Lastest border scheme only wastes $700 million
Editorial board, The Republic | azcentral.com 8:38 p.m. EDT March 15, 2014
Our View: Homeland Security is taking another shot at a virtual fence
Here's a through-the-looking-glass example of cutting government waste, Department of Homeland Security-style.
The last time DHS's Customs and Border Protection launched a virtual fence, the failed SBI-net system cost taxpayers $1 billion. Big money.
The latest high-tech border surveillance scheme is expected to waste only $700 million, according to the Government Accountability Office. A little less waste.
That means 300 million fewer of your tax dollars will disappear into a black hole named "Oops, We Flubbed It Again."
Is that reassuring? No.
Mistakes should become lessons, not recurring themes. Some in Congress agree.
"In this time of limited budgets, we cannot repeat the mistakes of the past," Rep. Candice Miller, R-Mich., said during a congressional hearing where the GAO report was discussed.
Alas, the same hearing also included an odd assurance from Customs and Border Protection's Mark Borkowski, assistant commissioner for the Office of Technology Innovation and Acquisition. "What we saw in the demos was impressive," he told Congress.
Well, no worries then. Demos never lie.
Except the GAO pointed out significant problems with the agency's plan for high-tech border surveillance. They included:
• Lack of performance measures.
• Lack of coordination among components of the system.
• Failure to independently verify long-term costs.
• Limited testing of surveillance towers, the most expensive single component.
What's more, the GAO said Customs and Border Protection has not documented how or whether existing surveillance technology helps agents catch smugglers or migrants entering the country illegally. Nor is it particularly interested in knowing what works or doesn't.
Borkowski told Congress: "We want to collect the data, but I would caution, until we collect it and study it, it is still an open question as to how much utility it would provide us."
Who needs facts?
We do.
DHS recently awarded a $145 million contract to Israeli-based Elbit Systems to erect up to 50 fixed surveillance towers along the Arizona-Mexico border. Testing was limited.
This may satisfy border hawks who like to pour money on the problem. But with apprehensions in Texas outpacing those in Arizona, you have to wonder if Homeland Security is fighting the last border war.
Border security is about more than just spending money on fences, virtual or steel.
Security should be part of a carefully developed plan. Dare we say comprehensive? It should build on what works and respond to current trends. Without data, Homeland Security can't produce more than scattershot strategies that look good in demos.
Congress should demand far more accountability. Cutting waste means more than just wasting less than last time.
http://www.azcentral.com/story/opini...lance/6428205/