Drudge Report: Rep. Puts Impeachment On Table In Closed Door Immigration Meeting...

http://l3.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/7k...7067007f3e.jpg



39%

http://www.drudgereport.com/i/logo9.gif

http://l2.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/HR...7067002e08.jpg


SHOWDOWN: Top Political Adviser Ignores Subpoena Again as White House Defies Issa...

Rep. Puts Impeachment On Table In Closed Door Immigration Meeting...

POLL: One-third of Americans want...

Aide: GOP Will Be Coming...



BORDER BREAKDOWN:

Idaho Governor Tells Feds Not To Dump Illegals In His State...

TOO LATE!

Feds use vans instead of buses to transport illegals; Avoid attention...

Residents get robocalls about plan to shelter migrant children...

IMPORT: Feds consider letting Hondurans into USA without making trek...

Sessions, Cruz sound alarm...

Video...

TX official sees 'tsunami'...

FL schools brace for flood...

NYT: CONCERN OVER NATIONAL GUARD TRAINING; LACK OF FED OVERSIGHT...

PELOSI: If Egypt didn't accept Moses, we wouldn't have 10 Commandments!


http://drudgereport.com/

There will be no impeachment of the teflon infiltrator.

In our political correct world of today it won't happen, he is simply too high on the liberal media minority ladder, if America fails it will be in large part due to media.

No Republican has what it takes to do the job:lol:

The media put him in office. You do not think all the hoopla that went on with his inauguration and that sham of the Nobel Piece Prize was without the help of the corrupt media. Well you have got to be dumber than a rock.

https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...98403654_n.jpg Drudge Report

WHITE HOUSE WARNS ON IMPEACHMENT

https://fbexternal-a.akamaihd.net/sa...&sw=600&sh=314

White House: Republicans May Push to Impeach Obama If They Get the Chance
The notion of impeaching President Barack Obama got substantial attention...
www.theblaze.com

White House: Republicans May Push to Impeach Obama If They Get the Chance

Jul. 25, 2014 5:00pm Fred Lucas

The notion of impeaching President Barack Obama got substantial attention Friday from two White House officials, who both said senior Republicans wanted to see it happen. But they couldn’t name any senior Republicans when pressed.

http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/u...7/600x4801.jpg

White House press secretary Josh Earnest. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

Further, White House press secretary Josh Earnest expressed doubt about whether House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) was sincere when he said impeachment is not on the table.
“I do believe that the speaker said on a number of occasions that there would not be steps taken by Republicans to shut down the government over health care,” Earnest said of Boehner, adding, “Maybe you need to ask him a little bit more about whether impeachment is on the table or not.”
Some conservatives have called for impeaching Obama regarding executive overreach on issues such as Obamacare, immigration and guns without congressional authorization. The Democratic National Committee and Organizing for America have consistently used impeachment in fundraising emails to warn donors about what could happen if Republicans win more seats in the House and gain control of the Senate.
The topic first made news Friday after Dan Pfeiffer, a counselor to the president, told a Christian Science Monitor breakfast: “I would not discount that possibility. I think Speaker Boehner, by going down the path of this lawsuit, has opened the door to Republicans possibly considering impeachment at some in the future.”
Asked about the comment, Earnest said, “There are senior members of the Republican Party, or prominent voices in the Republican Party who are calling for exactly that.”
“Who? Sarah Palin?” CNN reporter Jim Acosta asked, referring to the 2008 GOP vice presidential candidate who called for Obama’s impeachment.
“She mentioned it,” Earnest said.
Acosta followed, “Is anyone in the Republican leadership talking about that?” He added: “There’s been a lot of fundraising emails with the word impeachment in them. This seems an awful lot like a fundraising ploy, not a real thing. You don’t really think the president will be impeached do you?”
Earnest again stuck to the same point without being specific.
“I think there are some Republicans, including some Republicans who are running for office hoping they can get into office so they can impeach the president,” Earnest said. “That is apparently a view they have to hold because it is a view that they express publicly.”
Acosta asked, “Is the White House Counsel’s office looking at this? Have you been studying the possibility of him being impeached?”
Earnest didn’t have a specific answer, and pivoted to how the important issues are reforming the Veterans Administration and addressing the border crisis.
“Here we are, one week before Congress is about to leave town and there is not a discernible path that Congress is going to make progress on this,” Earnest said. “Instead, we see Republicans giddy about the prospect of passing legislation along a party line vote to pursue a taxpayer funded lawsuit agains the president of the United States merely for doing his job.”
Earlier in the briefing, Earnest was critical of Boehner for saying there would not be a vote on immigration reform. Sirius XM radio reporter Jared Rizzi asked: “You quoted the speaker about immigration. The speaker has also said he is not interested in impeaching the president. So why do you believe what the speaker says about immigration but not when it comes to impeachment?”
Earnest said there is reason to be skeptical of what Boehner says on topics.
“I do believe that the speaker said on a number of occasions that there would not be steps taken by Republicans to shut down the government over health care,” Earnest said. “We did see that that happened. Maybe you need to ask him a little bit more about whether impeachment is on the table or not. Maybe he’ll give you a more detailed answer than he has thus far. There’s no doubt there are other prominent voices in the Republican party that have indicated impeachment. That’s party of their agenda. The president’s agenda is not focused on those political sideshows. It’s focused on an agenda to expand economic opportunity.”
Both a CNN poll and a Fox News poll showed big majorities opposed impeachment.
–
Follow Fred Lucas (@FredVLucas3) on Twitter
Other Must-Read Stories

• Chris Matthews - Obama's Not Happy in White House: 'I Hear Stories That You Will Not Believe'
• White House Releases First Photo of President Obama on Night of Benghazi Attack
• 5 Reasons You've Never Heard of "Operation BlueStar" (moneymorning.com)

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014...et-the-chance/

https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...816c1b15582bc1 The Not So Silent Majority By Proliferocks.com

Impeachment??? With his record he'll be lucky if he gets off without being tried for TREASON!!!

https://fbexternal-a.akamaihd.net/sa...&sw=475&sh=249

White House Fears Impeachment If Obama Unilaterally Grants Amnesty
As is always the case with anything involving former-Alaska Governor Sarah Palin,...
breitbart.com

White House Fears Impeachment If Obama Unilaterally Grants Amnesty

http://cdn.breitbart.com/mediaserver...a_angry_AP.jpg

by John Nolte 25 Jul 2014, 11:58 AM PDT 2235 post a comment
White House says it is taking impeachment talk seriously
TheHill.com

White House says it is taking impeachment talk seriously

http://content-img.newsinc.com/jpg/2...g?t=1406293680

As is always the case with anything involving former-Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, our unbiased, objective, not-at-all-liberal media couldn't wait to mock her impeachment case against President Obama -- but not everyone is laughing. According to reporting from The Hill, The White House fears exactly that should the president take executive action to grant amnesty to thousands of illegals.

Senior White House advisers are taking very seriously the possibility that Republicans in Congress will try to impeach President Obama, especially if he takes executive action to slow deportations.
Dan Pfeiffer, a senior adviser to Obama, said Friday that the White House is taking the prospect of impeachment in the GOP-controlled House more seriously than many others in Washington, who see it as unlikely.
Obama's senior advisor, Dan Pfeiffer, as quoted by The Hill: "I saw a poll today that had a huge portion of the Republican Party base saying they supported impeaching the president. A lot of people in this town laugh that off. I would not discount that possibility.”
Writing for Breitbart News earlier this month, Governor Palin made a Constitutional case for Obama's impeachment based in large part on the ongoing border crisis. "Without borders, there is no nation," Palin writes. "Obama knows this. Opening our borders to a flood of illegal immigrants is deliberate."
In a Congressional meeting Friday, some House Republicans discussed the option of impeachment should the president continue to ignore the laws he is Constitutionally required to uphold.

Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...grants-amnesty

https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...37954990_n.jpg Mad World News

Top Obama Aid Admits Administration Is Fearing Impeachment
http://universalfreepress.com/top-ob...g-impeachment/
Why hasn't this already happened?

https://fbexternal-a.akamaihd.net/sa...sw=1500&sh=785

Top Obama Aid Admits Administration Is Fearing Impeachment
As the lawlessness of the Obama regime rages on, officials within his cabinet are...
universalfreepress.com

https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...52952481_n.jpg A Sheep No More shared USA TODAY's photo.

Check it out …the two-party OLIGARCHY is making it look like they are actually paying attention to the people and care …or … was the Obaminator just a manchurian candidate from the beginning?

https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.n...e459b5143f04f8

USA TODAY

President Obama could face impeachment, says a top White House aide: http://usat.ly/1nGv2La
(Photo by Mark Wilson, Getty Images)

Obama could be impeached, White House aide says

http://videos.usatoday.net/Brightcov...2194021001.jpg

The White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said Friday that "prominent voices in the Republican party" have called for the impeachment of President Barack Obama. VPC

Gregory Korte, USA TODAY 3:35 p.m. EDT July 25, 2014

http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/0f1f...MG-4203web.jpg

White House Senior Adviser Dan Pfeiffer speaks to reporters Friday at a breakfast sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor.(Photo: Michael Bonfigli/The Christian Science Monitor)


10856 CONNECT 366 TWEET 13 LINKEDIN 702 COMMENT

WASHINGTON -- A top aide to President Obama said it's possible that Obama could be impeached by the Republican-controlled House of Representatives.
House Speaker John Boehner's decision to proceed with a lawsuit against the president has "opened the door" to the third presidential impeachment in the nation's history, Senior Adviser Dan Pfeiffer told reporters at a Friday breakfast sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor.
"Impeachment is a very serious thing that has been bandied about by the recent Republican vice presidential nominee and others in a very un-serious way," he said, referring to former Alaska governor Sarah Palin. "We take it very seriously and I don't think it would be a good thing."

http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/6df8...?fit=440%2C330
ONPOLITICS
Boehner disagrees with Sarah Palin on impeaching Obama

Pfeiffer was quick to add that "no one has alleged anything that is even six universes from what is generally considered" to be an impeachable offense.
Boehner has dismissed calls for Obama to be impeached. His spokesman, Michael Steel, called Pfeiffer's comments "a fundraising exercise for Democrats."
"We have a humanitarian crisis at our border, and the White House is making matters worse with inattention and mixed signals," Steel said. "It is telling, and sad, that a senior White House official is focused on political games, rather than helping these kids and securing the border."
Later, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said "prominent voices in the Republican party" have called for impeachment, but was hard-pressed to name one other than Palin. "I think there are some Republicans, including some Republicans that are running for office, hoping that they can get into office so they can impeach the president," he said.
A CNN/ORC poll released Friday shows 35% of Americans favor impeachment, which is about the same support for efforts to impeach Presidents Clinton and George W. Bush. Pfeiffer noted that a majority of Republicans -- 57% -- favor impeaching Obama.
Impeachment is the bringing of charges against a president or federal judge by the House of Representatives. A president can only be removed after a trial on those charges by the Senate.
Boehner has chosen a less drastic approach with a plan to sue Obama over his decision to delay enforcement of a provision in the Affordable Care Act requiring employers to provide health insurance. That plan passed the House Rules Committee Thursday, clearing the way for a vote on the House floor.
http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/9065...s-Cup-Golf.jpg
USATODAY
GOP lawsuit against Obama could outlast his presidency

Pfeiffer said the lawsuit won't have an impact on how the president uses his executive authority. In fact, he said, the threat of lawsuits validates that Obama's executive actions are "far from the small ball that some have accused it of being."

Follow @gregorykorte on Twitter.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/p...?csp=fbfanpage

CNN Poll: 35 Percent Want Obama Impeached

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall//...iepavlich1.gif Katie Pavlich | Jul 25, 2014

http://media.townhall.com/townhall/r...15bd6c6970.jpg

According to a new CNN poll, more than one-third of American voters want to see President Obama impeached. In 2006, just 30 percent of voters wanted to see President George W. Bush impeached.

35% want Obama impeached, with nearly two-thirds saying the President should not be removed from office.

There's an obvious partisan divide, with 57% of Republicans but only 35% of independents and 13% of Democrats backing a move to impeach Obama.

The poll's release came one day after the House Rules Committee approved – along a party line vote – a resolution authorizing Speaker John Boehner's lawsuit against the President. The GOP controlled House is expected approve it next week.

Boehner and House Republicans plan to sue Obama over his health care law. They claim he violated the Constitution by circumventing Congress and changing the law's employer mandate on his own.

By a 57%-41% margin, Americans say House Republicans shouldn't file the suit. As with the question on impeachment, there's a wide partisan divide over the lawsuit.

The majority of voters disagree with calls from people like Sarah Palin for President Obama to be removed from the Oval Office.
One of the most important numbers in the poll has to do with President Obama's executive overreach as 45 percent say he has gone too far.

When it comes to expanding the power of the presidency, has Obama gone too far? Forty-five percent say yes, with three in 10 saying the President's actions have been about right, and 22% saying he hasn't gone far enough.
http://media.townhall.com/_townhall/...014/7/25/4.png

You can see the entire poll here.


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepa...campaign=nl_pm

The White House Is Starting To Take Obama Impeachment Threats Seriously

July 25, 2014 by Sam Rolley

The White House on Friday said that it is taking Republican threats to impeach President Barack Obama seriously. White House Senior Advisor Dan Pfeiffer said that the threat of Obama impeachment would increase if the President takes executive actions to keep illegal aliens in the country.
“The President acting on immigration reform will certainly up the likelihood that [Republicans] would contemplate impeachment at some point,” Pfeiffer told attendees of a breakfast forum hosted by The Christian Science Monitor.
Obama’s longtime advisor also told the audience that the days of the Administration laughing off impeachment talks have ended, with the President’s dismal polling numbers and a lawsuit against Obama promised by House Speaker John Boehner.
Polling data out this week from CNN/ORC reveals that 33 percent of Americans support the idea of impeaching the President and 41 percent said that the House GOP should move forward with a lawsuit against Obama.
But, according to The Monitor, Boehner denied that his suit was designed to set the wheels of impeachment in motion.
“This is a fundraising exercise for Democrats,” Boehner spokesman Michael Steel told the outlet. “It is telling, and sad, that a senior White House official is focused on political games, rather than helping these kids and securing the border.”
Other establishment Republicans like Senator John McCain (Ariz.) have also denied that impeaching the President is a viable plan.
“Well, I don’t agree and I remember going through an impeachment of William Jefferson Clinton,” McCain said earlier this month when former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin called for impeachment. “There are not the votes here in the United States Senate to impeach the president of the United States and I think that we should focus our attention on winning elections. We win this election and we regain control of the United States Senate we can be far more effective than an effort to impeach the president, which has no chance of succeeding.”
Other Republicans, however, have said that the President’s actions in dealing the Nation’s immigration problem could open the door to impeachment proceedings.
“He either enforces the laws on the books—as he was hired and elected to do—or he leaves. Congress no option. This is not our choice, this is the President’s choice and I would advise him to uphold the law on the books,” Representative Ted Yoho (R-FL) said in a recent statement.

http://personalliberty.com/white-hou...ats-seriously/

https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...83353584_n.png Glenn Beck

Wow

https://fbexternal-a.akamaihd.net/sa...&sw=640&sh=335

New poll shows one third of Americans support the impeachment of Obama
“This is actually gathering steam because the more things he does against the...
glennbeck.com

New poll shows one third of Americans support the impeachment of Obama

Friday, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:05 PM -0400
Video at the page Link:

A new CNN/ORC International poll shows one third of Americans believe President Obama should be impeached and removed from office. That figure includes 57% of Republicans, 35% of independents, and 13% of Democrats. On radio this morning, Glenn reacted to the new poll numbers.
The CNN/ORC poll was conducted between July 18 and July 20. The poll asked telephone respondents: “Based on what you have read or heard, do you believe that President Obama should be impeached and removed from office, or don’t you feel that way?” The results showed:
Should be impeached 33%
Don’t feel that way 65%
No opinion 1%
While 33% is by no means a plurality, Glenn found the partisan breakdown, which included 13% of Democrats supporting impeachment, to be interesting.
“Can you look up the polls on where the Democrats were on the impeachment of Bill Clinton? That didn’t work because the longer that went on, the more people got tired of the Monica Lewinsky thing,” Glenn said. “This is actually gathering steam because the more things he does against the Constitution that, you know, people who understand the Constitution and understand separation of powers understand that any president that is doing what this guy should be doing should be impeached.”
Glenn believes the Democrats who support impeachment understand it doesn’t necessarily mean the president is removed from office, instead it is an investigation and trial surrounding any wrongdoing.
“There should be a trial on this, not necessarily removed from office. That’s the verdict,” Glenn explained. “‘Do you impeach him?’ That means do you have a trial in the Senate, and see if what he’s doing is right or wrong. I know an investigation is never going to happen because there’s too many weasels, too many people that don’t care about the Constitution, and the American people don’t know the Constitution.”
The general lack of knowledge about the Constitution was evident in the response to survey question 41, which asked: “In general, do you think Congress should attempt to impeach a President in order to express dissatisfaction with his policies or the way the president is handling his job, or do you think Congress should attempt impeachment only if there is evidence that the president has committed a very serious crime such as treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors?”
Express dissatisfaction 18%
Only serious crimes 79%
Never impeach (vol.) 1%
No opinion 2%
“The Constitution calls for high crimes and misdemeanors. That’s what it is,” Pat said of impeachment. “Not treason or bribery, but high crimes and misdemeanors.”
“So in other words. If you want to abide by the Constitution, then it’s high crimes or misdemeanors,” Glenn concluded. “A plurality of Americans, 45%, believe Obama has gone too far in expanding his power. 30% said the President has been right in the terms of presidential powers. 22% said he hasn’t gone far enough. 22% of Americans think he hasn’t gone far enough! What kind of all-powerful president do you want? Don’t answer that question, please.”

See the full poll results HERE.

Front page image courtesy of the AP

http://www.glennbeck.com/2014/07/25/...ment-of-obama/

https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...98403654_n.jpg Drudge Report

'OBAMA BEGGING TO BE IMPEACHED'

https://fbexternal-a.akamaihd.net/sa...&cfs=1&upscale

Congressman at border: ‘Obama begging to be impeached’
A Free Press For A Free People Since 1997
www.wnd.com

WND EXCLUSIVE

Congressman at border: 'Obama begging to be impeached'

Witnesses shocking procedures for handling illegal immigrants

Published: 5 hours ago

http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/01/Jer...atar-96x96.jpg Jerome R. Corsi
Jerome R. Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D., is a WND senior staff reporter. He has authored many books, including No. 1 N.Y. Times best-sellers "The Obama Nation" and "Unfit for Command." Corsi's latest book is "Who Really Killed Kennedy?"

http://www.wnd.com/files/2014/07/border6.jpg

U.S.-Mexico border

McALLEN, Texas – Observing what he could only describe as “chaos on the border” during a midnight tour of the Rio Grande on Friday, Rep. Steve Stockman, R-Texas, concluded, “President Obama is begging to be impeached.”
“For all I know, Obama is preparing to process five million illegal immigrant kids and teenagers into the United States,” Stockman said upon observing border operations near McAllen, Texas.
“He wants us to impeach him now,” Stockman theorized, “before the midterm election because his senior advisors believe that is the only chance the Democratic Party has to avoid a major electoral defeat. Evidently Obama believes impeachment could motivate the Democratic Party base to come out and vote.”
Sign the petition demanding Congress follow through on impeaching Obama.
Accompanied by a WND film crew, Stockman began the evening by stopping at a massive Department of Homeland Security detention facility a mile or two north of the Mexican border, only to be encountered by seven or eight armed Border Patrol agents who approached Stockman and WND for questioning.
Though polite, a Border Patrol supervisor speaking from behind the chain-link fence that surrounded the facility refused to allow Stockman to tour the facility.
Through the chain-linked fence, the WND film crew took video of an active hanger-like open building cooled by two massive fans in which teenage illegal immigrants were being searched for concealed weapons as they were being processed into the detention facility.
Within minutes, as Stockman began asking questions of the Border Patrol supervisor, the hanger-like intake facility was shut down and emptied of illegal immigrant teenagers being processed by more than a dozen Border Patrol agents.
“We release all detainees under 14 years of age without taking any biometric identification, including no fingerprints,” the Border Patrol agent explained to Stockman. “We are prevented by law from taking fingerprints or other biometric information on these kids.”
The Border Patrol supervisor could not identify for Stockman the law in question.
“Then how do you know who these children under 14 years old are?” Stockman asked. “How do you know if you are releasing these kids to people who are truly family members in the United States or to pedophiles or other criminals posing as family members?”
“We only know who these children are by what they tell us,” the Border Patrol supervisor admitted. “Truthfully, we don’t really have any idea who they might be or where they came from other than what we can observe from questioning them. You’re right. If they give us false information, we have no way to know it or to follow it up without biometrics.”
Stockman asked what information the Border Patrol has on the people in the United States who claim to be relatives.
“That’s not what our department handles,” the Border Patrol supervisor again admitted.
http://www.wnd.com/files/2013/09/Ste...an-150x150.jpg Rep. Steve Stockman, R-Texas

Back in the vehicle, frustrated at seeing the facility going into rapid shutdown mode once he and the WND film crew set up to film, Stockman expanded on the impeachment theme.
Stockman observed that rather than begin impeachment proceedings now, what the House of Representatives should do is to take away money from the Obama administration.
“The only way we’re going to stop Obama from opening the border is to take away the money he needs to operate,” Stockman concluded. “What we should do is shut down the White House.”
The definitive case for removing Barack Obama from office is presented in “Impeachable Offenses” by Aaron Klein and Brenda J. Elliott.
In a four-hour tour of McAllen roads leading to the Rio Grande that began at midnight, WND observed dozens of Border Patrol lock-up vehicles, with one marked “LICE” in large hand-written letters, were transporting illegal immigrant detainees to destinations unknown to WND.
Every time WND’s vehicle approached the Rio Grande, Border Patrol trailed behind to engage in questioning once WND and Rep. Stockman stopped.
“Be careful, it’s a busy night out here,” one Border Patrol agent advised.
In another stop about a mile north of the border, WND observed a Border Patrol vehicle with an agent manning what appeared to be a 10-foot antenna scanning the surrounding open territory.
“It’s taking high-definition night-vision photographs,” the Border Patrol agent explained, as he dodged into the shadows to avoid being filmed in the bright lights of the WND film crew.
In a night where Stockman described law enforcement presence on the McAllen border as “heavily active and in plain view,” Stockman and WND observed several Department of Public Safety state troopers patrolling the border in conjunction with the ever present white-and-green-marked Border Patrol vehicles.
On Friday, Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minnesota, explained to WND in a cell-phone call from the airport that she and Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, are planning to join Stockman at the border in McAllen, Texas, arriving at noon Saturday.


http://www.wnd.com/2014/07/congressm...-be-impeached/

Is this sword double edged? The action might motivate him to self-evaluate and slow him down. The other edge is it may spur him into full throttle, doing what is naughtier than normal for him. I would love a conviction, but how quickly can they get it done?

The they may only a threat to be a subliminal message. Sure had my mail box full last nite, from both sides

Impeachment is too good for him. His punishment should be far more substantial.

DEVELOPING: Top Military Leaders Are in an Unprecedented Rebellion Against Obama

Posted on Sunday, July 27th, 2014 at 2:46 am.
by: Conservative Infidel

http://www.conservativeinfidel.com/w...33-300x199.jpg

Conservative Tribune Every American officer, regardless of branch of service, take the same oath upon their appointment to the military. They swear to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”
The language used is not dissimilar to that of the presidential oath of office as it appears in Article II of the Constitution: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
The American oaths of office are different from those of so many nations around the world, because we do not swear allegiance to a person, a religious sect, or even to the nation’s citizens. America’s leaders swear to uphold the Constitution, the document in which the individual freedoms that make America unique among all nations in history are enshrined and guaranteed.
It should come as no surprise, then, that when long-service American military officers see the principles of the Constitutional repeatedly violated, disregarded, and even held in contempt, they take offense.
Retired officers, of course, have more freedom to express their views without concern for the impact such honesty might have on their careers. For example, Air Force Major General Bentley Rayburn and four-star Army General Jack Keane have both spoken out against Obama’s treatment of Islamic terrorists, including his trade of several Guantanamo Bay detainees for accused deserter Bowe Bergdahl. Retired Lieutenant General William G. “Jerry” Boykin has gone so far as to call for Obama’s impeachment, as has General Patrick Henry Brady.
Retired U.S. Army Major General Paul E. Vallely has publicly argued that America’s current leadership has so damaged individual American liberty that it can be restored only by citizen protests to force the resignations of President Obama and other political leaders. The general has also recently been working to uncover the truth about the Benghazi attacks of 2012, which he says involved an illegal arms deal by Hillary Clinton’s State Department. General Vallely and retired Air Force Brigadier General Charles Jones have formed a “citizen’s council” to challenge the government more directly.
More recently–and more remarkably–active duty officers have been giving vent to their frustrations and concerns about the current administration. Active-duty 4-star Marine General and US Southern Command Commander John Kelly has commented on the grave threat to America’s existence that the current border crisis represents. Even more remarkable, the Commandant of the Marine Corp himself, General James Amos, recently made comments highly critical of the Obama administration’s leadership and policy in Iraq.
That’s quite a list, and it’s far from complete. Nor does it include the numerous other senior officers who retired at the rank of Colonel or Lieutenant Colonel who have also spoken out against this president, his administration, and his policies.
When a politician or even a journalist makes negative comments about the leadership and practices of a sitting president, it is wise to take those with a grain of salt, asking what the motive of the speaker might be.
In the case of these retired and active-duty senior military officers, however, their motive appears to be clear–the fulfillment of the oath they swore to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.

http://www.conservativeinfidel.com/o...bellion-obama/

https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...88182234_n.jpg Freedom Outpost

London Telegraph on Obama's Absence: He's "Sleepwalking Perfunctorily... amid Golf Rounds & Dinner Parties" : Freedom Outpost http://ow.ly/zD0qG

https://fbexternal-a.akamaihd.net/sa...&sw=862&sh=451

London Telegraph on Obama's Absence: He's "Sleepwalking Perfunctorily... amid Golf Rounds & Dinner Parties"

Melissa Melton 3 hours ago
2 Comments

Obama has “checked out.” Or rather, his administration and the folks that run his show have.
The president’s completely ridiculous, inappropriate behavior after the MH17 plane was shot down should’ve tipped even the casual viewer that something is a tad amiss here in good ‘ol U.S.A.
That day, reports that an official in the Ukrainian government had announced that 23 Americans were killed in the crash flooded the media. They were unsubstantiated reports later found to be incorrect, but they happened nonetheless.
Every outlet from Reuters on down ran with that information. Countless journalists Tweeted about it. In a late night moment of amazement at Obama’s response to this news, I made this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26J_X2gb_oM

The day after MH17 happened, I wrote, “Want more proof we’re living in The Matrix, America? Check out our president. The guy can’t even muster up the effort to pretend anymore.”
It started when he spoke for only about 40 seconds on the matter, saying, “And it looks like it may be a terrible tragedy.” Most people would agree that 300 people who were just minding their own business riding a plane from one country to another being murdered is spot on for the definition of “terrible tragedy”. He went from that right into jokes. As Red State reported, “In fact, it was so lacking in taste that even Piers Morgan noticed it was lacking in taste,” posting Morgan’s Tweet about the jarring transition from “may be a tragedy” to cracking lame jokes in literally no time.
Then the president (or rather, his handlers) didn’t even bother to reschedule his completely unrelated burger photo op.
Not just a burger. Not Obama was hungry because that’s normal so he went to grab a bite to eat.
No — a burger photo op. A burger photo op he went to despite how, at the very least, tacky that is and looks not only to the citizens of America but to the rest of the world and despite the fact that when he was in Texas after the border crisis hit the news, he refused to actually go to the border himself because he claimed he wasn’t interested in photo ops.
And that’s not all; the day the mainstream media was reporting 23 Americans perished among the 300 dead on flight MH17, Obama followed up his non-related burger photo op — just as he did when our Ambassador in Libya and three other Americans were killed by terrorists — with yet another fundraiser.
He already won reelection, by the way. What is he raising all those funds for? Doesn’t he have anything better to do, you know, as president?
Well, a little over a week later, and The London Telegraph apparently agrees Obama is a bit absent as far as presidents go with it’s new article, “Barack Obama has already checked out of his job,” subhead, “The degree to which Barack Obama is now phoning it in – sleepwalking perfunctorily through his second term, amid golf rounds and dinner parties – is astonishing.”

The article continued:

And based on his recent handling of situations much more serious than a possible post-presidential move to sunny California, it seems as if “No Drama Obama” is no longer even worried about keeping up appearances; he doesn’t care enough to fake it.
Consider this: In recent days, a) Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 was shot down, apparently by Russian separatists in Ukraine, b) In the Gaza strip, the numbers killed continued to mount as Israelis and Palestinians exchange rocket fire, c) a huge influx of children fleeing Central American poverty and gang warfare swamped America’s southern border, creating a humanitarian crisis. And, oh yeah, d) Christians living in Mosul were given the choice to either convert to Islam or flee the area they have inhabited for nearly two thousand years.
You know what else has happened during this time? a) Obama played many rounds of golf, b) he attended numerous fund-raisers, c) he dined on barbecue in Texas and burgers in Delaware, and d) he almost appeared on the comedian Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night television show in Hollywood.

…and finished up with:

If Nero fiddled while Rome burned, then Obama is dining out, golfing, and raising money while the world collapses.

Uh…yeah. Basically.
Most of us get it by now — the handlers pick and choose what tragedies the president (and that goes for any president we’ve had for decades now) is going to get visibly upset about and spend time and energy on if it will serve a particular agenda to be milked for all it is politically worth…but geez.
It’s just become so glaringly obvious at this point that Obama is gone, that even mainstream outlets can’t muster up the energy to pretend he’s still here anymore.
How sad is that?

Source

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.


http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/07/lo...inner-parties/

These are the real American defenders, our military leaders. We must not lose their support!

Biden, Pelosi, and others are pleading to build a 2 million dollar impeachment defense fund. That would indicate a fight that could take a lot of time.

Obama Golfs with ESPN Hosts as US Evacuates Embassy in Libya

http://cdn.breitbart.com/mediaserver...a-golf-jpg.jpg

by Breitbart News 26 Jul 2014 629 post a comment

On Saturday, hours after the U.S. embassy in Libya was being evacuated and a day after meeting with Central American presidents to address the border crisis, President Barack Obama golfed with ESPN "Pardon the Interruption" hosts Mike Wilbon and Tony Kornheiser at Congressional Golf Club in Bethesda, Maryland.

Obama has golfed with Messrs. Wilbon and Kornheiser in recent outings, and this is reportedly his first round at the exclusive golf course.
This week, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin said that Obama golfs and fundraises during crises because he knows he is "in over his head" as the country's chief executive.
Obama aide Marvin Nicholson, a frequent companion, rounded out the foursome.

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-S...bassy-in-Libya

Know What ‘Impeachable Offenses’ Are. Then Demand Obama Be Impeached

By Steve Straub On July 27, 2014 · Leave a Comment · In US

http://thefederalistpapers.integrate.../108012685.jpg

Sarah Palin makes a lot of sense here, no matter what you think of her or her politics this is worth reading.

Via Sarah Palin:

The White House is counting on the fact that Americans think impeachment is for committing a crime under the penal code. But I’ll keep repeating the truth in order to educate as many Americans as possible.
So, again, let’s be crystal clear on this. Impeachment isn’t necessarily for ordinary criminal acts, nor is it for bad political decisions or differences in opinion. We’re not saying, “Impeach him because his stimulus failed; he coddles Wall Street while dissing Main Street; he recklessly spends our tax dollars on skewed priorities, etc., etc.”
We’re saying he must be impeached for overstepping his Constitutional authority. Here are some examples: he broke the law in changing the Obamacare law by fiat, and he issued amnesty for illegal immigrants by fiat, and he committed fraud on the American people by lying that we could keep our health care if we like our health care, and he refused to secure our borders or halt this border crisis he caused. The list of abuse is long. Allowing any president to continue this lawlessness sets a precedent for future presidents that can allow destruction of our nation.
We’re acknowledging that there’s only one recourse in holding government accountable when led by a president who breaks the law. Remember the Constitution holds the president directly responsible for the executive branch. He can’t just vote “present” and keep feigning ignorance of all the scandals rocking his administration, any more than a mob boss can claim innocence because he didn’t personally do the hit. The buck stops with the guy at the top.
From Benghazi to the IRS and VA scandals, to the NSA spying on innocent Americans, to his Department of Justice wiretapping reporters and giving guns to Mexican drug cartels in Fast & Furious, to ignoring in-house illegal fundraising, I could go on and on.
Impeachment is the Constitution’s answer for a derelict, incompetent presidency, as well as for a lawless imperial presidency. Both describe the unprecedented problem we have with Obama.
In terms of lawlessness, the president is radically changing the way the executive branch does business. He has put us on a dangerous path that will fundamentally change us. With his “pen and phone,” he’s abrogating Congressional authority in violation of the Constitution’s separation of powers. He’s making himself a ruler, not a president. As I said last week, we had a revolution back in 1776 because we don’t do kings.

Should President Obama be impeached?

http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/u...a-be-impeached

https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...49382366_n.jpg Fox News

"This might be the first White House in history that's trying to start the narrative of impeaching their own president," House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La) told Fox News Sunday.

https://fbexternal-a.akamaihd.net/sa...&sw=660&sh=345

Dems Pump Up Impeachment Talk in Appeal for Support, Campaign Bucks
In a matter of days, Democrats looking to head off Republican gains in November...
foxnews.com

Dems pump up impeachment talk in appeal for support, campaign bucks

Published July 28, 2014
FoxNews.com

Dems pump up impeachment talk in appeal for support, campaign bucks
http://a57.foxnews.com/global.fncsta..._brown_640.jpg

Dems pump up impeachment talk in appeal for support, campaign bucksIn a matter of days, Democrats looking to head off Republican gains in November have found their new rallying cry: Impea...http://fxn.ws/1rRILiL

Video at the page link:

Never autoplay videos

In a matter of days, Democrats looking to head off Republican gains in November have turned scattered talk of President Obama's impeachment into a sustained rallying cry -- even managing to fundraise off the perceived threat.

The campaign arm for House Democrats has been sending out a barrage of fundraising emails warning of the impeachment threat, and claims to have raised roughly $2 million in their latest push.

The president and first lady Michelle Obama have warned of that possibility on the stump. And a top White House official even said Friday “it would be foolish to discount” a bona fide impeachment push by Republicans.
The frenzied warnings have Republicans scratching their heads – after all, few if any in the party brass are openly pushing impeachment -- and accusing the other side of ginning up the controversy for political gain.
“You know, this might be the first White House in history that's trying to start the narrative of impeaching their own president,” House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., told “Fox News Sunday.”
From the Democratic side, warnings that Republicans might try to impeach Obama potentially strengthen their case, among supporters, for why Democrats should keep control of the Senate. Under the Constitution, even though the House votes to impeach, it is the Senate that weighs whether to convict. Without a majority of support in the Senate, any GOP-backed impeachment push would ultimately fail.
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin kicked off the impeachment headlines earlier this month when she penned a column calling for it. But to date, most senior Republicans have shied away from that call.
House Speaker John Boehner stood by his decision to proceed with a lawsuit against the president over alleged abuse of executive power, but would not sign on to the impeachment idea. Even Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., one of the most conservative members of the House GOP caucus, would not get on board with impeachment (though she did back impeaching “certain officials in the Executive Branch.")
Scalise said Sunday it’s apparent “the White House wants to talk about impeachment.”
He added: “And, ironically, they're going out and trying to fundraise off that, too.”
At the same time, Scalise would not say whether impeachment is off the table, despite being asked repeatedly. This only fueled Democrats’ claims that impeachment is the next big thing for Republicans.
“The fact that the third-highest-ranking Republican in the House is refusing to rule out impeachment offers a stunning view of the extreme measures this Republican Congress will take to push their reckless partisan agenda,” Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Steve Israel said in a statement. “Republicans will spend the final week before their summer vacation plotting their lawsuit against the President, and now Scalise just made it clear that impeachment is absolutely on the table for House Republicans.”
Democrats are also fundraising off Boehner’s vow to bring suit against the president. But Democratic leaders, including the president, quickly began connecting the lawsuit and impeachment, blurring the lines between the two.
“You hear some of them – ‘sue him,’ ‘impeach him.’ Really? Really? For what? You’re going to sue me for doing my job?” Obama said earlier this month in Austin, Texas.
White House adviser Dan Pfeiffer said Friday that Boehner “opened the door” to impeachment by going down the lawsuit path.
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest later defended the comments, saying “senior members of the Republican political party or certainly prominent voices” were calling for it.
Still, aside from impeachment proceedings being politically perilous for the party that initiates them, a new Fox News poll underscores that the public has little appetite for impeachment at this point.
The poll, released last week, found voters think, by a 58-37 margin, that Obama exceeded his constitutional authority. But 61 percent oppose impeachment.
“There is no appetite for impeachment for the president,” Scott Brown, the former Republican Massachusetts senator who is running for a New Hampshire seat this year, told Fox News on Monday.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014...ntcmp=trending

Law Center Calls for Immediate Impeachment

Posted by Stingray USN Veteran on July 29, 2014 at 11:36pm
View Blog

Articles of Impeachment are prepared and ready for YOU to download, just click any link for the articles!

By JB Williams- Posted With permission
jb.uspu@gmail.com

In my previous column, I lay out exactly why the future of the Republican Party will be determined this November on the single issue of impeachment. In short, congressional Republicans have played dead for six years and unless they take a stand with the people who fund and elect them and impeach, their base will abandon them come November.

In an interview with the Chuck Wilder Show out of L.A. on July 22^nd I field questions that should remove any doubts you might have about that. (July 22^nd show - second hour at about 54 minutes in.)After six years of manufactured disaster after purposeful disaster by the most impeachable administration in U.S. history, it all comes down to the Rule of Law or a totally lawless society and congressional Republicans are fast running out of time to choose a side.As a result, the North American Law Center (NALC) has drafted the most complete and accurate set of Articles of Impeachment to date and is working with pro-American activists across the country to push House Republicans to stand up and fight for our Constitutional Republic and the Rule of Constitutional Law.Influential Republicans Allen West, Gen. Jerry Boykin and Sarah Palin have all been pounding out the drumbeat of impeachment in recent statements and the North American Law Center is openly calling upon them and others to stand together behind a very carefully crafted set of Impeachment Articles in a joint effort to convince House Republicans to honor their oaths of office and end the assault on all things American.NALC Lead Counsel Stephen Pidgeon explained the Articles on the July 28^th Erik Rush Show. "Since House Republicans lack the courage and decency to draft proper Impeachment Articles, we did it for them. And if they need thousands of Americans to force them to do the right thing, we will try to do that too"... Pidgeon said. - "Nothing in these Articles is about the so-called "birther" issue. It's about truth, known facts and the rule of law."

The NALC proposed Articles of Impeachment are very straight forward and yet, complete. They are broken into three general articles as follows;

ARTICLE I - Usurpation of the Oval Office via criminal identity fraud"Compelling prima facie evidence exists which demonstrates that Barack Hussein Obama has engaged in false personation and aggravated identity theft and in conspiracy to commit false personation and identity theft in the pursuit of high office and governmental power."

ARTICLE II - Malfeasance, misconduct and abuse of the Oval Office"Using the powers of the office of President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in disregard of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has repeatedly engaged in conduct violating the constitutional rights of citizens, impairing the due and proper administration of justice and the conduct of lawful inquiries, or contravening the laws governing agencies of the executive branch and the purposed of these agencies."

ARTICLE III - Aiding and Abetting known enemies of the United States"In his conduct of the office of President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama - has directly engaged in the covert aiding and abetting of foreign entities via the funding, arming, training and intelligence assistance to the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, Al Qaeda, Hamas, the Taliban, the Palestinian Authority, Hezbollah, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, the Free Syrian Army and others. He has directly or indirectly through the agencies under his direct command, used American tax dollars and assets to aid and abet known enemies of the United States, including known terror organizations and organizations identified on a Terrorist List established by the United States as enemies to the United States, in Egypt, Libya, Lebanon, Syria, Pakistan, Yemen, Tunisia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Kenya, Iran, Ukraine and North, Central and South America."

The FULL ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT are available HERE in pdf form, including related laws pertaining to the crimes alleged in the articles.Despite a growing number of public calls for impeachment in an effort to stop the ongoing destruction of our Constitutional Republic and block the Obama administration from single-handedly granting amnesty to millions of illegal invaders flooding into the country by Obama's open invitation, Republican members of the House are floating nearly a dozen lame excuses for not keeping their oaths to protect and defend the nation and uphold the Rule of Constitutional Law.

1) Republicans can't impeach because it will cost them the 2014 election
2) Republicans can't impeach without Democrat support
3) Republicans can't impeach because Obama will initiate Martial Law
4) Republicans can't impeach because Harry Reid won't convict
5) Republicans can't impeach because Joe Biden is worse than Obama
6) Republicans can't impeach because Obama is a usurper
7) Republicans can't impeach because they will be called "racists"
8) Republicans can't impeach because they will lose the illegal Latino vote
9) Republicans can't impeach because Bill Clinton wasn't removed from office upon conviction
10) Republicans can't impeach because blacks will riot in the streets

If you are intent on never doing the right thing, any excuse will serve a tyrant.The list of lame excuses for why Republicans "can't" impeach is nearly endless, just like their list of excuses for why they can't enforce existing immigration laws, or stop unconstitutional ObamaCare, or stop Obama from aiding and abetting known foreign enemies, or even block him from appointing known terror organization members to his cabinet.Republicans have not even forced this administration to pass one lousy federal budget in six years. So, of course they can think of a dozen reasons not to impeach, or do anything else that matters today. That's why groups like the North American Law Center have to do it for them! -- And that's why average American citizens feel it necessary to take law enforcement into their own hands on the Southern Border.Yet there is only one reason needed to impeach.... It's the right thing to do!"

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their Safety and Happiness." - Declaration of IndependenceThe U.S. Constitution provides the peaceful and constitutional solution when bad actors find their way to power and the people must alter the government in order to protect and preserve freedom, liberty and the rule of law. It's called impeachment..."The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."Impeachment was placed in the U.S. Constitution for just the conditions we find ourselves in today. It provides a peaceful and orderly transition of power, from the hands of bad actors guilty of crimes and awaiting trial, and into the hands of those who will stop the disaster from getting any worse.

Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story (1811-1845) explained: "The offenses to which the remedy of impeachment has been and will continue to be principally applied are of a political nature... What are aptly termed political offenses, growing out of personal misconduct, or gross neglect, or usurpation, or habitual disregard of the public interests."

James Madison explained impeachment during the debates of the Constitutional Convention of 1787: "Some provision should be made for defending the community against the incapacity, negligence, or perfidy of the chief magistrate. He might pervert his administration into a scheme of peculation or oppression. He might betray his trust to foreign powers."

Alexander Hamilton explained in The Federalist Papers (No. 65) that "impeachment of the president should take place for offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar propriety be denominated political, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to society itself."Over seventy-percent of Americans believe that the Obama Administration has abused public power and violated the public trust in so many ways that it would take a few encyclopedia volumes to chronicle it all. Half of Americans are convinced that Barack Hussein Obama is hiding his true identity and the true nature of his anti-American policies.If ever in U.S. history there was an administration so ripe for impeachment, it is the Obama administration which starts and ends every day with more impeachable offenses. Even members of the black community are calling for impeachment.

But as NALC Lead Counsel Stephen Pidgeon points out, "It's not enough to impeach, it must be done correctly, in the interest of the United States and the Rule of Constitutional Law."To uphold, protect and preserve constitutional law, we must simply follow and enforce constitutional law.When our representatives in congress lack the decency, courage and good sense to do what must be done, the buck does not stop with them. The buck stops with the American people who sit idle and allow their public servants to behave in such a cowardly self-serving manner with complete impunity.

The buck stops with the American people! Before today's Republicans are going to "do the right thing," the American people will have to do the right thing first!The people must stop sitting around on social networking sites whining, complaining and playing armchair political strategist focused on how elect to more politicians that they will never hold accountable after the election. It's time; no... it's well past the time to hold our current crop of public servants fully accountable for their actions and their fatal inactions.Before members of congress will grow the stones to take a real stand for the United States of America, "We the People" will have to grow the stones first!It's up to "the people" to make their representatives represent them.It only takes one House member to place these Articles of Impeachment into the House Judiciary Committee. Make sure that YOUR House member is that ONE! Send the Articles to your House Rep HERE.

All members of congress will be on August recess as of the end of this week. Make sure they don't have a moment's peace and quiet in their home districts on recess.

See them while they are at home and hand-deliver the Articles to their local offices.

Make sure that every member of the House Judiciary Committee receives a copy HERE.Also, if you are working to support a congressional challenger in the 2014 election cycle, make sure that they have a copy. If they will not openly support impeaching the most impeachable administration in U.S. history, why are you supporting their do-nothing challenge of a do-nothing incumbent?The bottom line is that "the people" must accept personal responsibility for how their public servants behave. If you won't do the right things, why should they and how can you even expect them to?Impeachment is not up to them. It's up to you!

The North American Law Center is a public policy and constitutional law division of The United States Patriots Union. They are requesting support for this action HERE.

Views: 200
Tags: Articles of Impeachment, Impeachment, impeach

http://patriotaction.net/profiles/bl...msg_share_post