Maybe Ron Paul is right - perhaps it isn't people but ideology that is the problem. Sovereignty vs. globalism. I suppose that, while there are specific names and figures we focus on - the SPP, Rockefeller, CFR, etc - the real driving force is a belief that one world government is the best way of life.

I used to consider this type of thing a conspiracy theory. The reality is more granular. It isn't a bunch of fat cats smoking cigars in the back room, but a collusion of peers. Like-minded persons who understand the world in a similar manner. This is the truth you can find everywhere from the Bohemian Grove to the think tanks on K Street. The essential argument we face is: are we "citizens of the world", or are we Americans? Our government and its school system want to teach our children one thing. Many here want to teach their children another. The questions are: what philosophy will win, and what will it take to win freedom from the alternative?