Thread: Our media personalities are lying when referencing a Trump “Muslim ban”.

.


The fact is, Trump’s “immigration ban list” may be based on illogical thinking, and even have nefarious motives behind it, but when looking at the facts it certainly is not a “Muslim ban”, which is what countless “fake news” sources have labeled it.


If it was a “Muslim ban”, Indonesia, with 87 % of its population being Muslim, would be on the list. It’s not.


If it was a “Muslim ban”, Pakistan with 96 % of its population being Muslim, would be on the list. It’s not.


If it was a “Muslim ban”, Egypt, with 90% of its population being Muslim, would be on the list. It’s not.


If it was a “Muslim ban”, Bangladesh, with 90% of its population being Muslim, would be on the list. It’s not.


Now, when and where did the list of countries banning immigrants come from? Well, the fact is, it came from “the Visa Waiver Program and Terrorist Travel Protection Act of 2015“, which was adopted long before Trump was elected as our President. The list includes: Syria, Iraq, Iran, Yemen, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan.


So, why are so many of our media personalities constantly beating the drum and calling it a “Muslim ban”?


JWK


Our media personalities are entitled to their opinions, but are lying when creating fake-news facts.

When trump first approached Giuliani he said “Muslim ban”. The fact is, I could see myself also saying “Muslim ban”, but really thinking “Muslim Terrorists”.

Now, click on the following link to hear Giuliani give the actual history behind the “ban” .

https://youtu.be/aGOwEOTYfuE?t=188


Is it possible that Trump and his current Administration really are concerned about allowing Muslim Terrorists entering our country and the “ban” is really an attempt to deal with this?

I don’t know what is in the minds and hearts of this Administration, but I can say I would be extremely cautious at this time about allowing Muslims, or anyone in, from countries where ISIS is a major player. This is only common sense.

So, why is there such an uproar over Trump's proposal?

JWK

It's just common sense. It's like what Trump said, call it a Muslim ban, call it whatever you want, they aren't coming into the United States without extreme vetting.

Originally Posted by Judy

It's just common sense. It's like what Trump said, call it a Muslim ban, call it whatever you want, they aren't coming into the United States without extreme vetting.

I see a judge appointed by globalist Bush has put a hold on Trump's order.


We have an infestation in our judiciary which needs to be dealt with as any other destructive infestation would be dealt with.


JWK



Without our Fifth Column Media, Loretta Lynch and a corrupted FBI, Hillary Clinton would be making license tags in a federal penitentiary

I'm hearing that the Judge who issued the halt on Trump's seven country temporary ban, James Robart, has a "black lives matter" problem and ruled against Seattle's police union.

I will try to check this out.


JWK

Check out Federal judge declares ‘black lives matter’ in court

"U.S. District Judge James Robart declared “black lives matter” in court Monday during a hearing on Seattle police reform."


JWK

SEE: Federaljudge in Mass. won’t extend order halting Trump immigration ban

”In two contradictory rulings on Friday, a federal judge in Seattle blocked President Trump’s ban on travelers and immigrants from seven Muslim-majority nations, while a federal judge in Boston refused to extend a court order that had temporarily blocked the ban.”

So, one says yes and one says no.This is going to get interesting

JWK

Well, if we had to ban people from Israel, it is a Jewish-majority nation. We are a Christian-majority nation.

The ban is what it is...and that is the majority religion in those Nations.

Maybe it would NOT be the majority if those nations start their own little multi-cultural experiment and accept people of other countries and religions.