Thread: Immigration Is About People

to myself iguess

if we aer wut we appear to be then god help us all, everyone...

tomorro i start a new 20 unit condo with two whiteye and six guatamilans... one of them about twelve years old... no big stix in guatamala, but here, i know that a twelve year old should be in school rather than helping me frame a rather large wood frame structure... i have personally seen "men" maimed, and do not desire to see same of a child. dont know if they are or are not illegal, they dont abladeanglos with the whiteye. in fact they appear to hate the whiteye.

may god help me, for i know not what i do. i am usually union, but as we all no the unions are dying... i sometimes wonder y. /s

i tried, but apparently this kid is not within the boundry of current american jurisprudence... the gentle(wo)man who started this thinks he is doing some kind of service to humaniuy, but all he is doing is justifying child labor, child exploitation... and most assuredly worse.
direct me to any posts on the pornogirls from south/central america murdered and dumped all over the sw after used...?

i dont even know if this kids "father" is in fact daddy, or just someone that bought him while crossing the boarder. it ticks me off in spades that no one in our so called government cares about this kid.
if he is in fact hurt or maimed, you will alll see me on the national noos, dead... or standing for a pretrialarraignment...

those who are unregistered are at the mercy of their masters... and those "advocates" like number 1. servitude to death and degradation is apparently their lot in the leftist scheme of this hell on earth. we were once americans (now "racists")... and we were once distinct from the rest of the world because we developed standards that prohibited what is now returning to our country. it will not stand in my country, and if it does, then i will no longer be standing in this country. i would rather fall with my conscience intact than stand in their hell for a single day.

this will only hold for so long, as there are those among us who are going to knok it down, no kidding, no fear and most assuredly no comprimise.

my name is michael james mercier
i live in danvers massachusetts, my town did not fear the british in the 1770's and i have no fear of anyone or anything to this day. george bush can kiss my butt, as i tell hin in my daily emails.

i feast on those who seek submission, and my dogs are always hungry... as are the communist democrats who are loving this political blunder of earth shattering proportion. their beauty is their ability to stay physically seperated from those who they intend to destroy. they are truely the "beautiful" people.

i appoligize to the normal people out there, but the goose will fly where it wants... and i got a liter of it in me.... the wifeypoo is gonna kill me when i go up in a minute... she gets me fore juge greer, thats fersure...

mjmercier

Wow, ya seem to have had a good time at the bar tonight, mercier. Hope ya do not hate yourself too much tomorrow.

Yes, there's auto-deportation, and fines for employers, and no 'free' services, I'd also fine landlords for renting to illegals.

Never get rid of all of them? Possibly not. But can certainly get rid of MOST of them.

And then, there's bounty hunting, too. Placing a reward for illegals turned in ( already on offer, you know) could create a whole new US industry. (I'm half joking).

I'm for a moratorium on immigration for at least ten years. We need to see where we are now. I disagree with multiculturalism, think it's divisive and we have too much of that already.

Another thing I would do is stop state and federally funded education. It's a failure and getting worse by the year. Tuition-only schools b/c it allows parents to choose the school works very well. There are so many things that need to be removed from the public trough that it's mind boggling. That's another battle that must soon be taken up by the people. One thing at a time.



RR

Originally Posted by Tom2

Wrong. Emiliano is the real scum. He vitriolically uses sarcasm, IMO very poor sarcasm, to encourage these desperate people to become felons in the US. My rhetorical question is why didn't Doris settle in Guatemala, Honduras or Mexico. The answer of course is obvious. Those countries are corrupt crap holes that simply kill illegal aliens or extort their families. Someone needs to teach Emiliano the meaning of the term illegal.

Tom,

As a forum moderator, I am going to ask you to tone down both your posts and your language. We do not call people scum. We do not make personal attacks. We do not call other countries "crap holes." We do not post like sailors around here.

We are taking the high road on this issue .. this is not Free Republic where personal attacks, profanity, name-calling etc. are given free rein. The forum's founder has set standards and rules and we are all to abide by them.

We can leave the name-calling to the OBL's. Their argument is so weak name-calling is about all they have to offer.

Please refer to forum rules if you have any questions.

Thank you for your cooperation and please amend your post accordingly.

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

Operation 'wetback' worked and it stopped the problem and sent the message.

Yes, I've read about the sucess of "operation wetback."

But we have a leader who doesn't want to "send 'em back."

And open borders and lack of enforcement of current law on the books .. what kind of message does that send?

And they don't "wanna go back."

And they're on our back .. the back of the American taxpayer .. asking for and arrogantly demanding free health care, food stamps, welfare, etc. etc. etc.

Originally Posted by RoadRunner

Yes, there's auto-deportation, and fines for employers, and no 'free' services, I'd also fine landlords for renting to illegals.

I don't think the Fair Housing Act would allow that.

Here's a true story from an African-American friend of mine. Her aunt, a senior citizen, lives in the Oak Cliff part of Dallas. That's a very racially diverse area, predominately African-American, if I remember correctly, but the Hispanics are moving in by the droves now.

The lady owns a duplex. When the other resident died, she was approached by a young Hispanic wanting to rent the place. She told him she was not interested in having a young family and children next door .. that she and her husband were retired and just wanted peace and quiet. He was defiant and said she didn't want to rent because he was Hispanic. She reiterated that she wanted to keep the status quo .. her previous tenant had also been a senior and she had no interest in having a young family next door. It is her property, right?

The woman began to get harrassing phone calls that were later traced to LULAC. She made a call to NAACP and was advised that is not unusual on the part of LULAC.

I'm for a moratorium on immigration for at least ten years.

That's a fantastic idea but Bush and his cronies who want open borders and a Banana Republic won't go for that. It would get in the way of their economic agenda and NAFTA/SHAFTA.

I disagree with multiculturalism, think it's divisive and we have too much of that already.

Way too much!

RR for office! You have some good ideas. Let's get you elected and start implementing your ideas.

Originally Posted by BlueHills

Gee, now I'm confused

You're not the only one! Emiliano's just trying to take us for a spin.

I have no problem with Immigrants, I have problems with Illegal Immigrants.

My reply:

I have a "problem" with immigration in general.

For one, I simply do not support high levels of legal immigration. If you look at history you will see the only times that there has been an expansion of the middle class was when there was a "labor shortage". It is sad, but many of these shortages were the result of war or disease, but the fact remains expansion of the middle class and an overall increase in the quality of life has been strongly correlated with labor scarcity. Population growth is geometric. And our current legal immigration rate is simply too high. Quality of life issues, assimilation issues, and cultural issues all point to the fact that legal immigration is also a issue that needs to be carefully addressed.

Additionally there are "moral" issues. I have a real problem with a United States that allows via its immigration policy the "best" natural resources of a nation to abandon it. Discontent at home is the catalyst for change. We systematically deprive countries of their most talented natural resources (their intelligent motivated populace) by allowing them an opportunity to immigrate to the United States. Essentially we are depriving other nations of important resources that could elevate their own societies. Do you really think Mexico would continue as it does today if we suddenly deported every illegal alien we could find? Within weeks there would be a revolution in Mexico as its people came home and demanded investment in social services like they experienced in the United States. We in the United States have a lot to answer for by allowing our Government to provide an escape valve that allows a corrupt Government in Mexico to continue its policies. I have no doubt that our open borders policy is one of the reasons there is not more of a catalyst for change in Mexico.

In summary immigration is a difficult issue. While it is easy to be pro legal immigration there are important social and moral questions that also need to be addressed and the United Sates should consider if it has an undeniable right to systematically strip other nations of their best and brightest through the lure of "opportunity.

Food for thought,

Patriotman

Welll spoken..thank you,
RR

By way of support to my above post, read this:

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles ... le_id=4386

and then my post again.

Regards,

Patriotman