Thread: The Largest, Best Funded Voter Fraud Operation in US History Happening Before Your Ey

The Largest, Best Funded Voter Fraud Operation in US History Happening Before Your Eyes

Posted on March 13, 2015
by Steven Ahle


Within the first couple of months of Obama’s illegal immigration executive action, at least ninety thousand Social Security cards were issued to illegal aliens. Now Republican Senators led by Ben Sasse and Jeff Sessions are asking the Obama administration to answer questions on how many additional social security cards were issued. The answer is important because it will allow citizens to know just how much money taxpayers are spending on illegal aliens.

Social Security cards are keys to the kingdom for illegal aliens. With them, they are able to access a number of all sorts of benefits, including the Earned Income Tax Credit, Social Security disability payments or Social Security’s supplemental income program. The senators also want to know how much in benefits these illegals have collected. The senators have yet to connect the dots in Obama’s real scheme. Let me help them out.

Social Security cards besides making illegals eligible for benefits, can present a more profound problem for the United States. The cards make it very easy for illegals to register to vote, even in states with voter ID laws. One of the documents accepted for registering to vote is………….Social Security cards. This is dot number one. But administration officials don’t dare instruct the illegals on how to vote and many might not trust them. The Washinton Times explains how easy it would be to add millions of new voters through the democrat’s illegal amnesty.

So how do you get around this? Simple. You have La Raza do it. Yes, La Raza actually teaches illegal immigrants where and how to register and vote. With the advent of so many illegals being able to vote and limited resources, La Raza couldn’t possibly handle the volume or afford to spend the kind of money necessary to facilitate such a huge undertaking.

Obama and congressional democrats along with a huge assist from Eric Holder may shed some light on this, too. What if we add the former ACORN into the mix? No, they aren’t defunct, they just use the democratic playbook, which calls for changing the name of ACORN to NeighborWorks America. That may answer the manpower problem to a large extent, but what about the massive amount of money that would be needed?

Both NeighborWorks America and La Raza have found a huge funding source. The DOJ has sued several banks and made settlements in which the banks have paid 24 billion in fines. One of the banks, CitiCorp was also ordered to pay $50 million to La Raza and NeighborWorks America as part of the settlement. But wait, it doesn’t stop there. Another clause in the agreement makes it possible for La Raza and NeighborWorks America to rake in even larger amounts of money.

Of the remaining money the banks needed to pay in settlements, the banks were able to contribute additional money to La Raza and NeighborWorks America. For every dollar they contribute, it reduces their debt to the government by 2 dollars. That’s some mighty powerful incentive to give generously.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) and House Financial Services Chairman Jeb Hensarling have questioned why this money was sent to the two organizations rather than to the alleged victims of the bank’s crime. The administration of course declined to answer. Here is part of their letter to Holder:

“It seems that the alleged victims are not the primary beneficiaries of these multi-billion dollar settlements. Instead, the terms in the Justice Department’s two latest settlements look less like consumer relief and more like a scheme to funnel money to politically favored special interest groups.”

“This makes donations to activist groups far more attractive to banks than providing direct relief to injured consumers. As a result, the settlements appear to serve as a vehicle for funding activist groups rather than as a means of securing relief for consumers actually harmed.”

So now, with Social Security cards, manpower and tons of money to go along with the two years before the next presidential election, the largest and most successful voter fraud campaign may alter the course of the elections not to mention the future of the United States.

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/03...ore-your-eyes/

La Raza Provides Illegal Aliens With Info on Where They Can Vote Illegally

october 29, 2014 by steven ahle



La Raza, the radical group supporting illegal immigration is providing a map that was created by the Washington Post that explains where people can vote without providing an ID. This is an effort to circumvent US law and allow illegal democrats voters to vote for democrats in an effort to avoid the tsunami due to arrive on November 4th. Let me point out that under an honest government, La Raza would be considered a co-defendant in any trial involving an illegal alien voting.

Already there are fears that illegals voting can swing close elections for the Senate. This is from the WaPo article that provides a voting map for illegal aliens pointing out where they can vote without an ID:

“Voter ID laws are at-issue across the country, with newly Republican-controlled legislatures having passed them in numerous states after the 2010 election. Most states still request some form of ID, but don’t require it. Another 20 states don’t require identification. In case you’re wondering where your state is at in all of this, a helpful (sic) graphic from the Post’s graphics team.”

Of course the WaPo framed their article in a way to shield themselves from charges of accessories to voter fraud. La Raza has no such qualms and have prepared their response to such charges as pure unadulterated racism.
Voter I.D. laws by state – Proving that you can vote


Voter identification laws vary by state – some requiring proof of identity at election polls. Virginia is now one of seven states where voters must present a photo ID.


Source: National Conference of State Legislatures. The Washington Post.Published on October 25, 2014, 10:10 p.m.

Just more false accusations of voter fraud that doesn’t exist.

http://redstatements.co/la-raza-prov...ote-illegally/

Pass the FairTax! HR 25 in the US House of Representatives and S 155 in the US Senate, repeal the income tax, shut down 501 C 3 tax frauds posing as "charities" when they are in fact political action organizations but as 501 c 3's they are likewise eligible for public funds. So the above article is right on target, has nailed this part of this issue on its head, and it all needs to grind to a halt. No income tax, no income tax credit refunds, no tax fraud charities, no tax returns, no tax return expenses, no time or effort expended on income tax reports and returns, just a simple report and a % of gross sales collected by retail businesses who are paid a fee for the service.

This is the way it should be, this is the way it should have been all along, now we have an ideal proposal to do that, it's called the FairTax, lets pass it and move our country and citizens forward.

www.fairtax.org

Judy wrote:

This is the way it should be, this is the way it should have been all along, now we have an ideal proposal to do that, it's called the FairTax, lets pass it and move our country and citizens forward.

Nope, too many negatives involved with the so-called fair tax plan. Don't listen to what anyone on here post, positive or otherwise, on the fair tax plan. There is a ton of information out there on it, so please do your own research. Thank you.

FairTax is the only way to go. There is no negative about it for a free nation of free people who believe in limited government, individual liberty, and right to keep the government out of your life and out of your wallet until you're ready to hand them some money when you voluntarily decide to purchase new goods and services.

And here is the source for the most comprehensive research on the topic of the FairTax, HR 25 in the US House of Representatives with 67 Sponsors and S 155 in the US Senate with 6 Sponsors and more who will be now that the government's website is showing the current new bill for the 2015 session. I see that Ted Cruz just signed on this month who was a sponsor last session, and Richard Burr will be also, since he's a long-standing supporter of the FairTax and was a sponsor last session as well.

www.fairtax.org

If you go to the research section, it posts all research with comments pointing out errors in the research that has a negative conclusion. One of the biggest errors was in the study done by the Committee appointed by Bush II, who liked the FairTax, and appointed a committee with funding to research it. Despite their big budget and over a year spent on it, they failed to incorporate the crucial fact that the FairTax rate of 23% includes 8.09% earmarked to fund Social Security and Medicare, with the balance of 14.91% funding general revenue! How could an honest research team make suck a grotesque error? Because all the people who "research" against the FairTax are employed by the tax industry, that's how they make their living and they're worried they might have to take their billions and invest in something new, something competitive, something real, and something that actually makes a production or actual service contribution to the United States that people actually want to buy.

The only people against the FairTax are people who work in the income tax business, want to "tax the rich" to redistribute from those who earned it to those who didn't, or are people who have read the income tax lobby "internet" postings and rants against it and haven't bothered to check the facts.

There's even a report at the FairTax website on the Fact Check.org "fact check" on the FairTax, who also blew their fact check mission, misstated and misrepresented the FairTax, were caught and called on the carpet about it, and eventually but reluctantly posted the correction. FactCheck.org is like the Ford Foundation, and is no longer what the founders of the funds expected it to be or do.

One of the groups the Anti-FairTax lobby has tried very hard to get some footing in their opposition are Senior Citizens, convincing a few that if the FairTax passes, they'll be subject to double-tax on their savings and retirement plans which couldn't be further from the truth. There is no income tax at all on their retirement funds when they draw them out under the FairTax because the income tax is repealed. They are eligible for the Rebate if they want it which exempts FairTax on their purchases up to the Household Consumption Allowance whether they spend it or not, and the FairTax they do choose to pay is the same as the embedded income taxes they would have paid under the income tax plus under the income tax, they would pay income tax on their retirements when they draw them out.

Originally Posted by Judy

FairTax is the only way to go. There is no negative about it for a free nation of free people who believe in limited government, individual liberty, and right to keep the government out of your life and out of your wallet until you're ready to hand them some money when you voluntarily decide to purchase new goods and services.

And here is the source for the most comprehensive research on the topic of the FairTax, HR 25 in the US House of Representatives with 67 Sponsors and S 155 in the US Senate with 6 Sponsors and more who will be now that the government's website is showing the current new bill for the 2015 session. I see that Ted Cruz just signed on this month who was a sponsor last session, and Richard Burr will be also, since he's a long-standing supporter of the FairTax and was a sponsor last session as well.

www.fairtax.org

If you go to the research section, it posts all research with comments pointing out errors in the research that has a negative conclusion. One of the biggest errors was in the study done by the Committee appointed by Bush II, who liked the FairTax, and appointed a committee with funding to research it. Despite their big budget and over a year spent on it, they failed to incorporate the crucial fact that the FairTax rate of 23% includes 8.09% earmarked to fund Social Security and Medicare, with the balance of 14.91% funding general revenue! How could an honest research team make suck a grotesque error? Because all the people who "research" against the FairTax are employed by the tax industry, that's how they make their living and they're worried they might have to take their billions and invest in something new, something competitive, something real, and something that actually makes a production or actual service contribution to the United States that people actually want to buy.

The only people against the FairTax are people who work in the income tax business, want to "tax the rich" to redistribute from those who earned it to those who didn't, or are people who have read the income tax lobby "internet" postings and rants against it and haven't bothered to check the facts.

There's even a report at the FairTax website on the Fact Check.org "fact check" on the FairTax, who also blew their fact check mission, misstated and misrepresented the FairTax, were caught and called on the carpet about it, and eventually but reluctantly posted the correction. FactCheck.org is like the Ford Foundation, and is no longer what the founders of the funds expected it to be or do.

One of the groups the Anti-FairTax lobby has tried very hard to get some footing in their opposition are Senior Citizens, convincing a few that if the FairTax passes, they'll be subject to double-tax on their savings and retirement plans which couldn't be further from the truth. There is no income tax at all on their retirement funds when they draw them out under the FairTax because the income tax is repealed. They are eligible for the Rebate if they want it which exempts FairTax on their purchases up to the Household Consumption Allowance whether they spend it or not, and the FairTax they do choose to pay is the same as the embedded income taxes they would have paid under the income tax plus under the income tax, they would pay income tax on their retirements when they draw them out.

Like I say folks, do your own research and you'll find the plan is extremely lacking in a lot of areas and isn't anywhere near the "perfect solution" as advertised by its supporters.

Oh, and I could point you to all sorts of 'best sources' but I won't do that because then someone would say the sources are biased or complain that I'm cherry picking. Do the research and you'll see for yourself, just as I did.

How about if someone's interested in learning more about the FairTax legislation, they go to the proposed law itself, read it for themselves and determine from the law itself if they believe they'd be better off with the FairTax or the Income Tax? HR 25 in the US House of Representatives and S 155 in the US Senate, and both bills re-introduced this year are now on the respective Congressional websites.

Originally Posted by Judy

How about if someone's interested in learning more about the FairTax legislation, they go to the proposed law itself, read it for themselves and determine from the law itself if they believe they'd be better off with the FairTax or the Income Tax? HR 25 in the US House of Representatives and S 155 in the US Senate, and both bills re-introduced this year are now on the respective Congressional websites.

That would be fine as a starting place. However, some folks need things laid out more in layman terms to reach a full understanding of the details and how the will be indvidually impacted.

How is the FairTax going to eliminate Social Security cards?

Originally Posted by artclam

How is the FairTax going to eliminate Social Security cards?

The FairTax doesn't eliminate Social Security cards. Social Security and Medicare continue unchanged in terms of eligibility and benefits under the FairTax, because the FairTax only changes the way Social Security and Medicare are funded, not how they operate. Under the FairTax, all payroll taxes along with all other income based taxes are repealed and eliminated. The FairTax retail sales rate on new goods and services of 23% is divided up into two categories, 1. 8.09% that is ear-marked to fund Social Security and Medicare and 2. 14.91% that is ear-marked for General Revenue. The statute also requires an adjustment by Congress to the Social Security and Medicare portion if and when there is a need for more funds for Social Security and Medicare. Employers would still file their wage reports for employees like they do now, they just no longer withhold Social Security taxes from paychecks and are no longer required to match it with their share. The payroll taxes all go away and are replaced with the revenue from the 8.09% portion of the FairTax that all consumers pay.

I hope this answers your question. If not, please let me know, okay?

Thank you for your inquiry!