Thread: Coulter: Liberal Media Are Brilliantly Distracting Us to Shield Immigration From a Ro

Liberal Media Are Brilliantly Distracting Us to Shield Immigration From a Robust Debate

By Ann Coulter | June 13, 2015 | 11:09 PM EDT

I'm impressed by the coolness and steadiness of our media in suppressing any news about immigration. It's as if they've built a triple-layer fence with border guards around immigration topics. And guess what? Their fence is working!

How many thousands of news stories have there been on Ferguson, ISIS, Chris Christie's "Bridgegate" or men becoming women?

But the media will never tell you about Mexicans gang-raping a lesbian in Richmond, California, an Indian immigrant in San Francisco importing 12-year-old girls he bought from their parents for sex, or three children being beheaded by Mexicans in Baltimore.

Don't Americans have a right to know about the cultures flooding into our country?

This isn't a natural transformation. It is purely the result of government policy. But our media don't care to discuss the issue. In fact, they get mad whenever Americans find out what they're doing with immigration.

When Americans do think about immigration, they're against it. In polls earlier this year, more Americans had a favorable opinion of North Korea than wanted to increase immigration. That's why the media's approach to immigration is to never talk about it.

Three times in the last decade, Democrats and Republicans conspired to grant illegal aliens amnesty. All three times, the American people rose up in blind rage and shut it down. The only way they were tipped off to the proposed amnesties was through the hard work of about three bloggers, four talk-radio hosts and the Drudge Report.

What will happen if Matt Drudge ever goes on vacation? (Answer: You'll be living in Mexico.)

The media will make absolutely sure we know about every immigrant who wins a spelling bee. It's either important to know about who's immigrating to this country or it's not. If it's important, then we have a right to be told not only about the spelling bee champions, but also about the child rapes, genital mutilations, welfare use and Medicaid scams of our recent immigrants.

But the media's position is: If we don't talk about immigration, it doesn't exist.

Unfortunately, they're right. Most people think about only what the media want them to think about. Everyone has developed a position on Ferguson, ISIS and gay marriage. This week, everyone has a position on a policeman's confrontation with a black girl in a bikini at a pool party in Texas.

But no one is supposed to have an opinion about who gets to live, collect government benefits and vote in this country.

Whatever issue you think is more important than immigration, you're wrong. Without our post-1965 immigration policy, Obama would never have been elected president. That means no Obamacare, no withdrawal of every last troop from Iraq, no playing footsie with the Iranians, no Eric Holder, no Fast and Furious, no IRS harassment of tea party groups, no Benghazi massacre -- and on and on and on.

Democrats haven't been able to persuade a majority of white people to vote for them in any presidential election since 1948, except the aberrational Democratic landslide in 1964. That's why they had to bring in ringers.

In addition to giving the Democrats tens of millions of new voters, our immigration policies have also brought in people who engage in charming traditional practices such as genital mutilations.

In 2006, an Ethiopian immigrant living in Lawrenceville, Georgia, tried to cut off his 2-year-old daughter's clitoris with a pair of scissors. The New York Times ran one tiny AP item on his conviction -- on Page 19 -- titled, "Man Convicted in Daughter's Mutilation." (Always look for "Man" in the headline to find the most appalling stories about immigrants.)

Thanks to decades of mass immigration from Africa and the Middle East, it is estimated that at least half a million girls living in the United States have been subjected to genital mutilation. And that's just one of the many ways immigrants are making our country more vibrant!

One white male, Bruce Jenner, merely contemplates voluntary genital mutilation and gets 10,000 times more media attention than the hundreds of thousands of "American" girls being involuntarily subjected to this practice.

When it comes to immigration, you'll only hear "Diversity is a strength," "Immigration is fantastic for the economy," "Polls show Americans overwhelmingly support a 'path to legalization'" -- pay no attention to the outpouring of hostility every time an amnesty bill comes up -- and "Oh, look! An immigrant valedictorian!"

The media don't need to run this scam forever. Democrats only need to keep it going until they have California-style majorities in every state, and then they'll say, "Screw you, America. We did this deliberately, and now there's nothing you can do about it."

That's exactly what the Labour government of Tony Blair did -- as we found out in 2009. In public, Blair's government claimed that the mass immigration of the Third World to Britain was absolutely crucial to the economy!

Once they were out of office, Blair adviser Andrew Neather admitted that their real objective had been "to rub the Right's nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date," as the London Telegraph reported in 2009.

That's one way of winning elections. It's cheating, but it works!

Here in the U.S., Republicans aren't even fighting back. First of all, the GOP's big donors want the cheap labor. True, the country will be ruined, but business owners will be able to make a pile first -- and then retire.

Evidently, elected Republicans ran the numbers and realized that the GOP won't be completely wiped out for a few more years, and by then, they'll all be retired.

Apres moi, le deluge.

(Noticeably, the younger, smarter Republicans are all on America's side on immigration: Sens. Tom Cotton and Ben Sasse, and Rep. Dave Brat.)

If necessary, political and media elites will call you a "racist" for opposing their mass immigration policies. But they'd really rather that you just not find out what they're doing to the country.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ann-cou...gration-robust

IMO. that was the real reason for the invasion of Iraq. Bush had a major distraction from open borders and illegal alien invasion. However, distraction has been used to shelter alien invasion for decades. Old trick.

Citizens of all ages, disciplines, professions, incomes, origins, race, religion, etc.,etc.,etc. need to ask themselves 3 questions:

1. Why does our government that is already well over $18 trillion in national debt want to legalize illegal aliens and expand legal immigration knowing full well this steals jobs from Americans, deflates American wages, and grows poverty and unemployment that increases government spending?

2. Why does our government that through its "free trade" policies has already changed our once trade surpluses (more exports than imports) to massive trade deficits (more imports than exports) that suck our money, manufacturing, investment, technology and jobs out of the country want more "free trade" agreements that will increase trade deficits and suck even more money, manufacturing, investment, technology and jobs out of the country?

3. Why do we elect candidates to office who do this to our country and citizens?

Judy, question 3 as presented by you I've asked myself for 25 years, today I ask why do other Americans keep electing those that have done this to America as well as Americans. Those are democrats and republicans who have hexed Americans and are so proud of it they now pander to aliens while boasting about it, still Americans vote for guess who? Democrats and republicans. The books I have studied call that insanity, doing things as you have always done them but expect a different result! I can't find another word to better define that attitude, I gave up and admitted to craziness, and made changes.

Consequently, there is no one in Washington that I have voted for, some say that leaves me unrepresented. That is said to me to cause me to come back to insanity. My pay off, I can promise any and all Americans that I have not sent anyone to Washington that has or will hurt them. That feels good to just know that. At this time I do not have to justify the action of any politician, either. Yes, I hope for wide change in politics, ultimately America, then I will have to accept responsibility for action from someone I voted for. Until then.......no way.

Originally Posted by kevinssdad

Judy, question 3 as presented by you I've asked myself for 25 years, today I ask why do other Americans keep electing those that have done this to America as well as Americans. Those are democrats and republicans who have hexed Americans and are so proud of it they now pander to aliens while boasting about it, still Americans vote for guess who? Democrats and republicans. The books I have studied call that insanity, doing things as you have always done them but expect a different result! I can't find another word to better define that attitude, I gave up and admitted to craziness, and made changes.

Consequently, there is no one in Washington that I have voted for, some say that leaves me unrepresented. That is said to me to cause me to come back to insanity. My pay off, I can promise any and all Americans that I have not sent anyone to Washington that has or will hurt them. That feels good to just know that. At this time I do not have to justify the action of any politician, either. Yes, I hope for wide change in politics, ultimately America, then I will have to accept responsibility for action from someone I voted for. Until then.......no way.

There is no other better word for it .... insanity is the best word there is in our language.

Does that mean Americans are insane? No, it means our hope, optimism and very nature make us victims to lies, deceit, betrayal and treason. Why can't we wade through this dilemma? I've thought about this for awhile now and the best answer I can come up with so far is in the Republican Party, because we're split between social personal issue platforms and national interest economic and fiscal necessities. Pro-Immigration and Free Trade Traitors figured out that if they run for office on the Republican Ballot against women and abortion rights and against gays and same-sex marriage rights, they're "in like flint" with churches, globalists and "growth" interests that glean them both donors and votes, while America erodes. For awhile, people voted for them anyway because there was usually no one else on the ballot to vote for. But, after 2008, things changed and enough people dug in their heels and said "no", which is why Mitt Romney lost the election.

And even though I'm always hopeful and optimistic, I believe the same thing will happen again in 2016, unless a dark horse who actually represents the majority of our country emerges and can win a primary on the Republican ballot.

It's very discouraging, because it's an unbelievable dilemma that a lot of Republicans have created and for what purpose or gain, I have no clue. The situation was first initiated by a guy named James Bopp, a lawyer from Indiana, who represented as a lawyer for money, the Pro-Life groups, mostly Catholic and other church related entities as well as just anti-abortion and anti-gay "charities". He infiltrated the Republican Party and became a delegate, then got named to the Platform Committee, then became General Counsel, and then Vice Chairman, all under a direct, clear and present conflict of interest, exploiting his work with the Republican Party to deliver political results for his clients, all 501 C 3 tax frauds, for ... money in the form of legal fees.

I exposed this and got him removed from his official positions, except for his delegate role which is up to the Republicans who elect him in Indiana, but in a recent google search to find out what he's up to now, I found out that he's back as a "volunteer" without pay assistant General Counsel of the Republican Party, so the Mole is back burrowing his tunnels to collapse our country on the backs of pregnant girls and women and people who happen to be gay, with the idiot Prince Reibus extolling his laurels for his contributions to the Republican Party, which whether he's paid or not by the Republican Party is irrelevant because he's paid by his clients for his conflict-of-interest work in the party, which for all I can tell is his determined alienation of women and gays from the Republican Party with a platform that promotes perverts in our party to elect perverts on our ballot who would rather spend their time thinking about pregnant little girls and our money forcing them into childbirth against their will through the force of law instead of enforcing immigration law, promoting trade that benefits our country and citizens, and protects our civil rights.

A most "peculiar" situation to say the least.

With 12 announced candidates and an anticipated 4 yet to arrive, it is easily conceivable that the ultimate candidate will be selected at the convention. That means backroom deals to get the losers to concede. Thus if the selected candidate is A and I voted for A, I cannot be assured that the reason I voted for A has not been dealt away. Now, it is even possible to have bi[partisan backroom deals, so I cannot even be sure that the party platform I voted for did not lose a plank, or two. It is a big reason I do not vote for major party candidates. Party politicians are not trustworthy for decades so I stay away from them. Otherwise I am participating in the political insanity.

And now they have given TPP etc 6 more weeks of distraction ffrm border security and aliens. When are we going to get tired of being treated that way by republicans? It is what democrats do, too.