Hillary 2016: Old, Fat, Sick…still good enough for government work.

Hillary 2016: Old, Fat, Sick…still good enough for government work.

Posted by MOTUS on March 1, 2014 at 12:51pm
View Blog
Some are whispering that Hillary is too old to run for president.

http://lh4.ggpht.com/-y3pc0MSiGgw/Ux...jpg?imgmax=800

But that’s clearly not the issue, as Hills will only be 69 when she runs for president in 2016. Ronald Reagan was 73 when he ran in 1984, as was Bob Dole when he ran, and John McCain was 71 for his run against Hope and Change.
No, the question is not:“Is Hillary too old to run for president?” It’s “Is Hillary too fat to run for president?”

http://lh4.ggpht.com/-eTIvXl7u8EM/Ux...jpg?imgmax=800

And before you squawk “SEXISM!” allow me to point out that weight is a legitimate issue for both sexes; just ask Chris Christie.

http://lh4.ggpht.com/-4gXIWc4F3k8/Ux...jpg?imgmax=800

Now I’m not saying that Hills is Chris Christie fat:

http://lh5.ggpht.com/-Lfuz43n_jmQ/Ux...jpg?imgmax=800

Heck, she’s not even Kirstie Alley fat:

[IMG]http://api.ning.com/files/gWhc*8EYmk*eXqIjwZe0plPLQEJfxeErCJeJTFUNywmzOakImA-vbPXmJ7HzFZCMKg79SvSa6HrJgKJ0YDqz0OdrQ43-RHU2/ScreenshotStudiocapture1414.png[/IMG]

A little chubby maybe, butt Kirstie Alley fat? – nah.

Butt now I see there’s a new whisper campaign asking “is Hillary too sick to run?” with irresponsible innuendos of a brain tumor. This is a red herring. I’m not sure who tossed it out: It may have been Hill’s own campaign team, seeking to establish health-fueled plausible deniability argument for her abdication of responsibility in Benghazi.

http://lh4.ggpht.com/-j94fEXcYYrw/Ux...jpg?imgmax=800

If it was her political enemies, then it’s intended to undermine her overall fitness for office. If that’s the case, it probably won’t fly, as we’ve gone for over 5 years without knowing whether Big Guy is physically fit enough to run the country. To establish a new standard now and demand to know about Hillary’s health would be outright sexist – so don’t be expecting the MSM to bring it up; we all know that’s the purview of the GOP.

http://lh5.ggpht.com/-CdgHLQX_lIQ/Ux...jpg?imgmax=800

All I can say, is that even if Hillary has lost those thick, lush “boy eyebrows” of her youth:

http://lh6.ggpht.com/-7pkv6rjHGmM/Ux...jpg?imgmax=800

She’s somehow managed to maintain her youthful insouciance:

http://lh6.ggpht.com/-OwSg6eBJfbE/Ux...jpg?imgmax=800

And that’s all that’s necessary to be President. So don’t worry about her suffering from a serious brain disorder, she’s the smartest woman on earth:

http://lh4.ggpht.com/-pt0oOiRiksI/Ux...jpg?imgmax=800

(with apologies to Rush Limbaugh)


http://patriotaction.net/profiles/bl...msg_share_post

http://www.alipac.us/f9/hillary-clin...nghazi-298534/

http://www.alipac.us/f9/former-wh-ai...6/#post1398383

http://www.alipac.us/f9/hillary-clin...h-bush-295459/

This Should Mean The End of Hillary

Posted by Prof. Charles Xavier on March 10, 2014 at 10:30pm

View Blog


This Should Mean The End of Hillary

THESE TWO PICTURES, BACK TO BACK, SAY IT ALL:

http://www.rightvoicemedia.com/wp-co...ap-300x199.jpg

Hillary, staging her Russian Reset fantasy, belied by abject failure in Crimea’s Lenin Square.

How can anyone be so naïve? How can anyone be so careless with America? How can anyone be so dismissive of the benefits of American strength? How could anyone allow America’s credibility to be so utterly destroyed?

I’ll tell you how – President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton did it after Obama was elected to demonstrate that Obama was right and how he was now in control.

http://www.rightvoicemedia.com/wp-co...ea-300x168.jpg

They wanted you to see with your own eyes that the world really is a safe place now, so no need for all those messy military weapons, plans or budgets.

They wanted to make fools of people like Mitt Romney, who warned that the Russians were “our No. 1 geopolitical foe.”

And of Sarah Palin, who predicted that Obama’s approach “would only encourage Russia’s Putin to invade Ukraine next.

And of Republicans in general.

They took a victory lap.

It was all a political show. There was not then, nor has there ever been, a reset. It was another lie – a deceit, to be honest about it. They wanted us to believe in the reset:

• Just like they wanted us to believe that there were no terrorists in Benghazi.
• Just like Hillary, the Grandmother of Obamacare, told us that there would be no new bureaucracy.
• Just like they told us “If you like your plan, you can keep your plan.”
• Just like they promise to “pivot” to providing “jobs,” all the while eliminating them with regulation.
• Just like they promise to get to the bottom of the use of Obama’s own agencies – like the IRS, the FBI and the ATF – against their political opponents.
• Just like they promise to – oh hell, this could go on forever. You get the point.

This should be the end of the error of Hillary and Obama. Get over it, media! You were had. What’s worse, you volunteered to be had! You were the ones that ended up being made fools of.

It’s time to take Hillary and Obama off the table. For anyone else, such folly would mean THE END of their political career. It would mean THE END of their credibility. They would never be taken seriously by any serious person again.

Ironically, the Russian word Hillary chose for “reset” turned out to be the most honest word of all – “overcharged.” Overcharged is right! It was a con, and she is the con artist.

This should mean THE END of Hillary’s political career. No worries for her though – she can always join Bill on the lecture circuit. I hear there are lots of liberal “marks” there, and plenty of money to be made.

http://www.rightvoicemedia.com/2014/03/this-should-mean-the-end-of-...

Tags: Hillary, Obama, Russians, credibility

http://patriotaction.net/profiles/bl...end-of-hillary

https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.n...08309361_n.jpg


https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...81884005_q.jpg ForAmerica

More Clinton Double Talk: Hillary told one Florida group she wanted to change ObamaCare then later urged a group of students to enroll in ObamaCare. Just more proof Hillary would make a terrible president!

bttt

http://www.alipac.us/f9/national-arc...on-one-301422/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...;v=1TGd1veB0DU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=1TGd1veB0DU

Krauthammer: New Benghazi Email A ‘Classic Cover-Up Of A Cover-Up’

Posted on Wednesday, April 30th, 2014 at 4:19 pm.
by: Thomas Jefferson

http://www.conservativeinfidel.com/w.../charles11.jpg

by Brendan Bordelon

Video at the Page Link:

Conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer declared the new email showing White House involvement in the Benghazi talking points “a classic cover-up of a cover-up,” calling it “a serious offense.”
Krauthammer appeared on a Fox News panel along with The Washington Post’s Charles Lane and Fox News host and former White House press secretary Dana Perino.
The panel discussed new Benghazi emails released by government watchdog Judicial Watch, which reveal an intense interest and involvement by top White House staff in then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice’s September 2012 claim that the Benghazi attacks were caused by a Youtube video.
“We now have the smoking document, which is the White House saying, ‘We’re pushing the video because we don’t want to blame it on the failure of our policies,’ which is what anybody who looked at this assumed all the way through,” Krauthammer explained.
“Before an election, Obama is saying GM is alive, Al-Qaida is dead,” he continued. “He’s running essentially the foreign policy issue, on which the whole campaign is based, is one that says he killed bin Laden, Al-Qaida is on the run.
“This undermines the whole narrative,” Krauthammer asserted, “therefore they have to invent the video. So I think this is extremely important.”
But Krauthammer lamented the fact that the email may prove too little, too late.
“I know what’s going to happen,” he claimed. “The mainstream media will say ‘Oh, it’s so complicated,’ and they are not going to look into this. And without it, it’s going to be quite a struggle.”
“I think the Republicans have something here that really ought to be looked at,” Krauthammer noted. “I just don’t know if there’s going to be any interest in the mainstream media. They should because his exposes a cover-up of a cover-up.”
The email was blacked out in Judicial Watch’s initial Freedom of Information Act request and only revealed after a federal judge ordered the government to do so — facts that Krauthammer believed were telling indications of guilt.
“The fact that it was redacted, when the documents were asked for, and only revealed by a court order is telling you this is a classic cover-up of a cover-up,” Krauthammer explained. “And that is a serious offense.”

http://dailycaller.com/2014/04/29/krauthammer-new-benghazi-email-classic-cover-up-of-a-cover-up-and-that-is-a-serious-offense/#ixzz30P25KjlH

http://www.conservativeinfidel.com/u...c-cover-cover/