Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
05-23-2015, 12:34 PM #1
SESSIONS: ‘THIS PROPOSAL WILL WIDEN FURTHER OUR TRADE DEFICITS AND ELIMINATE JOBS’
SESSIONS: ‘THIS PROPOSAL WILL WIDEN FURTHER OUR TRADE DEFICITS AND ELIMINATE JOBS’
Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images
by BREITBART NEWS
22 May 201559
Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL)reacts to the procedural vote that allowed a trade measure to advance in the Senate on Friday night:
Under fast-track, Congress transfers its most basic legislative powers to the Executive for six years. Any yet-unseen global pacts, no matter how sweeping, are guaranteed a “fast-track” to congressional adoption. No amendments. No ability to strike any offending provision. And no chance to apply either the 60- or 67-vote thresholds used for important legislation and treaties.
I asked the President how his fast-tracked proposals would impact jobs, wages, and trade deficits. He would not answer. The bill’s promoters also refused to answer when asked whether their proposal would reduce net manufacturing jobs in the United States. That is because they know it will. Like the South Korean trade deal—which doubled our trade deficit after promises of a trade renaissance—this proposal will widen further our trade deficits and eliminate jobs.
The Trans-Pacific Partnership opens our markets to foreign imports, but allows foreign countries to continue closing their market to ours.
Our country has not been engaged in reciprocal free trade but, as the Chairman Emeritus of Nucor Steel explained, “the enablement of foreign mercantilism” and “unilateral trade disarmament.” We have allowed state-dominated and mercantilist trading partners to maintain their varied and elaborate non-tariff barriers, exporting their unemployment to our shores.
Stubbornly, our political elites have treated trade as a matter of religion. To them, there is no such thing as a bad deal. They know American workers lose jobs when we allow trading partners to cheat. But they insist it is all for the greater good. This is why the American worker keeps ending up on the losing end.
Fast-track will also lock into passage a new global governance authority known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership Commission. Chartered with a “Living Agreement,” this new transnational commission will be able to amend the agreement after its adoption. Among other things, this could empower the President to expand the admission of foreign workers without congressional approval. We are creating another unelectable, unaccountable, unanswerable bureaucracy that can tie down and frustrate American sovereignty.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...liminate-jobs/
-
05-23-2015, 02:21 PM #2
I trust what Sen. Sessions says more than any other member of the U.S. Congress. If he says it's bad for America and Americans, you can bet it is bad for America and Americans.
The TPP, called NAFTA on steroids by some, will further erode the quality of life for America's middle class and poor! Let's hope the U.S. House of Representatives have more sense than the U.S. Senate on this issue."The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttps://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
05-23-2015, 05:05 PM #3
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 3,185
There is more resistance in the House to this than there was in the Senate, but I am not sure that there is adequate resistance to withstand. Boehner will cave, if not already, and he does have a contingency of loyalists.
Again, Sessions has pin pointed what many do not see or choose not to see. We improve other countries economies by buying their goods, at the same time allow them to send their unemployed to take our low paying jobs.
Then Congress creates some new work visa so that high end employers can claim not enough qualified and import workers for good paying STEM jobs. For three decades neither political party has worked for America's work force, but that work force still votes for their domestic enemy?
Similar Threads
-
Electrolux to eliminate 850 jobs in Iowa. To Juarez
By jamesw62 in forum General DiscussionReplies: 6Last Post: 10-26-2009, 04:16 PM -
States consider billions in cuts as deficits widen
By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 1Last Post: 11-06-2008, 10:12 PM -
United Air to Eliminate 1,550 Flight Attendant Jobs (Update2
By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 0Last Post: 08-27-2008, 10:10 PM -
Proposal to eliminate protections for Salvadoran immigrants
By had_enuf in forum illegal immigration News Stories & ReportsReplies: 1Last Post: 11-18-2005, 09:35 AM -
U.S. trade deficits wrosen in airplanes, ag & most other
By jp_48504 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & ReportsReplies: 0Last Post: 11-16-2005, 05:45 PM
As Sen. Cortez Masto Scuttles Mayorkas' Impeachment, Illegal...
04-18-2024, 06:27 AM in Americans Killed By illegal immigrants / illegals