First presidential candidate announces his 2020 run for president

Stephen Colbert went to Russia to ‘announce’ his 2020 run for president

By Amy B Wang June 24 at 12:40 PM

For Russian ears only: Stephen Colbert is running for president of the United States in 2020.

In an appearance Friday on the Russian late-night show “Evening Urgant,” “The Late Show” host sat on the other side of the desk for once, bantering with host Ivan Urgant through an interpreter and playing “Russian roulette” with a tray of vodka-filled shot glasses and pickles.

Midway through their game, the American comedian interrupted Urgant to say he had something to disclose — but only if he could confirm first that the show wasn’t broadcast in the United States.

“I am here to announce that I am considering a run for president in 2020,” Colbert said, delivering what was ostensibly a joke with a straight face.

The audience applauded as Colbert nodded seriously.
“And I thought it would be better to cut out the middleman and just tell the Russians myself,” Colbert continued. “If anyone would like to work on my campaign in an unofficial capacity, please just let me know.”

The “announcement” was an obvious jab at President Trump and the swirling allegations that his campaign colluded with Russia to meddle in the 2016 presidential elections. Stateside, Colbert has been one of the most vocal critics of Trump, making the president the chief target of CBS’s late-night show.

Colbert has continued to troll Trump, apparently even while traveling abroad. After Trump tweeted earlier this week that he had in fact made no “tapes” of his conversations with former FBI Director James B. Comey — despite ominously tweeting a warning last month to Comey that there might be — Colbert responded by posting a picture of himself in Russia.

22 Jun
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images...00m_normal.jpgDonald J. Trump
✔ @realDonaldTrump

...whether there are "tapes" or recordings of my conversations with James Comey, but I did not make, and do not have, any such recordings.

Follow
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images...pO0_normal.jpgStephen Colbert
✔@StephenAtHome

.@realDonaldTrump Don't worry, Mr. President. I'm in Russia. If the "tapes" exist, I'll bring you back a copy! pic.twitter.com/v5flvAMtFY
11:07 AM - 22 Jun 2017
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DC8cCDXWAAAq1ww.jpg:large

• 
  
• 
  6,0176,017 Retweets
• 
  28,05128,051 likes

Twitter Ads info and privacy


In his appearance on “Evening Urgant,” Colbert joked that, because the show was part of a state-owned TV channel, Urgant was “officially an employee of the state.”

“I look forward to going back to America and testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee about colluding with Russia,” Colbert deadpanned.

Later, Urgant encouraged him to take a shot of vodka during their game of “Russian roulette.”

“To the beautiful and friendly Russian people,” Colbert toasted, before throwing back his first shot. “I don’t understand why no members of the Trump administration can remember meeting you.”

With their final shots, Colbert and Urgant clinked glasses.

“A strong America!” Colbert yelled. “A strong Russia!”

[On SNL, The Rock and Tom Hanks joked about a 2020 White House bid. Some want to believe.]

Joking aside, Colbert has in the past ventured into politics, albeit, well, facetiously. In 2007 he attempted to be listed as a presidential candidate on the Democratic primary ballot in his native South Carolina but was rebuffed by the state’s Democratic Party leaders for not being a viable candidate.

At the time, Colbert was the host of Comedy Central’s “The Colbert Report,” where he played a caricature of a conservative TV personality. He would continue his antics in 2012, when he formed a “super PAC” and once again tried unsuccessfully to get on the presidential primary ballot in South Carolina.

Failing that, Colbert threw the full weight of his satirical support behind Herman Cain — a Republican candidate perhaps best known for his “9-9-9” tax plan — running television ads that encouraged voters to choose “the one name on the ballot that stands for true Americanimity: Herman Cain.” Cain, a favorite among tea-party conservatives, had already dropped out of the race at that time.(For those curious, the Sunlight Foundation broke down exactly how Colbert’s super PAC spent its money.)

Since last November’s election, Colbert’s show on CBS has enjoyed blockbuster ratings, in large part because he has been unafraid to skewer Trump and his policies, week after week.

However, Colbert’s relentless criticism of the president hit a bump in the road last month, after he came under fire for making a vulgar joke about Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The joke prompted accusations of homophobia and calls on the right for Colbert to be fired.

Colbert was relatively unapologetic.
“I would change a few words that were cruder than they needed to be,” he told his audience a few days after the joke.

“I’m not going to repeat the phrase. But I just want to say, for the record, life is short, and anyone who expresses their love in their own way, is to me an American hero. I think we can all agree on that. I hope even the president and I can agree on that. Nothing else. But that.”

There has been little love lost on Trump’s side. In a recent interview with Time magazine, Trump called Colbert a “no-talent guy.”“There’s nothing funny about what he says,” Trump told the magazine. “And what he says is filthy. And you have kids watching. And it only builds up my base. It only helps me, people like him.”

In a rare unvarnished interview, Colbert recently described what it has been like to deliver jokes, night after night, under a Trump presidency.

“It’s all so petty and venal, and there’s nothing grand about it,” he said in his appearance at the Vulture Festival. “It’s not Shakespearean at all. It’s ‘Veep.’ ”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.2a44c7f9f773

It’s been 4 years since Stephen Colbert created a super PAC — where did all that money go?

by Melissa Yeager

• investigations

SEP 30, 2015 10:34 AM

Before taking over as host of “The Late Show,” Stephen Colbert was interviewed by Salt and Light — a Catholic media foundation — in anticipation of the arrival of Pope Francis in the United States. The host asked Colbert what he would like to see the pope talk about during his visit to Congress.

Colbert: The corrupting influence of money in politics, because it reinforces not looking out for the poorest or the least of my brothers. I think that’s what they need to hear the most because until you can control the money you will not control the message of Congress, and so you won’t get action in Congress that looks out for average people. One thing I’ve learned … I had a super PAC for a couple years …

Host: What ever happened to that money?
Colbert: Good luck finding out.

The host suggested they needed an investigative journalist to look through the paper trail. “You’d be the first journalist who tried,” Colbert quipped.

We were surprised to hear that no one had followed the money trail. So, Mr. Colbert, we at the Sunlight Foundation would like to accept your challenge.

Sunlight’s Senior Staff Writer Melissa Yeager went step-by-step down the Colbert super PAC money trail to demonstrate how complicated it really is to follow the money under our current campaign finance system.

In the interest of transparency, we’re going to walk you through the process and provide all the links which will hopefully help you monitor the cash flow of 2016 candidates. The resources we used include campaign finance reports from the Federal Election Commission, nonprofit disclosure forms known as 990s from the Internal Revenue Service, our own Real-Time Federal Campaign Finance tracker, as well as financial statements and press releases from the charities that received funds from Colbert-affiliated entities. Finally, we did some good, old-fashioned research on Google, LinkedIn and social media.

Full disclosure: This post is going to feel a little bit like Carrie’s apartment wall in Homeland, but keep with us and we’ll all get to the end together. Much like every other candidate super PAC, there are lots of money trails. Consider yourself warned.All right, let’s get started!

THE PLAYERS

Before we start, we want to clarify the players you need to know:

• The super PAC: Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow, Inc., established in June 2011 by Stephen Colbert
• The 501(c)(4) dark money group: The Colbert Super PAC SHH Institute, established in late 2011 by Stephen Colbert to lure anonymous donors
• The beneficiary of the money not spent by the super PAC: The Ham Rove Memorial Fund of the Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina

THE DONORS

According to the Federal Election Commission website, Colbert’s Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow super PAC raised $1,237,220 in 2011-2012.

FEC filings report $1.1 million of the money raised by Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow came from unitemized individual contributions. “Unitemized contribution” is a term the FEC uses for contributions of $200 or less. PACs aren’t required to list these individually, and they appear on the filings as a lump sum. (Colbert called these people “Heroe$” and scrolled their names through the show even though he was not required to name them.)

The FEC does require candidates and PACs to individually list the names, occupations and addresses for each donor who contributes more than $200.

Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow’s filings show $121,065 came from itemized individual contributions. The spreadsheet on the FEC’s website can be sorted to show the top donors.

• The largest contribution of $9,600 came from Alex Rigopulos, the former CEO of Harmonix Music Systems, Inc.
• Frank Brunckhorst, manager of Delicatessen Service Co, LLC — you likely know their product Boar’s Head deli meats — of Sarasota, Fla. gave twice for a total of $6,000.
• Aubrey Ayash, co-president of Federal Coal Company in West Virginia, gave $3,000.
• Finally, Daniel Zanger, a trader from Woodland Hills, Calif., gave $2,000.

INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES

Now it’s time to find out where the $1,237,220 went.

https://i2.wp.com/sunlightf.wpengine...oom=1.25&w=900

First, the easy part: independent expenditures.
Independent expenditures are any expenditure made by a super PAC either supporting or opposing a candidate made without consulting with or at the suggestion of another candidate or candidate’s committee (PAC).

Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow spent $79,526 on independent expenditures. Here’s the breakdown of those, courtesy of Sunlight’s Influence Explorer:

• $31,530 supporting Herman Cain
• $26,102 opposing Newt Gingrich
• $20,669 opposing Mitt Romney
• $900 opposing Herman Cain
• $326 supporting Mitt Romney

These expenditures were political ads that ran online and on local television stations in Iowa.

So we’re all following along so far? Good. Here’s where it gets tricky.

Operating expenditures

Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow spent $395,194 on operating expenditures, or the costs needed to run the campaign.

Who received that money? Not many people have looked into that part of the Colbert super PAC, and this is where it gets interesting.

When Colbert decided to run for “the President of the United States of South Carolina,” he turned over the super PAC to Jon Stewart, who, in addition to hosting “The Daily Show,” was an executive producer of “The Colbert Report.”

https://i1.wp.com/sunlightf.wpengine...oom=1.25&w=900

Super PACs are not allowed to coordinate, consult with or take suggestions from candidates or their candidate committees. Yet, the expenses from the super PAC show they were paying a lot of people with obvious direct ties to “The Colbert Report.” This was likely an intentional way for the witty Colbert to satirize how a campaign could easily flout the “no-coordination” rule — and no one would question or investigate the super PAC’s activities.

For instance, we found the Colbert super PAC had a multitude of so-called media consultants. In fact, 14 different people and companies were listed as media consultants to the tune of $33,963. With quick use of Google, we found several with direct ties with “The Colbert Report.”

In fact, most of the list of expenditures reads like the credits of “The Colbert Report.” Again, this is similar to how most super PACs supporting a campaign are run by former aides or someone who has long-time ties to the candidate.

Those include:

• Meredith Bennett, current executive producer for “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” and former co-executive producer for “The Colbert Report,” reimbursed for fundraising supplies
• Andro Buneto, art director for “The Colbert Report,” reimbursed for media consulting
• Peter Gwinn, former writer for “The Colbert Report,” reimbursed for writing, administrative consulting and media consulting
• Brendan Hurley, prop master for “The Colbert Report,” reimbursed for T-shirt design and administrative consulting
• Humor Logistics Corporation, the company of “The Colbert Report” writer Eric Drysdale
• Opus Moreschi, current “Late Show with Stephen Colbert” writer and formerly of “The Colbert Report”
• James Kuo, assistant to the executive producers of “The Colbert Report”
• Alon Katsir, who may be Jay Katsir the intern (actually a writer at the show), was reimbursed for media consulting
• Frank Lesser, writer for “The Colbert Report,” was reimbursed for, well, writing.
• Kris Long, “The Colbert Report” graphic designer, who was paid for T-shirt design
• Liz Miggliaco, “The Colbert Report” props production assistant
• Erica Myrickes, former writer for “The Colbert Report,” reimbursed for web services, media consulting and fundraising supplies
• Kateri Palen, talent for “The Colbert Report,” reimbursed for fundraising supplies
• Purple Canoe Productions, which is owned by Meredith Bennett’s husband, Robert LaForty, for media consulting and administrative services.
• Scardino & Sons, owned by former writer Meredith Scardino, for writing.
• Well Read Doofus Productions, Inc., owned by Scott Sherman, then a writer for “The Colbert Report”

By our math, about $43,959 went to different team members of “The Colbert Report.” The super PAC also paid money to other businesses with links to the Colbert show including:

• MTV Networks (email communications), the former parent company of Comedy Central
• Extreme Group Holdings, LLC, also owned by Viacom, Comedy Central’s current parent company, was paid for media consulting
• Hello Doggie, Inc., the production company for “The Daily Show” and “The Colbert Report”

And, the PAC also paid $2,755 to meat processor Plumrose in New Jersey, presumably for the vital services of Mr. Ham Rove over the period of several months. In other food-related expenditures, the PAC paid $400 for a cake congratulating Jon Stewart on the success of his book “Earth.”

The PAC also spent $3,500 toward commissioning Marist Institute of Public Opinion to conduct a poll and $47,965 for T-shirts and other apparel. (Stephen Colbert tote bags, anyone?)

And, of course, it’s the lawyers who always win.

Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow paid the largest amount, $90,051, to attorneys at D.C. law firm Caplin and Drysdale. On the show and on the super PAC’s website, Colbert repeatedly bragged about having good attorneys. The fees likely paid for advisement on the formation of the PAC and communication with the FEC to get opinions about the legality of talking about the super PAC on TV.

WHERE DID THE REST OF THE MONEY GO?

FEC filings show the balance of the super PAC’s money, $773,704 went to the Stephen Colbert Super PAC SHH Institute, a 501(c)(4) nonprofit.

These so-called social welfare groups are allowed to spend money on limited amounts of political activity, but it’s next to impossible to see who donated that money and where it went, a loophole that was likely not lost on Colbert and the staff of “The Colbert Report.”

Nonprofits are required to file either a 990 tax form or a 990-EZ card with the IRS. The EZ card is typically filled out by organizations who have gross receipts of $50,000 or less. The 990 form N is filled out by organizations typically raising more than $50,000 and contains more itemized information about names and salaries of those running the nonprofit, its receipts and expenses, and sometimes they include donor information. There is a 501(c)(4) registered with the IRS called the Stephen Colbert Super PAC SHH Institute, but because it doesn’t report having assets of more than $50,000, it’s required only to turn in a postcard, not the full 990 return.

https://i2.wp.com/sunlightf.wpengine...oom=1.25&w=900
Ham Rove. (Credit: The Colbert Report/Wikimedia Commons)

IRS filings are typically at least two years behind, and it’s hit or miss on how clearly they identify donors or whether they identify donors at all. By then, the election is long over and voters don’t have the opportunity to see who’s really behind these groups and consider their motivations when casting their ballot.

The website dedicated to the end of the Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow says that the money went from the SHH Institute to the Ham Rove Memorial Fund, in honor of the adviser to his super PAC. The money was distributed to six different charities. Many of the charities listed the donations on their websites as coming from “Ham Rove Memorial Fund of the Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina.” That’s the same foundation that handles the charitable distributions for the proceeds from Stephen Colbert’s Ben and Jerry’s flavor, Americone Dream.

(Colbert alluded to passing the money to a second 501(c)(4) on his show.) Each of the six reportedly received $125,000.

But we found that wasn’t quite the case.

Going through Coastal Community Foundation’s 990s as well as press releases and the 990s of the charities in question, we were able to piece together that the Ham Rove Memorial Fund was established and the foundation distributed donations in the exact figures of:

• $138,022 to Donors Choose
• $141,500 to Habitat for Humanity
• $125,000 to the Yellow Ribbon Fund
• $125,000 to Team Rubicon
• $136,852.41 to Campaign Legal Center
• $136,852.41 to the Center for Responsive Politics

If you do the math, you’ll figure out that that amount, $803,226.82, is $30,006 more than the $773,220 reported to the FEC. We suspect the “media consultants” may have also donated their “consulting fees” to charity.

HOW DID THE CHARITIES SPEND THE MONEY?

This is a whole lot of work to point out the lack of transparency in campaign finance laws. The silver lining is that the Heroe$ really did help six nonprofits continue their work.

Habitat for Humanity, Donors Choose and Team Rubicon all received the funds to help with recovery from Hurricane Sandy. The Yellow Ribbon Fund received funds to help injured service members and their families. The Center for Responsive Politics and the Campaign Legal Center both renamed their conference rooms in honor of Ham Rove.

Deep breath, everyone. We made it.

It’s important to point out that following the money for Colbert’s political finance groups was a long, long process. But despite the arduous amount of research we did, tracking the cash flow of Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow was actually much easier than it would be for almost every other case. Mr. Colbert flaunted his super PAC on cable television and left plenty of bread crumbs for journalists to follow; we knew where the money ended up and were able to fill in the gaps. Without these clues, it may have been simply impossible to track. Needless to say, few candidates for political office will be as generous — leaving the public in the dark.

So, what do you think, Mr. Colbert? Did we find all the money?

https://sunlightfoundation.com/2015/...that-money-go/