Results 1 to 5 of 5
Like Tree13Likes
  • 3 Post By GeorgiaPeach
  • 3 Post By MW
  • 2 Post By Judy
  • 3 Post By posylady
  • 2 Post By Beezer

Thread: House GOP Proposes Largest Restriction on Legal Immigrants Since the 1920s

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Super Moderator GeorgiaPeach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006

    House GOP Proposes Largest Restriction on Legal Immigrants Since the 1920s

    House GOP Proposes Largest Restriction on Legal Immigrants Since the 1920s

    January 22, 2018

    David Bier and Stuart Anderson

    Key House Republicans with the support of the White House have introduced the Securing America’s Future Act (H.R. 4760) as their solution to the immigration impasse in Congress. But the bill would have far-reaching negative effects on economic and labor force growth in the United States, instituting the most severe restriction on legal immigrants since the 1920s.

    H.R. 4760 would reduce the number of legal immigrants by more than 420,000, or 38 percent, in 2019. This is far larger than the 260,000, or 25 percent, cut advertised by the bill’s authors. In fact, the bill has far more in common with a Trump-endorsed bill in the Senate—the RAISE Act (S. 1720)—that would reduce the entry of legal immigrants by more than 470,000, or 43 percent, in 2019. Each would further reduce legal immigration over time.

    Both bills would end the diversity green card lottery and ban the entry of all legal immigrants sponsored by U.S. family members, except for spouses and minor children of U.S. citizens. The RAISE Act would also reduce the age at which U.S. citizens can sponsor minor children from 21 to 18, while the House bill would, in effect, roughly halve the number of asylees. The House bill modestly increases the employment-based quota.

    Shockingly, both bills immediately cancel applications for millions of people who have waited years to become legal immigrants.

    Table: Existing Laws and Proposed Changes to Legal Immigration

    *Based on FY 2016 figures, accounting for the FY 2018 cut in refugees

    The authors of H.R. 4760 calculated a much smaller reduction in legal immigration by using the average flow of parents from 2006 to 2015 rather than the most recent level in 2016. They also ignore that the bill aims to reduce grants of asylum by, among other changes, imposing a much higher evidentiary standard even to apply (p. 233), which will likely reduce the number of new asylees by at least 50 percent.

    Finally, the House Republicans assume that spouses and children of legal permanent residents will continue to receive green cards. But their bill reduces this category by the number of parolees who live here for longer than a year (p. 6). Based on available data and analysis, this number is likely larger than the quota. The authors of the RAISE Act appear to implicitly recognize this fact, which explains why their calculation of the new level under their bill is about the same as ours. House authors would have to amend the bill if they did intend to keep this category.

    The RAISE Act authors also recognize that the cut will grow over time as fewer immigrants are able to obtain citizenship and sponsor new spouses and children. They estimate that after 10 years, it will have further decreased legal immigration by 100,000, leading to a 50 percent reduction. Based on this estimate, H.R. 4760 would also almost halve the number of legal immigrants by 2028. Fewer U.S. births to immigrants would further compound the damage.

    In the entire history of the United States, the only policy-driven cuts in legal immigration that rival the effects of these bills were the Emergency Quota Act of 1921 and the Quota Act of 1924, which cut the number of legal immigrants by 496,000 in 1922 and 413,000 in 1925, respectively. Congress enacted these laws to keep out Italians and Eastern Europeans, specifically Jews, and were used throughout the 1930s to prevent the entry of German Jews.

    These cuts lack any reasonable justification. Labor force growth is an essential component of economic growth. Immigrants already increase U.S. Gross Domestic Product by roughly $2 trillion annually. For the United States to remain competitive internationally, it needs an expanding workforce. These proposals will harm domestic growth and make it more difficult for U.S. businesses to out-produce their competitors around the world.

    U.S. immigrants who primarily enter under the family sponsorship and diversity categories are the most highly educated in American history. True “merit-based” immigration reform would give these immigrants more opportunities to immigrate, not fewer. In any case, America needs workers at both ends of the skills spectrum to grow job opportunities for all Americans. There is simply no economic justification for banning so many legal immigrants.
    MW, lorrie and European Knight like this.
    Matthew 19:26
    But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    North Carolina
    I don't see how either of these bills get through the U.S. Senate. However, if one did, we would end up winning by the numbers. While I don't support amnesty, the reality of the situation has us staring one in the face. If we are forced into one, we had better darn well get some big concessions in trade. Well, with whatever happens, at least neither of these bill has a scenario where the parents of the illegals get to stay or be legalized.

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at

  3. #3
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    I totally support these bills to reduce legal immigration.
    lorrie and Beezer like this.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at

  4. #4
    Senior Member posylady's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Diversity is not just the color of peoples skin as people are lead to belive. It is older people beside younger people from different walks of life learning from each other sharing cultures and experiences along with memories. There is as much diversity in the same shade of skin in this country between farmers, poor, wealthy, city raised, country raised educated, uneducated allowing us all learn from each other no matter the shade of our skin. Every time the government gets involved things go wrong. Build that wall.
    Judy, lorrie and GeorgiaPeach like this.

  5. #5
    Moderator Beezer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016

    Judy and European Knight like this.


Similar Threads

  1. GA Sen. McKoon proposes no in-state tuition for immigrants without legal status
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-13-2016, 02:30 PM
  2. House of Representatives passes Bill, enables restriction of 2nd Amendment right
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-03-2014, 02:52 AM
  3. Third-ranking House Republican backs legal status for immigrants
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-23-2014, 11:04 AM
  4. Sununu Sees House Republicans Giving Immigrants Legal Path
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-05-2014, 11:23 PM
  5. Mexicans Chicago's Largest Group of Legal Immigrants
    By ChiWatcher2 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-30-2009, 08:55 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts