Judge Jeanine Pirro Opening Statement - Benghazi Scandal Biggest Cover-up Since Watergate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...;v=i6-LY-Ipqg0
Judge Jeanine Pirro Opening Statement - Benghazi Scandal Biggest Cover-up Since Watergate WH Defends Benghazi Narrative Amid New Allegations Of Cover-Up
"YOU Mr. President, have defrauded the American People!"
https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...86070432_t.jpg Conservative Lady
[Watch] Judge Pirro, John Bolton – Benghazi, Watergate and Hillary Clinton in Hiding
https://fbexternal-a.akamaihd.net/sa...&sw=610&sh=319
[Watch] Judge Pirro, John Bolton – Benghazi, Watergate and Hillary Clinton in Hiding
For the simpletons on MSNBC, who claim they can’t figure out why Benghazi is a big deal, as well as for the benefit of all of America struggling under the tyranny of...
gopthedailydose.com
The Benghazi Cover-up - Gowdy: WH Withheld Docs From Congress - Criminal Act - Huckabee F&F
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=RPumCwN6Pr0
The Benghazi Cover-up - Gowdy: WH Withheld Docs From Congress - Criminal Act -Huckabee Fox & Friends
Trey Gowdy: Proof Of 'Systematic Intent To Hide' Benghazi Info
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=NE_rWecL6Lk
Trey Gowdy Claims to have Evidence Of 'A Systematic, Intentional Decision To Withhold Documents From Congress' on Benghazi Read More at http://freedomoutpost...
Benghazi mess points to Hillary and ‘possibly criminal’ cover-up
Posted on Sunday, May 4th, 2014 at 3:44 am.
by: Benjamin Franklin
http://www.conservativeinfidel.com/w...om-246x300.jpg
Make it go away!
That was the message of the Obama administration and their friends in the media for the past two years, and now we know why: Benghazi is the scandal they always denied it was.
Thanks to a lawsuit by watchdog group Judicial Watch, the administration last week released correspondence about the terrorist attack in Libya on Sept. 11, 2012 that left US ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others dead.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BmqHyzMCYAAMIhs.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images...6e9_normal.png Judicial Watch ✔ @JudicialWatch
Follow
We brought the #Benghazi scandal back to the forefront this week. Get the Update: http://jwatch.us/jE41Yf #tcot #tlot
4:42 PM – 2 May 2014
One memo, from Ben Rhodes, the deputy national security director for strategic communications, shows how the administration was trying to spin the attack as something other than their own strategic failures.
“Reinforce the president and administration’s strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges,” he wrote to UN Ambassador Susan Rice. He instructed her to “underscore” that the events in Benghazi were “protests . . . rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.”
Beyond the callousness of this message, and the fact that officials already knew this was the work of terrorists, that this document is just coming out now shows the depth of the administration’s cover-up.
http://www.conservativeinfidel.com/w...zi-300x198.jpg
Despite numerous subpoenas from Congress, Obama’s people never handed over the e-mail. Make it go away means hiding evidence from the American people.
http://thenypost.files.wordpress.com...rice.jpg?w=231
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said in a hearing on Thursday that the whole situation reminded him of Richard Nixon.
“Why aren’t we talking about something else?” whined House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).
Because the Obama administration ignored legal requirements and a pursued a possibly criminal cover-up, they’ve just ensured Congress is going to talk about nothing but. House Majority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) said Friday he’ll be forming a select committee to investigate Benghazi.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=a2jApRfRpTI
He’ll find plenty.
The Rhodes memo is just the beginning. It and other e-mails were obviously selected from a much larger set of internal administration communications on the Benghazi cover-up that remains hidden from the public and from Congress.
The person who should worry most is former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
For example, until now we have seen zero documentation to explain how Clinton out of the blue concocted the statement she issued on the evening of the attacks, which first raised the notion that the attacks came “as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet.”
In all the material released by the administration to date, there are no notes, e-mails or drafts of Clinton’s Sept. 11, 2012 statement similar to the back-and forth e-mail chain released last year showing how the CIA talking points evolved during three days of inter-agency discussion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=TC0AKNQBV80
And yet surely such documents exist. We know from the public recordhttp://cdncache1-a.akamaihd.net/item...rrow-10x10.png that Clinton was getting real-time information on the attacks. She understood — because her own officials were telling her — that there were no protests in Benghazi and that the attacks on the Special Mission Compound and on the Annex were a well-planned terrorist assault.
And yet, after consulting by phone with President Obama at 10 that night, Hillary decided to blame it all on an Internet video.
http://thenypost.files.wordpress.com...amam.jpg?w=400
Similarly, the administration has released no notes, e-mails or other communications that describe the substance of that phone call, so we still don’t know who first floated the idea of blaming it all on a non-existent video. Nor has the White Househttp://cdncache1-a.akamaihd.net/item...rrow-10x10.png revealed, despite repeated requests, what the president was doing that night as he prepared for his fund-raiser the next day in Las Vegas. Dialing for dollars, perhaps?
In testimony before the House Oversight and Government Reform committee on Thursday, Brig. Gen. Robert Lovell, the chief of intelligence (J-2) for US Africa Command at the time of the attacks, revealed that his “analysts worked through chat” all night long. None of those documents have been turned over to congressional committees.
Top military officials at Africom headquarters in Stuttgart, Germany, told me they watched live video feed from a Predator drone over the Special Mission Compound and later, over the Benghazi airport and the Annex, which clearly showed there were no protests. So far, that footage has not been released.
http://thenypost.files.wordpress.com...bya1.jpg?w=400
We know that orders were issued, then recalled, to deploy a 50-man Special Forces unit from Croatia that could have reached Benghazi within hours. But no documents on who ordered that unit to stand down have yet been released.
The American people deserve the truth. With four Americans returning home in body bags, this scandal is no garden-variety cover-up.
And despite Hillary Clinton’s fervent hope, no, it’s not going to go away.
Investigative reporter Kenneth R. Timmerman is the author of “Dark Forces: The Truth About What Happened in Benghazi,” forthcoming from Broadside Books. He’s running for lieutenant governor of Maryland.
http://www.conservativeinfidel.com/o...riminal-cover/
Quote:
Originally Posted by AirborneSapper7
judge jeanine
I want to thank you so much for standing up for us why you should run for our next President
how come obama is not impeached yet ?after all he did & hillary I would not vote for her at all
thank again
South bx
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Jk-8nM-hYbo
Benghazi: Judge Pirro Calls for Impeachment of Barack Obama
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=Jk-8nM-hYbo
Exclusive: CIA Whistleblower Exposes Secret of Benghazi
Infowars.com
May 3, 2014
Alex speaks with famed whistleblower William Robert “Tosh” Plumlee, a former CIA contract pilot who covertly flew munitions for the agency, joins the show to break down the extensive cover-up of Benghazi, including the program that saw weapons smuggled out of Benghazi by the CIA to terrorists in Syria.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=xDzMEi1y5o4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=uqqJsrpYsr4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=M1YSXeSM7jo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2VmfAmksn5A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vsKQf0f55EM
This article was posted: Saturday, May 3, 2014 at 12:50 pm
Tags: foreign affairs
Related Articles
- Benghazi Whistleblower Lawyer: “Stolen” Libyan Missiles Will Be Used to Shoot Down Aircraft
- Pat Caddell: John Boehner Aiding Obama Cover-Up of Benghazi
- Benghazi whistleblower: ‘I’ve been demoted’ for challenging Susan Rice’s claims
- Whistleblower Exposes Secret Fusion Center Operations
- Breaking: Whistleblower Reveals U.S. State Dept. Ships Arms Directly to al-Qaeda
http://www.infowars.com/exclusive-ci...t-of-benghazi/
The “Phony Scandal” of Benghazi that Just Won’t Go Away
Ed Wood 2 hours ago
0 Comments
In spite of the best efforts of the Obama Administration, and those of the Government Agencies funded by it, the Benghazi tragedy just won't go away.
Involved, are the usual suspects:
- FBI
- CIA
- NSA
- State Department
- Justice Department
- Defense Department
- Department of Homeland Security
Everyone involved, including Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and even the President himself, has committed to punishing the guilty. On October 26, 2012, a year and a half ago, the President said:"What happened in Benghazi is a tragedy. We're investigating exactly what happened... I send these folks in harm's way, I want to make sure they're always safe and when that doesn't happen, that we figure out what happened and make sure that doesn't happen again. But my biggest priority now is bringing those folks to justiceand I think the American people have seen that's a commitment I'll always keep."Nearly two years have passed, and no one -- no one -- has been arrested, captured, or droned in connection with the deaths of Ambassador Stevens and the three other Americans who died trying to protect him.
But the lack of results has not been for a lack of investigation. Or at least attempts to investigate. I took about ten minutes this morning Googling for a list of various government agencies that have been investigating the Benghazi incident. I'm sure the list is not complete, but here is a start:On 9-13-12, two days after the incident, the FBI opened an investigation into the deaths. A team was sent to Benghazi. But as you may recall, it took more than 30 days for the team to work through the red tape required in order to gain entry to the premises. They spent three hours on site, and left. Obviously, they discovered that by then the suspects had all disappeared,So what has been the result of all this investigating? Nothing. Nada. Zip. Zero. Why? Well, there is a matter of jurisdictional limitation. As a hypothetical example, the Homeland Security Committee may not be able to question a member of the State Department, since the State Department does not fall under the auspices of Homeland Security, etc., etc..
Next to be involved was the "Search for International Terrorist Entities (SITE) Intelligence Group"
Then Matthew Olson, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, was summoned to appear before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
Next was Shawn Turner, Director of Public Affairs for the Department of National Intelligence, appearing before the Senate Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
The State Department then announced the formation of an Accountability Review Board. Nothing has been heard from them.
Jason Chaffetz (R-UT), chairman of the subcommittee on National Security, Homeland Defense and Foreign Operations, held his investigations.
The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reformdid their thing, as did the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Senate Intelligence Committee, SenateHomeland Security Committee, the State Department's Operations Center the House Committee on Homeland Security, and The House Committee on Foreign Affairs, aided and abetted by the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), who allegedly perjured himself in his Congressional testimony.
Then, just to be fair, each investigating committee must be "bi-partisan" in its makeup. So in its investigation, each member gets five minutes to question the witnesses. The Republican member will grill on the details, followed by the Democrat member offering softballs, giving the witness an opportunity to recover in preparation for the next five-minute Republican grilling -- and vice versa.
Of course, there is the customary lack of memory as we saw this past week when, former National Security spokesman Tommy Vietor was asked by FOX News Chief Political Anchor Bret Baier whether Vietor had a hand in allegedly changing the White House's messaging directives following the tragedy. Baier asked the perennial question, "Did you change 'attacks' to 'demonstrations' in the talking points?" Vietor responded, "Dude, this was two years ago!" "Maybe, I don't remember."
And then there is the matter of witnesses pleading the Fifth. Can anyone say "Lois Lerner"?
Hindering all of this is the stonewalling by the White House in providing requested documentation, and if provided, it is so redacted (marked-through) as to make it useless.
President Obama has described the Benghazi incident as a phony scandal. And late night comedian Bill Maher declared that he doesn't understand the fuss over Benghazi. Said Maher, "I still don't know what the scandal is."
But something did slip through this past week. In response to a Freedom of Information request by the watchdog group, Judicial Watch, a directive was uncovered, written by Ben Rhodes, Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategic Communications and Speechwriting, revealing that the official White House account of the Benghazi attack was written purposely to mislead the media and the American public, and to:"Underscore that these protest are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy," and, "to reinforce the President and Administration's strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges."The official White House instructional document was sent to a dozen members of the administration's inner circle, and key members of the White House communications team, including White House Press Secretary Jay Carney.
Conservative legislators and media pundits have declared thisto be the "smoking gun" they have been looking for, confirming that the Administration purposely mis-characterized the terrorist attack in Benghazi just to make Mr. Obama look more "presidential" prior to the 2012 election. Senator Lindsey Graham, (R-SC) said, "If this is not a smoking gun, proving beyond any doubt, the story told by the administration about Benghazi was politically motivated and fabricated, nothing will ever prove that."
So, last Friday, Lead-From-Behind House Speaker John Boehner said that he will call for the House to vote on a resolution to create a new "Select Committee" to investigate the Benghazi terrorist attack that killed the four Americans. In theory, at least such a "select committee" should be able to cross jurisdictional boundaries that have hindered previous investigations, and, according to Boehner, have "robust authority."
Representative Trey Gowdy, (R-SC) is among those being considered to lead it, but that would be almost too good to be true.
Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.
You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.
http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/05/phony-scandal-benghazi-just-wont-go-away/
https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...88182234_s.jpg Freedom Outpost
The “Phony Scandal” of Benghazi that Just Won’t Go Away : Freedom Outpost http://ow.ly/wt7Mi
https://fbexternal-a.akamaihd.net/sa...&sw=491&sh=257
The “Phony Scandal” of Benghazi that Just Won’t Go Away - Freedom Outpost
In spite of the best efforts of the Obama Administration, and those of the Government Agencies funded by it, the Benghazi tragedy just won't go...
Freedom Outpost
Krauthammer on Benghazi Emails: "The Equivalent of What Was Discovered With The Nixon Tapes"
Video at the Page Link:
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: Look, I think what's really happened here is what Mara says, this e-mail has sort of reopened this in the same way that in Watergate it was this sort of quiet, private discovery that there were tapes in the White House. It also died down, and I think Richard Nixon would still be president of the United States today, still hook or by crook, had the tapes not been discovered. And that's what restarted this. And this e-mail from the White House, that's what everybody had said, is there a way to -- is there any involvement here of the White House which makes it obviously a political issue, the reelection of the president overriding the truth. And that's why I think it is all reopened.
And watching Carney today, I have to say again, they don't pay him enough. On the first question, if this was a release of information for a request on Benghazi, how can you tell us it isn't about Benghazi? He simply says, I have no idea, ask the State Department. But then when you point out the fact that this is the only time -- well, it isn't the only. It's one of the rare times when you get a high administration official going on all five shows. It happened only once in the Bush administration. It never happened in the Clinton administration. And if they had not been about Benghazi, does anybody imagine she would have been on the five shows because of a demonstration in Cairo? That's ridiculous.
The briefing, the appearances, it was all about Benghazi. Of course everything in the memo is about Benghazi. And when Carney denies it, he simply looks foolish.
BRET BAIER: I didn't pull the sound bite, but a few weeks ago you said right here on this panel that Republicans should move on, that they should kind of leave benghazi alone, that it was a dead end. Have you changed your perspective?
KRAUTHAMMER: Yes, because of the appearance of this memo. To me, it's the equivalent of what was discovered with the Nixon tapes. The point is that Republicans have done a terrible job in building the case. Even today I have to say, the questioning was disjointed. It was not orgdanized. If they had appointed a special committee a long time ago, the way it was done in Watergate, we would have had answers on this and the country wouldn't be tired.
But what I did say was the reason it would not go anywhere is because the lack of interest of the other media. And what's changed now, and we saw it in the briefing room, is I think the other media are somewhat embarrassed by the fact that, unlike FOX, they allowed themselves to be stoned and spun and rolled for a year and a half and now the memo appears and it's obvious that they missed this story.
Related Videos:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...xon_tapes.html
https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...22217924_s.jpgThe Federalist Papers
What do you think, does Judge Pirro have a solid case in calling for Obama's impeachment or she way off base?
https://fbexternal-a.akamaihd.net/sa...&sw=750&sh=393
ABUSE: Judge Jeannine Pirro Calls For Obama's Impeachment; Her Case Is Indisputable!
thefederalistpapers.org
Judge Jeannine Pirro Calls For Obama’s Impeachment; Her Case Is Indisputable!
By Steve Straub On May 4, 2014 · Leave a Comment · In Uncategorized
http://thefederalistpapers.integrate...4-16.59.59.jpg
Fox News host Judge Jeanine Pirro has launched a scathing, on-air indictment of President Barack Obama, calling for his impeachment from office.
Judge Jeanine Pirro’s ‘Opening Statement’ eviscerates President Barack Obama on his total failure of his promises and duties as the Commander In Chief along with his total lack of leadership and concern over responding to the Benghazi attack.
“Mr. President, it’s called an abrogation of duty,” Pirro said. “You have not taken your oath to honestly and faithfully execute the duties of your office. As commander in chief, you have NOT protected us. This dereliction of duty as commander in chief demands your impeachment.”
Watch the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=3DTzOCfeQK0
What do you think, does Judge Pirro make some good points in calling for Obama’s impeachment or she way off base?
http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/u...s-indisputable
https://fbexternal-a.akamaihd.net/sa...&sw=588&sh=308
EPIC: Judge Jeanine Demands Obama Impeachment Over Benghazi Cover-Up
May 04, 2014EPIC: Judge Jeanine Demands Obama Impeachment Over Benghazi Cover-Up
May 04, 2014/RedFlagMay 04, 2014/RedFlag/
redflagnews.com
EPIC: Judge Jeanine Demands Obama Impeachment Over Benghazi Cover-Up
http://static.squarespace.com/static...4/?format=750w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=i6-LY-Ipqg0
http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines...ghazi-cover-up
Judge Jeanine’s Smoking Hot Proof Democrats are Scared to Death of Gowdy & the Benghazi Hearings
Video at the Page Link:
http://www.ijreview.com/2014/05/1375...hazi-hearings/
Nobody died as a result of Watergate!
http://cdn.thedailybeast.com/content...098.cached.jpg Ibrahim Alaguri/AP
http://cdn.thedailybeast.com/etc/aut...402.cached.jpgEli Lake
Politics
05.14.14
New Benghazi Investigation Spooks GOP Leaders
It’s not just the Democrats who are opposed to a new select committee looking into the Benghazi attacks. Many top Republicans are uneasy, too.
Last Wednesday, as the House was preparing for its new investigation into the Benghazi attacks, House intelligence committee chairman Mike Rogers gathered Republican members of his committee for a meeting. While the main purpose of the meeting was to discuss surveillance reforms the committee was about to pass, Rogers also warned his colleagues about the upcoming select committee to investigate Benghazi.
“He was saying this could be a rabbit hole,” one House member told The Daily Beast. “He was warning us that we should not let this investigation get into conspiracy theories.”
Contrary to the caricature of Republicans, as singularly obsessed for political reasons with Benghazi, the reality is quite different. There is deep unease within the Republican leadership that the select committee, which has yet to announce a schedule of hearings, could backfire, and badly. Investigate and find nothing new, and the committee looks like a bunch of tin-hatted obsessives. Investigate and uncover previously-hidden secrets, and it makes all of the other Republican led panels that dug into Benghazi seem like Keystone Kops.
Three Republican sources tell The Daily Beast that the chairmen of the House Intelligence, Armed Services, and Government Reform committees—Reps. Rogers, Buck McKeon, and Darrell Issa, respectively—all opposed the formation of a select committee on Benghazi. All three men have led their own investigations into the matter.
House Speaker John Boehner himself resisted calls to form the committee for nearly a year and a half. Rep. Frank Wolf, a Republican from Virginia, proposed a special select committee on Benghazi first in November 2012. Since then he worked to get a majority of Republicans to sign onto his plan.
But it was not until Judicial Watch in April uncovered a set of White House emails on Benghazi—emails that were not shared with Congress—that Boehner agreed to Wolf’s idea.
Boehner’s calculation was, in part, political, according to one House Republican aide. The Speaker was looking to mollify the Tea Party faction of his caucus who were upset with him about a range of issues, including the federal budget and immigration reform.
“There is a whole combination of factors here,” this aide said. “You have the email. But remember Boehner has also gotten a lot of resistance from House Republicans on immigration. He wanted to turn the page on this.” This aide said that Boehner’s view was that, “OK, I am giving you guys this committee, now it’s on you to make this work.”“He was saying this could be a rabbit hole. He was warning us that we should not let this investigation get into conspiracy theories.”House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, for her part, has said she is considering a Democratic boycott of the committee, but has yet to decide.
Since the investigations into Benghazi began in earnest in 2012, the GOP has been divided on what these probes would ultimately uncover. While some claim there was a massive White House operation to cover up the attacks, Rogers and McKeon see a more nuanced story. Rogers has been highly critical of the administration’s failure to call the assault a terrorist attack; but he has not accused the administration of in any way abandoning the CIA officers protecting the agency’s base that evening. McKeon’s oversight work has focused on the failure of the administration to have key military assets in place for the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks when there was ample reason to believe al Qaeda would seek out soft targets to strike on that day.
When Rogers’s committee finally heard in a closed session last year from the CIA contractors who responded on the evening of the attacks, Rogers downplayed their testimony in interviews. On Fox News he said he did not believe the CIA was stonewalling his committee, as others had alleged.
Other lawmakers, however, such as Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the Utah Republican who first contacted key State Department whistleblower Greg Hicks, say the Benghazi story is more about how the White House failed to deploy all of its assets on the evening of the attack to save Americans.
Chaffetz, who serves on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform but was not chosen for the select committee, came close to uncovering evidence for his view this month when retired Air Force Brigadier General Robert Lovell testified that the military did not even try to save personnel on the night of the Benghazi attacks, or in his words, “run to the sound of the guns.”
After Lovell’s testimony, McKeon issued a statement defending his own investigation’s conclusion that no assets were in place to conduct such an operation. “Lovell did not serve in a capacity that gave him reliable insight into operational options available to commanders during the attack, nor did he offer specific courses of action not taken,” he said at the time.
This tension between committees has often played out inside the Republican conference, behind closed doors. And the new, select committee may only make things worse.
“Look at this from their perspective,” one House Republican told The Daily Beast. “This [select] committee in many ways will be checking their work. No one likes that.” Rep. Tim Huelskamp, a Republican from Kansas, told Slate’s Dave Weigel last week: “Mike Rogers fought against this for a year and a half. They used to stand up in conference and say, ‘Quit worrying about it, we’ve got it all taken care of.’”
Boehner selected Rep. Trey Gowdy, a former career prosecutor, to lead the Benghazi committee. To date, Gowdy has played his cards close to the vest as to what the committee will actually investigate. Last week, at a press conference, Rep. Jim Jordan, who is also serving on the new select committee on Benghazi, said the panel will focus on the “before,” “during” and “after” of the attack. He later explained that this meant probes into why the State Department denied requests for security to the Benghazi diplomatic post and why the early talking points on Benghazi downplayed the possibility that it was a terrorist attack. But Jordan also said the committee would investigate, to borrow Lovell’s phrase, why U.S. forces weren’t “running to the sound of the guns.”
If the Benghazi committee uncovers new evidence that the Obama administration failed to do all it could to save Americans on the evening of the attack, it would be a vindication for their party and a scandal for the White House. But it may also end up revealing prior investigations from Congressional Republicans to be hollow.
If this committee, however, does not find that smoking gun, then it will also prove the low-key warnings of lawmakers like Rogers and McKeon to have been correct all along. No wonder top Republicans were so reluctant to have it move forward
http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...p-leaders.html
https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...76497368_s.jpgConservative Daily
A former president weighs in on a hot button issue...
https://fbexternal-a.akamaihd.net/sa...sw=1089&sh=570
Bill Clinton Has an Explanation for Why His Wife Hillary Missed the 3 AM Phone Call
Bubba defends his wife's conduct like only he can...
ijreview.com
Bill Clinton Has an Explanation for Why His Wife Hillary Missed the 3 AM Phone Call
By Michael Hausam 4 hours ago
Video at the Page Link:
Former President Bill Clinton was interviewed in Washington D.C. today, and took the opportunity to defend his wife Hillary’s actions during the Benghazi crisis:“In my opinion, Hillary did what she should have done.In other words, Hillary chatted with some people before disappearing to who-knows-where without taking any swift and serious action. A few critically important facts that Bill didn’t address:
She impaneled a very high-level review committee with the immediate-past Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.”
- Hillary continued to blame an internet video, even after the administration knew it was a terrorist attack.
- The State Department’s actions were self-investigated; this is akin to a high school student “grading his own homework.”
- Hillary was exempted from the investigation.
- She did not convene the Counterterrorism Security Group, and did not dispatch the in extremis rescue team, though the siege lasted hours.
Of course, it is not surprising that Bill would defend his wife or omit these pertinent points. However, maybe – just maybe – he’s distracted by thoughts of getting back into the White House…
http://www.ijreview.com/2014/05/1382...ions-benghazi/
Fox News Poll: 50% believe Hillary Clinton has lied about Benghazi; See how many think Obama is telling the truth
Posted on May 14, 2014 at 10:17 PM in Politics | 15 Comments
By The Right Scoop
http://therightscoop.com/wp-content/...a_benghazi.jpg
So, at least 50% believe Hillary has been lying about Benghazi at some point. I guess the rest just believe she’s telling the truth because she’s a woman.
The amount of people who think Obama is lying seems low. Given all the lies he’s told about everything else, it should be 100%.
http://therightscoop.com/fox-news-po...ing-the-truth/