HILPOCRISY

Archive and review.

HILPOCRISY

Exclusive: Chuck Norris decries many 'free passes' given to Clinton for major scandals

Published: 05/10/2015 at 4:44 PMimage:
CHUCK NORRIS

“Clinton’s hypocrisy knows no bounds,” read a recent Los Angeles Times report about the former first lady and now presidential candidate. Hillary’s life and politics have incorporated the gamut of faults, yet she often remains unscathed in the eyes of many Americans.

It doesn’t matter what wrong Hillary has done – email cover-ups, the receipt of corrupt campaign or foundation funds, or dodging responsibility for the murder of Americans at the American Embassy in Benghazi, Libya, she continues to weasel around onus of sin. She always has an excuse, justification or reason. And regardless of her corruption and crime, mainstream media and liberal progressives continue to give her free passes.

Hilary’s crossroads of corruption and cover-ups are nothing new to the Clintons.

Of course, you know how Hillary clearly discarded the Freedom of Information Act and federal government requirements through the former secretary of state’s use of a private email account for all her official business and then dumping half of her email. Just last week, senior State Department Assistant Secretary of State for Administration Joyce Barr told the Senate Judiciary Committee that Hillary’s email use was “not acceptable”: “I think the message is loud and clear that that is not acceptable.”

And yet, mainstream media and liberal progressives gave her another free pass.

Regarding Benghazi, as Ben Shapiro argued in his book, “The People vs. Barack Obama,” “[T]hose Americans are dead because of Hillary Clinton’s negligence. Clinton may not merely be guilty of negligent homicide – she could also be guilty of violations of the Arms Export Control Act and the Espionage Act for her department’s movement of guns into Libya and Syria without Congressional authorization.”

And yet, mainstream media and liberal progressives gave her another free pass.

But do you remember during her first 2007 presidential run, when she acknowledged receiving $850,000 in campaign contributions from convicted criminal Norman Hsu and his intermediaries?

Lowell Ponte explained that, as investigators Edward Timperlake and William Triplett II exposed in their book “Year of the Rat,” during former President Bill Clinton’s presidency, contributors to the Clintons included agents of Chinese organized crime Triad gangs that closely work with China’s Communist government. They would visit the White House, periodically carrying large brown paper bags stuffed with $100 bills.

Ponte went on to say that, during Bill Clinton’s presidential terms, “nearly 150 people with ties to Clinton fund raising fled the country or took the Fifth to escape criminal self-incrimination.”

And yet, mainstream media and liberal progressives gave her another free pass.

Remember when Hillary muscled a law firm coordinating lawsuits against the tobacco industry to allow her brother reap some of the benefits – to the tune of $7,000 per hour for his legal work?

And yet, mainstream media and liberal progressives gave her another free pass.

And let’s not forget Hillary’s “miraculous $100,000 from a $1,000 investment in cattle futures through a political favor-seeker in Arkansas” or her “feigned surprise that subpoenaed missing Rose Law Firm billing records were found next to her living quarters in the White House,” again as Ponte noted.

And yet, mainstream media and liberal progressives gave her another free pass.

Hillary says she’ll fight to keep Israel an ally of the U.S., despite the fact that she gave tens of thousands of dollars to the Palestine Liberation Organization in the past – and even helped arrange a fundraiser for it. A former White House staff personally observed her exhibit anti-Semitic sentiment.

And yet, mainstream media and liberal progressives gave her another free pass.

The world has recently learned that the Clinton Foundation was not correctly reporting some foreign donations in tax filings – something the former president blamed on “inadvertent mistakes.” Furthermore, Peter Schweizer, author of “Clinton Cash,” discusses in his book how those foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation even influenced Hillary Clinton’s decisions as secretary of state.

And yet, mainstream media and liberal progressives gave her another free pass.

And last week the Los Angeles Times reported, “Clinton, who has emphasized campaign finance reform in the early stage of her latest White House bid, has apparently already decided the modest approach alone won’t be enough. She is going after much bigger checks, much sooner, and in a much more aggressive way than her campaign had revealed.”

Jeff Bechdel, communications director for the research group America Rising, explained, “Just three weeks ago, Hillary Clinton decried unaccountable money in politics and even called for amending the Constitution to ban it. Today, she announced she’s going to personally court donors and raise money for her own super PAC. … Clinton’s hypocrisy knows no bounds.”

Way back in 2007, before her first run for president, Lowell Ponte coined a brand new term for Hillary’s hypocrisy that I really like because it fits better today than it did eight years ago. He said Hillary’s hypocrisy was, “so haughtily brazen, disreputable, dishonest, and transparent that it deserves a new word to describe it. I hereby dub the hyper-hypocrisy of Sen. Hillary Clinton ‘Hilpocrisy.'”

And the whole time I’m writing this column, I keep thinking of what Hillary told our then commander in Iraq, Gen. John Petraeus, in a Senate hearing: “The reports you provide to us require the willing suspension of disbelief.”
Now, that’s the pot definitely calling the kettle black.

I’m back to the words of comedian Dennis Millers: “The only yoga that Hillary Clinton practices is contorting the truth.”
Don’t ever forget it: Hillary is her name, and Hilpocrisy is her game.


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/hilpocris...d7wVlCD12Jl.99