Results 1 to 2 of 2
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: U.S. District Judge John D. Bates engages in judicial tyranny over DACA!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member johnwk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    2,484

    U.S. District Judge John D. Bates engages in judicial tyranny over DACA!

    See: Federal judge says Trump administration must allow new DACA applications


    ”S. District Judge John D. Bates ruled Tuesday that the administration's decision to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program was never fully explained and could not be justified. However, Bates did allow for a 90-day hold on his ruling “to afford [the Department of Homeland Security] an opportunity to better explain its view that DACA is unlawful.”


    The only legitimate question which the judge may rule upon is whether or not President Trump can reverse a previous president’s executive order which sets public policy. It is not within a judge’s power to assess the wisdom of the president’s decision. And this is what Judge Bates wants to do . . . second guess public policy decision making by a sitting president.


    The principal behind this limitation on a judge’s authority to meddle in the making of public policy is basically articulated as follows by our Supreme Court with regard to Congress’ legislative authority:


    ……we are not at liberty to second-guess congressional determinations and policy judgments of this order, however debatable or arguably unwise they may be…The wisdom of Congress’ action, however, is not within our province to second guess. _________ELDRED et al. v. ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL (2003)


    U.S. District Judge John D. Bates has in fact taken it upon himself to use his office of public trust to go beyond his constitutionally assigned duty by asking the Trump Administration to justify a public policy making decision ___ a request which is not within the judge’s power and in fact impinges not only upon the President’s assigned duty and violates our constitutional system’s separation of powers doctrine, but also usurps legislative power as well ___ and as such, he is engaging in judicial tyranny!


    JWK


    The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny. ___ Madison, Federalist Paper No. 47

  2. #2
    Moderator Beezer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    30,909
    DACA IS NOT JUSTIFIED!

    YOU CANNOT PICK AND CHOSE WHO STAYS AND WHO GOES...THEY ALL GO!

    DOES NOT MATTER IF THEY CAME ILLEGALLY 20 YEARS AGO OR 20 SECONDS AGO!

    NO AMNESTY #8

    NO OBAMA MEMO TO GIVE "TEMPORARY DEFERRED DEPORTATION"

    DEPORT THEM ALL NOW!
    ILLEGAL ALIENS HAVE "BROKEN" OUR IMMIGRATION SYSTEM

    DO NOT REWARD THEM - DEPORT THEM ALL

Similar Threads

  1. The Curious DACA Order From A DC District Court Judge
    By MW in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-25-2018, 02:35 PM
  2. Trump has opportunity to help end judicial tyranny
    By johnwk in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-27-2016, 02:14 PM
  3. John Stone, Republican, for Congress, Challenger, GA, District 12, Vs. John Barrow
    By ALIPAC in forum ALIPAC Campaigns & Elections Endorsements 2004-2024
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-10-2014, 02:41 PM
  4. We the People Need a Tyranny Czar By John Lillpop
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-18-2009, 10:46 PM
  5. JUDICIAL TYRANNY
    By Kate in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-06-2007, 08:25 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •