Results 1 to 6 of 6
Like Tree5Likes

Thread: Obama’s U.S. Is Starting To Look Like The Early Days Of Mao’s Communist China

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    Obama’s U.S. Is Starting To Look Like The Early Days Of Mao’s Communist China

    Obama’s U.S. Is Starting To Look Like The Early Days Of Mao’s Communist China

    March 21, 2014 by The Dollar Vigilante

    THINKSTOCK

    Many people like to watch movies or read novels as a way to relax and get away from work and other stresses of day-to-day life. I, on the other hand, find nonfiction to be much more interesting than almost anything dreamed up by a fiction writer. So when I want to relax and get away from things, I like to read nonfiction books and documentaries.
    Given what is going on in China lately, I have been nearly obsessed with learning about China’s history. It is easily one of the most interesting cultures on Earth, with thousands of years of dynasties, warlords, communism, capitalism, wars and atrocities.
    Of all the atrocities, the worst by far was committed during Mao Zedong’s Communist China revolution and the typically Orwellian-named, “The Great Leap Forward.”
    That leap eventually ended up with the deaths and starvation of somewhere between 20 million and 45 million people. Despite this devastation, American oligarch David Rockefeller said this of the period: “Whatever the price of the Chinese revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.”
    As I watched a recent documentary on this period, it struck me how eerily similar the early years of Mao, leading to those deaths, were to today’s United States and Obama.

    The Similarities


    Hope and change: As with Obama, Mao was swept into power under great fanfare as a savior by a society of people who had been so impoverished and war-torn that they put their faith in this man with his ideas. As with Obama, the first few years didn’t go too terribly, giving some people hope. But soon after taking power in 1950, Mao quickly got China involved in the Korean War.

    Land reform:
    During that same period, Mao went to work on taking land away from landowners and giving it to the people. Done differently, but with the same end goal, the U.S. has been decimating small-farm owners through regulations, taxes and even armed raids, ending up with large corporations owning more and more of the productive land. The large corporations, through the U.S. blend of fascism and socialism, end up owning more and more of the land. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the number of farms in the United States has fallen from about 6.8 million in 1935 to only about 2 million today. According to Farm Aid, every week some 330 farmers leave their land for good. This isn’t done as overtly as it was during Mao’s time of just killing landowners, as the U.S. government has perfected propaganda; but the end result is essentially the same.


    Suicides:
    In Shanghai during that time, suicide by jumping from tall buildings became so commonplace that residents avoided walking on the pavement near skyscrapers for fear that suicides might land on them. In the U.S. today, even The New Yorker writes about the “suicide epidemic.” Between 1999 and 2010, the number of Americans between the ages of 35 and 64 who took their own lives rose by almost 30 percent. Among young people in the United States, suicide is the third most common cause of death; among all Americans, suicide claims more lives than car accidents, which were previously the leading cause of injury-related death.


    Media suppression and targeting:
    Mao launched the “Hundred Flowers Campaign” urging all those with different opinions to express themselves. It was a ruse, however; and he used this to target opponents, eventually killing 500,000 landowners. In the United States it is done differently; but groups, like the Tea Party, have been targeted by the Internal Revenue Service for having opposing views. And it is well known in the mainstream media that you cannot speak out against the current regime. Journalist Abdulelah Haider Shaye was imprisoned under Obama’s orders for speaking out about U.S. involvement in the Mideast. And, currently, according to Reporters Without Borders, the U.S. stands at No. 46 on the World Press Freedom Index, just after Romania and one ahead of Haiti.


    Only those in government prospered:
    During Mao’s time, it was said that only those in government and those in the capital cities connected to the government prospered. This is very similar to what is happening today in the United States. Government workers currently get paid 45 percent more than their counterparts in the private market. And while most of the country languishes in depression-level conditions, Washington, D.C., is flourishing. The Washington metro area includes a whopping six of the 10 most affluent counties in the Nation.


    Lies and statistics:
    As things got worse in Mao’s China, the government took to overtly lying about nearly every statistic. It lied egregiously about crop production and the number of deaths due to starvation. Doctors were not allowed to list “starvation” as a cause of death. In the United States it is similar in that nearly all government statistics are heavily manipulated to paint a better picture of what is really going on. Unemployment figures, for one, are adjusted so that if people give up looking for work they are not counted as being “unemployed” anymore. The U.S. government currently says that the rate of unemployment is 7.3 percent. However, the percentage of the population that is employed is at lows not seen in 40 years. And computing the unemployment numbers the way they were computed prior to 1994 (before they took out “long-term discouraged workers” from the figures), as computed byShadowstats.com, shows an unemployment rate of 23 percent.


    Famine and starvation:
    As things got worse, by the end of the 1950s, tens of millions of Chinese died of starvation. The United States has much more past wealth to live upon and still has the printing of the U.S. dollar to keep things more afloat temporarily; but even with these advantages, one in six Americans is on food stamps. And 1 in 4 children in the United States is on food stamps. In other words, already, a very large percentage of the population cannot even afford food to eat without assistance. Without government assistance, they would starve.


    The Differences


    It should be said that China in the mid-20th century and the United States in the early 21st century are two very different places. China, at that time, was a very poor and backward place, whereas the United States — due to semi-free markets for centuries — is incredibly advanced and has built up a lot of wealth.
    As well, communication technologies such as the Internet do not allow most government’s today to wholesale slaughter people. In the United States today, these same goals are undertaken through fines, taxation, regulation, inflation and criminalizing nearly every human activity. Nearly half of all people under the age of 23 in the United States today have been arrested, and the U.S. has the world’s largest prison population (25 percent of the prisoners, yet only 5 percent of the world population). Through these means, the U.S. government can look to be less heinous than it would by outright murdering thousands or millions of people but essentially with the same results.
    Because of these differences, we should not expect to see the United States follow the exact same path of Mao’s China. But the similarities of the two times are striking.
    The Dollar Vigilante has published this cartoon from the Chicago Tribune in 1934 on numerous occasions because it so perfectly explains what is going on in the U.S. today.



    Spend! Spend! Spend!:
    The U.S. government has been spending and going into deficits at rates that would have shocked people even 15 years ago. The debt of the U.S. government has increased $6.666 trillion since Obama took office. When Obama was first inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2009, the debt of the U.S. government was $10,626,877,048,913.08, according to the Treasury Department’s Bureau of the Public Debt. As of Jan. 31, the latest day reported, the debt was $17,293,019,654,983.61 — an increase of $6,666,142,606,070.53. The total debt of the United States did not exceed $6.666 trillion until July 2003. In the little more than five years of the Obama Presidency, the U.S. has accumulated as much new debt as it did in its first 227 years.


    Blame the capitalists:
    Fomenting a class war, the heavily socialist-indoctrinated youth and poor are constantly told “greedy corporations” are causing their problems. This can be seen clearly in all the recent minimum wage rhetoric.


    Junk the constitution:
    The Constitution and the Bill of Rights have been all but ransacked in recent years — specifically since 9/11 and the Patriot Act. People collecting rainwater or building a pond on their own property or living sustainably off the grid have been deluged by Federal agencies threatening them with massive fines or jail time. And the rising police state and the endless accounts of police brutality are just other examples of this.


    Declare a dictatorship:
    Obama continues to wage wars without approval from Congress, issue executive order edicts and create kill lists. And in his most recent State of the Union address, he even went so far as to say that he was going to go around Congress to get things done… all to wild applause. That is a dictatorship.


    The Fall Of America


    Those plans, as laid out in the Chicago Tribune cartoon from 1934 are falling exactly into place. That, combined with the fact that Obama’s U.S. is following a very similar path to Mao’s China should be enough to make the hairs on the back of your neck stand up.
    Unfortunately, it only keeps getting worse. Capital controls are coming into effect in July under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA); so if you don’t have yourself or your wealth well outside of the United States by this point, your time is running out.
    For this reason, The Dollar Vigilante has set up an urgent conference called the Crisis Conference, scheduled for April 30 to May 4 in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico. If you still have significant assets inside the United States, I urge you to seriously considering attending.
    The U.S. is currently similar to the early days of Mao. How it ends up is anyone’s guess, but it isn’t going to be pretty.

    – Jeff Berwick

    Filed Under: Conservative Politics, Hot Topics

    http://personalliberty.com/2014/03/2...mmunist-china/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    That leap eventually ended up with the deaths and starvation of somewhere between 20 million and 45 million people
    once they disarm you all hell will break loose; there is video of them saying they expect to kill or Jail and reeducate 25 million Americans just because they are not Communists
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Conservation Easements: The Rape And Pillage of Landowners

    March 21, 2014 by US~Observer Staff

    The US~Observer has recently started an investigation into what is obviously a scheme to fraudulently obtain ranchers’ and farmers’ property for nothing or next to nothing by using controversial conservation easements. From what we know so far, the major players in this scheme are the State of Colorado, brokers and land trusts made up of or directed primarily by attorneys. At the time of this writing, the US~Observer believes that the ultimate goal of the perpetrators is to get control of the ranchers’ and farmers’ land, which includes water, mining and development rights.
    This process in the State of Colorado concerning conservation easements began in 1999, when the land developers asked certain attorneys to design a State bill that would allow tax deductions and tax credits to be generated in exchange for landowners to donate all or portions of their property to go to conservation easements, reportedly to preserve the land for “ranching, farming, and open space,” thereby preserving natural resources. This bill was introduced at a time when the State enjoyed a surplus of tax revenue.
    However, in the mid-2000s and later when the economy began to take a downturn, the State began seeking additional or new tax revenues, even if it meant double-crossing people who had legally and honestly availed themselves of tax incentives offered earlier by the State.
    A decade later, the State of Colorado is now on a relentless mission, with the “behind the scenes” help of other entities, to recoup tax credits, plus multiple years of penalty and interest, from landowners who legitimately took advantage of the scheme established by the State Legislature. The ruse the State is using is that the lands that were appraised by “State-licensed” appraisers at the land owner’s expense are actually of zero value. How’s that for pure insanity!
    In one case, involving one family and three separate, contiguous conservation easements, the Internal Revenue Service calculated their 2003 conservation easements to have at least 87 percent of their appraised value. But officials within the State of Colorado — particularly the executive director of the Colorado Department of Revenue (CDOR), Barbara Brohl, and State Attorney General John Suthers — are virtually ignoring the IRS. Brohl and Suthers are promoting this insidious injustice, even in light of the fact that the Colorado statutes (2003-2007) identified that the IRS regulations were the only standards that applied to Colorado conservation easements. And they simultaneously argue that statutes enacted from 2008 to 2013 apply retroactively to the “open space” donations made between 2003 and 2007.
    Amazingly, Governor John Hickenlooper settled his own personal conservation easements with the IRS in the midst of his gubernatorial campaign, and the CDOR accepted “his” IRS settlement. In other words, it didn’t attempt to monetarily rape and pillage Hickenlooper, like it has approximately 600 ranchers and farmers throughout the State. Go figure! Hickenlooper is Brohl’s boss, and he obviously has great influence over Suthers.
    Hickenlooper could have ended the abuse and financial destruction of ranchers and farmers at any time during his tenure of office. But he has remained mute, seeming to enjoy Colorado’s stolen benefits, as well as his enhanced connections to high-dollar interests.
    Property owners, financially devastated by their participation in the conservation easement program, have done everything strictly by the book and at great expense:

    • Costs and professional fees to establish the conservation easements.
    • And expending exorbitant attorney fees to defend their “open space” donations.

    What the State is doing to them is absolutely unconscionable. And the arguments being used by the State and certain attorneys can be described only as an egregious abuse of power — an outrageous story of David and Goliath.
    The US~Observer is preparing an in-depth article on this issue for our April edition wherein we will be naming the main culprits and their true motives.
    Anyone with information on Colorado’s conservation easements or any of the players involved is urged to call Lorne Dey at 720-231-2038 or email lorne@usobserver.com.

    Lorne Dey


    Filed Under: Conservative Politics, Demanding Accountability


    http://personalliberty.com/2014/03/2...of-landowners/

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    Senior Member HAPPY2BME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    17,895
    The problem with Obama's manifestation of Communism is that the two largest communist nations on earth are planning on vetoing it in large fashion.

    No matter what the rest of us think or do.

    All is not lost. We have Obama's transgender national defense forces to fall back on.

    Moving the Pentagon to San Franciso will be the next strategic move.

    On the Russian front: Obama will freeze Putin's FACEBOOK account and lock him out of Twitter.

    We're in good hands ..
    Join our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & to secure US borders by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  6. #6
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    2014 Labor Department Counts Suggest Reason for an American Patriot Spring

    Posted by Dave H - Rocky Mountain Patriot on March 25, 2014 at 1:30pm

    View Blog


    Beginning the first week of spring, Americans are used to renewal and change virtually all look forward to. We’re just days past St. Patrick’s Day and Sunshine Week, both of which are part of the official transformation into spring. St. Patrick’s Day has elevated celebration of green to dizzying heights that must vault environmentalists and far-left activists into something close to orgasmic ecstasy. Sunshine week serves as a precursor to and celebration of hope for spring’s always appreciated greening of plant life dressed up with a veritable rainbow of colors in blooms. It’s long been a season of promise and time of year the nation cherishes, where the beloved, central theme of the period is green.

    What’s missing for a sixth year under the Obama Administration is a form of green necessary for survival for tens of millions of Americans separated from gainful employment, with unprecedented numbers increasingly relegated to Not in Labor Force status. The Department of Labor has simply shifted how and where the nation’s longest-term disenfranchised unemployed will be placed and how they should be categorized in a way that’s not so visible for the front-and-center U3 unemployment rate which is released and laughably supported by Obama’s fawning media each month. Since we’re approaching what some will insist is a recovery summer again, number four in succession for those keeping track, a critical question is why is the count of the nation’s employed still 2.95 million down from the workforce this Administration inherited in January 2009 from George Bush. And that’s with an influx of nearly 40 million ready, often highly educated and trained workforce hopefuls who’ve sought entry to the workforce for a chance at independent adulthood.

    Employment figures remain dismal, which assures greenbacks will be in short supply for scores of millions of otherwise eligible and available workers. One of the BLS’ most telling measures, the Labor Force Participation Rate, has fallen to lows not seen since before women joined the workforce in significant numbers in the 70’s and early 80’s. The latest LFPR inched up to 62.7 from January’s 62.5 percent figure, neither of which had been seen since May of 1978. Remarkably, under the current Administration, America’s graduates from higher education, secondary and trade school programs have reached a mid-20-million count for five-plus years now, almost 6 million LPR’s have been granted green cards, upwards of 3 million H1-B, refugee and asylee visas have been issued combined, and tougher to determine millions of illegal aliens have waltzed unimpeded across our Southern Border, perhaps feeling invited from executive orders issued to ICE and the CBP curtailing enforcement activity. The burgeoning influx of labor has been especially tough on native born workforce hopefuls who suffer without opportunities.

    What few understand is the magnitude of job losses under the Obama Administration and strategic sleight-of-hand the DOL has engaged in to keep disturbing information about workforce shrinkage from reaching the public. The Employment & Training Administration (ETA) keeps the nation’s only actual counts of registrants for unemployment following job losses, along with a quarterly employers’ payroll record count that’s more accurate than anything kept by statisticians at the Census Bureau. When Thursday’s data is released later this week, it will vault cumulative filings for unemployment by new registrants who suffered job losses above 115 million from January 24, 2009 through March 22, 2014. By Tax Day, the total number of distinct new claims for unemployment will have exceeded 116 million from records kept by state employment offices across the country.

    Paired with an actual count of employed workers from payroll records relied upon to substantiate who’s covered for unemployment insurance with each state, the Obama Administration’s workforce shrinkage still registering 2.95 million fewer jobs than George Bush’s final numbers is especially troublesome. Of course, workforce figures have come back modestly from the 8.33 million jobs lost in 2009 and 2010 combined, in what’s referred to by many as the Great Recession. Somehow, with nearly 40 million newcomers seeking entry to the workforce and a verifiable 115 million distinct claims for unemployment following job losses, the 2.95 million jobs shortage is magnified several-fold and, instead, supports little to no recovery at all. A graph of the Labor Department’s only actual count of the nation’s employed shows on a quarterly basis when and under whom the current recession reached critical mass for tens of millions of Americans. Visible on the graph is a turn in early 2011, which corresponds to the 112th Congress seating a Republican House capable of slowing the kid-in-a-candy-store version of legislating and instituting progressive policies by the Democrat Supermajority in Washington for Obama’s first two years. Obviously, the job killing, healthcare crippling ACA was passed into law at a time not a single Republican voice mattered or supported the legislation during the Congressional vote.

    Since there are scores of different metrics and hundreds of data sets kept using survey-based predictive estimates by the BLS, it’s not uncommon to find surprising variance, especially between unadjusted and seasonally adjusted figures. The latter allows considerable latitude for statisticians to address what’s seen as anomalous, curiously unexpected survey results, which are smoothed and presented to substantially support anticipated results for personally-invested government workers serving under political appointees in charge of the BLS. The CPS survey typically reports marginally above 50,000 responses, which is close in number to several internet compilations of Presidential polls ahead of the 2012 election that reported cumulative results from 20-plus polls. A targeted 90% response rate to 60,000 contacts by Census Bureau staff contracted to survey strategically selected households on a four-month rotating basis uses just .00016 (a ratio of about 3 out of 20,000) of the nation’s populace to arrive at the critically important BLS figures released to the public. When compared against the ETA’s actual nationwide counts, BLS rates, especially the seasonally adjusted predictive estimates, seem woefully inadequate and susceptible to less than accurate rates and figures. That’s at the heart of former BLS Commissioner John Hall calling the BLS data presented in late 2012 “deeply flawed”, and a former Labor Department Chief of Staff, Rick Manning, being more aggressive with his description of data that seemed intentionally misleading and heartlessly inaccurate for the express purpose of serving the incumbent President's campaign. Nevertheless, the unadjusted Employment Level shown on LNU02000000 suggests a miserable 176,000 jobs added across the President’s five years in Office in January’s BLS estimates little more than a month ago.

    Real counts from the ETA are invaluable to understanding the economy and Americans’ workforce woes, but everyone who’s read online news comments or found political sites both parties follow understands Obama’s sycophants insist we’re in the midst of an impressive recovery that supposedly dwarfs Reagan’s second term successes. They give no more consideration to statistics they don’t like than a grade-schooler who glosses over college calculus or linear matrix algebra material for obvious reasons. For that reason, corroborating statistics which support Labor Department counts from the ETA can be helpful to make a point.

    Since the left invariably disputes evidence of the Administration’s feckless, ACA-driven paralysis of the economy, some key corresponding figures are available in support of the ETA's real counts. Chief among those are tax revenues shown by the CBO from 2007 and 2008, ahead of the Obama Administration's crash-and-burn loss of 8.33 million jobs during 2009 and 2010. The CBO showed revenues from taxation of 2,567,985 (in millions) during 2007, then 2,523,991 in 2008, before dropping 419 billion to 2,104,989 in 2009. The bulk of that historic reduction was 230.5 billion slashed from income tax revenue, which vanished when the economy suffered 3.75 million jobs lost in Obama's inaugural year. In 2010, the CBO recorded a further 17 billion loss on Americans' individual income taxes with total revenue of 2,162,706, which remained suppressed throughout Obama's first term. Of course, millions of jobs lost, according to the nation's real count from the ETA, has everything to do with unprecedented budget deficits that were bound to skyrocket at a time revenues plummeted from a painfully shrunken workforce.

    Specifically regarding budget deficits, keep in mind the Bush Administration averaged just $250,702 (in millions) across eight years from 2001-2008, while Obama's gut-wrenching deficits came up short $6,096,358, according to the CBO from 2009 through what’s predicted at this point for 2013, which estimates another trillion dollar deficit at $1,006,358. The average annual budget deficit since Obama has been in Office fell to $1,219,385, using the latest 2013 estimate which will be finalized once all tax revenues are counted around late summer or early fall. The difference in budget deficits for Obama calculates to 4.86 times the worrisome deficits turned in by the Bush Administration, and almost 40% of the latter’s deficits came from the Democrats' 110th Congressional budgets under Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. And those were budgets Obama took part in drawing up and voted to implement along with fellow Democrats in control of the House and Senate.

    A few more statistics are available to support the painful workforce collapse Americans have endured under the Obama Administration. The growth of SNAP/EBT enrollees under Obama topped 19.4 million by the end of 2013 at 47,636,000 which nearly doubled increases during President Bush’s eight years in Office. By 2011, during the heart of American workers' disturbing job losses, expenditures for food assistance under SNAP increased 201% from 2008 final figures to $75.687.62 (in millions). At the end of 2013, the number continued to rise at a reduced pace, even as the left boasted a phantom, illusory recovery, to $79,882.73. During the same five-year period, Americans collecting SSI disability income rose by an unprecedented 2 million, and the BLS upped counts of Americans Not In Labor Force all the way to 92,534,000 on figures released in February 2014. The growth of 11.9 million in the NiLF estimate dwarfs every other metric of change for BLS figures during the Obama Administration's crash-and-burn economy, and it doesn't include a doubling of workers cast into a purgatory, of sorts, relegated to one of two discouraged workers’ metrics not counted as part of the U3 unemployment rate or the 92.5 million long-term disenfranchised workers stricken from every other employment measure by the BLS.

    Census data, along with key Department of Labor statistics, offers insight into a demographic shift that may surprise some for what this Administration has done to an unwitting populace liberals like to call racist. While the 2010 Census reported Americans listed as "White alone" at 231,040,398, which was 72.4% of the population, Hispanic numbers expanded at a 43.0% clip (Mexicans alone by 54.1%) reaching 50,477,594 to become 16.3% of the nation's population overall. Black or African Americans counted by the USCB tallied 38,929,319, which was 12.3% of the population.

    Those numbers and rates of growth magnify what's happened to the nation's workforce, especially where opportunities for white Americans are concerned. Using numbers from the BLS on the date Obama was inaugurated, white workers have lost 2.1 million jobs to-date, early in Obama's sixth year. Blacks gained 702,000 jobs during the same 62-month period, while Hispanics gained 2.7 million new jobs under the Administration's illusory recovery for the unemployed and graduates in search of work. The Digest of Education Statistics showed white college students made up 62-64% of college students across the latest five-year period, while blacks ranged from 13-15% and Hispanics made up 12-14% of degree granting institutions’ student population. Since whites continue to graduate a higher percentage of students from post-secondary institutions, the only slightly overrepresented group was blacks admitted to higher education institutions of learning. Hispanics were slightly underrepresented, so nothing from the nation’s high schools or colleges supports the significant workforce shift that’s taken place during the past five years. Including Mexican Nationals paid under the table who don’t appear on contractors’ books nor in employers’ counts from the BLS’ CES survey, Hispanic gains over the past five years have significantly outpaced the reported BLS growth for Americans of Latino descent. Apparently, since the Obama regime continues to insist recovery is taking place, the nation is supposed to celebrate the Administration’s curious reward for newcomers of Spanish heritage, at least.

    The disparity of at least 4.8 million more jobs going to Hispanics than native born white Americans under Obama’s shrunken economy is magnified by the percentage each demographic holds in the populace. With white Americans making up 4.58 times the number of Hispanics reported on the 2010 Census and 3.5 times the number of unemployed Hispanics (with a significantly higher percentage than that moved to NiLF counts), multiplying the figures gives a basic, simplified difference in rate and likelihood at which an unemployed white could expect to find employment compared to a Hispanic seeking work during the Obama years. Amazingly, the U.S. government's own data from the Census Bureau and the BLS showed Hispanics found employment at a rate 17 times that of native born white workers in search of jobs. Including recent graduates, the rate increases to almost 20 times more likelihood in favor of workforce hopefuls having Spanish bloodlines. While Hispanic males continue to outpace every other demographic on workforce participation figures at 80.4%, foreign born workers have managed the next best participation rate at 79.3%, while our own college graduates sit atop native born categories at 75.6%. The cumulative count of white workers on BLS data sets under Obama has fallen to a painful 63.0% participation rate on February’s BLS figures. Keep in mind, the Department of Labor's Employment & Training Administration has shown 115 million once gainfully employed workers having filed unemployment claims after job losses since the third week of January 2009, and the Obama Administration remains down 2.95 million jobs to-date, according to comprehensive employers' payroll record counts gathered by the ETA.

    Blacks, who gained 702,000 jobs, still were 2.8 million ahead of whites during the collapse from 2009 onward. Since whites make up 5.9 times the numbers of blacks in the U.S. and 3.4 times the unemployed, according to BLS estimates, the 2.8 million difference could be multiplied by at least the smaller factor to arrive at the likelihood of either demographic being restored to employment under this Administration. While the 9.5 times blacks were more likely to gain employment under Obama than an unemployed white individual came up short of Hispanics' 17 times advantage, this Administration's unbelievable Affirmative Action policies run amok are precisely why white Americans have reason to object and be angry. Including recent graduates, blacks’ advantage for securing employment approaches 11 times the likelihood that a white applicant has for being hired under the current Administration’s tenure.

    The affirmative action Pretender-In-Chief with his AA enforcer in the Justice Department has punished Americans like no former President or Administration could realistically have envisioned surviving. Remarkably, the cabal in Washington remains largely untouched.

    The promise of renewal entering spring is one of transformation to green with life-changing growth across the country. Millions of unemployed grasp at whatever thread of hope they can find, awaiting opportunities seemingly rare as gemstones to return to gainful employment and the accompanying green necessary for a self-sufficient adult life. Barring significant imminent change, this feels like the right season for an American Patriot Spring along the lines of what the President supported and helped flourish in the middle-east while his own country smoldered. Among the things we must do is cut the head off the beast in Washington with November’s election, and May 16th promises to be a date for amplifying grassroots conservatives' message for restoration in the nation’s capital in a matter of weeks. Can you hear us now, Mr. President?




















    excel_summary_ui_claimants_since_2009_obama_eta_t1 _rmp_3-20-14.pdf
    http://patriotaction.net/profiles/bl...msg_share_post
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •