Thread: Rand Paul drafts bill to restore voting rights for ex-cons

Paul drafts bill to restore voting rights for ex-cons

By Benjamin Goad

Political figures strongly opposed on other issues found common ground Tuesday at the Georgetown University Law Center as Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Attorney General Eric Holder both voiced support for restoring voting rights to some ex-convicts.

Paul is working on a bill, referred to as the Civil Rights Voting Restoration Act, that would apply to federal elections, he said during a speech at the law center.

“We think that if you had a nonviolent felony — we’re for getting you voting rights,” said the senator, who hails from one of handful of a states where felons can permanently lose access to the voting booth.

Paul’s remarks come as Democratic Attorney Gen. Eric Holder urged states to scrap laws restricting voting rights for ex-cons who have served their sentences, completed probation and paid all their fines.

Although many states have scaled back voting restrictions for past criminals, 11 still have on their books “felony disenfranchisement” laws barring roughly 5.8 million Americans from casting ballots, Holder said Tuesday at Georgetown.

Paul, who opposes his own state’s law, plans to testify before members of the Kentucky Legislature next week in favor of restoring voting rights for nonviolent felons.

The legislation now in the works is similar to a bill introduced by Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.) and championed by a group of Senate Democrats.

The lawmakers argue that the patchwork of disparate state laws results in uneven and unfair restrictions on who can vote in presidential elections and other federal contests.

The similarly named Democracy Restoration Act, however, would apply to all felons who had completed their sentences.

Paul stopped short of embracing that proposal.

“I’m just not quite there yet,” he said. “There can be an argument made for — once you’ve served your time, you’ve served your time. But I think as far as trying to get the coalition necessary to pass this, we’re looking at nonviolent felons.”

Paul, a vocal critic of Holder’s positions on other matters, has become an ally of the Obama administration on some criminal justice issues.

He, along with the Justice Department, has called for an end to mandatory minimum sentences for certain crimes.

On Tuesday, the conservative lawmaker called his agreement with Democrats on those issues “the best part of bipartisanship.”

“It isn’t that we come halfway to each other and split the difference on things,” he said. “It's that we can have people on the right and left that passionately believe in the same thing, and you can get something done simply by throwing away partisanship and saying, ‘What’s the right the right thing to do here?’ ”

http://thehill.com/blogs/regwatch/le...#ixzz2yeAC2MvJ

Another reason for not voting Paul IMO.

I am trying very hard not to use profanity with creeps like Rand Paul. This country is dying becauseit is being overwhelmed by an uncontrolled mass migration of foreigners. And what is it that Mr. Paul worries about –well the faux critical issue of felons getting to vote. God knows this is a crisis of our time. Apparently Mr. Paul thinks there are not enough Democrat voters to screw up our society (predictably felons are overwhelmingly Democrats). Mr. Paul would never, ever introduce legislation to build a border fence, or make e-verify noncompliance a felony, or “God forbid” deport foreigners who do not belong here. No Mr. Paul, under the delusion of some kind of libertarian consistency, wants to promote legislation that will guarantee more Democrat votes to neutralize conservative votes. Well Mr. Paul will surely get into liberal heave for this.

Either Rand Paul is on the billionaire money “take” or he is a dumb ass fool. The conservative movement really needs to have a knock down drag out battle to cleans itself of left wing agent provocateurs, gullible fools and naïve college children that have had their brains so screwed up by Marxists professors that even when they want to rebel they literally do not know the difference between left and right, between right and wrong.

We really need to have this fight between the grass roots conservatives and the faux conservative, rich, elitist establishment, like the Senate Conservative Fund and the Conservative Political Action Committee.

We really need to draw a line in the sand; YOU CAN NOT BE A CONSERVATIVE AND FOR AMNESTY OR INDIFFERENT TO IT – PERIOD. You and I can not be friends when you work atcross purposes to us and make common cause with our enemies.

If Erich Holder is for it that is the best evidence that it is a bad idea and ought to be fought against.

So some 5.8 million felons can not vote, and If Rand and Holder get their way that probably means a good 4 million (or more) extra votes for the Democrats. Yah, Rand Paul you really know how to fight for freedom. With "leaders" like Paul it is not hard to understand why the miserable little Marxist Obama won reelection.

70% of non-felon jailbirds register as Democrats after being released. The percentage of felons registering as Dems would be at least as high, if they were allowed to vote again.

I wouldn't support Rand for dogcatcher, much less the presidency.





.

RELATED

http://www.alipac.us/f9/rand-paul-go...ter-id-302486/

5/9/14

http://www.alipac.us/f12/6%25-voters...ection-313389/