Results 101 to 110 of 278
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
01-31-2007, 04:34 PM #101
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- westcoast
- Posts
- 465
noyoucannot,
I explained in the Hillary, I don't think so thread the reason why most many, if not most, Democrats also oppose illegal immigration. Illegals are a burden on our schools, environment and health care. These are my top priorities and illegals are tearing my dreams down. Yes, I support subsidized health care, but only to US citizens or legal residents. Education is very impotant for the future of my kids, and ilegals aresucking our schools dry. Illegals drive cars here in Ca, they don't have a driver's license or insurance. They are more likely to drive under influence, and becaue hey drive a car, they pollute our environment.
The rest of the country don't know what it's like in California, but we are taking the burden that illegals cause us. Their destination number 1 is California, and not Maine or Hawaii.
We can only vote 2 parties, and I just have to vote for the lesser of the 2 evils
Today I said in another thread that if Tancredo wins the GOP, I may vote for him under some very severe conditions, unless he must take it on to Hillary. I love the Clintons, they're in my heart. If Tancredo has to run against Hillar or Obama, the 2 Dems will get my vote, if he is running against any other Democrat, he may get my vote under, like I said, severe conditions.mkfarnam, thank you so much for ya help. My laptop & windows are working again as it used to be. Thanks to you !!!
-
01-31-2007, 05:17 PM #102
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- westcoast
- Posts
- 465
Originally Posted by loservillelabor
I associate Republicans and Bush with one important issue, this is probably the most important issue to me: the war in Iraq.
I can't take away Bush' stance on the war, they're linked to each other.mkfarnam, thank you so much for ya help. My laptop & windows are working again as it used to be. Thanks to you !!!
-
01-31-2007, 05:29 PM #103
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- NJ
- Posts
- 12,855
Everyone is aware that we still have military in Bosnia.......Klinton's war, right? The war that he refused to go to the United Nations of Theft & Genocide for 'approval.'
That one will keep going on and on in spits and spurts.
And the Horn of Africa?
Everyone is aware that Klinton deployed our bombers & used more munitions/bombs than any other president other than a wartime president? Which means that Klinton dropped more bombs without a war or 'conflict' than ever in our history.
Well I'll be damned How did he get away with that?
We don't need to mention the pill factory again
cause that was just a teeny weeny uh oh mistake and it's not fair to make him/them take responsibility for his actions.Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
01-31-2007, 05:55 PM #104
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- westcoast
- Posts
- 465
Originally Posted by 2ndamendsis
what Clinton did was right, and when Clinton bombed the pill factory, he was supported by the Republican Congress.
Clinton rules :
mkfarnam, thank you so much for ya help. My laptop & windows are working again as it used to be. Thanks to you !!!
-
01-31-2007, 05:56 PM #105
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Posts
- 400
I'm done commenting on the other issue, but I will comment on the whole dem vs repub issue here.
Main point: IMHO party loyalists are morons, too timid and brainwashed to think for themselves so they instead vote for a party (like only buying mutual funds for fear of picking the wrong stock).
The ultra rich pols and upper echalon members of each party rely on this fact and profit immensely from it while the party loyalist gets nothing but the satisfaction of, once again, not having to think for themselves. It's a sweet deal for both the party leaders and the cerebrally challenged.
Dem party loyalists still think that clinton was a great president (which shows you the level of cranial feebleness)? Can you say Monica, definiton of 'is', selling secret technology to the chinese, campaign funded by same etc? Just on the issue of lack of character alone, he will be remembered as a fool.
As long as there are feeble minded loyalists who refuse to vote on issues instead of oprah's picks we will continue to have these same problems. In the meantime though, the thinkers are having to expend massive amounts of energies in order to prevent the inevitable demise of our country, directly attributable to these 'fools'.
I only hope we can undo what they have done before it's too late?"There's no such thing as ILLEGALalien-able rights!" REGRESO E MEXICO !
-
01-31-2007, 06:02 PM #106
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- westcoast
- Posts
- 465
Originally Posted by Nomoremexmkfarnam, thank you so much for ya help. My laptop & windows are working again as it used to be. Thanks to you !!!
-
01-31-2007, 06:03 PM #107
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- NJ
- Posts
- 12,855
The ultra rich pols and upper echalon members of each party rely on this fact and profit immensely from it while the party loyalist gets nothing but the satisfaction of, once again, not having to think for themselves. It's a sweet deal for both the party leaders and the cerebrally challenged.
Dem party loyalists still think that clinton was a great president (which shows you the level of cranial feebleness)? Can you say Monica, definiton of 'is', selling secret technology to the chinese, campaign funded by same etc? Just on the issue of lack of character alone, he will be remembered as a fool.
I like the way you explained the problem we face.
Certainly agree and
Well said
Blind loyalty has led to disaster throughout history.
When one repeats what one is doing...........then one will keep getting what one has gotten.
Little difference between the parties although the repubs certainly outnumber the dems when it comes to patriots - the legislation tells the tale.Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
01-31-2007, 06:42 PM #108Originally Posted by cassieDeportacion? Si Se Puede!
-
01-31-2007, 07:05 PM #109Originally Posted by cassie
Brief Summary of HR 676
The United States National Health Insurance Act establishes an American national health insurance program. The bill would create a publicly financed, privately delivered health care system that uses the already existing Medicare program by expanding and improving it to all U.S. residents, and all residents living in U.S. territories. The goal of the legislation is to ensure that all Americans will have access, guaranteed by law, to the highest quality and most cost effective health care services regardless of their employment, income, or health status.
· With over 45-75 million uninsured Americans, and another 50 million who are under- insured, the time has come to change our inefficient and costly fragmented non health care system.
· Who is Eligible
· Every person living in or visiting the United States and the U.S. Territories would receive a United States National Health Insurance Card and ID number once they enroll at the appropriate location. Social Security numbers may not be used when assigning ID cards.
Health Care Services Covered
· This program will cover all medically necessary services, including primary care, in patient care, outpatient care, emergency care, prescription drugs, durable medical equipment, long term care, mental health services, dentistry, eye care, chiropractic, and substance abuse treatment. Patients have their choice of physicians, providers, hospitals, clinics and practices. No co-pays or deductibles are permitted under this act.Unemployment is not working. Deport illegal alien workers now! Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
01-31-2007, 08:58 PM #110
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Posts
- 448
I'm against illegal immigration,For securing the border,For going after employers,For allowing illegals to self-deport by attrition,which they will do if NO amnesty is offered them.
Therefore I'm not only not neutral on amnesty,I'm adament that there should NEVER,EVER,be amnesty for illegals.This would only insure that we would have millions,if not hundreds of millions,more illegals in the future,all of them waiting for their own Amnesty to come to pass.
If amnesty is ever approved by Congress,you can count on hundreds of thousands to head for the border immediately,and you can be assured that when they reach our interior that every one of them and their families will state they have been here for ever how many years the new law will say they have to be here to qualify.
We must never give up the struggle to convince our lawmakers to NEVER allow amnesty to become law.
Mike Johnson betrays border security for more foreign aid
04-18-2024, 10:31 PM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports