Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
Like Tree3Likes

Thread: The many forms of genocide

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    73

    The many forms of genocide

    What we are experiencing in America is genocide. The Europeans in this country, especially the WASPs, are being genocided by the government, churches and educational institutions. To help you recognize what is going on, here is an abstract to a paper, "The Many Forms of Genocide: Hard and Soft".

    This is a short comprehensive guide that lays out all the forms genocide takes: (a) hard is the violent form and so this section is old news and most of the info comes from public sources like Wikipedia, and (b) soft is the cultural, sociological ways that genocide occurs; this section is new. This article covers what is missing on the Wikipedia page on Genocide, which they will never cover. This article is about concentrating on exposing the many types of soft genocide being conducted today throughout Western societies and its Anglosphere diaspora. The second section is based on the research of George Irbe did on Marxism that uncovered other forms that genocide takes which the Soviet Union engaged in. The war against race/nation, i.e. soft genocide, makes up a large part of Political Correctness/Social Justice.
    The Link:

    https://www.academia.edu/34936383/Th..._Hard_and_Soft

    These include: Deconstructionism of race, Deracination, Ethnic dilution and more. We are under assault and this paper is about informing you on all of this very treasonous actions being conducted in our country.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    San Bernardino, CA
    Posts
    1,810

    Redefining The Definition!

    This article is about concentrating on exposing the many types of soft genocide being conducted today throughout Western societies and its Anglosphere diaspora. The second section is based on the research of George Irbe did on Marxism that uncovered other forms that genocide takes which the Soviet Union engaged in. The war against race/nation, i.e. soft genocide, makes up a large part of Political Correctness/Social Justice.
    "Rape" can mean forcible sexual intercourse, consensual sex between defined minors, and a host of other sexual activities. So the meaning of the word becomes diluted. Global warming becomes "climate change" so as to be all inclusive of anything weather related. So now this author tries to water-down the definition of genocide so anything can fit under his umbrella.

    These are the thoughts of a racist! Hitler was for racial purity! The KKK is for racial purity! And in virtually every ethnic group there are those who are for racial purity. Blacks ostracize mixed-race blacks, thereby perpetuating racial segregation. But that blending of races IS NOT genocide! There may be lunatics who push the idea of their own political agenda, but there is a big difference between forcible genocide and voluntary blending of races.

  3. #3
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    67,706
    Actually, the blending of races is genocide if the goal is the destruction or diminishing of a targeted race and if the blending is being manufactured by powerful groups or individuals.

    Complaining about, researching, discussing, analyzing, or opposing genocide in all forms does not make one like Hitler. It makes a person the opposite of Hitler who engaged in hard violent genocide to pursue his goals.

    It is ok to disagree on topics like this here at ALIPAC, but don't reach for the leftist race card as a defense for your positions or go straight to calling someone Hitler for cheap points.

    I've not read the materials at the link, but will check them out later.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    73
    Quote Originally Posted by jtdc View Post
    "These are the thoughts of a racist! Hitler was for racial purity! The KKK is for racial purity! And in virtually every ethnic group there are those who are for racial purity. Blacks ostracize mixed-race blacks, thereby perpetuating racial segregation. But that blending of races IS NOT genocide! There may be lunatics who push the idea of their own political agenda, but there is a big difference between forcible genocide and voluntary blending of races.
    In his book, The Birth of Fascist Ideology, Prof. Zeev Sternhell came to the conclusion that fascism is only a "revision of Marxism". I ask Jtdc to see that Fascism is only a reaction to International Socialism. There would have been no National Socialism without International Socialism. If you read the link, you will notice that I quote from Mein Kampf and that what radicalized Hitler, was that the Jewish led Democratic Socialist party and its unions were going around telling people that race/nation were a "capitalist construct", meaning race/nation were false. What was going on in the Austrian-Hungarian Empire and in the German state was International Socialist propaganda spreading race-mixing and race deconstruction.

    What is a good man to do?

    Any good man stands up to preserve his race. Hitler took this further in glorifying race which was already part of the German romantic movement.

    Preserving one's race has nothing to do with the Hitler movement.

    There can NOT be a "voluntary blending of races" because that is NOT the Will of God. God destroyed the Tower of Babel. God created races/nations. It says in Psalm 85, "all the nations whom you have created". God created nations/races. They are NOT to be blended. Voluntary or not. It is NOT up to humans. We are not to attack God's creation.

    This is from the 1st century BC, the virtue of righteousness:

    “First among the claims of righteousness are our duties to the gods, then our duties to the spirits, then those to the fatherland (patrida) and parents, then those to the departed; and among these claims is piety, which is either a part of righteousness or a concomitant of it.” (pseudo-Aristotle, Virtues & Vices, v, 2 ª)
    We are called to do our Duty to the Fatherland. That means to keep and preserve one's people. St. Peter says, "Supplement the Faith with Arete (Virtue). We are commanded to supplement our faith with Virtue. The Virtue of Righteousness demands that all and anybody are to do their duty to the Fatherland.

    In the face of nation-killing of International Socialists, one must be aware of how they accomplish soft genocide.

    As Plutarch says, "We are NOT in the world to give the laws...but in order to obey the commands of the gods."

    Our duty is to be obedient to God. The Tower of Babel was evil in the sight of God. To attack the Natural Order, is to make oneself an enemy of God. To attack Nature is Gnostic. What is going on is that many people are Gnostic. Marxism is Gnosticism. Gnosticism is a Christian heresy. Nowhere does Christianity teach the hatred of nature or to deconstruct Nature. Our duty is to RESPECT nature.

    To "voluntarily blend the nations" is to create The Tower of Babel while destroying the handiwork of God.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    San Bernardino, CA
    Posts
    1,810

    I Beg Your Pardon!

    Quote Originally Posted by ALIPAC View Post
    Actually, the blending of races is genocide if the goal is the destruction or diminishing of a targeted race and if the blending is being manufactured by powerful groups or individuals.
    I strongly disagree! The blending of races preserves the races that are the person's ancestors rather than destroy it. It is not destruction of a race although in generations that race will no longer be discernible.

    Complaining about, researching, discussing, analyzing, or opposing genocide in all forms does not make one like Hitler.
    WHERE DID I SAY IT MADE THEM LIKE HITLER? My complaint is the expanding of the definition. Hitler tried to eradicate a race from this earth. What Clinias quoted was a redefinition of the word. Hitler murdered. The mixing of races is not murder.

    It is ok to disagree on topics like this here at ALIPAC, but don't reach for the leftist race card as a defense for your positions or go straight to calling someone Hitler for cheap points.
    Again, where did I call anybody Hitler? I used "rape" and "climate change" as similar redefinition's. Aren't those left-wing tactics?

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    San Bernardino, CA
    Posts
    1,810

    Religion As The Foundation For Hate!

    Quote Originally Posted by Clinias View Post
    I ask Jtdc to see that Fascism is only a reaction to International Socialism. There would have been no National Socialism without International Socialism.
    That socialistic belief may have driven Hitler to commit genocide, but it is not genocide!

    Any good man stands up to preserve his race.
    Then you support absolute segregation.

    There can NOT be a "voluntary blending of races" because that is NOT the Will of God. God destroyed the Tower of Babel. God created races/nations. It says in Psalm 85, "all the nations whom you have created". God created nations/races.
    Wrong chapter! And you are quoting from a late interpretation. Then you add a meaning not there. Nowhere does it say they are not to be blended!

    To "voluntarily blend the nations" is to create The Tower of Babel while destroying the handiwork of God.
    Wow! Those people were trying to build a ladder into heaven. We now have rocket ships the go much further than those people ever got and God hasn't destroyed the space program, yet! And it is a cooperative effort of many countries!

    Religion seems to be the justification for racial purity and hatred. Islam preaches death to infidels. KKK bases their hate on religion. Religions seem to all justify racial purity. So America must be the Great Satin with all the different races welcomed here.

  7. #7
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    67,706
    You implied that the poster or author of this study was like Hitler when you said...

    These are the thoughts of a racist! Hitler was for racial purity! The KKK is for racial purity! And in virtually every ethnic group there are those who are for racial purity.
    Read your own posts!

    It is not destruction of a race although in generations that race will no longer be discernible.
    That is crazy talk! How can a race be no longer discernible and still be a race? The main precedent for the "blending of races" you are defending took place through warfare, conquest, the mass slaughter of males in societies in southern europe, and the sexual enslavement and mass rape of women and children.

    Most of the perpatrators of genocide in human history made their goal to make specific ethnic groups "no longer discernable" as you suggest and defend.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    San Bernardino, CA
    Posts
    1,810
    Quote Originally Posted by ALIPAC View Post
    You implied that the poster or author of this study was like Hitler when you said...
    And in virtually every ethnic group there are those who are for racial purity.
    NO! You are denying the existence of racists in every ethnic group? If you feel your race is superior and other races should be subservient, or dead, then you are like Hitler. But I did not accuse the poster or the author of being like Hitler. I did not "imply", I clearly stated what I meant.

    That is crazy talk! How can a race be no longer discernible and still be a race?
    Is a race skin color or other physical characteristics? Or is it a bloodline? Many people like to refer to the ancestry of their parents, which may be two different races, but many times a mixture of many races. They all exist in that person. They may not be pure, but they were not annihilated.

    The main precedent for the "blending of races" you are defending took place through warfare, conquest, the mass slaughter of males in societies in southern europe, and the sexual enslavement and mass rape of women and children.
    So in this country, in the South, slave owners had sex with slaves who they considered less than human, had children with them, yet claimed to be for racial purity. Kind of hypocritical!

    Most of the perpatrators of genocide in human history made their goal to make specific ethnic groups "no longer discernable" as you suggest and defend.
    So now "discernable" means the same as existing. That goes to what my original point was, the global warming becomes climate change so they and you can categorize them as all being the same.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    73
    Jtdc has attacked the KKK and says "bases their hate on religion".

    What the KKK was, was a self-defense movement. Their basis actually is a love of their culture and their people and protecting them. To preserve and to protect is to love. The KKK did not come out of the blue but was a reaction to the Republican Party which was changing the Southern culture and putting Blacks in charge of Whites. This was an in-your-face-slap to White Southerners.

    Abraham Lincoln and the Republican Party that started were proto-Marxists. Abraham Lincoln was a reader of Karl Marx. All of this is in the book by Jon Nichols: The 'S' Word; A Short History of an American Tradition, Socialism. The book starts off with Thomas Paine who he calls a proto-Socialist. Abraham Lincoln's favorite phrase was "Labor must control Capital". That is a Marxist phrase. Marxism is also called International Socialism for a purpose. Because it was about doing away with nations and races. Lincoln was an avid reader of the New York Herald Tribune which ran over 400 articles by Karl Marx and Freidrick Engels. Abraham Lincoln got all of his education from newspapers. Lincoln put German communists, those that fled Germany after the 1848 revolution, in his cabinet!

    The foundation of the Republican party was in radical abolitionism and radical progressivism. It was called "Red Republicanism". Red Republicanism is a violent European revolutionary movement. This was the Republican Party and its leader Lincoln.

    The Republican Party moved into the South attacking the culture and mores and putting blacks in power positions. They were tearing down the South. The KKK is a reaction to Red Marxist Republicanism. It was about fighting back against Yankeeism. Jtdc, I don't see you attacking Lincoln. Lincoln and his Red Republicans had much hate against Southerners. John Brown went around killing slave owners. That is Hate. Abolitionists had a great hate toward slave owners and were willing to butcher them.

    What you miss Jtdc is that American Protestantism and its Abolitionist movement is Gnostic. Gnosticism is the hatred of nature, the hatred of particularity and the hatred of history. There's your hate. Yankeeism, a progressive ideology coming out of the Puritans, is Gnostic, and filled with hate.

    One man's garbage is another man's treasure. Take that to heart Jtdc. Hate is all around. In essence, the KKK was a self-defense force. Life is War. Diversity + Proximity = violence. That is how nature works. Don't you know the agrarian saying, "Birds of a feather flock together". Segregation is how nature works. And to maintain boundaries requires discipline. The Marxists Red Republicans wanted to transform the South. The KKK prevented that, or tried to.

    So jtdc, you need to look at your own ideological history and discover the HATE of your side. You are full of hate yourself. The father of Karl Marx called his own son, the most hateful, spiteful man he has ever met. International Socialism is full of hate. It follows the character of its founder.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    San Bernardino, CA
    Posts
    1,810

    Clinias Clearly Supports The KKK!

    Quote Originally Posted by Clinias View Post
    Jtdc has attacked the KKK and says "bases their hate on religion".
    Yes! We are clearly on opposite sides with you supporting the KKK and me condemning it!

    Their basis actually is a love of their culture and their people and protecting them.
    And that justifies the lynchings and other atrocious acts they committed? I'm sure the Islamists make the same claim, that it is their love of their culture, their family, their god, their race, etc, that motivates them to bomb infidels and advocate the annihilation of Israel! And here you are defending/justifying such hatred.

    Jtdc, I don't see you attacking Lincoln.
    So from a criticism of the expanding of the definition of genocide, you criticize me for not including criticism of everybody in history that has done something wrong?

    What you miss Jtdc is that American Protestantism and its Abolitionist movement is Gnostic.
    So now Clinias condemns Protestantism as well.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Death by Gun Control - Genocide Chart Hatred + Govt + Disarmed Civilians = Genocide
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-25-2013, 08:30 AM
  2. Are we setting our selves up for Genocide ?
    By Justthefacts in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 07-03-2010, 12:09 AM
  3. OBL and Genocide Advocacy
    By Lugundum in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-15-2008, 06:27 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •