INVOKING RONALD REAGAN - Republican group shows support for gay marriage

H2 Note: In case you haven't read a newspaper, browsed the web, or turned on your TV in the past ten years, if you are still naive enough to believe there is ONE BIT OF DIFFERENCE between 'Republicans' and Democrats then I've got an election to sell you in 2016.

BTW, in her autobiography, Laura Bush admitted she was a closet supporter of both gay marriage and abortion THE ENTIRE TIME she sat as the First Lady in the White House. These 'Republicans' are in 100% bound agreement with Eric Holder and Barack Obama - NO DIFFERENCE whatsoever!

--------------------------------------------------------------------

AP
3/5/14

Republican group shows support for gay marriage

SALT LAKE CITY (March 5, 2014) - A group of Republicans has come out in support of legalizing gay marriage in Utah and Oklahoma, arguing that allowing same-sex unions is consistent with the Western conservative values of freedom and liberty once championed by Ronald Reagan and Barry Goldwater.

Led by former Sen. Alan Simpson of Wyoming and former Sen. Nancy Kassebaum of Kansas, 20 Republicans signed a friend of the court brief submitted Tuesday to a federal appeals court in Denver that is reviewing same-sex marriage bans in Utah and Oklahoma.

The list also includes former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson, former Republican National Committee chairman Kenneth Mehlman and several state legislators from Wyoming and Colorado. Melhman came out as gay in 2010 and has worked to bring together Republicans willing to step forward in support of gay marriage.

Denver attorney Sean Gallagher, whose firm wrote the 30-page argument, said the filing shows that many prominent Republicans are re-examining their stance on gay marriage.

The group call themselves "conservatives, moderates and libertarians who embrace the individual freedoms protected by our Constitution," embrace Reagan's idea of the Republican Party being a "big tent," and share Goldwater's belief that the party shouldn't "seek to lead anyone's life for him," the brief says.

"It is precisely because marriage is so important in producing and protecting strong and stable family structures that (we) do not agree that the government can rationally promote the goal of strengthening families by denying civil marriage to same-sex couples," the argument says in the conclusion.

Washington, D.C., and 17 states, mostly in the Northeast, allow same-sex marriage. Others may soon follow depending on how federal appeals courts, and eventually the U.S. Supreme Court, rule on state bans that have been overturned.

Including Utah and Oklahoma, six federal judges have issued pro-gay-marriage rulings since the Supreme Court's decision in Windsor v. U.S. in June that struck down part of the federal anti-gay-marriage law. The latest came last week in Texas.

In Kentucky, Gov. Steve Beshear, a Democrat, announced Tuesday the state will hire outside attorneys to appeal a judge's decision granting legal recognition to same-sex couples married in other states and countries. That came as the state's attorney general, also a Democrat, announced that he would not pursue the case further.

Democratic attorneys general in at least seven states — Virginia, Pennsylvania, California, Illinois, Oregon, Kentucky and Nevada — have declined to defend same-sex-marriage bans that have been challenged in court by gay couples.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said last week that his state counterparts are not obligated to defend local laws banning same-sex marriage if they believe the laws violate the U.S. Constitution.

The gay marriage bans in Utah and Oklahoma were passed by voters in 2004. They were overturned by separate federal judges in each state within a month of each other in December and January.

The Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal has assigned the same panel of judges to review both cases, which are on a fast track, but has decided to hold two different hearings. The court will discuss Utah's case on April 10 and Oklahoma's on April 17.

The appeals court must decide if it agrees with the federal judges in Utah and Oklahoma who ruled that the bans violate gay and lesbian couples' rights to due process and equal protection under the 14th Amendment.

More than a dozen groups and organizations filed friend of the court briefs Tuesday ahead of the midnight deadline.

The American Sociological Association told the court that the claim from state attorneys in Utah that same-sex parents can't be good parents is contradicted by "abundant social science research."

"Unsubstantiated fears regarding same-sex parents do not overcome these facts and provide no justification for upholding the marriage bans," the brief from sociological association said.

The American Military Partner Association said the "uneven patchwork of marriage equality" is hindering efforts to recruit and retain same-sex couples who fear they'll be stationed in a state that doesn't recognize their union.

A coalition of people and groups from religions that include Episcopal, Unitarians, Methodists and a group called Mormons for Equality argued for gay marriage saying that "American religious panorama embraces a multitude of theological perspectives on lesbian and gay people and same-sex relationships."

Last month, a coalition of religious organizations that included Catholics, Mormons and Southern Baptists urged the appeals court to uphold the bans in both states, saying unions between a man and woman are best for children, families and society.

In making its case for gay marriage, Tuesday's filing from the Republican group points to decades-old words from Goldwater, the longtime U.S. senator from Arizona who aggressively advocated for conservative principles. He died in 1998. The group cited this passage from his 1960 paper, "The Conscience of a Conservative."

"For the American Conservative, there is no difficulty in identifying the day's overriding political challenge: it is to preserve and extend freedom," it said. "As he surveys the various attitudes and institutions and laws that currently prevail in America, many questions will occur to him, but the Conservative's first concern will always be: Are we maximizing freedom?"

http://www.onenewsnow.com/ap/legal/r...e#.Uxd1YIXCvW4