The Caravans Cometh, Making America Great No More
The Caravans Cometh, Making America Great No More
By Ilana Mercer| October 27th, 2018
https://amgreatness.com/wp-content/u...2-1024x576.jpg
T
The latest “caravan” community planning to crash borderless America is not part of Latin America’s problems; it’s escaping them. So say America’s low-IQ media.
And Latin America’s problems are legion.
The region, “which boasts just eight percent of the world’s population, accounts for 38 percent of its criminal killing.” Last year, the “butcher’s bill . . . came to around 140,000 people . . . more than have been lost in wars around the world in almost all of the years this century. And the crime is becoming ever more common.”
So writes The Economist earlier this year, in an exposé aimed at “shining light on Latin America’s homicide epidemic.”
As is generally the case with this august magazine, the shoe-leather journalism is high-IQ, but the deductions drawn therefrom is positively retarded.
Tucked into these frightening facts about a killer culture is a timid admission: The problem—Latin America’s murder trends—could be exported to the neighbors.
How? Do tell. By osmosis? Perhaps by “caravan”? Liberals never say.
By the by—and just so you know—Latin America’s crisis of crime “has been mounting.” El Salvador, for instance, had the highest murder rate in the world: 81 murders per 100,000 people. By the early 2010s, “the bloodshed in some cities had reached a pitch.”
Referred to by demographers also as a “youth bulge,” this “demographic bulge” is the crème de la crème comprising the caravans. Their exodus is from the slumdog cities of Latin America, where the crime is heavily concentrated, and where “people are crowded into . . . shantytowns and favelas.
Our young, strong caravanners hail from a culture of “extortion gangs,” “drug-trafficking,” badly trained, “often corrupt” police and prosecutors, marred by general “institutional weaknesses.”
Warlike conditions in their countries force “Latin American governments [to] spend an average of five percent of their budgets on internal security—twice as much as developed countries.”
Since I reported on El Salvador’s murder rate a couple of paragraphs back, the murder rate in that country has “rocketed to 104 per 100,000 people.”
Such is the power of the warlords there, that stationing “soldiers on the streets” and throwing “thousands of gang members into prison” only served to increase crime.
Only when the government began offering bribes to “El Salvador’s three main gangs” did murders halve “almost overnight.” The government gave “imprisoned leaders luxuries like flat-screen televisions and fried chicken if they would tell their subordinates to stop killing each other.”
But then “the gangs began to see violence as a bargaining tool,” and the peace died.
What do you know? Since telling you about El Salvador’s criminal pinnacle, a mere paragraph ago, Venezuela did one better. (Maybe The Economist isn’t so high-IQ, as the rather randomly yoked-together data I relay here are its own).
“Venezuela now has the world’s highest homicide rate.” The country “stopped releasing murder statistics altogether in 2005,” because these make South Africa seem an oasis of peace and prosperity.
To fanfare, Colombia announced the achievement of “a murder rate of 24 per 100,000 people, its lowest in 42 years,” in 2017. In the United States, it’s still 4.9 per 100,000, although in some spots, murder rates are higher than in South Africa.
When they aren’t in hiding, Latin-American leaders and their international helpers try to excite a reverence for life among their people with sexy sounding campaigns. “Value life” is one. Another is “Instinct for Life.” These efforts haven’t caught on for some reason.
Still, when the most hated man in America, President Donald J. Trump, questioned the benefits to the United States of immigration from what he called “shithole” countries, the low-IQ media lost it.
The president’s brutal honesty masks a more vexing question: What makes a country, the place or the people? Does “the country” make the man or does the man make the country?
To listen to the deformed logic of the president’s detractors, it’s the former: The “country” makes the man. No sooner will these Latin-American migrants crash into our borderless country than the process of cultural and philosophical osmosis will begin.
Big time.
In no time will American probity and productivity become second nature to the newcomers.
Quite the reverse.
Having chronicled and analyzed the fate of the dying Christian civilization at the southern tip of Africa, allow me to sound the alarm, straight from a book that predicted the demise of South Africa, due to the same, shared flippant attitude toward human capital:
Human action is the ultimate adjudicator of a human being’s worth. The aggregate action of many human beings acting in concert is what makes or breaks a society. Overall, American society is superior to assorted African [and Latin American] societies because America is [still] inhabited by the kind of individuals who make possible a thriving civil society.
Put differently, it is the individual who creates the collective, not the other way around. The Man makes the country what it is.
South Africa ceased being great once enough good people were expunged from state and civil society.
The tipping point is coming. A sufficient number of bad people admitted into the Unites States of America will make America great no more.
https://amgreatness.com/2018/10/27/t...great-no-more/
