Results 1 to 6 of 6
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: 72,000 Iowans could be first to lose coverage as insurance market collapses

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040

    72,000 Iowans could be first to lose coverage as insurance market collapses

    72,000 Iowans could be first to lose coverage as insurance market collapses

    Tony Leys , Des Moines Register
    5:45 p.m. CT May 4, 2017


    Karen Slessor’s health insurance is hanging by a thread.
    Slessor, a Reinbeck widow who has diabetes and arthritis, is one of nearly 72,000 Iowans who are on the brink of losing coverage as Congress tries to overhaul the country’s health care system.

    The at-risk Iowans buy their own health insurance policies, usually because they don’t work for employers that offer coverage and they don’t qualify for government insurance programs, such as Medicaid and Medicare.


    Iowa is the first state where consumers face the likelihood of losing all access to individual health insurance policies, but experts say other states could soon follow.


    The two largest health insurers offering individual coverage in Iowa, Aetna and Wellmark Blue Cross & Blue Shield, announced last month that they would stop selling such policies for next year because of heavy financial losses and uncertainty in the market.

    In most of the state, that left just one relatively small carrier, Medica. The situation became critical on Wednesday, when Medica leaders said they probably also will pull out of Iowa.


    “Then what would I do? I don’t know,” said Slessor, who has a Medica policy.


    Other states could follow


    Iowa could be on the leading edge of a national calamity. Cynthia Cox, a vice president for the Kaiser Family Foundation, said Iowa is the first state to face the likelihood of having no individual insurance carriers in most counties. In Tennessee, 16 of 95 counties are without a carrier for 2018, she said.

    Several other states have just one carrier left, so they could quickly be in the same boat as Iowa.



    Medica, a Minnesota based health insurer, released a statement suggesting it was close to following two larger carriers in deciding not to sell such policies in Iowa for 2018, due to instability in the market. Wochit




    The U.S. House narrowly passed a bill Thursday that would replace the Affordable Care Act. In celebrating the victory, House Speaker Paul Ryan cited the imminent collapse of Iowa's individual health insurance market.

    "What kind of protection is Obamacare if there are no plans to choose from?" the Wisconsin Republican asked at a White House press conference.


    The House bill includes some measures meant to cushion risks to insurers, but critics say it would make matters worse for many middle-age Americans and people with chronic health problems. The House bill faces an unclear future in the U.S. Senate, and insurers are running out of time to make decisions about where to offer coverage next year.


    "It looks like the political uncertainty could continue," Cox said.


    The loss of Iowa carriers could hamstring people who bought subsidized insurance policies on the Affordable Care Act’s online marketplace, as well as Iowans who bought full-price policies via insurance agents.


    The loss of individual policy options wouldn’t affect more than 2 million Iowans who obtain insurance via an employer or government plan, such as Medicare or Medicaid. It also wouldn't affect about 77,000 longstanding Wellmark customers who bought policies before the Affordable Care Act took effect in 2014. But people who buy individual policies usually do so because they have no other choices. The loss of carriers could leave tens of thousands of Iowans adrift, unless Congress acts quickly to shore up the market.


    Individual coverage has been a prime option for many people who become divorced or widowed and lose access to their spouses’ employer-provided coverage. Another vulnerable group could be young adults who lose access to their parents’ coverage when they turn 26. If they can no longer obtain their own insurance, such consumers could be under increased pressure to find jobs offering health benefits. That could limit their flexibility to work part time or take jobs with small employers that don’t provide coverage.


    Shaky market gets shakier


    Insurance experts say the individual health insurance market was already shaky under former President Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act, and it has become even more unstable because of uncertainty about whether and how President Donald Trump and the Republicans running Congress will change the rules.

    Slessor is in a particularly precarious position. She’s the kind of potential customer health insurers used to screen out, before the Affordable Care Act barred carriers from denying coverage for pre-existing health conditions.


    She’s 61, and she has diabetes and arthritis. She makes regular trips to doctors’ offices, including a visit to a Cedar Falls eye clinic on Wednesday for examination of a small growth on her eyelid. Such visits to medical specialists cost her a $60 copay, which is a stretch for someone living on an annual income of $29,000 in widow’s pension and Social Security benefits. But if she becomes uninsured, she fears she won’t be able to visit doctors at all.


    The Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, subsidizes premiums for private insurance policies purchased by moderate-income Americans like Slessor. She pays about $213 per month in premiums, which is a relative bargain. The federal government pays another $808 per month to Medica.

    “There’s no way I could afford that — not if I wanted to buy medicine and eat,” she said.


    Slessor doesn’t see any other coverage options. She makes a bit too much to qualify for Medicaid, which is the federal and state program for the poor. She used to be covered under an employer-provided policy via her husband, Rod, who was a pastor. But she lost access to that policy after he died in 2013.

    She’s four years away from qualifying for Medicare, the federal program for seniors.


    “I was just hoping I could kind of creep through,” she said.

    Carriers not required to sell policies

    Obamacare relies on private insurance carriers to cover moderate-income Americans, but it doesn’t require the companies to offer policies. Many of carriers have been pulling back in recent years. Their main complaint is the government hasn’t done enough to enforce an Obamacare requirement that most Americans have coverage.

    The lack of enforcement has let many young, healthy Americans stay out of the pool, insurers say. Now, carriers don’t know what to expect from the Trump administration and the Republican-controlled Congress, which have vowed to repeal Obamacare.


    Medica Vice President Geoff Bartsh said in an interview that Congress has been compounding the market's instability by continuing to argue even as insurers try to figure out their rates for 2018.


    “We need someone to do something,” Bartsh said.


    Medica, which has about 14,000 Iowa customers, has until mid-June to tell state officials whether it intends to sell individual policies here for 2018.

    On Wednesday, the company announced that it probably would pull out of Iowa’s individual health-insurance market, in which Wellmark alone says it has lost $90 million in three years.


    Iowa Insurance Commissioner Doug Ommen has said his hands are tied unless Congress gives states more flexibility to set insurance market rules.


    “This is a federally created situation, and we need a federally created solution,” he said last month.


    The Republican plan that passed the House Thursday would let states opt out of many Obamacare rules, including the one barring insurers from charging more to people with pre-existing health problems. In return, the bill would offer billions of dollars to help states set up high-risk pools for people with chronic health problems, but skeptics say the money would not be nearly enough.




    The U.S. House of Representatives will vote on repealing the Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, later today, beginning the process of repealing and replacing the bill. Newslook

    Supporters say the Republican plan would encourage Americans to maintain coverage without requiring them to have it, as Obamacare has tried to. Critics warn the new plan would return the country to pre-Obamacare days, when insurance was out of reach for many Americans with chronic ailments.

    Agents look for options


    Leading Iowa insurance broker Lynn Schreder has been advising clients not to panic about the looming loss of carriers here. She wants to see Congress act quickly to give states some flexibility in trying to woo or retain health-insurance companies. But the clock is ticking.

    “What I’m telling people is we have to hope and pray that something’s going to happen in Washington, because that’s our only hope,” she said.


    Schreder is president of the Iowa Association of Health Underwriters and a co-owner of the KHI Solutions insurance brokerage, based in Fort Dodge and West Des Moines. She has been aggressively seeking alternatives for customers in danger of losing individual health insurance policies.


    For some self-employed customers, Schreder has been arranging to set up “micro-group” plans. To qualify, they need at least one employee besides themselves. That person could be a spouse, as long as they receive company pay that is reported to the IRS on a W-2 form, she said.


    The “micro-group” plans could be good alternatives for self-employed people, even those who have pre-existing health problems, Schreder said. Insurers used to set small businesses’ rates partly on employees’ health status, but they’re not allowed to do that under the Affordable Care Act. Carriers now only consider participants’ age, ZIP code and gender when setting rates.


    Some Iowans could sign up for faith-based “health care sharing ministries,” in which religious people agree to help cover each other’s medical expenses. Such options aren’t full insurance. The plans require participants to attest to religious beliefs, and they exclude costs for such things as birth control, out-of-wedlock pregnancies and injuries sustained in drunken-driving accidents. The ministries also can exclude payment for pre-existing health problems. But they do count as qualifying coverage for Americans trying to comply with the Affordable Care Act’s requirement that most Americans obtain insurance.

    Karen Slessor of Reinbeck, gets her eyes checked Wednesday, May 3, 2017, during an appointment at Wolfe Eye Clinic in Cedar Falls. (Photo: Michael Zamora/The Register)


    Carriers didn't foresee costs

    When the Affordable Care Act first took effect in 2014, one of Iowans’ main options for individual insurance was CoOportunity Health, a health insurance cooperative set up with tens of millions of dollars in federal money. The effort collapsed in 2015, followed by most other such co-ops nationally.

    One of CoOportunity’s founders, Dave Lyons, said last week that he had feared the market’s problems would lead to a complete lack of carriers for individual health insurance in Iowa.


    Lyons, who is a former state insurance commissioner, said numerous problems destabilized the individual insurance market.


    “I’m incredibly disappointed that even the largest, strongest, deepest-pocketed carriers aren’t able to pencil out how to remain in this marketplace,” he said.


    Experts for all the carriers, including CoOportunity, failed to foresee how much health care formerly uninsured Americans would use once they became covered, Lyons said. Also, he said, the federal government failed to live up to commitments to help shelter carriers from unexpected risk in the new market.


    Lyons also noted that in Iowa, Wellmark was allowed to keep tens of thousands of longstanding customers covered in older policies that didn’t meet the Affordable Care Act regulations. Those customers were healthy enough to pass health screenings that insurers previously used to check for pre-existing conditions. After the Affordable Care Act took effect, the block of relatively healthy Iowans stayed out of the general pool, skewing the risk among the remaining consumers, he said.


    Lyons said he hopes someone figures out how to prevent tens of thousands of Iowans from losing their coverage for 2018.


    “It’s hard to be optimistic right now,” he said.


    Cox, the Kaiser Family Foundation expert, also noted Wellmark's reports of having a single, unidentified Iowa patient with a rare genetic condition that is costing more than $1 million per month to treat. Cox speculated that once Wellmark announced that it was leaving the Iowa market for individual insurance, the remaining two carriers might have decided they would have to also leave or risk taking on that patient's extreme costs.


    Sara Collins, a national expert on health insurance issues, said Iowa is one of several states that were down to just one carrier for individual insurance as of last week. Collins, a vice president of the Commonwealth Fund, said some carriers have gotten the jitters from Trump’s stated desire to see the Affordable Care Act collapse and from Congress’ stop-and-start attempts to repeal and replace the law.

    “That has created a lot of uncertainty for insurers,” she said.

    Buy PhotoKaren Slessor of Reinbeck (left, walks with registered nurse Lacy Kolder Wednesday, May 3, 2017, during an appointment at Wolfe Eye Clinic in Cedar Falls. (Photo: Michael Zamora/The Register)


    If Congress doesn’t resolve the issues by the end of May, more insurers could decide against offering individual policies for 2018, she said. However, Collins said states and the federal government have several options to try to encourage carriers to stay in or re-enter the market.

    One would be to organize “re-insurance” arrangements, which would help shoulder the costs of particularly expensive patients. If insurers knew they wouldn't have to carry such patients alone, they could be more confident in setting rates for everyone else, she said.


    Such reinsurance arrangements were offered by the federal government in the first few years of the Affordable Care Act, but they have been phased out.


    “Congress could reinstate that tomorrow,” Collins said.

    She added that Alaska and Minnesota have set up state versions. The U.S. House bill includes money states could use for such arrangements.

    Collins said the Trump administration also could help ease insurers’ fears by committing to continue spending billions of dollars to help cover deductibles and other costs related to health insurance policies that moderate-income Americans purchase via Obamacare. That money goes to the insurers, and Trump has at times talked about cutting it off.


    Members of Congress would face enormous pressure if thousands of their constituents were suddenly forced off of insurance plans, Collins said.


    “I think ultimately, they will find a way to make sure people in these states have access to health insurance,” she said.


    In a pinch, Congress theoretically could pass a temporary patch. For example, Collins said, residents in states lacking private carriers could be allowed to buy into existing government insurance plans, such as Medicaid, the military program Tricare or federal employees’ health insurance program. Those who now qualify for Obamacare subsidies for private insurance could be allowed to use that money for public coverage.


    Slessor, the Medica customer, would favor that idea. She thinks in the long run, the country should shift to a single-payer system, in which everyone is covered by a taxpayer financed plan such as Medicare. But Slessor, who is a Democrat, knows such a plan would never fly with the current president and Congress. She's not sure how hopeful to be that even a short-term fix could be approved to help Iowans like her avoid losing their subsidized private coverage.


    "If there aren't any companies that are willing to come in and do it, then I'm not sure what anybody's going to do," she said.

    http://www.desmoinesregister.com/sto...are/310390001/

    Last edited by JohnDoe2; 05-04-2017 at 10:07 PM.
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    One solution is find a job with a company that offers employer health insurance. Ever think of that?! Maybe a spouse could find a job with an employer that offers a health insurance policy that covers the family. Ever try that?! What did people do before Obamacare?
    Last edited by Judy; 05-05-2017 at 12:41 AM.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  4. #4
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  5. #5
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    Quote Originally Posted by Judy View Post
    One solution is find a job with a company that offers employer health insurance. Ever think of that?! Maybe a spouse could find a job with an employer that offers a health insurance policy that covers the family. Ever try that?! What did people do before Obamacare?
    The Republican health-care bill could cut benefits in employer-backed plans, too
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  6. #6
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    The Republican health care bill doesn't cut benefits in any plan. It restores the freedom to consumers, insurance companies and employers to design and choose the benefit plans they want, if they want one. No has to buy one, no one has to sell one, no one has to provide one. There are some protections for example, children can stay on parents policies until they're 26. If you're an insurance company you can charge a surcharge up to 30% for 1 year, for a lapsed policy beyond 63 days if the person has a pre-existing condition, but you can't deny that person coverage, all you can do is charge them up to 30% more for no more than 1 year. You don't have to, you aren't required to, but you can and still be compliant. So if the normal premium is $300, you lapse for some reason or never signed up, then you can buy insurance with a pre-existing condition for $400 for no more than a year, then after a year or 10 months or 6 months or whatever that carrier decides to offer, your premium would return to the normal rate of $300 a month. Your normal premium might only be $200 a month and then your surcharge would be less than $100 a month, it would be $66 a month.

    And competition for your business might eliminate the surcharge altogether. Insurance companies may decide it's not worth it and just make the normal rate for everyone $325 and focus on growing their customer base instead of punishing their customers for one thing or another.

    It's a much a do about nothing seems to me. What people don't seem to understand is the big picture of what this Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 fix to Obamacare is going to do is open up competition, increase efficiencies, and grow the insurance pools to historic levels. Most Americans haven't ever really experienced a competitive insurance market because for 72 years, it's been a collusion-driven, anti-competitive insurance market because of McCarran-Ferguson.

    So it's all going to be okay, it's going to great for everyone, a whole new experience. Give it a shot. It surely can't be any worse than it is now and everyone is totally fed up with the whole issue, they want a change and they want a change for the better for everyone.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. 15,000 UPS Spouses Lose Insurance Coverage Thanks To Obamacare
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-02-2013, 11:27 PM
  2. Mental Health Coverage Expanded to Most U.S. Insurance Plans
    By JohnDoe2 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-09-2013, 03:59 PM
  3. Roof Collapses on Housing Market: No Job = No House
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-25-2010, 10:02 PM
  4. TX-Border landowners fear loss of insurance coverage
    By MyAmerica in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-15-2008, 10:30 AM
  5. Illegals Lose Medicaid Coverage
    By mkfarnam in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 12-15-2007, 05:20 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •