tea that was destroyed should be paid for.


    Reply

    Share ›

    Avatar
    Donald Joy The Reactionary Researcher • 2 days ago

    What bearing does that have on the point made here? They nonetheless disputed, and ultimately prevailed, against the crown claiming jurisdiction over them as subjects, and over the land as a kingdom. They accomplished this not chiefly by appeals to jurisprudence, but ultimately through violent physical force.
    3

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    The Reactionary Researcher Donald Joy • 2 days ago

    Perhaps none... I'm not sure. I just thought it was noteworthy that the original tea party's ethics and sense of justice was so strong and so finely tuned that they would pay for the property they destroyed during a protest.

    I further thought that stood in contrast to Bundy who refuses to pay for that which most of the rest of us pay for. So in your opinion, my friends company that mines copper on BLM land is justified in not paying his lease fees?

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    Donald Joy The Reactionary Researcher • 2 days ago

    Are the Japanese justified in calling their islands Japan? If so, why? Can't someone just come up with legal theories and explanations as to why some other people who came before really own the land, and that the Japanese should be paying the descendants and administrators of that long-ago tribe or whatever?

    If your friend's company decides to forcibly resist any attempts by the BLM to obtain payment or run them off, and succeeds, what really prevents you from acknowledging that your friend's company now owns the mine? Again, legal theories go out the window when land is won in battle. Prove me wrong.

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    The Reactionary Researcher Donald Joy • a day ago

    Prove you wrong? You want me to prove wrong the idea that when people take things by force that it becomes theirs? I can't prove that wrong. I'll simply restate that I had no idea you were advocating armed overthrow of the Federal Government.

    Personally, I don't want my kids to grow up in a state of civil war, but that's just me. Additionally, you think a small bunch of militia, or even a large group of militia would defeat the Federal Government if it came down to it?

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    Donald Joy The Reactionary Researcher • a day ago

    I suggest you simply read the article. And for the second time, I'm not advocating what you allege.

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    The Reactionary Researcher Donald Joy • a day ago

    I did read the article. I don't respond to things I don't read; I may have missed the point, but I certainly read it. I'm speculating that perhaps you feel my response to your article is shaped by our previous interactions; I assure you it is not. I suspect if you and I were to sit down and have a beer and conversation that we'd have many beliefs in common.

    That said, I doubt this issue would be one of those areas, but people needn't agree about everything. Putting aside for a moment our discussions, etc., are you proposing that a secessionist movement is the best solution to the Bundy conflict? If not, what do you think is the best solution? To which parties should Bundy pay grazing/lease fees? If you don't think there should be grazing/lease fees, how should federal or state owned land be managed?

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    Ericsr The Reactionary Researcher • 2 days ago

    You have a friend?
    1

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    Donald Joy Ericsr • 2 days ago

    LOL

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    Ericsr The Reactionary Researcher • 2 days ago

    The BLM was formed by Roosevelt in 1946 to put people to work after the war. not to act a para-military enforcement gang that was acting without provocation. You are a paid troll trying to cause an argument just to have fun. You are a reactionary communist and should go back to mommy's basement and play internet games.
    1

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    The Reactionary Researcher Ericsr • a day ago

    Reactionary Communist? Well it's obvious that someone needs to break out the dictionary and perhaps acquaint himself with some new words. So you're saying I'm an "extremely conservative" Communist. Sure... makes a lot of sense.

    With respect to your point about the BLM: Yeah... so? I never said the BLM was justified in behaving like a SWAT team to collect an unpaid bill.

    Is some slew of lame ad hominems the best you've got? Based on your command of the English language, I'm going have to surmise, that yes, that is the best you've got. Aren't you in your 70's. This is how mature Americans act now? Wow... we truly have declined as a nation.

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    violater1 Ericsr • 2 days ago

    Yeah the same demoniccrap president that essentially laid taxation on all Americans for their labors!

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    Donald Joy The Reactionary Researcher • 2 days ago

    Bundy has not refused to pay, he merely refuses to recognize/pay to the feds. As others have pointed out, he tried to send the remittances to the state instead. He stopped paying the feds because they weren't doing what they were supposed to do as far as maintaining fences and bridges etc., and they demanded that he first agree to all kinds of ever-increasing, unreasonable conditions before he could even pay them.
    2

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    The Reactionary Researcher Donald Joy • a day ago

    I'll restate that sending money to parties that doesn't own the land is equivalent to not paying. I might as well send my mortgage payment to AT&T and then cry foul when they come to foreclose on my home.

    I'm not sure why I can't get the point across that I'm not now nor was I ever stating that the Federal Government behaved well in this situation. What I did dispute is whether any of this would be happening if he'd just paid his fees. I guess we won't ever know.

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    Rob The Reactionary Researcher • 2 days ago

    Wrong. Bundy has offered to pay all the grazing fees to the State of Nevada, with whom he had a valid grazing contract until the BLM came in and decided to take it out from under him.
    12

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    The Reactionary Researcher Rob • 2 days ago

    The state of NV doesn't own BLM lands, no matter what Bundy says. You might as well state that he tried to pay grazing fees to AT&T, another entity that doesn't own the land. If he's so willing to pay his grazing fees to NV, why not just pay the person who owns the land?

    I'm not sure why this is so difficult.

    Nevada became a state in 1864, prior to Bundy's family living in the area or grazing cattle on the land. According to the Constitution of the State of Nevada: "the people inhabiting said territory do agree and declare, that they forever disclaim all right and title to the unappropriated public lands lying within said territory, and that the same shall be and remain at the sole and entire disposition of the United States"

    Furthermore, any right to the land was superseded by the Taylor Grazing Act of 1934, which was instituted to reduce damage to range land and manage the same.

    Where's your supporting evidence, aka facts?

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    MyronJPoltroonian The Reactionary Researcher • a day ago

    Mayhap the question of who "Owns" what, and how much, is in need of a visual aid. The map below provides a graphic depiction of just how large the leviathan of federal "Ownership" of allegedly "Sovereign" states has grown. The size and spread of this arrogance is only going to grow exponentially what with the proclivity of the current regime to issue "Executive Orders" and the issuance of a veritable entanglement of new rules and policy changes by unelected bureaucrats. To "Borrow" a phrase from the left when I was playing music with them from the mid '60's to the mid '80's: "If not us, who? If not now, when?

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    The Reactionary Researcher MyronJPoltroonian • a day ago

    I won't dispute that the federal government is out of control; you'll get no argument from me about that point. I further won't dispute that the federal government owns massive tracts of land throughout the west. Absolutely, one hundred percent correct. Furthermore, I won't dispute the notion that the Obama administration is a particular lawless regime. I've really only offered two points re: the Bundy Ranch conflict, one of which isn't relevant to this thread, and the other that if Bundy had paid the grazing fees, he'd be in a more powerful position... not one that would require an armed standoff.

    With respect to your borrowed phrase: What is it that you're proposing we do?

    By the way, thanks for not calling me a commie because I haven't jumped on the Conservative bandwagon with respect to this issue. Rational discussion is always appreciated and preferred.

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    Ericsr The Reactionary Researcher • 2 days ago

    Try the constitution of the USA. it states that the feds can only own D.C. and state land for forts and naval bases.
    1

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    The Reactionary Researcher Ericsr • a day ago

    Hmmmm... well either your right or legal constitutional scholars are correct. I'd probably go with legal scholars over random internet comments.

    The U.S. Constitution addresses the relationship of the federal government to lands. The Property Clause, Article IV, § 3, Clause 2, gives Congress authority over the lands, territories, or other property of the United States. It reads:

    The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States.

    This provision provides broad authority for Congress to govern the lands acquired by the federal government as it sees fit, and to exercise exclusive authority to decide on whether or not to dispose of those lands. The U.S. Supreme Court has described this power as “without limitation,”
    Join our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & to secure US borders by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Hey enough is enough they pick on on old man steal his cattle, kill many of them, terrorize his family and friends, with over 200 BLM thugs carrying military weaponry. Leave him dis-tr-aught and upset, at his age very possibly confused, until his friends and family show up to help him.... When even more people show up to help protect him they are called names by a State Senator. Maybe you all need to follow the money instead of picking on a poor man trying to defend himself and his property. A man that he does not want to sell his land, and has grazing right permits. But no00000 you all just can't wait for him to make a mis statement so you can find something to pounce on against him and his supporters....

    On the other hand, some of our wacko politicians, like Pelosi, and Reid, Obama,along many others make so many stupid statements and lie to us on all kinds of things and it is ignored and or written off...Maybe our Country should be taken over by some thuggish jack-as--es, like these because I think "stupid is as stupid does" is really running away here!!!

    I will tell you one thing I would rather defend a man like Gliven Bundy, than as a--hole like Reid and the likes of Pelosi and /or Obama! OHHHH and that is just to mention a few there are too many other idiots out there that deserve that "Honorable" mention as well!!!! CAPEESH!!!! COMPRANDE"
    & UNDERSTAND!!!!!!!

    Time to wake up America smell the flowers the fall is almost here!!!!!!

  6. #6
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Black Soldiers: Cliven Bundy Is Not Racist - http://www.infowars.com/black-marine...is-not-racist/

    “Who the heck are we to determine another man’s perspective on the world around him?!”


    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  7. #7
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Black Soldiers: Cliven Bundy Is Not Racist

    “Who the heck are we to determine another man’s perspective on the world around him?!”

    Adan Salazar
    Infowars.com
    April 25, 2014

    A black marine who sides with Nevada cattle rancher Cliven Bundy in his dispute with the BLM has posted a diatribe on Facebook defending Bundy’s comments and slamming the corporate media’s coverage as a race baiting distortion designed to create social division.

    Image: Charlie Delta, Facebook

    In his missive, a marine going by the handle Charlie Delta blames the “liberal media” for attempting to paint Bundy as a racist, and says he himself has also wondered “the same about the decline of the black family.”Delta admits Bundy is “maybe not so tactful” and is “not an orator,” but that “he definitely isn’t – a racist.” He defends Bundy’s comments as being his own perspective, which he is entitled to.


    Read his comments below:

    The media distorts information to the point of social division. This is a photo of myself and the resilient, often charismatic, and maybe not so tactful Cliven Bundy. He’s a cowboy and a helluva family man, not an orator. One thing he definitely isn’t – a racist. I found his comments to not only be NOT racist, but his own view of his experiences. Who the heck are we to determine another man’s perspective on the world around him?! Just because Picasso’s view of the world was abstract, does it negate the fact that his art was genuine? Furthermore, if you take the time to do your own research, you’ll find that his statements about some black Americans actually hold weight. He posed a hypothetical question. He said, “I wonder IF” … Hell, I’m black and I often wonder about the same about the decline of the black family. Bottom line is that we are all slaves in this waning republic, no matter our skin color. Mr. Bundy could have used any racial demographic as an example: Native Americans on reservations, whites in trailer parks, etc. He noticed the crippling effects of receiving government “assistance” and the long term result of accepting handouts. It’s not progress at all. I challenge Sean Hannity, Rand Paul, and others to read my comment and reconsider their position in this matter. Individual liberties are at stake here, yours and mine. THAT is the issue. Don’t let the liberal media and ignoramuses like Glenn Beck and that weasel Harry Reid make you lose sight of the real issue here: The federal government is a burgeoning behemoth and a bully on a once constitutional playground.I sincerely hope you real patriots out there who can see through the smoke.
    In the wake of Bundy’s supposedly “racist” comments, CNN hoped to get a reaction of outrage when they interviewed one of the men who has been guarding Bundy; in fact, they got the exact opposite response.

    Video at the Page Link:

    When asked if he found Mr. Bundy’s comments offensive, six-year Army veteran Jason Bullock replied, “Mr. Bundy is not a racist. Ever since I’ve been here, he’s treated me with nothing but hospitality. He’s pretty much treating me just like his own family.”

    “I would take a bullet for that man if need be. I look up to him just like I do my own grandfather,” Bullock stated. “I believe in his cause and after having met Mr. Bundy a few times, I have a really good feel about him and I’m a pretty good judge of character.”

    As we reported earlier today, Bundy’s comments, in which he weighs whether black slavery has simply been traded for a new form of government slavery, were undoubtedly taken out of context. This is immediate to anyone who views the heavily-edited 90-second clip put out by White House mouthpiece Media Matters.

    Taken with the proper context, the full, un-edited video shows Bundy making both pro-Hispanic and pro-Black remarks, and calling on them all to “join us and be with us.” Of course Media Matters and The New York Times needed to omit these crucial comments in order to help them to portray Bundy as a redneck, scofflaw racist who nobody should support.

    In another video we pointed to yesterday, the IJReview’s Kira Davis also sided with Mr. Bundy, agreeing that essentially one form of slavery has given way to another, where people are enslaved to the government and dependent on their subsidies.



    H/T: theblacksphere.net, TheGatewayPundit.com

    This article was posted: Friday, April 25, 2014 at 2:30 pm

    Related Articles





    http://www.infowars.com/black-marines-cliven-bundy-is-not-racist/


    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  8. #8
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696



    Draft Judge Andrew Napolitano for President

    Racist Harry Reid is still at the epicenter of the BLM Land Grab in Nevada.

    Help Expose the BLM and Harry Reid! - Sign up TODAY!

    http://constitutionalrightspac.com/c...and-harry-reid
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  9. #9
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Investigate Reid & Expose The BLM!

    Demand an investigation into Harry Reid and his connection to the BLM's involvement in the Bundy Ranch.


    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  10. #10
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Nye County, Nevada Votes to Kick Out the Feds

    Jim White 6 Hours Ago
    4 Comments

    In Nye County, Nevada, the deeply rooted corruption of the Harry Reid dynasty, and his evil surrogates, has taken a big hit. On the heels of the Bundy Ranch situation, the Nye County Board of County Commissioners passed two resolutions; one for Free Speech and one in support of Ranchers. Tired of being under the thumb of overlord, Harry Reid, Nye County stepped up and took action. In the video below, I interview the County Commissioner, Donna Cox, and the Chairman of the Nye County Republican Party, Bill Carnes. Sandwiched in between is an interview with Oath Keeper and Veteran, Leah Aldrich, who made the trip down to Bunkerville the day the BLM backed out.



    Source

    Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.


    http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/04/ny...ive-feds-boot/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •