Thread: SS is due to release on Monday SS app for SS# of H.Bounel

Social Security Administration Is Due To Release On Monday Social Security Number Application For SSN 042-68-4425 Of Harry Bounel Which Obama Is Fraudulently Using


Saturday, September 14, 2013 21:01






Press release, Social Security administration is due to release on Monday Social Security number application for SSN 042-68-4425 of Harry Bounel which Obama is fraudulently using
Law Offices of Orly Ttaitz
For 5 years now Attorney Orly Taitz has pursued the issue of Obama ‘s use of fabricated IDs. the most damning evidence against Obama is his use of Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 , which failed E-Verify and SSNVS and which was traced to Harry Bounel, born in 1890.
Currently there are 7 challenges to Obama brought by Attorney Taitz, two of them are cases specifically dealing with this issue. The cases are slightly different. The latest motion before Judge Lamberth in DC is based on Obama’s failed E-Verify and his number, which was traced to Bounel. The second case, which was filed in MD, where SSN administration is located, is filed based on Bounel’s name and the same Social Security number and the fact that the regime wrongfully denied access to his application, claiming privacy, even though he was born over 120 years ago and privacy no longer applies based on 120 year rule.
Taitz filed a motion for summary judgment. Rod Rosenstein, US attorney for MD, asked presiding judge, Ellen L. Hollander, for more time to respond to a 2 page motion, claiming that 2 weeks were not enough. She granted the request the same day, before the plaintiff could even see the motion to extend time. Shortly thereafter the war or possible war with Syria broke. Now there is a peace agreement, no further distractions, the response id due on Monday and regime ran out of excuses.
Yesterday the regime sent a trial balloon. It published in a couple of blogs (at least one of these blogs is believed to be controlled by the regime) something to the extent that maybe by a typographical error the information of Bounel and Obama got crossed in one database. They were quoting a researcher Susan Daniels stating that the information about Bounel found by Albert Hendershot was a one time thing found by one researcher, one error in one database. A number of people, who might be connected to the regime as well, sent Taitz this article to make sure Taitz saw the trial balloon to ascertain if this latest story would fly.
The answer, it will not fly.
Incidently, researcher Albert Hendershot was visited by the FBI. When he refused to cooperate, he was tackled, thrown on the ground and handcuffed. At that time he was asked for password for his computers. His computers were taken and in fear of being thrown to jail he gave the password. Hendershot published an article about his experience and published the receipts given to him by the FBI for his computers. This matter was not litigated yet.
Further on, Attorney Taitz did not submit to court Hendershot’s findings until she had confirmation. Originally, when Taitz talked to investigator Susan Daniels, the investigator said that she could not find Bounel’s information and Taitz did not submit Hendershot’s findings to several courts, including administrative court in GA, where Daniels testified for Taitz. Later, in a phone conversation Daniels confirmed to Taitz that she found Bounel ’s information as well. Only when Taitz had this confirmation from a second source, from Daniels, did she submit it to court. Daniels and Hendershot used different databases. Only after Daniels confirmed to Taitz that she found Bounel’s infomation, Taitz contacted Hendershot and related to him that his findings were confirmed by Daniels and he wrote a second article about it.
If need be, Taitz will provide proof of all of the above.
At this point Obama is cornered. He is using a stolen Social Security number and proven computer generated forgeries instead of valid IDs.
This might be related or not, but Dan Pfeifer, Obama strategist, who together with Perkins-Coie attorney, Bob Bauer,presented to the public on April 27, 2011 the forgery of the Obama’s birth certificate, was yesterday taken to the hospital with the stroke like symptoms.
The response is due on Monday, right after Yom Kipur, the Jewish day of atonement. We’ll see what U.S. attorney Rod Rosenstein and Federal Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander will do.
More information on this and other cases can be found on OrlyTaitzESQ.com.

Posted by giveusliberty1776 at 7:37 AM

RELATED

_{SNOPES: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/ssn.asp}

Originally Posted by JohnDoe2

_{SNOPES: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/ssn.asp}

"The righteous is a guide to his neighbor,
But the way of the wicked leads them astray."
- Proverbs 12:26
SNOPES and other fact-checking websites provide an ongoing flood of disinformation on behalf of Mr. Obama. The above Snopes article is a collection of SEVERAL disinformation items which deflects,
confuses the less informed, and misleads seekers of truth into the tall grass.

Red herring: It was never about a SSN ending in "8722" (Ludwig).
Early on, the name "Ludwig" was erroneously associated with the
SSN ending in "4425". The S.S. Administration protects SSNs by
not allowing reverse searches (SSN => name), so it took months for
the SSN ending in "4425" to be connected with its actual identity,
"Harrison J. Bounel". However Bounel's name came to light, once
it was revealed, a normal SSN search (name => SSN) validated it.

Anticipate that the SSA, an executive branch agency, will fraudulently
cauterize the SSN database of information incriminating Mr. Obama.

For accurate information about Mr. Obama's Constitutional ineligibility,
avoid Obama shill websites like SNOPES, FactCheck, or DailyKOS.
However reliable they may be for other information, they are unworthy
of your trust about Mr. Obama being ineligible to the Presidency.

See http://orlytaitzesq.com or the ALIPAC Obama ineligibility website.

As I understand it, Snopes was started and is run by liberals who voted for Obama and unfortunately, they show their bias frequently.

Snopes.com - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snopes.com‎

• Cached
• Similar

Snopes.com /ˈsnoʊps/, officially the Urban Legends Reference Pages, is a ... The Mikkelsons founded the San Fernando Valley Folklore Society and were ...
‎History - ‎Main site - ‎Lost Legends - ‎Accuracy


snopes.com: About the people behind snopes.com

www.snopes.com/info/aboutus.asp

The snopes.com website was founded by Barbara and David Mikkelson, who live and work in the Los Angeles area. What they began in 1995 as an expression ...

Originally Posted by JohnDoe2

Snopes.com - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snopes.com‎

• Cached
• Similar

Snopes.com /ˈsnoʊps/, officially the Urban Legends Reference Pages, is a ... The Mikkelsons founded the San Fernando Valley Folklore Society and were ...
‎History - ‎Main site - ‎Lost Legends - ‎Accuracy


snopes.com: About the people behind snopes.com

www.snopes.com/info/aboutus.asp

The snopes.com website was founded by Barbara and David Mikkelson, who live and work in the Los Angeles area. What they began in 1995 as an expression ...

None of this stops them from being liberals, the husband does VOTE. Besides, Wikipedia is not great source either--anytime you allow anyone to edit a subject, you are going to have issues with facts, especially when it concerns issues which are very divisive. And FactCheck is also associated with liberals so I wouldn't trust that either.


http://www.fair.org/blog/2012/09/05/dems-didnt-start-social-security-and-other-false-factchecks-from-factcheck-org/

Dems Didn't Start Social Security — and Other False Factchecks From Factcheck.org

By Jim Naureckas

Under the headline "Democratic Disinformation From Charlotte," the website Factcheck.org (9/5/12) took aim at this "dubious or misleading claim":

Rep. James Clyburn engaged in partisan myth-making when he said “Democrats created Social Security” while Republicans “cursed the darkness.” History records strong bipartisan support in both House and Senate for the measure President Roosevelt signed in 1935.

Later, in explaining this judgment, Factcheck wrote:

For sure, there was opposition to the legislation. Sen. Daniel Hastings, a Delaware Republican, warned that it would "end the progress of a great country," as the New York Times reported. But Hastings was in the minority, even within his own party, when it came to voting on the bill.

Well, let's factcheck Factcheck. According to the Congressional Research Service's legislative history of Social Security (12/19/86), Hastings didn't just warn against Social Security, he offered an amendment to the Social Security Act "to strike out the old-age benefits provisions from the bill." The amendment was defeated 15 to 63–but with 12 Republicans in favor and just seven opposed.

So while a majority of Republicans voted for the final bill–which also included assistance for the blind and abandoned children, among other things–most of them had already gone on record as opposing the Social Security part of the Social Security Act.

Likewise, in the House, Rep. Allen Treadway (R.-Mass.), arguing that "business and industry are already operating under very heavy burdens," offered an amendment to send the bill back to committee in order to kill it. That amendment failed–with 95 Republicans voting for it and one Republican voting against it.

So is it fair to say that Democrats created Social Security? Certainly. Is it accurate to say that it had strong bipartisan support? No, that's entirely misleading.

Factcheck's other observations from the DNC largely offered more spin and special pleading. "Democrats who accuse [Romney] of proposing a middle-income tax increase are misrepresenting what he's said"–because "he could choose, for example, to renege on his promise to cut rates or to keep the amount of revenue neutral rather than violate his promise not to raise taxes on those in the middle."

Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn "made the misleading claim that Romney 'added $2.6 billion in debt.'… To be sure, long-term debt increased by $2.7 billion during Romney’s tenure. But that's nothing out of the ordinary."

Factcheck claims to be "holding Democrats to the same standards we applied in last week’s coverage of the Republican convention." That's true in the sense that Factcheck's real standard is that it will always find roughly the same degree of dishonesty on both sides–because otherwise it would not be seen as a neutral, nonpartisan arbiter by the very serious people.


Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting, Inc. (FAIR) is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. FAIR's federal tax-exempt I.D. number is 13-3392362. Donations to FAIR are fully tax-deductible.

Where is the info that was to be released today???

Originally Posted by JohnDoe2

Where is the info that was to be released today???

To be specific, here is "the info that was to be released today" whereof you speak:
The SSN ending with "4425" mentioned in the original post above was assigned to Harrison J. Bounel, b. 1890.
This is an SSN verification such as an employer obtains with E-Verify.

Now, you answer my question, and then I will answer your question, (the answer to which, you already know).

While Mr. Obama is committing and has committed the most massive fraud since the serpent in the Garden of Eden (not a question),

[my question] why are you being a "devil's advocate?" [/my question]

The first article above said that Social security was going to release some information on Monday.
I can't find any newly released info anywhere.
I was asking if anyone had any new info released by SOCIAL SECURITY to share with us.