Thread: Media EDITED UCLA Shooter’s Religion

Apparently, race too...

UCLA student editor discovers UCLA shooter's religion bio was changed within hours of shooting



This is the "white male" UCLA shooter Mainak Sarkar that the media has been telling us about for the last 24 hours. Unfortunately, none of what the media is telling us is true. The media appears to be falsely reporting identities that don't fit their political agenda. UCLA student Pardes S. witnessed a shocking moment when www.everipedia.com changed Sarkar's religion from Islam to Hindu. The news is now all over social media:

https://twitter.com/PardesSeleh/stat...94854443515908
https://twitter.com/PardesSeleh/stat...98994271866880
via (Link: www.everipedia.com)


Media EDITED UCLA Shooter’s Religion Before Publication… Trump Was Right

So there was a suspected mass shooting on the campus of UCLA on Wednesday, which after swarms of SWAT officers scoured the campus for hours amid a collective freakout by the media, was determined to be a fairly typical impassioned murder/suicide.

The perpetrator of the terrible crime was almost immediately known to law enforcement and school officials, and if you are wondering why the media didn’t immediately rush to plaster the name and face of the alleged “white shooter” all over the news, it isn’t that hard to figure out why.

It turned out that the “white male” the media intimated was responsible for the murder was actually a decidedly non-white male of Indian or Bengali descent named Mainak Sarkar, according to RedStateWatcher.

Making matters worse for the deceptive media, they seem to have been caught in the act of attempting to cover up both the race and religion of Sarkar in an effort to make his crime fit with a political narrative by editing his Everipedia profile before publicizing his name.

Turns out the #uclashooter's race didn't fit the media's leftist narrative after all. https://t.co/zhVbyVNO6L pic.twitter.com/Xn1L8E9dsn
— Pardes Seleh (@PardesSeleh) June 2, 2016

Campus Reform correspondent and UCLA student Pardes Saleh noted that Sarkar’s profile, which originally listed his religion as “Islam,” was changed Wednesday morning to read “Hindu,” which Saleh rightly called out on social media.

Unfortunately @Everipedia listed #uclashooter as Muslim b4 confirming. Here's the version they updated seconds ago pic.twitter.com/s1YjR4JLZV
— Pardes Seleh (@PardesSeleh) June 2, 2016

Even still, the apparent attempted cover up continues, as the killer’s profile now lists his religion as “Muslim or Hindu (unconfirmed),” leaving just enough wiggle room for politically correct liberals to continue to push their narrative of Islam being a religion of peace filled with Muslims that would never hurt anybody.

This blatant effort at covering up a rather salient piece of information regarding the UCLA killer was nothing short of disgusting, as you and I both know that the same sort of careful courtesy would not have been extended to a shooter of another religion.

In fact, if the shooter really had turned out to be a “white male” and a “Christian,” we would have seen his face plastered on the news non-stop for the past 24 hours, would already know where he lived as a child, what church he went to, where his parents worked, where he bought the gun, what kind of cereal he ate that morning, his favorite color, etc., etc. See the Charleston shooter as a prime example.

Instead, a crazy Islamic guy killed his white ex-girlfriend in Minnesota, then traveled to UCLA immediately to kill a white professor he had a beef with, then killed himself, with hardly any of that information being reported by the liberal media, as it doesn’t fit their carefully manufactured narrative that Muslims are peaceful and white guys suck.

http://conservativetribune.com/media...ters-religion/

Media EDITED UCLA Shooter’s Religion Before Publication… Trump Was Right

Trump is always right. When has he been wrong?

Originally Posted by Judy

Trump is always right. When has he been wrong?

Trump, like every adult on the planet earth, has been wrong plenty of times in his lifetime. However, that doesn't mean he won't make a good President.

I was referring to the issues of the campaign.

trump will be a very good leader