Thread: New Research Casts Doubt Upon “Attrition Through Enforcement”

H2 Note: The source of this article (immigrationimpact.com) is a liberal, pro-amnesty political organization.

------------------------

New Research Casts Doubt Upon “Attrition Through Enforcement”

immigrationimpact.com
by Walter Ewing
25 Oct, 2012



Contrary to the expectations of anti-immigrant activists, unauthorized immigrants are not leaving the United States and returning home en masse in response to the onslaught of federal, state, and local immigration-enforcement initiatives in recent years. In fact, preliminary evidence indicates that unauthorized immigration to the United States from Mexico may be inching its way upward again for the first time since the Great Recession. Why? Because unauthorized immigration responds far more to the state of the U.S. economy than it does to the intensity of U.S. immigration enforcement. This casts considerable doubt upon the nativist creed of “attrition through enforcement”—the belief that making life difficult enough for unauthorized immigrants will motivate them to “self-deport.”

The timing of these events indicates that U.S. immigration enforcement plays a minimal role in shaping Mexican migration patterns.

These conclusions are bolstered by new research from the Tomás Rivera Policy Institute in Los Angeles and El Colegio de la Frontera Norte in Tijuana. This research indicates that, when it comes to Mexican migration patterns, “northbound flows are holding steady with signs of increasing unauthorized migration, while southbound flows are decreasing. The result is that the size of the Mexican-born population in the United States has fully recovered from losses experienced during the recession.”

Moreover, “given the available indicators as of mid-2012, it appears that even a relatively small increase in the demand for Mexican labor in the U.S. economy would prompt a positive response in the migration flows despite intensified enforcement efforts by the federal government, several states, and some local governments.” Given the onset of the Great Recession in December 2007, it comes as no surprise that the researchers found that “since the first quarter of 2008, unauthorized flows from Mexico to the United States posted 16 straight quarters of decreasing volume.” But, then, “the pace of decline began to slow in the second half of 2010, and in the first two quarters of 2012 the flow marked small gains compared with the previous year.” At the same time, “the recession had a short and sharp impact on the southbound flow” of Mexicans leaving the United States and returning home. After peaking in the fourth quarter of 2009, “the number of Mexicans leaving the country then started to decrease. Since 2010, the southbound flow has held close to its pre-recession levels.” And “the data available for 2012 suggest that the number declined further.”

The timing of these events indicates that U.S. immigration enforcement plays a minimal role in shaping Mexican migration patterns. This is evidenced by the fact that unauthorized immigration has begun to increase despite immigration enforcement efforts of unprecedented scope. As the researchers write:

“Even as a buildup of border controls continued, a new push began in 2008 to seize and remove migrants from the interior of the country. This new strategy has been gaining momentum ever since. In addition, the most notable efforts to use state and local laws to crack down on unauthorized migrants have occurred since 2010. However, during these years of markedly increased enforcement, most notably 2010 to the present, the overall trends [in unauthorized immigration from Mexico] have been stability and even moderate growth. While the recession had a clear and indisputable impact on Mexican migration, the same cannot be said for the current enforcement campaign. As such, the indicators suggest that all other factors being equal, any improvement in the U.S. labor market is likely to be accompanied by an increase in Mexican migration flows.”

Unauthorized immigrants tend to go where there are jobs. And unauthorized immigrants are willing to brave border walls and immigration agents for the chance to earn a living. This is the compelling logic of unauthorized immigration—and nativists often underestimate just how powerful it is.

New Research Casts Doubt Upon

What a bunch of overt stinking lies!

Especially this little statement of wild opinion...

The timing of these events indicates that U.S. immigration enforcement plays a minimal role in shaping Mexican migration patterns.
.

So I guess every nation that engages in immigration enforcement is wrong in their thinking about the impact? Wow, all that energy around the globe lol.

And then there is this. Why would anyone believe what a group with the following name had to say about illegal immigration? This would be laughable if so many Americans were not losing their jobs, homes, and lives over this invasion from the South!

The timing of these events indicates that U.S. immigration enforcement plays a minimal role in shaping Mexican migration patterns.

These conclusions are bolstered by new research from the Tomás Rivera Policy Institute in Los Angeles and El Colegio de la Frontera Norte in Tijuana.

Hey everyone I guess we had better just give up right because the Tomás Rivera Policy Institute in Los Angeles and El Colegio de la Frontera Norte in Tijuana say so LOL

W

Something has to be tried before you can know if it'll work!

While they may move from state to state in response to enforcement measures, the many small businesses, such as residential construction, continue to employ so many of them as these businesses are exempt from e-verify. Anchor baby citizenship, with all its attendant benefits, also remains a powerful draw, as the benefits they receive are greater than anything they would get back home. Mandatory e-verify for Every business, and stopping anchor baby benefits will force them to leave.

Originally Posted by hattiecat

[T]he many small businesses... continue to employ so many of them as these businesses are exempt from e-verify. Anchor baby citizenship, with all its attendant benefits, also remains a powerful draw, as the benefits they receive are greater than anything they would get back home. Mandatory e-verify for Every business, and stopping anchor baby benefits will force them to leave.

+1

The anchor baby nonsense goes against the stated intent of the people who wrote the 14th Amendment.
************************************
Americans first in this magnificent country

American jobs for American workers

Fair trade, not free trade