Donald Trump Won’t Rule Out Cruz As VP, ‘Always Gotten Along Well’

Donald Trump Won’t Rule Out Cruz As VP, ‘Always Gotten Along Well’

http://media.breitbart.com/media/201...ty-640x480.jpgJoe Raedle/Getty Images
by MICHELLE FIELDS 5 Feb 2016 3,682

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump won’t rule out choosing rival Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)as a potential vice president if he is elected president, according to Politico

.

“Well, I don’t know. Look, I have nothing against him. It was sort of a sad thing that happened, but I’ve always liked him,” Trump told Hugh Hewitt on his radio show Thursday, after weeks of trashing his primary rival as nasty, hypocritical and disliked.

Trump added that he has “always gotten along well” with Cruz, but that “I’m so much now focused on New Hampshire.”

The remarks come a day after Trump said he would likely sue after tweeting that Cruz cheated and “illegally” stole Monday’s caucuses in Iowa.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...ut-cruz-as-vp/

This just proves how confusing presidential candidate politics can be if you're not paying close attention.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MW

This just proves how confusing presidential candidate politics can be if you're not paying close attention.

---

For those paying close attention much of it can appear to be BS, or insanity. :cool:

It just shows how easily deluded some people are to believe for a second Trump will ever be the same room with Ted Cruz after this election.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Judy

It just shows how easily deluded some people are to believe for a second Trump will ever be the same room with Ted Cruz after this election.

---

Why would you say that? Are you now calling Trump a liar? I just don't get you.

No, I'm not calling Donald Trump a liar, I'm calling you deluded. Trump isn't going to tell anyone who he might want for VP, he's not going to create any issue at all associated with his VP selection. He's already said, he's not going there until after he wins and now because of Iowa, that's going to be a long, long, long time from now, maybe never. He may not be able to defeat the Establishment that's going to rally big-time behind Rubio. Trump needed to win Iowa to Run the Table and get this over with fast. You've no idea the damage to our cause and country that has been caused by Cruz supporters like you who wanted to defile our front-runner, the man who could have won it all and fix our country. All of that is in jeopardy now.

You people who thought you could fall for a con artist like Ted Cruz, and have your cake and eat it too, with your silly TWOFER deal, I mean it's just unbelievable that you could be part of our organization for as many years as you have and fall for such a stupid and potentially fatal scheme as that.

GRRRRR!!!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Judy

No, I'm not calling Donald Trump a liar, I'm calling you deluded. Trump isn't going to tell anyone who he might want for VP, he's not going to create any issue at all associated with his VP selection. He's already said, he's not going there until after he wins and now because of Iowa, that's going to be a long, long, long time from now, maybe never. He may not be able to defeat the Establishment that's going to rally big-time behind Rubio. Trump needed to win Iowa to Run the Table and get this over with fast. You've no idea the damage to our cause and country that has been caused by Cruz supporters like you who wanted to defile our front-runner, the man who could have won it all and fix our country. All of that is in jeopardy now.

You people who thought you could fall for a con artist like Ted Cruz, and have your cake and eat it too, with your silly TWOFER deal, I mean it's just unbelievable that you could be part of our organization for as many years as you have and fall for such a stupid and potentially fatal scheme as that.

GRRRRR!!!!!!

---

Actually, at this moment Cruz is the front runner. And you speak to me about defiling a candidate. What do you think you've being doing to Cruz? You've been on a one person mission to crush him every since you felt he was a threat to Trump.

Furthermore, if you don't consider this post a personal attack, I don't know what one is!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MW

Actually, at this moment Cruz is the front runner. And you speak to me about defiling a candidate. What do you think you've being doing to Cruz? You've been on a one person mission to crush him every since you felt he was a threat to Trump.

Furthermore, if you don't consider this post a personal attack, I don't know what one is!

---

Oh "suck it up Butter Cup", stop whining over straight talk, "Sweetie-Pie". Cruz is not the person who is going to help us solve our immigration and trade problems, Trump is. Everyone in the frigging world knows that, so why don't you and few others around here? Our cause here is to stop illegal immigration and free trade treason, that is our job here. So why are you "slobbering" all over Cruz who supports both immigration and free trade treason and tearing Trump to pieces?

You have no idea the damage you have done to our cause. Ted and Heidi are already laughing all the way to the bank.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Judy

Oh "suck it up Butter Cup", stop whining over straight talk, "Sweetie-Pie". Cruz is not the person who is going to help us solve our immigration and trade problems, Trump is. Everyone in the frigging world knows that, so why don't you and few others around here? Our cause here is to stop illegal immigration and free trade treason, that is our job here. So why are you "slobbering" all over Cruz who supports both immigration and free trade treason and tearing Trump to pieces?

You have no idea the damage you have done to our cause. Ted and Heidi are already laughing all the way to the bank.

---

Obviously not everyone.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MW

Obviously not everyone.

---

Oh yeah, everyone in the world knows. Some either just don't care or have other objectives.

Judy, we really need you to ease up on MW and any other Cruz supporters here. Everyone understands you are passionate about issues and Trump. But to be honest, many of your comments are going way too overboard and too far into the realm of personal insults.

I've asked you privately to ease up and I've asked you in the open before.

Now, with maximum respect I'm telling you to put your gloves on and disengage entirely from addressing anyone else in this way if you cannot keep the personal or insulting language out of your posts directed at others.

Calling MW "deluded" and this other language about sucking it up buttercup is a clear violation of ALIPAC rule #2 that you yourself helped put into place here 10 years ago!

Quote:

---

2. Conflicts: No personal attacks, threatening language, or personal information on the board. Calling other users names or attacking others will not be tolerated. Don't call other users names or apply labels to them that you can't substantiate (See Bayourod). Any information about private citizens or your personal info should not be placed on the open forum.

---

I'm calling a meeting of our volunteer moderators on this matter. Consider this a solid final warning and be advised that further violations of ALIPAC rules will not be tolerated.

William

William, it's no problem. I'll just stop posting altogether. You call me out but never do likewise to MW. You let him talk down to me, call me names, insult me, demean me and never say a word. You let him post anything he wants but ask me to not post my stuff. I don't know what's going on here, but it's no problem, I'll just read and let you all figure your situation out.

Ive got an idea. Why dont we all agree that Judy and MW can post whatever comments and articles you like, but from this point forward to not address each other?

W

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

Ive got an idea. Why dont we all agree that Judy and MW can post whatever comments and articles you like, but from this point forward to not address each other?

W

---

Yes, that would be excellent. In fact, weeks ago, I asked MW not to address me any more, but he openly refused my request.

By the way, the "suck it, Buttercup" as was the "sweetie pie" as was the "slobbering" which I had in quotes, they were in quotes because those are things that MW said to me. Why is it that you see these when I throw them back at him, but you didn't see them when he first threw them at me?

Just to set the record straight of who is actually violating our rules and policies.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

Ive got an idea. Why dont we all agree that Judy and MW can post whatever comments and articles you like, but from this point forward to not address each other?

W

---

I don't really think that is fair, William. A lot of the constant bashing she does on Cruz is not always the whole truth and deserves to be responded too. Giving her a free hand is not the way to go in my opinion. If you haven't noticed, most of the time the disagreements start when she begins bashing Cruz to build up Trump. Those attacks shouldn't go unanswered. Haven't you noticed how the large majority of her post always turn into a bash on Cruz. Look, I support both candidates and would be happy to have either one as our president. You very seldom see me bashing Trump unless it's in response to one of her ridiculous attacks on Cruz.

How about she stop bashing Cruz and I'll do the same thing for Trump?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Judy

William, it's no problem. I'll just stop posting altogether. You call me out but never do likewise to MW. You let him talk down to me, call me names, insult me, demean me and never say a word. You let him post anything he wants but ask me to not post my stuff. I don't know what's going on here, but it's no problem, I'll just read and let you all figure your situation out.

---

Judy, I want to hear what you have to say, just as I want to hear what everyone says. I need to hear from all sides as I try to make up my mind. I don't want to have to choose sides with my fellow ALIPACers. I would rather concentrate on picking everyones brains for facts so that I can make the right decision.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MontereySherry

Judy, I want to hear what you have to say, just as I want to hear what everyone says. I need to hear from all sides as I try to make up my mind. I don't want to have to choose sides with my fellow ALIPACers. I would rather concentrate on picking everyones brains for facts so that I can make the right decision.

---

Thank you, MontereySherry. Absolutely, we all want to make the right decision, it's such an important one, probably the most important Presidential election in our lifetimes.

Judy wrote:

Quote:

---

By the way, the "suck it, Buttercup" as was the "sweetie pie" as was the "slobbering" which I had in quotes, they were in quotes because those are things that MW said to me. Why is it that you see these when I throw them back at him, but you didn't see them when he first threw them at me?

Just to set the record straight of who is actually violating our rules and policies.

---

It's all about context, Judy. Are you going to pretend I wasn't provoked? Look, I'm not going to get into an argument over this on an open forum. I welcome the moderators to sort through the post and decide who is the aggressor. The "suck it up Buttercup" was used because you were throwing all kinds of accusations at Cruz because he won. The "Sweetie-Pie" was used as a response when you threw the "Butter Cup" comment back at me (Sweetie-Pie was used in humor). As for the "slobbering" comment. I'm not sure but I think I said something like everyone isn't going to "slobber" all over Trump or something like that. Those are very mild compared to some of the things you've launched at me. Yes, I'm human and I can be provoked. Just saying ....

I just can't believe that in the middle of this very critical time, with the final illegal immigration siege of America being well underway, that two of our most seasoned activists and long time participants here are at each others throats over Trump and Cruz.

Such hostility is opening the window for Rubio to come sliding right in.

How is it that both of you have been able to participate here for 10 years each, but now you want to blow up on our boards and draw blood on each other?

And instead of sticking to the rules the solution is to drop participation?

How about instead of throwing fits and insulting each other and breaking the rules and causing major distractions and havoc at a critical time you two touch gloves and just back off, ease up, and get fully within the rules????

You do both realize that the vast majority of both Cruz and Trump supporters are our strongest audience for our cause in the nation right?

You do realize that this kind of fighting is happening everywhere and that while there is a major rumble going on down the middle of the anti-amnesty segment of the GOP there is no longer any major rifts among the establishment side...

Please show some leadership here folks. Show other people how we debate such contentious matters within the community rules designed to keep ALIPAC.us open to all that would share our mutual cause of saving every life and job we can.

Just knock of the below the belt blows and put your daggers up because this is not the place where people with a shared cause need to be drawing blood online or typing to each other with so much disrespect.

You are both fighters but this is the training yard inside the fort, not the battlefield. Save your pointed arrows for the enemy, not each other.

W

I've got an idea. Maybe we need a closed Caucus Forum. A place where members can thrash out their opinions with the understanding that the passion is toned down on public forums. We all know that once the National Election Campaign begins that we will be attacked by trolls. It is important that we are able to stand together and have each others back.

You need get a grip on yourself, MW. Nothing I have ever said was provoking to you. I have free speech same as everyone on this forum and in our country to address political issues and political candidates and politicians and anyone else involved in destroying our country or trying to help it. These are our political opinions that my family has fought for since before the United States was even a nation. I'm free to criticize a United States Senator wanting to bump up to the White House who I believe is a liar, a cheat and a thug. And time will prove me 100% correct on that.

You're free to think he's wonderful and the greatest thing since sliced bread. But that does not give you the right on this forum to belittle me, to demean me, to insult me, to talk down to me, or call me "buttercup" "sweetie pie", a "blind loyalist", "living in fantasy world", "slobbering" over Trump or suggest I'm drunk with a "rum and coke by my keyboard". I've put up with this chauvinistic crap for 3 decades, and if you think for a minute I'm going to put up with it here, then you are grandly mistaken.

Now, the solution is very simple. You do not address me and I'll do likewise. You can respond to my articles I post, you can even respond to the issue of a comment I make, just do not address me personally. Very simple.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

I just can't believe that in the middle of this very critical time, with the final illegal immigration siege of America being well underway, that two of our most seasoned activists and long time participants here are at each others throats over Trump and Cruz.

Such hostility is opening the window for Rubio to come sliding right in.

How is it that both of you have been able to participate here for 10 years each, but now you want to blow up on our boards and draw blood on each other?

And instead of sticking to the rules the solution is to drop participation?

How about instead of throwing fits and insulting each other and breaking the rules and causing major distractions and havoc at a critical time you two touch gloves and just back off, ease up, and get fully within the rules????

You do both realize that the vast majority of both Cruz and Trump supporters are our strongest audience for our cause in the nation right?

You do realize that this kind of fighting is happening everywhere and that while there is a major rumble going on down the middle of the anti-amnesty segment of the GOP there is no longer any major rifts among the establishment side...

Please show some leadership here folks. Show other people how we debate such contentious matters within the community rules designed to keep ALIPAC.us open to all that would share our mutual cause of saving every life and job we can.

Just knock of the below the belt blows and put your daggers up because this is not the place where people with a shared cause need to be drawing blood online or typing to each other with so much disrespect.

You are both fighters but this is the training yard inside the fort, not the battlefield. Save your pointed arrows for the enemy, not each other.

W

---

I agree and hope Judy takes what you said to heart. Everything doesn't have to be rah-rah Trump or a bash on Cruz. I think we need to take a neutral stand on both Trump and Cruz as far as the editorials, opinions, and speculations go for now. As Joe Friday used to say, "just the facts". We all know Trump and Cruz have a big following here and around the country. I agree that it is ridiculous that we're tearing either of them down on here. Some of the attacks are getting to be so redundant. I also agree that we're letting Rubio sneak up on us. As ironic as this may sound, I like both, Trump and Cruz. Thanks, William.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MontereySherry

I've got an idea. Maybe we need a closed Caucus Forum. A place where members can thrash out their opinions with the understanding that the passion is toned down on public forums. We all know that once the National Election Campaign begins that we will be attacked by trolls. It is important that we are able to stand together and have each others back.

---

I think I'll just stop posting for awhile. It's alright. Don't worry about it. There are lots of people here with lots to say and lots of information to post.

See you later!

Commercial-free 'State of the Union' to feature Trump, Clinton, Sanders

Wow, can you even imagine 8 years of Trump followed by 8 years of Cruz. That would be fantastic (IMO).