Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    Rush Limbaugh: Panic Reigns Throughout Drive-By Media - Liberals can see the writing

    Support the Sheriffs that support The Constitution

    Liberals can see the writing on the wall.
    http://conservativebyte.com/2014/11/...t-drive-media/



    Panic Reigns Throughout Drive-By Media - Conservative Byte
    Panic Reigns Throughout Drive-By Media
    conservativebyte.com

    Panic Reigns Throughout Drive-By Media

    October 31, 2014


    Windows Media

    BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
    RUSH: Now, ladies and gentlemen, it's starting to get interesting. Now it's all starting to effervesce. Now it's all starting to percolate. Now is when we can actually trust what we're being told. Well, I don't want to go that far. But we can be a little bit more confident in believing what we're told now than, say, a month ago, two months ago, or three months ago.
    JOHNNY DONOVAN: And now, from sunny south Florida, it's Open Line Friday!



    RUSH: The Democrats are making absolute fools of themselves. The Democrat Party with Charlie Rangel, Mary Landrieu, Paul Begala, The Forehead, they are all telling us so much about where their heads are, where their minds are. They are stuck in an America 50 years ago in an attempt to avoid an election disaster. Everybody talks about how cool the Democrats are. Everybody talks about how hip the Democrats are. The Democrats have turned their playbook back to 1963 in order to try to scare minority voters to the polls on Tuesday.
    Great to have you with us, my friends. It's Open Line Friday. And I am your trusted guiding light, Rush Limbaugh here behind the Golden EIB Microphone. The telephone number, if you want to be on the program, as always, 800-282-2882, and the e-mail address, ElRushbo@eibnet.com. Open Line Friday, pretty much whatever you want to talk about, fine and dandy.
    Okay, my friends, let's just take a look at the latest we have on some of the polling data that sums things up. As I've been saying, this is when the polling units out there have to be concerned about their credibility and therefore they have to be concerned that what their polls say is accurate, is close to what the actual result is going to be. They don't care about that a month ago. They don't care about it two months ago. They certainly don't care all of this calendar year up to this point. They don't care about it because they use the polls to make public opinion, to shape it.
    But now we are getting what they think is actually going to happen. We're getting a reflection. The AP has a story coming. It's not out yet, but I want to alert you to it. It will be sometime this afternoon. According to the latest data from AP's election research team -- and this is according to sources that I trust -- according to the latest data from AP's election research team, Republicans have a 10 percentage-point lead in early voting ballots cast so far.



    Independents have cast about 25% of the early vote total to date. In Florida, the early vote already exceeds the total early vote of 2010. And it is the 2010 turnout that we compare the 2014 turnout to, not 2012. You compare midterm turnout to midterm turnout, presidential turnout to presidential turnout. So, again, the AP coming soon later this afternoon from their own election research team, Republicans have a 10 percentage-point lead in ballots cast. Independents have cast about 25% of the vote total so far. And in Florida, the early vote is already exceeding the total early vote of 2010.
    Everywhere you look in the Drive-By Media today you just see the word "panic." It's either printed or not printed, but panic is all over the headline, it's all over the story. New York Times Upshot: 71% likelihood the Republicans win the Senate. That is up four percentage points since Thursday. The Washington Post's Election Lab forecasts the Republicans will see a net gain of seven Senate seats. The forecast projects a 95% chance Republicans will take the Senate, up three points from Thursday.
    Nate Silver's FiveThirtyEight blog gives Republicans a 68.5% chance of winning the Senate, up over four points from Thursday. So you can see, even if you want to dispute the actual raw numbers, you can look at the trend and see which way the trend is going.
    So let's review here. New York Times Upshot. That's the name of a section in the website newspaper. Seventy-one percent chance the Republicans win the Senate, up four points from Thursday. Election Lab in the Washington Post, 95% chance Republicans take the Senate. That's up from 92% on Thursday. Nate Silver, FiveThirtyEight blog, 68.5%. And coming later from the AP, Republicans have a 10% lead in ballots cast so far.
    That has got to stun the Democrat Party. That just has to have 'em bamboozled. Early voting, that's something they own. He this own early voting like they own, they think, the Hispanic vote, and like they think they own the black vote.
    END TRANSCRIPT

    Related Links






    http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/20...drive_by_media
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Rush Limbaugh

    I really didn't think that there was any lower that they could go, I thought they found the gutter, but I was wrong.



    Pathetic Obama Plays to Half-Filled Arenas, Denigrates Stay-at-Home Moms
    RUSH: He can't even get 6,000 people in a 10,000-seat arena in the Democrat stronghold of Philadelphia, and they have to curtain it off so that people can't see...
    rushlimbaugh.com

    Pathetic Obama Plays to Half-Filled Arenas; Denigrates Stay-at-Home Moms

    November 03, 2014


    Windows Media

    BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
    RUSH: "On the campaign trail two days before the midterm elections, President Obama went to one of the few places that would take him: Philadelphia. Campaigning in support of gubernatorial candidate Tom Wolf, Obama spoke to about 5,500 attendees at a mid-sized 10,000 seat arena that had to be partitioned off with a curtain to cater to the incoming crowd; a far cry from his former days as candidate Obama, when he filled Denver's then-named Invesco Stadium" at Mile High between the cheap crepe paper Greek columns.
    He drew 70,000 people to hear his acceptance speech, and now he can't even get 6,000 people in a 10,000-seat arena in the Democrat stronghold of Philadelphia, and they have to curtain it off so that people can't see the empty seats. In the South, the Democrats are playing the race card again.



    I really didn't think that there was any lower that they could go, I thought they found the gutter, but I was wrong. The Democrats are in such a low place now that when they look up, they see the gutter. Now a vote for a Republican in the South is a vote for the KKK. How many years ago in the playbook is that page? I mean, that's been gotta be a 60-year-old page in the playbook.
    Not to mention which the only Klan member that's ever served in the United States Senate's a Democrat, Sheets Byrd, from West Virginia.
    BREAK TRANSCRIPT
    RUSH: This is in the Weekly Standard. Obama was in Rhode Island today. Well, actually date of this is October 31st, was last Friday. Or was it Saturday? Whatever the date. Halloween was the 31st, right? (interruption) It always is. Was that a Friday? (interruption) Trick or treat? Okay, so that's when this is from. "President Obama called for more taxpayer-spending on pre-school in order to 'make sure that women are full and equal participants in our economy' and" then he said this.
    Are you ready?
    Quote, "Sometimes, someone, usually mom, leaves the workplace to stay home with the kids, which then leaves her earning a lower wage for the rest of her life as a result. And that’s not a choice we want Americans to make." Obama's talking about women who stay home to raise kids. "[T]hat's not a choice we want Americans to make." Let me read it to you again.

    "Sometimes, someone, usually mom," in most cases a woman, but not always anymore. Usually "mom" is a mother. Do you agree with that? (interruption) Usually. It's not always true anymore, but for this purpose we assume he's talking about women. "Sometimes, someone, usually [a female] mom, leaves the workplace to stay home with the kids, which then leaves her earning a lower wage for the rest of her life as a result. And that’s not a choice we want Americans to make."
    Moms who stay home to raise kids.
    Family values.
    Democrat Party.
    Barack Obama.
    This is the same guy who... Well, you know his role in infanticide and post-abortion abortions in Illinois.
    BREAK TRANSCRIPT
    RUSH: Here you have Obama suggesting that mothers who stay at home to raise their kids, "that's not a choice we want Americans to make." He didn't say, "That's not A CHOICE we want Americans to HAVE TO make." That would have been a different thing. He could have been talking about economics: Oh, we wish that Americans didn't have to make that choice. What he said was,"[T]hat's not a choice we want Americans to make."
    We don't want 'em staying home, raising kids. We don't want that to be required, necessary, and so forth.
    END TRANSCRIPT

    Related Links






    http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/20...y_at_home_moms
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Rush Limbaugh

    This is one of the indications that Democrats think that they are going to lose huge, and this may be one of the surest signs yet how well the Republicans are gonna do, because the authors of this screed want to increase the term in the House from two years to four years, and they want to increase the term in the Senate from six years to eight years, and then they advance some ludicrous arguments.




    New York Times Op-Ed: Cancel the Midterms
    RUSH: This is how you know. This is one of the signs.
    rushlimbaugh.com

    New York Times Op-Ed: Cancel the Midterms

    November 03, 2014


    Windows Media


    BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
    RUSH: The New York Times. Folks, this is so great. (chuckling) The New York Times, a couple guys David Schanzer and Jay Sullivan: "Cancel the Midterms." You seen this? Cancel the midterm elections! It's pointless anymore. The Democrats are famous for this.
    This is how you know. This is one of the signs. This is one of the indications that they think that they are going to lose huge. And this may be one of the surest signs yet how well the Republicans are gonna do, because the authors of this screed want to increase the term in the House from two years to four years. And they want to increase the term in the Senate from six years to eight years. And then they advance some ludicrous arguments.
    They claim, for example, that since World War II, the midterm elections have made presidents weaker. The midterm elections are one of the reasons why we can't have a great president anymore because in the midterm elections the president's party always loses, except 2002 when Bush's party won. They would never suggest this if a Republican president were gonna lose, what, enough seats to lose control of the Senate.
    And lose 70 seats in the House total in two years or whatever. They'd never suggest this under a Republican. No, no, no! (chuckling) Let's make these midterms one year instead of two! It's so transparent. It's so patently obvious. "Cancel the Midterms." The Constitution is screwed up. The Constitution's a mistake. We need to limit the access to their representatives the American people have.
    We let them vote too often for their representatives. The people are stupid. The people are dunces. The people are dense. The people are glittering idiots. We have to protect Washington from the people -- and, therefore, we need to limit the number of times people can elect their representatives. So we need to expand House terms to four years instead of two in order to save failing, incompetent Democrat presidents.
    BREAK TRANSCRIPT
    RUSH: Mr. Snerdley, do you remember the woman known popularly as "Dumplin'"? (interruption) Dumplin'. Dumplins. Do you remember who that was? (interruption) That was the one-time governor of North Carolina, Bev Perdue. Do you remember what was likely the beginning of the end for her is when she suggested that House races need to be moved. They're too often. House races, elections in general occur too often.



    Every two years is too often. She suggested, much like these guys, moving it and making it once every four years, much like the New York Times. I firmly believe that was the first name North Carolina voters had it confirmed for them that they were dealing with someone who thought the voters were irritants and get in the way. Most Democrats think that. Most Democrats disdain elections. They resent having to go before the voters.
    Other than the Democrats in safe, sure shots like the Kennedys always have. That was fun. It didn't matter. You could do anything. But other Democrats who have to fight for their victories really resent the hell out of having to do it. They consider themselves to be so superior to the obviously inferior hayseeds that vote in this country. They think it's just unseemly that the derelicts have a say.
    Like Mary Landrieu thinks that people of Louisiana are a bunch of racists and sexists, misogynists and all that. She just resents the hell out of the fact that people like that have a say-so in whether she wins or loses. What an insult! They resent the hell out of that. Bev Perdue was the first. Now the New York Times has come along.
    END TRANSCRIPT

    Related Links






    http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/20...l_the_midterms
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-31-2014, 02:38 PM
  2. RUSH LIMBAUGH: Liberals Unhappy with Diminished Obama
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-30-2014, 01:32 AM
  3. RUSH LIMBAUGH: LAYOFFS, RATINGS SLUMP MEAN 'PANIC TIME' FOR CNN
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-24-2014, 05:44 AM
  4. RUSH LIMBAUGH: OBAMA HELD PANIC PRESS CONFERENCE
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-08-2013, 11:54 PM
  5. Rush Limbaugh: Regulate the 'Drive-By Media'
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-12-2007, 12:55 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •