Thread: WND Exclusive Trump throws wrench in U.N. plan to 'replace' U.S. population

WND Exclusive

Trump throws wrench in U.N. plan to 'replace' U.S. population

Obama stoked globalist agenda laid out in 2000


Liam Clancy | Email Liam Clancy is an intern at WND.

image: https://mobile.wnd.com/files/2017/03...camp-kenya.jpg
Most Somali refugees start out here, at the United Nations Daadab refugee camp on the Kenya-Somalia border. Between 5.000 and 11,000 Somalis per year are sent to the United States and distributed to dozens of cities, along with thousands of other U.N.-selected ‘refugees’ from Syria, Sudan, Iraq and Afghanistan.

WASHINGTON – In the last year of his presidency, Barack Obama and his administration worked tirelessly with the United Nations to expand the definition of “refugee” to include economic migrants and drastically increase the numbers being resettled in the United States.
And he found a willing partner in the Republican-controlled Congress, which funded not only more refugees but provisions for record numbers of unaccompanied minor children, so-called UACs, showing up at the border from Central America.

In the fall of 2016 Obama hosted the U.N. Leaders’ Summit on Refugees in New York, where he and other world leaders used rhetoric strikingly similar to the concept of “replacement migration,” a U.N. plot to replace the population of a given country with migrants and “refugees” from the developing world.
WND recently reported on the scheme, revealed in a U.N. document prepared in the year 2000 entitled “Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Aging Populations?”

Read WND’s expose of the U.N. “Great Replacement” plan for Western nations.

The report details the plunging birthrates across Western Europe, Russia, Japan and the United States and identifies a solution: mass migration from the Third World into these “aging and declining” nations.
The 17-year-old document makes the case for mass immigration as necessary to replace the aging populations of developed countries. Without the migration of populations from the developing world, it reasons, economies will suffer because of labor shortages and falling tax revenues.
“Therefore, among the demographic variables, only international migration could be instrumental in addressing population decline and population aging in the short to medium term,” the report concludes.

Obama’s stated goals before the Leaders’ Summit last fall were to increase financing for global humanitarian appeals, as well as double the number of resettlement slots and use “alternative legal pathways,” such as student and family-based visas, for refugees to enter the United States.
A report by the influential Brookings Institute included reasons to support Obama’s plan to increase resettlement, stating: “For receiving countries, migration has already become the most important source of demographic growth and renewal for wealthy societies.” This is the goal of “replacement migration.”
“The so-called benefits of replacing a country’s population with Third World migrants is bogus and imaginary,” said Leo Hohmann, author of a 2017 investigative book, “Stealth Invasion: Muslim Conquest through Immigration and Resettlement Jihad.”
Hohmann said that while the costs of refugee resettlement are understated, often ignoring refugees’ heavy use of public assistance programs such as food stamps and Medicaid, refugee advocates also like to overstate the economic impact of refugees in the work place.
“For example, even after five years in America, 60 percent of refugees use food stamps, compared to 15 percent for native-born Americans,” Hohmann said, citing statistics provided by the U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement.
Yet, when Catholic Charities, Lutheran Social Services and the other resettlement agencies show up in a city to inform leaders of their intention to send refugees, they talk about how the new arrivals will open businesses and boost the local economy, Hohmann said.
“It’s a bunch of lies and half truths,” he said. “They’re never told the rest of the story.”

Minnesota, for instance, earlier this month approved an additional $600,000 to treat a measles and tuberculosis outbreaks mostly within its Somali and Hmong refugee communities, and that was on top of the $1.5 million the state had already allocated for these outbreaks this year.
Another hidden cost, which is almost never talked about, is that of educating the refugees’ children, most of whom require expensive tutors and translators, Hohmann said, pointing to migrant-heavy school districts like Wichita, Kansas, where students speak more than 50 languages.
None of these costs are subtracted from the supposed economic benefits of importing refugees to come up with a net economic impact, Hohmann said.
The official pledge given by the United States at the Leaders’ Summit on Refugees included the following statement:
“The United States admitted 85,000 refugees in Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 – 15,000 more than in FY 2015 – and pledged to increase its refugee admissions to 110,000 in FY 2017. The United States also increased alternative pathways of admission into the United States, providing special immigrant visas to more than 11,000 people at risk from Iraq and Afghanistan in FY 2016 – an increase of over 4,000 from FY 2015.”
A day before the Leaders’ Summit, the U.N. convened at the U.N. Summit for Refugees and Migrants 2016, and statements from top U.N. officials at the event revealed that “replacement migration” continues to be a top priority for their global agenda.
“Replacing populations in the West with those from the Third World is also seen by the globalists as a great way to redistribute the world’s wealth,” Hohmann said. “We ship many of our manufacturing jobs to the Third World and they ship us their poor masses who can take advantage of our generous welfare programs while working in the factories that have not yet been outsourced. That’s a double whammy used against the American middle class, impoverishing Americans while improving the financial lot of those in poor countries.”

Expanding the definition of ‘refugee’
H.E. Peter Thomson, president of the U.N. General Assembly, made remarks at the 2016 summit that the U.N.’s commitment toward migrants is not restricted to refugees, but toward economic migrants as well, declaring that those migrants “in search of opportunity and a better life for their children” deserve the same rights as those “fleeing armed conflict and the brutal effects of war.”
The U.N. included the economic rights of migrants in a major document for the first time with its Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development.

https://mobile.wnd.com/2017/07/trump...kAfbVM0rY0Q.99

What exactly has Trump done to monkey wrench this plan since dangerous Muslim refugee resettlement programs continue, DACA Amnesty continues, and the number of illegals crossing illegally into America rivals or exceeds the historic high levels reached under Obama.

Am I correct?

Trump immediately upon taking office cut that 110,000 of Obama's to 50,000, and by that point in time, late January of 2017, Obama had already admitted or approved 45,000. Trump acted swiftly and in the nick of time. He reduced the 50,000 to 45,000 in 2018 and plans to reduce it again for 2019.

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

What exactly has Trump done to monkey wrench this plan since dangerous Muslim refugee resettlement programs continue, DACA Amnesty continues, and the number of illegals crossing illegally into America rivals or exceeds the historic high levels reached under Obama.

Am I correct?

Actually, William, the historic high levels of illegal immigration were during the Bush Administration not Obama's. Trump ended DACA, the courts are keeping it going. Trump not only reduced Obama's refugee program caps, he also ordered a Travel Ban against Muslim migration from dangerous Muslim countries. The courts made him revise and reduce it, but the last one made it and was upheld in June of 2018 by the US Supreme Court. Trump ordered an end to Catch and Release but the Courts made him resume the releases. Trump ordered an end to Sanctuary Cities but the courts upheld opposition lawsuits to protect those protecting illegal aliens in their cities and states so sanctuary cities continues by court order. Trump has tried so many things, but has been stalled and blocked at every turn.

I don't know why anyone thought taking our country back was going to be easy.

Trump ended DACA, the courts are keeping it going.

That is not true Judy. Trump never lifted the DACA Amnesty protections from illegal aliens. He kept DACA in place and only tried to stop taking new applications.

These judges have no jurisdiction over DACA because DACA is not a law and not an Executive Order.

Please do NOT misrepresent Trump's true actions on our board in your efforts to cheerlead for him no matter what.

I'm referring to the DACA 2012 program rescission announced by Jeff Sessions on September 5, 2017 that's been tied up in the courts ever since. So sorry if that wasn't clear in my post.

Originally Posted by Judy

I'm referring to the DACA 2012 program rescission announced by Jeff Sessions on September 5, 2017 that's been tied up in the courts ever since. So sorry if that wasn't clear in my post.

Your misrepresenting the facts. To put things in the proper context, Trump didn't actually want to end DACA. His hand was forced when the Attorney General of Texas, Ken Paxton, and his allies from other states filed a lawsuit to close DACA down. The final nail in Trump's DACA was AG Jeff Sessions refusal to defend DACA in the courts.

To this date DACA has been a huge Trump failure. He should have ended it as promised immediately after moving into the White House. When he decided to keep the program alive, it was no longer Obama's DACA, it was Trump's DACA!

I have no problem with your "context". It is what it is which is a rescission of the DACA 2012 program by the Trump Administration that's tied up in the courts.

We need to cut more of OUR money going to the UN and BOOT them off our soil. They can go set up their human trafficking ring somewhere else!

We do NOT want or need these people. Many from these countries have 4 or 5 wives and 25 children! The men do not work, they make the women work like slaves and keep them pregnant. They are tribal people, a lot of incest! They have children with their cousins and relatives! This contributes to their Low IQ, mental instability and violent tendencies! They are a backwards culture and will NEVER assimilate in this country.

We are going to more automation that will replace this "cheap" labor. And this "labor" is NOT so cheap to the US taxpayers. WE fork over BILLIONS every year to pay for their crime, diseases, medical care, jail, courts, overbreeding, poverty, theft and education!

10 YEAR MORATORIUM ON ALL IMMIGRATION

START DEPORTING THE 30 MILLION REFUGEES, ASYLUM LIARS, ILLEGAL ALIENS AND TPS

THE U.N. CAN GO TO THEIR FAILED COUNTRIES AND GIVE THEM A "COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR REFORM" AND BIRTH CONTROL!

WE DO NOT WANT MORE PEOPLE HERE OVERBREEDING AND CREATING MORE GHETTOS AND CRIME!

Watch UN Army Smash Mexican Border Defenses

The incoming caravan of illegal immigrants has torn down a border gate in Guatemala as they make their way to the U.S. border. Alex exposes the U.N. agenda to use these people to destabilize America’s immigration system.

https://www.facebook.com/theNewsWar/...2595653391307/