Thread: Huckabee: Obama Is Toast – Benghazi-Gate Lies Will Cause Him To Resign

Huckabee: Benghazi will drive Obama from office

The former Arkansas governor called the affair 'more serious than Watergate.' | Reuters
Close
By MACKENZIE WEINGER | 5/6/13 2:50 PM EDT

Mike Huckabee on Monday predicted that President Barack Obama won’t finish out his second term in light of the “cover-up” of the deadly attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi and the former Arkansas governor called the affair “more serious than Watergate.”

“I believe that before it’s all over, this president will not fill out his full term. I know that puts me on a limb,” the former Arkansas governor said on “The Mike Huckabee Show.” “But this is not minor. It wasn’t minor when Richard Nixon lied to the American people and worked with those in his administration to cover-up what really happened in Watergate. But, I remind you — as bad as Watergate was, because it broke the trust between the president and the people, no one died. This is more serious because four Americans did in fact die.”

Huckabee, however, said his predication about Obama “will not happen” if the Democrats seize control of the House and retain control of the Senate next year.

(Also on POLITICO: Joe Biden, John Kerry honor fallen diplomats)

“If they’re able to get control of the House and maintain the Senate, this will not happen because they won’t let it happen,” Huckabee said.

“And they won’t let it happen not because they’re protecting just the president, they’re trying to protect their entire political party. If they try to protect the president and their party, and do so at the expense of the truth, their president and their party will go down. Now, here’s what I’m going to suggest will happen — as the information and facts begin to come out, it will become so obvious that there was a concerted and very, very deliberate attempt to mislead this country and its people to lie to Congress, as well as to you.”

And as the truth about the deadly attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi emerges, Huckabee said, “they will have lost the right to govern.”

(Also on POLITICO: Issa: Clinton 'wrong' on Benghazi)

“The highest levels of people in the United States government all the way up to the president knew that what they did tell us was not true,” he said. “And they continued to tell it throughout an election season and beyond, and they’ve tried to change the subject. And when the facts come out, they will not be able to stand. They will have lost the right to govern.”

What happened with Benghazi is not a “political issue” — “this goes all the way to the heart of the integrity of the United States government,” Huckabee said.

“When a president lies to the American people and is part of a cover-up, he cannot continue to govern,” Huckabee said. “And as the facts come out, I think we’re going to see something startling. And before it’s over, I don’t think this president will finish his term unless somehow they can delay it in Congress past the next three and a half years.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/0...#ixzz2SdzVihpI

Huckabee: Obama Is Toast – Benghazi-Gate Lies Will Cause Him To Resign

FEATURED

Posted by BC
Featured Story:

Folks we are witnessing the end of the Obama nightmare!



POLITICO – What happened with Benghazi is not a “political issue” — “this goes all the way to the heart of the integrity of the United States government,” Huckabee said.

“When a president lies to the American people and is part of a cover-up, he cannot continue to govern,” Huckabee said. “And as the facts come out, I think we’re going to see something startling. And before it’s over, I don’t think this president will finish his term unless somehow they can delay it in Congress past the next three and a half years.”

Read more


http://im41.com/archives/27822

We shall see however doubt much will occur unless his adoring media gets behind it.

SOURCE: ONLY PRESIDENT COULD HAVE MADE 'STAND DOWN' CALL ON BENGHAZI



by KERRY PICKET 7 May 2013, 11:18 AM PDT 309POST A COMMENT

A source with intimate information about the events that happened on the ground in Benghazi the night the U.S. Consulate and the CIA annex was attacked by terrorists told Breitbart News that, ultimately, only the President of the United States, or someone acting on his authority, could have prevented Special Forces either on the ground or nearby from helping those Americans who were under deadly assault.

According to the source, when the attack on the Consulate occurred, a specific chain of command to gain verbal permission to move special-forces in must have occurred. SOCAFRICA commander Lieutenant Col. Gibson would have contacted a desk officer at the time, asking for that permission.

That desk officer would have called Marine Corps Col. George Bristol, then in command of Joint Special Operations Task Force-Trans Sahara. From there, Bristol would have made contact with Rear Admiral Brian Losey, then Commander of Special Operations Command Africa. Losey would have contacted four-star General Carter Ham, commander of U.S. AFRICOM at the time.

“Ham answers directly to the President of the United States,” said the source. It wasn’t a low-level bureaucrat making the call, the source adamantly added.

That call may have been made early in the engagement. Both Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey testified in January that they had no further communication with President Barack Obama after an initial briefing in the early hours of the Benghazi crisis, which continued through the night.

But what about then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton?

“I have a hard time thinking it was Hillary alone. Hillary may have tried to circumvent the counterterrorism board and deal with this. I think in order for her to tell General Ham, ‘No, you’re not going to get involved,' she would have had to talk to the president. The president would have had to say, ‘No, take your commands from Hillary.’ He would have had said something, because Ham does not work for the Department of State; he works directly for the president,” the source explained.

The lack of clarity surrounding orders given during the Benghazi attacks is a stark contrast to the clarity projected after the successful Osama bin Laden raid in May 2011, when administration officials were keen to attribute responsibility for the orders to the president.

Witnesses with firsthand information about the Benghazi attacks will appear before the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday.

State Department employees Mark Thompson, Gregory Hicks, and Eric Nordstrom are expected to be whistleblower witnesses who will reveal information about State’s reaction to the attacks that has not been released previously.

AWR Hawkins contributed to this report.


http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2...enghazi-Attack

We can hope that this will be the final straw. Is the corrupt MSM finally coming around to reporting news? Maybe. Let's all hope that this evil administration has been so thoroughly exposed that there is no other avenue but people to be indicted and others to step down, including Soetoro.

Washington Post Now Declares Obama Benghazi Explanation An Outright LIE… (M.I. Related)

by Ulsterman on May 7, 2013 with 22 Comments in News

When the left-leaning Washington Post comes right out and declares something a lie – a Democratic presidential administration must be feeling the heat. Today WAPO Glen Kessler rips apart the false narrative provided by the Obama administration following the Benghazi Massacre, and repeatedly calls for an answer as to who was responsible for approving that narrative.

(Political cartoonists are now clearly referencing Obama’s Benghazi cover-up to Nixon’s Watergate.)

________________________________

EXCERPT:

“Some readers have suggested we should boost the Pinocchio rating for Rice’s comments. Still, it is clear Rice was simply mouthing the words given to her. The bigger mystery now is who was involved in writing — and rewriting — the talking points.

The talking points have become important because, in the midst of President Obama’s reelection campaign, for a number of days they helped focus the journalistic narrative on an anti-Islam video — and away from a preplanned attack. As we noted in our timeline of administration statements, it took two weeks for the White House to formally acknowledge that Obama believed the attack was terrorism…” LINK

Read more in News

« State Dept. Official Calls Out Obama Administration On False Benghazi Narrative (VIDEO)

BREAKING: “The Dam Is About To Break On Benghazi” »

______________________

(The Washington Post is actually, in their own Inside-the-Beltway version here, indicating the Obama administration allowed four Americans to die simply because of re-election politics. That is the kind of president sitting in OUR White House America. Barack Obama went to sleep after learning of the attacks on Benghazi. He didn’t care so long as his campaign would insulate him from any political damage. Well, he did win the battle for re-election, but he may not win the war that is now his second term… -UM)
______________________

Ed Morrisey writing for The Week, goes even further in his condemnation of the Obama White House regarding the Benghazi cover-up:

“…Recall that the attack took place in the middle of the general election, just a couple of weeks after the party conventions. Obama and the Democrats had just argued that the administration’s foreign-policy successes, including the intervention in Libya, showed that America had a steady and seasoned commander-in-chief, and that voters should think twice before electing an untried Mitt Romney.

On the ground in Benghazi, however, the truth was that the sudden vacuum of power had liberated not eastern Libya but the Islamist terrorist networks that had long operated there.” LINK
_______________________
I would ask readers to again note the cartoon at the top of this page. The reference to Watergate as a comparison point to the Benghazi Massacre and cover-up has increased substantially in recent days – becoming more and more prominent even within the Mainstream Media coverage.

Do you recall this promise made just days after the 2012 Election?

“Voters failed to do right thing.

Up to us now. We intend to try another option.

Watergate him. Not waterboard him. Watergate him.

Don’t contact me again.”

_________________

http://theulstermanreport.com/2013/0...e-m-i-related/

Time for some justice IMO. He should have been removed from office long ago on his fraud and forgeries uncovered by Sheriff Joe. In this travesty, people died and Obama and his cohorts lied and lied and lied.............

I will believe this when I see it and not before.